3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Shift knob wear? Scam?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 13, 2004 | 12:37 PM
  #26  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by Ryan23
I guess my biggest source of confusion was that since the 93' plastic appears to be sub-standard (compared to say, Toyota) then maybe everything else in the interior falls apart in a similar fashion (which would explain the ragged looking ****)
Just FYI, the interior plastic is same on all the 93-95 models. What covers the plastic is what's different. The 94-95 have a textured coating which doesn't chip like the '93 coating.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2004 | 12:38 PM
  #27  
adam c's Avatar
Cheap Bastard
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,368
Likes: 50
From: San Luis Obispo, Ca
You can't tell mileage by the ****. Some people leave their hand on the **** all the time. I met a guy last night that was an original owner of a 93 R1. His car had just over 60k, and was in excellent condition. His shift **** was much worse than the one in the pic, but everything else was sweet.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2004 | 12:40 PM
  #28  
lopedl's Avatar
Forever Modified
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,423
Likes: 0
From: WA
Swapping the clusters out with these cars wont do anything, the same miles will show on the replaced cluster. It doesn't matter what you do since its digital. It has a memory somewhere in the car, that records the miles, if it's messed with it will set off an alarm or something like that. So If it's on the speedometer most likely its accurate.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2004 | 12:50 PM
  #29  
Ryan23's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: Colonial Beach, VA
Originally Posted by lopedl
Swapping the clusters out with these cars wont do anything, the same miles will show on the replaced cluster. It doesn't matter what you do since its digital. It has a memory somewhere in the car, that records the miles, if it's messed with it will set off an alarm or something like that. So If it's on the speedometer most likely its accurate.

Just because it's digital does not mean it's tamper proof. Not that I would, but give me a shop manual and a couple hours with a donor, lower mileage, "car-b-que" and I could have the high mile car reading lower. MKIV's are digital and have been tampered. Same with some of the third gen F-body's. Mileage is not stored in the ECU, if that's what you were thinking.

Ryan
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2004 | 12:52 PM
  #30  
Ryan23's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: Colonial Beach, VA
Originally Posted by adam c
You can't tell mileage by the ****. Some people leave their hand on the **** all the time. I met a guy last night that was an original owner of a 93 R1. His car had just over 60k, and was in excellent condition. His shift **** was much worse than the one in the pic, but everything else was sweet.
That certainly settles it, right there. I'll have to poke around and see what the owner says. I just hate to have to hop a flight to just be disappointed.

Ryan
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2004 | 12:54 PM
  #31  
Ryan23's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: Colonial Beach, VA
Originally Posted by Mahjik
Just FYI, the interior plastic is same on all the 93-95 models. What covers the plastic is what's different. The 94-95 have a textured coating which doesn't chip like the '93 coating.
Thanks for the clarification

Ryan
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2004 | 01:54 PM
  #32  
zullo's Avatar
Obsessed
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
From: Lenexa KS
I'd say the car has "a lot" of miles on it from the pic, but hard to say.

On a related note, do NOT use Simple Green to clean leather interiors. In another car (fortunately) I wiped down the shift **** and steering wheel with Simple Green and it completely stripped the finish from the leather. It ended up looking like this shift **** after about 6 months. (fyi, Simple Green is a concentrated universal piney-scented cleaner that works well on just about everything else...)

Moral of the story? It could be a low-mileage car that was routinely detailed with carburetor cleaner or something...
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2004 | 03:43 PM
  #33  
turbojeff's Avatar
Do it right, do it once
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,830
Likes: 14
From: Eugene, OR, usa
Originally Posted by lopedl
Swapping the clusters out with these cars wont do anything, the same miles will show on the replaced cluster. It doesn't matter what you do since its digital. It has a memory somewhere in the car, that records the miles, if it's messed with it will set off an alarm or something like that. So If it's on the speedometer most likely its accurate.
Wrong...

Cluster holds the mileage...
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2004 | 03:51 PM
  #34  
RXASSASIN7's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: CHARLOTTE,NC
my shift **** is completely down to the plastic and my car only has 95k on her.

you CANNOT determine miles by wear cause its all based on HOW the person drove the vehicle.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2004 | 06:47 PM
  #35  
Snook's Avatar
Tony Stewart Killer.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,156
Likes: 4
From: London
yeah the cluster totally holds the mileage. If you remove the cluster you can still even drive the car and it wont record miles. really dumb setup they have

simple green should also never be used for cleaning polished parts
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2004 | 11:20 PM
  #36  
mecman's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 679
Likes: 24
From: Chicago, IL, USA
When I bought my '93 it had 62K on it with a wear spot down to the plastic. Miles were CARFAX certified. I replaced the **** with OEM from Fritz.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2004 | 06:44 AM
  #37  
skunks's Avatar
I'm a CF and poop smith
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 1
From: Hawaii
its halarious that anyone would try to guess the millage/much less the condition of an engine by looking at the shift ****. This thread should be deleted! If you wanna know how a fd is running, drive it. if you wanna know how good the engine is, compression test it. its really not rocket science and you cant hide very much from a compression test or test ride/drive. use common sence to tell you what is up with a car...
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2004 | 09:27 AM
  #38  
Ryan23's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: Colonial Beach, VA
Originally Posted by skunks
its halarious that anyone would try to guess the millage/much less the condition of an engine by looking at the shift ****. This thread should be deleted! If you wanna know how a fd is running, drive it. if you wanna know how good the engine is, compression test it. its really not rocket science and you cant hide very much from a compression test or test ride/drive. use common sence to tell you what is up with a car...
Look dude, I think we came to a conclusion. Thinking "This thread should be deleted" is a pretty narrow view of things. I asked a simple question about how the shift ***** in FD's hold up in regards to mileage, obviously the answer in this case is "not related". If you would actually read, instead of writing BS, you would have seen that NO WHERE did I ask about the condition of the engine. That would be foolish. BACK TO SUBJECT, No, we cannot ascertain any sort of correlation between mileage and interior wear. That's NOT the case with every type of vehicle. Certain things in some cars wear with usage ata pretty consistent rate. Be it carpet, shift ****, steering wheel, rubber on the pedals, ETC. Usage=Mileage. When a vehicle is claimed to be 65K and looks like the leather is worn off the shift ****, I was a little suspicious. Other factors have come in to view since then and backed up that mileage claim. Maybe living on an island permits you to "just go drive it" but for me it's either a 16 hour drive or roundtrip airfare. I don't like to waste my time. Obviously you do, based on your post above.

Ryan
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2004 | 10:39 AM
  #39  
zmarko's Avatar
shoo shoo retarded flu!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,560
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
Originally Posted by turbojeff
Wrong...

Cluster holds the mileage...
Agreed.


Now what I'm wondering is if they changed that setup in later year other Mazda cars. I have an '01 Tribute that has a digital ODO, and was curious if the cluster holds the mileage.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2004 | 01:14 PM
  #40  
PVerdieck's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,742
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Still purple
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2004 | 02:12 PM
  #41  
neuro's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
From: Boulder, Co
Mine is just a LITTLE more worn than yours with 72k
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
distr0
Canadian Forum
3
Oct 7, 2015 08:17 AM
musker
New Member RX-7 Technical
1
Oct 1, 2015 05:58 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:23 PM.