3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Throttle body coolant bypass / removal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-08-16, 10:08 AM
  #1  
Work in Progress
Thread Starter
 
AUS-FD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 129
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Throttle body coolant bypass / removal

I did do a search but mainly came across 2nd Gen threads, can someone please confirm which is the correct method for relocating/deleting the coolant lines to the throttle body.





Do you:<br/><br/>1) Block off A, B, C and D.<br/><br/>Or<br/><br/>2) Block off C and D, then add a hose between A and B.<br/>
Old 01-08-16, 10:26 AM
  #2  
My girl

iTrader: (3)
 
Houstonderk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Andrews AFB, MD
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I went from A to B., block of C and D. But the thermowax does help alot during cold weather driving.
Old 01-08-16, 12:15 PM
  #3  
Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
IRPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,347
Received 317 Likes on 190 Posts
Easiest way is to loop A to B, but the best way is to remove the two nipples and then weld them shut (not recommended with the motor assembled) or tap and insert -an plugs. Cold start and idle is not significantly affected if you tune for it.
Old 01-08-16, 01:11 PM
  #4  
Urban Combat Vet

iTrader: (16)
 
Sgtblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Mid-west
Posts: 12,012
Received 863 Likes on 612 Posts
^This unless you use the line for an aftermarket temp gauge sensor. Then just loop it.
Old 01-08-16, 04:13 PM
  #5  
Work in Progress
Thread Starter
 
AUS-FD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 129
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What's the risk of blocking A and B by leaving an inch of hose connected and putting a bung inside the hoses instead of welding the nipples.

Also just wanted to note the climate conditions aren't an issue where I live.

Thank you
Old 01-09-16, 07:32 AM
  #6  
Urban Combat Vet

iTrader: (16)
 
Sgtblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Mid-west
Posts: 12,012
Received 863 Likes on 612 Posts
Doing it that way leaves you with four potential failure points. Tapping them for -AN is cleaner and permanent, but admittedly would be harder on the rear iron with the engine in the car. I would absolutely do it if the engine came out.
Old 01-09-16, 08:43 AM
  #7  
RX-7 Bad Ass

iTrader: (55)
 
DaleClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 15,399
Received 2,437 Likes on 1,508 Posts
I concur with Ihor, take the hose that goes from the back of the block to the throttle body and re-route it to the water pump housing, A to B. There's a good amount of room for the hose to safely run.

If you had it out of the car and was doing major work, it can make sense to block off those 2 holes. But, that's going a long way for something that can really be quite reliable.

Big one for me, though, is PROPERLY removing the thermowax rod from the throttle body. If it's left on there zip-tied out of the way that can, possibly, bind up on the throttle body and cause the throttle to stick open. This is CRAZY dangerous. You do have to remove and then re-adjust the TPS to take the whole thermowax off, but it's really just on there with some screws and maybe a snap ring.

Dale
Old 01-09-16, 10:33 AM
  #8  
Urban Combat Vet

iTrader: (16)
 
Sgtblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Mid-west
Posts: 12,012
Received 863 Likes on 612 Posts
^ FWIW, I've had my looped (A to B) for years b/c I use the hose for the temp sensor. Not visible, but IIRC they were double clamped at both ends. Never had issues....

Name:  Engineremoval054Medium_zps7af76323.jpg
Views: 850
Size:  96.7 KB

Last edited by Sgtblue; 01-09-16 at 10:38 AM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
deweyy757
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
5
01-06-16 02:29 PM



Quick Reply: Throttle body coolant bypass / removal



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:27 PM.