3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

top speed question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 1, 2003 | 09:00 PM
  #1  
RotorMotor's Avatar
Thread Starter
DRIVE THE ROTARY SPORTS
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,150
Likes: 0
From: CA (Bay Area)
top speed question

so people have claimed to do speeds in excess of 170. correct me if im wrong but in 5th the car redlines @ ~168mph. that can not be raised w/out a new transmission or gears right? im just trying to understand where the people who are saying "yeah i did 180" are coming from.....
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2003 | 09:31 PM
  #2  
poss's Avatar
Slower Traffic Keep Right
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,194
Likes: 2
From: Dayton, OH
it's actually around 200mph (+/-) at redline, assuming stock wheel diameters
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2003 | 09:33 PM
  #3  
911GT2's Avatar
The Power of 1.3
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,835
Likes: 0
From: Shrewsbury, Massachusetts
205 mph as far as I know.

The quoted top speed of 165 or so is drag limited, not redline limited. As long as the car has to power to do it, it can break 200 mph.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2003 | 02:54 AM
  #4  
RotorMotor's Avatar
Thread Starter
DRIVE THE ROTARY SPORTS
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,150
Likes: 0
From: CA (Bay Area)
seriously?? the fastest ive taken her is 140 and the 7 seemed completely at home at that speed.. very stable. although looking at the tach, it didnt seem like there would be much left before redline... @ 140 what RPM are we talking about? for some reason im thinking mid to high 5K RPM (someone correct me please cause i just glanced down)... im really surprised by a 200MPH redline in 5th. but if you say so I believe you! i felt a little to comfortable going 140 now that i think about it...but much faster and youre really starting to push it as far as turbulant air/ front end lift no? i usually end up at 120 at least once every time i take her out and i dont really think twice about it any more.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2003 | 03:49 AM
  #5  
ttb's Avatar
ttb
No Cup Holder Racing
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,446
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
according to this one chart with 4.10 rear end you get 182mph @ 7500rpm 5th gear
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2003 | 03:50 AM
  #6  
BoostedRex's Avatar
NorCal 7's Co-founder
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,130
Likes: 5
From: Rocklin, CA
I know for a fact that 176mph is attainable with fairly stock trim. I have heard of FD's breaking into the 190's with good mods. Also, you should be able to hit right near the 140mph mark as you redline 4th gear. Try it sometime. You should end up near there. About 7800rpm in 4th should easily yield between 130 and 140mph. I know it did in mine and I had a stock rear end and stock tranny build. Just what I've seen. But I also know that FD's tend to be different car to car. Laterz.

Zach
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2003 | 07:30 AM
  #7  
skunks's Avatar
I'm a CF and poop smith
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 1
From: Hawaii
Originally posted by ttb
according to this one chart with 4.10 rear end you get 182mph @ 7500rpm 5th gear
redline is 8500rpm though
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2003 | 09:08 AM
  #8  
RX-Racer's Avatar
Aoohh!!!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
From: Pacific Beach, CA
Mines 10,000RPM
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2003 | 03:31 PM
  #9  
Kento's Avatar
2/4 wheel cornering fiend
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,090
Likes: 3
From: Pasadena, CA
Everyone should also know that speedos are notoriously unreliable as far as displaying your actual speed, especially as your speed goes into triple digits. Due to an obscure federal requirement that mandates any speedo on any car sold in the U.S. must not under any circumstances display a speed lower than what the car is actually traveling, car manufacturers "build in" a speedo error of 5-9% to cover their asses. Then you must take actual tire diameter (not just wheel diameter) into account, and every tire is different. Then there's wheelspin (not sure if the FD speedo reads off the rear or front wheels) at speed.....
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2003 | 03:45 PM
  #10  
bajaman's Avatar
Constant threat
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,968
Likes: 39
From: near Wichita, Kansas
Originally posted by Kento
Everyone should also know that speedos are notoriously unreliable as far as displaying your actual speed, especially as your speed goes into triple digits. Due to an obscure federal requirement that mandates any speedo on any car sold in the U.S. must not under any circumstances display a speed lower than what the car is actually traveling, car manufacturers "build in" a speedo error of 5-9% to cover their asses. Then you must take actual tire diameter (not just wheel diameter) into account, and every tire is different. Then there's wheelspin (not sure if the FD speedo reads off the rear or front wheels) at speed.....
The speedometer is digitally read off the transmission.

