3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Strange thought

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-13-05, 04:15 AM
  #1  
DETH TRP

Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
4CN Air's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Manhattan Beach, CA
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Strange thought

Do you think a screen could be made that would fit in between the turbo manifold and turbine inlet that would do the follow:

1.) withstand the heat without breaking down
2.) not affect flow
3.) be strong enough to block a projectile apex seal

even if it had to be made of soem exotic material and cost $100 many would buy one


just a crazy 5am thought
Old 10-13-05, 08:37 AM
  #2  
fart on a friends head!!!

 
rotorbrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: sheppard AFB, TX
Posts: 4,104
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
a screen could clog with carbon build-up. . . i dont think it would be beneficial even if it DID hold up to the heat.
Old 10-13-05, 09:29 AM
  #3  
Moderator

iTrader: (7)
 
dgeesaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Fort Kickass
Posts: 12,302
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
An interesting idea, but I think rotorbrain's right: fine enough to catch the destructive shards of apex seal = clogging with carbon. But my engine doesn't run that rich - I suspect it would be fine.

Dave

Last edited by dgeesaman; 10-13-05 at 09:39 AM.
Old 10-13-05, 10:20 AM
  #4  
Call me gramps!

 
WaLieN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 2,334
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rotorbrain
a screen could clog with carbon build-up. . . i dont think it would be beneficial even if it DID hold up to the heat.
Agreed. Not to mention the "shards" would fly back into the housing, thus creating more damage on possibly salvageable parts. Also, it would be an incredible restriction in exhaust flow.
Old 10-13-05, 10:45 AM
  #5  
Moderator

iTrader: (7)
 
dgeesaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Fort Kickass
Posts: 12,302
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by WaLieN
Agreed. Not to mention the "shards" would fly back into the housing, thus creating more damage on possibly salvageable parts. Also, it would be an incredible restriction in exhaust flow.
It's hard to predict. A fine screen (if clean) would not present much pressure drop. The main cat restricts in way that would be similar to screen that is several inches long, and that's not a big deal.

However, the flow is pretty tightly choked through the exhaust port, so the flow velocity is much higher than thru the cat. Such a screen should be located at the widest possible point between turbo and engine. I have to think that a thin screen upstream of the turbos would be less restrictive than the fat-old precat was, even if it's located in a narrow area where the flow velocity is high.

It would also increase turbulence in the flow, which could hurt the efficiency of the turbo. But I don't know any specifics to guess whether it would be significant.

Since these things are opposing factors, I conclude nothing I'm not sure that doing some calculations would mean much, either.

Dave
Old 10-13-05, 10:57 AM
  #6  
Call me gramps!

 
WaLieN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 2,334
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dgeesaman
It's hard to predict. A fine screen (if clean) would not present much pressure drop. The main cat restricts in way that would be similar to screen that is several inches long, and that's not a big deal.

However, the flow is pretty tightly choked through the exhaust port, so the flow velocity is much higher than thru the cat. Such a screen should be located at the widest possible point between turbo and engine. I have to think that a thin screen upstream of the turbos would be less restrictive than the fat-old precat was, even if it's located in a narrow area where the flow velocity is high.

It would also increase turbulence in the flow, which could hurt the efficiency of the turbo. But I don't know any specifics to guess whether it would be significant.

Since these things are opposing factors, I conclude nothing I'm not sure that doing some calculations would mean much, either.

Dave
Yes, it would be difficult to calculate (I would assume). But wouldn't you agree that any restriction prior to the turbo would result in negative effects?
Old 10-13-05, 11:29 AM
  #7  
Moderator

iTrader: (7)
 
dgeesaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Fort Kickass
Posts: 12,302
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Yes, indeed it would cause some and restriction is bad from a performance point of view. I just wonder if it would be significant (as in more than, say, 1% power change).

Dave
Old 10-13-05, 11:49 AM
  #8  
Call me gramps!

 
WaLieN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 2,334
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dgeesaman
Yes, indeed it would cause some and restriction is bad from a performance point of view. I just wonder if it would be significant (as in more than, say, 1% power change).

Dave
I would that the figure would depend on the wastegate and size of turbos. Though, this is just a guess. This scenario is too difficult to even guess, due to all the variables involved.

I think 1% may be true for extremely small turbos on applications where exhaust flow was already greater than the needs of the turbo.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
renjiv2
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
57
01-25-24 03:34 AM
ArmAnirx7
West RX-7 Forum
35
03-08-21 12:54 AM
vish86
Interior / Exterior / Audio
3
10-01-15 11:53 PM
SSpyderX
1st Gen General Discussion
0
09-29-15 04:37 PM



Quick Reply: Strange thought



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:37 PM.