3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

SMB Downpipe and Midpipe?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 13, 2020 | 10:50 PM
  #1  
knut's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member: 5 Years
Liked
 
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 92
Likes: 8
From: Los Angeles
SMB Downpipe and Midpipe?

Does anyone run these products and what exhaust do they pair them with? They’re both 3.5” and was thinking of using them with my racing beat dual tip 3” exhaust. Would that limit the flow much? or do I definitely need to buy a different exhaust.

Going from stock to smic, autoexe intake, pfc, downpipe, hfc/midpipe.

Reply
Old Feb 14, 2020 | 04:23 AM
  #2  
fendamonky's Avatar
F'n Newbie...
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,942
Likes: 323
From: Nokesville, Va
A 3" exhaust flows enough for the vast majority of users.

You won't "need" a larger catback, especially not with your other mods.

Does the SMB midpipe/cat section terminate as 3.5" or does it step down to 3" before the rear flange? If it's got a 3.5" flange then you'll run into trouble trying to mate it up with anything other than a 3.5" rear exhaust section.

Last edited by fendamonky; Feb 14, 2020 at 04:50 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2020 | 06:46 AM
  #3  
Sgtblue's Avatar
Urban Combat Vet
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 12,160
Likes: 983
From: Mid-west
Originally Posted by knut
....
Going from stock to smic, autoexe intake, pfc, downpipe, hfc/midpipe.
Just so I’m sure I’m following you here....the “stock” intercooler IS a SMIC configuration. And is it a hi-flow cat (hfc) OR a midpipe? It’s kinda hard to have both.


And if you’re contemplating a downpipe/midpipe on the stock twins you might want to read up on boost creep. The stock twin’s wastegate is on the smallish side and often can’t handle unrestricted exhaust flow. That can cost you an engine AND turbos.

Last edited by Sgtblue; Feb 14, 2020 at 06:52 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2020 | 07:19 AM
  #4  
Rotary Freak
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,972
Likes: 147
From: JAX, FL
overkill for the stock twins IMO. if you plan on upgrading them at the same time then go for it. for reference, with the STOCK intercooler, aftermarket intake, 85mm turbos back exhaust, and a restrictor after the downpipe, I was still seeing 14+psi. if you go this route you will want to upgrade your fuel pump and secondaries as well.

Last edited by AE_Racer; Feb 14, 2020 at 07:22 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2020 | 08:30 AM
  #5  
DaleClark's Avatar
RX-7 Bad Ass
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,622
Likes: 2,725
From: Pensacola, FL
I've had an SMB high flow cat for ages, super well made and top quality all around.

I agree, 3" is plenty for what you are looking for. My high flow cat is 3" and bolts up to any cat-back out there with zero problems.

If you do want to go 3.5" I would email SMB and ask about compatibility with a standard cat-back. I know they will also custom-make parts, in theory they could make a mid pipe that has a regular flange on the back but you'd be choking the exhaust down at that point.

Dale
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2020 | 05:37 PM
  #6  
knut's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member: 5 Years
Liked
 
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 92
Likes: 8
From: Los Angeles
Appreciate all the good info. Okay then I’ll start looking into 3” downpipe or reach out to them to see if they can make it custom so I don’t have any issues with the catback.

Yeah, the plan is to get an upgraded smic, autoexe intake, hfc and tune of course. With that setup, would I still need to worry too much about boost creep? And porting the wastegate?

I’m trying to keep things simple and close to stock as possible, and im motivated to go this route cause my stock cat is hollowed out so I want to get the car set up “right” before i do any damage on the 60k mile original engine. (Compression shows decent numbers and hoping to last another 20-30k before rebuild if i don’t chase hp)

Reply
Old Feb 15, 2020 | 05:41 AM
  #7  
Sgtblue's Avatar
Urban Combat Vet
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 12,160
Likes: 983
From: Mid-west
To keep it simple I’d suggest a 3” Bonez or HKS downpipe, a 3” Bonez or SMB hi-flow cat and your R.B. cat-back. All good quality, all will fit and function, sound good with no creep or smell. Boom.

If you feel flush, have the DP heat coated or (cheaper) header wrap it.

Last edited by Sgtblue; Feb 15, 2020 at 05:43 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2020 | 04:40 PM
  #8  
knut's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member: 5 Years
Liked
 
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 92
Likes: 8
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by Sgtblue
To keep it simple I’d suggest a 3” Bonez or HKS downpipe, a 3” Bonez or SMB hi-flow cat and your R.B. cat-back. All good quality, all will fit and function, sound good with no creep or smell. Boom.

If you feel flush, have the DP heat coated or (cheaper) header wrap it.
Appreciate the suggestion. Im a noob and sometimes while digging through the forum im not sure if im selling myself short by taking suggestions from 2004, etc..
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2020 | 04:57 PM
  #9  
fendamonky's Avatar
F'n Newbie...
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,942
Likes: 323
From: Nokesville, Va
So in the case of using stock twins your main exhaust flow restriction/chokepoint is going to be in the turbo manifold. Opening up the exhaust itself beyond 3" won't really be beneficial. In fact, going *too* free flowing can hurt twins because it could lead to boost creep when the WG's just get overwhelmed.

If you don't have the 3.5" exhaust already than I'd honestly pass on it for now. A 3" DP with 3" midsection and high-flow cat will help nicely and be a good match for your current setup
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2020 | 06:53 PM
  #10  
knut's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member: 5 Years
Liked
 
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 92
Likes: 8
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by fendamonky
So in the case of using stock twins your main exhaust flow restriction/chokepoint is going to be in the turbo manifold. Opening up the exhaust itself beyond 3" won't really be beneficial. In fact, going *too* free flowing can hurt twins because it could lead to boost creep when the WG's just get overwhelmed.

If you don't have the 3.5" exhaust already than I'd honestly pass on it for now. A 3" DP with 3" midsection and high-flow cat will help nicely and be a good match for your current setup
Got it. You guys saved me a lot of headache and cleared up the questions i had.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2020 | 04:35 AM
  #11  
Nakd n Fearless's Avatar
Senior Member
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 381
Likes: 77
From: Coral Springs, FL
Originally Posted by knut
Appreciate the suggestion. Im a noob and sometimes while digging through the forum im not sure if im selling myself short by taking suggestions from 2004, etc..
Mid 2000s was the best time for a stock modded twin-turbo FD RX7, not much has changed.
The best single turbocharger is still a daily debate as turbo tech is rapidly changing.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Raven93 Rx7
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
20
Oct 5, 2012 02:16 PM
anees
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
23
Dec 10, 2010 12:50 PM
RX7R1
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
27
Jan 13, 2005 07:33 PM
DashKits.net
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
12
Oct 30, 2002 05:14 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:10 AM.