You are correct in pointing out that the actual tire diameter will affect the actual speed. The stock speedo is calibrated to new 225/50-16 tire/wheel combo.
Meaning a 24.858" diameter tire.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2003 | 09:37 AM
  #11  
Viper1308's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: Texas
When i was street tuning with Steve Khan I ran up to 150mph at 8000rpms in fourth gear! Scared the mess out of me.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2003 | 11:53 AM
  #12  
teamstealth's Avatar
Ozone Depleter
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,610
Likes: 0
From: StL
there was an article in motor trend a year or two ago about speedo error...and it turns out that japanese cars were the best with like a 2% error, followed by the americans @ 4% and then the germans...which are very paranoid...9-11% error. So i would trust ur FD's speedo
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2003 | 12:14 PM
  #13  
Kento's Avatar
2/4 wheel cornering fiend
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,090
Likes: 3
From: Pasadena, CA
Maybe at legal speeds (like the MT test), with totally stock tires and rims. Once you go into triple digits, the error increases exponentially. Plus, since the FD speedo is reading off of the rear wheels, wheelspin (which does occur at triple digit speeds on dry pavement, believe it or not) will also increase the actual speed displayed.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2003 | 01:47 PM
  #14  
RotorMotor's Avatar
Thread Starter
DRIVE THE ROTARY SPORTS
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,150
Likes: 0
From: CA (Bay Area)
in any case people are saying 150 in 4th right? 5th gear can squeeze out another 50MPH??? when i shift to 5th it doesnt drop the rpm's down very far. i just dont see how 200MPH at 8K RPM is possible. has anyone on a dyno verified this?
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2003 | 05:22 PM
  #15  
Van Sema's Avatar
Bacon
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 0
From: PNW
Enjoy ...

Reply
Old Aug 4, 2003 | 05:42 PM
  #16  
jdhuegel1's Avatar
Glug Glug Glug Burp
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,819
Likes: 0
From: Scott AFB, IL
Originally posted by Van Sema
Enjoy ...


DEAR GOD tell me you did that on a dyno!! I'd be too damn scared to take my hand off the wheel to take a pic!!!!
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2003 | 05:50 PM
  #17  
paximus's Avatar
20B FD|20B Cosmo|S5 TII
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 850
Likes: 2
From: SLC
woah!
enough said i guess....
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2003 | 05:51 PM
  #18  
DaedelGT's Avatar
Uber Newb.
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: LSU - Baton Rouge, Louisiana
He had to have done it on the dyno. There is no way the picture could be so stable with the vibrations at those speeds.

If not, he's got ***** the size of watermelons.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2003 | 05:52 PM
  #19  
turbogarrett's Avatar
0 lbs of boost
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,261
Likes: 1
From: wisconsin
Originally posted by RotorMotor
in any case people are saying 150 in 4th right? 5th gear can squeeze out another 50MPH??? when i shift to 5th it doesnt drop the rpm's down very far. i just dont see how 200MPH at 8K RPM is possible. has anyone on a dyno verified this?
it should be a lot easier on a dyno without 200 mph of wind resistance.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2003 | 06:16 PM
  #20  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
Originally posted by RotorMotor
in any case people are saying 150 in 4th right? 5th gear can squeeze out another 50MPH??? when i shift to 5th it doesnt drop the rpm's down very far. i just dont see how 200MPH at 8K RPM is possible. has anyone on a dyno verified this?
You don't need a dyno, basic math serves very well and eliminates speedo error.

With the stock gearing and wheel+tire diameter, you can hit 141 mph at 8000 rpm in 4th, which has a 1:1 gear ratio. 5th gear has a 0.72 ratio. This equals approximately 196 mph.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2003 | 06:29 PM
  #21  
DCrosby's Avatar
No it's not Turbo'd
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,511
Likes: 2
From: Los Angeles, Ca


Uh, I've seen this with my own eyes, if you pull the fuse for the Engine cluster and go past 100 or the 12'o clock position the needle drops on the other side, all you'd have to do it park it and rev the gas to 8K and take the Picture with both wheels standing still !

Now if the needle was steady at 180 there might still be the Photoshop factor, but it would be more believeable...

-DC

Reply
Old Aug 4, 2003 | 06:46 PM
  #22  
Kento's Avatar
2/4 wheel cornering fiend
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,090
Likes: 3
From: Pasadena, CA
Originally posted by Van Sema
Enjoy ...
...what? All I see is a photo of a tach and needle pegged. Proves nothing.

Originally posted by turbogarrett
it should be a lot easier on a dyno without 200mph of wind resistance.
Exactly. Now that's enough said....
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2003 | 07:08 PM
  #23  
DCrosby's Avatar
No it's not Turbo'd
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,511
Likes: 2
From: Los Angeles, Ca
He's about to run out of fuel too LOL ! That'll slow him down !
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2003 | 07:56 PM
  #24  
RotorMotor's Avatar
Thread Starter
DRIVE THE ROTARY SPORTS
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,150
Likes: 0
From: CA (Bay Area)
holy sh*t!!! ok well 'nuff said, im a believer! wow they should put a redline on the speedo too!!! thanks for all the info everyone!
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2003 | 10:28 PM
  #25  
legendrx7's Avatar
Rotarded since 1992
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 348
Likes: 3
From: Little Rock, AR, USA
On a DynoJet, my car did 194.5mph, with 315/35/17's

on a road, I have seen the speedo just past the 180 mark on 225/50/16's

with 315/35/17's on the road, I've seen the speedo read barely under the 180 mark

what I'm getting at here, is that I know that several other people have done these speeds and faster in an FD. A modded FD is definately capable of these speeds and upwards of 200mph!
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:38 AM.