3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

which short shifter?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 07:22 AM
  #1  
BNA_ELLIS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 524
Likes: 0
From: ENGLAND, UK
which short shifter?

Can anyone confirm which short shift has the shortest throw?
I installed a re-amemiya one for a customer the other day. He bought it off of ebay, so I don't know if it was a genuine item or not but there was not much difference between the throw on a stock setup. I have been in a car with a mazdaspeed before which was pretty short, just trying find the general thoughts on which is best.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 08:42 AM
  #2  
Illyont's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: Norway
I'm also wondering about this.

Re-Amemiya are usually considered good stuff in my book, but it doesn't have to be a bad shortshifter just because the throws are almost stock.. But to find out what shortshifter have the shortest throws would be a nice piece of knowledge for sure.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 08:57 AM
  #3  
DaiOni's Avatar
Wankler
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,565
Likes: 2
From: Kobe, Japan
Originally Posted by Illyont
I'm also wondering about this.

Re-Amemiya are usually considered good stuff in my book, but it doesn't have to be a bad shortshifter just because the throws are almost stock..
kind of defeats the purpose though - why bother upgrading?

several people have commented similarily about the RE unit

the shift reduction on the mazdaspeed unit is quoted as 25%

not sure about c's - here's an ad, should be on there somewhere (maybe your eyes are better than mine): http://page5.auctions.yahoo.co.jp/jp/auction/e50059649

As far as which unit is 'best', I did a fair bit of searching on this topic, and popular opinion seemed to be 1. mazdaspeed, 2. C's, 3. B&M. With quite a few negative comments about the B&M, relative to the other two. I went for the C's, mainly due to the price differential (x2), Unfortunately - I didn't notice a significant throw reduction, it's notchier than I expected, and any reduction of throw is countered by the fact that it takes double the force to shift. In short - not a good mod at all. I did have a somewhat notchy 1-2 shift - so not a good platform to start with, admittedly.

Last edited by DaiOni; Mar 13, 2006 at 09:01 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 09:42 AM
  #5  
Sgtblue's Avatar
Urban Combat Vet
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 12,160
Likes: 983
From: Mid-west
RE Amemiya is basically the stock shifter with a shortened shaft. The distance from the pivot point (ball socket) to the bottom of the shifter is unchanged.
PETTIT/MAZDASPEED/rx7store short throw shifters are the same and I think result in the shortest throw (reducing about 50%). They have shortened shafts AND lengthen the distance from the pivot point to the bottom bushing. This will cause a loss of mechanical leverage and make shifting effort a little heavier. But I still like mine.

https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.p...=short+shifter

Last edited by Sgtblue; Mar 13, 2006 at 09:46 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 02:14 PM
  #6  
BNA_ELLIS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 524
Likes: 0
From: ENGLAND, UK
Ok looked at the other thread. Looks like the b&m have a nice short throw but make the actual gear change very notchy, so I will be better off with the mazdaspeed or C's, for short throw and smooth gears?
DaiOni it looks like that ad for C's claims it knocks half a second off of 1/4 mile time?
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 02:43 PM
  #7  
jic's Avatar
jic
volk racing
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,897
Likes: 1
From: bay area
i have the RE one
id highly recommend the Cs shifter
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 03:15 PM
  #8  
olyrx7's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
From: BC, Canada
I have the B&M, and I really Like it. It shortens the shifts significantly and the shifting is firm. Yes it is a little notchy, but I think it's one of the best S/S
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 03:30 PM
  #9  
Kento's Avatar
2/4 wheel cornering fiend
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,090
Likes: 3
From: Pasadena, CA
Not that it's an actual direct comparison, but I drove an FD with a B&M SS, and I definitely prefer the action of my Mazdaspeed unit. B&M was notchy and required greater effort to shift.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 03:34 PM
  #10  
MakoRacing's Avatar
Where has my $ gone?
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,653
Likes: 7
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by olyrx7
I have the B&M, and I really Like it. It shortens the shifts significantly and the shifting is firm. Yes it is a little notchy, but I think it's one of the best S/S
I agree, I like the B&M and it is notchy, but I think people exaggerate when they say how much effort is required to shift...unless they need to start eatn more wheaties!
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 05:31 PM
  #11  
FDeez's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 734
Likes: 1
From: Oakland, CA
Mazdatrix? http://www.mazdatrix.com/g4.htm

But, I personally have the Mazdaspeed one. Good product!
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 05:36 PM
  #12  
Donovan's Avatar
Hi sir
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 443
Likes: 2
From: Modesto/Rancho Cordova CA
I have a B&M as well. The throw is very short and due to less leverage on the shifter it is a bit harder to shift. It is notchy and rattles a bit too. The only real reason to change to a shorter shifter in the 3rd gen is to replace broken parts, as was my case. The stock is already short and if you're going to complain about a notchy shift stay stock or save your money.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 05:39 PM
  #13  
SRA-FD3S's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
From: rotary world!!!!!!!!
mazda speed period!!..ow i have one for sale also!!!
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 06:18 PM
  #14  
M14socom's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
Changing to a shortshifter should in no way take 1/2 a second of your quarter mile time...unless your just really really slow with the stock unit. I was looking at the Gotham racing shifter $99 on sale. It looks similar to the B&M unit? Anyone know anything about it or tried it?
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 06:27 PM
  #15  
BNA_ELLIS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 524
Likes: 0
From: ENGLAND, UK
Originally Posted by Donovan
I have a B&M as well. The throw is very short and due to less leverage on the shifter it is a bit harder to shift. It is notchy and rattles a bit too. The only real reason to change to a shorter shifter in the 3rd gen is to replace broken parts, as was my case. The stock is already short and if you're going to complain about a notchy shift stay stock or save your money.
For drag racing. I am upgrading to a supra box the next time I blow my gearbox, but in the meantime I require quicker gear changes.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 06:34 PM
  #16  
M14socom's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
In my personal opinion I like the notch gears. It makes it easier to know exactly where you need to shift and also makes it easier to shift without the clutch pedal.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
msilvia
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
164
Mar 8, 2020 08:00 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:33 AM.