3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

save the whales, SAVE YOUR MOTOR

Old Mar 4, 2010 | 07:00 AM
  #276  
Barry Bordes's Avatar
"Elusive, not deceptive!”
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 930
Likes: 13
From: Slidell, LA
This is an elegant solution and better than the RA adapter. That adapter was a headache due to interference with the stock twins oil return line. But for this you would need to mill a groove for another o-ring corresponding to the one on the OMP or you're going to get oil leaks.

Pomamferrari, the way the oil system is designed is that it oil pressure lubricates the pump's drive shaft plain bearing surface and the spill-off fills the small reservoir on the OMP's face.
There is no real pressure on the reservoir. Mine operates with a tight fit on the OMP’s boss and a very light coat of 515 Loctite gasket eliminator.

Barry


I saw one solution where a guy did something like this but with a second o-ring to prevent oil leaks.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 07:24 AM
  #277  
Barry Bordes's Avatar
"Elusive, not deceptive!”
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 930
Likes: 13
From: Slidell, LA
Originally Posted by no_more_rice
I have two issues with this:

1) where to put the reservoir

Trout2 is putting his behind the power steering pump frame. Mine is above my turbo intake (see previous thumbnail).

2) what happens when your pump fails and you're not aware of it, or a line gets pinched or fails....bye bye motor

I agree that premix is safer and simpler. Especially for racers where you are max output all the time it is easy to mix for that.
But for street cars, how much carbon build-up would you expect running those dog rich ratios for safety?

When Howard makes his 200 mph attempt he surely will be richer than 256:1 or 128:1. Probably more like 50:1. The OMP does this already. But only when you need it.


again, there is a reason all two stroke racers delete pumps like this and pre-mix: zero possibility of failure...is it really worth saving 15 seconds at the pump? keeping it simple always wins in terms of reliability
And by the way. I would premix till the next engine removal. Doing this mod is like building a ship in a bottle, while laying on your back under your car in a cold garage, going uphill both ways! .... I getting carried away.

Barry
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 07:36 AM
  #278  
Barry Bordes's Avatar
"Elusive, not deceptive!”
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 930
Likes: 13
From: Slidell, LA
Originally Posted by rdahm
There was a good question asked in single turbo that was regarding fuel cut and premixing tuning with the PFC. No answers :-(

I don't think this is much of a problem because there is no load on the seals, the time is short, so the residual oil will handle this easily.

That's my concern re: premix. Someone brought it up and it nags on me.
My Thoughts,
Barry
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 09:42 AM
  #279  
no_more_rice's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
From: NC
At 50:1 I really have to believe you would see plug fouling and/or high rpm power loss. This isn't a two stroke engine, that is a ton of extra oil, and it's just not necessary to lube these tiny seals. Again, Idemitsu reports racers running 400:1, and yes that's on a roadcourse, full throttle.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 09:48 AM
  #280  
DaveW's Avatar
Racecar - Formula 2000
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,028
Likes: 366
From: Bath, OH
Originally Posted by no_more_rice
At 50:1 I really have to believe you would see plug fouling and/or rpm power loss. This isn't a two stroke engine, that is a ton of extra oil, and it's just not necessary to lube these tiny seals. Again, Idemitsu reports racers running 400:1, and yes that's on a roadcourse, full throttle.
Also, and I don't remember if this has been previously mentioned in this thread, excess oil in the combustion chamber will decrease fuel-burn quality and HP. Therefore, running as little premix/oil-injection as possible without excessive wear is the objective.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 12:41 PM
  #281  
Barry Bordes's Avatar
"Elusive, not deceptive!”
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 930
Likes: 13
From: Slidell, LA
Originally Posted by no_more_rice
At 50:1 I really have to believe you would see plug fouling and/or high rpm power loss. This isn't a two stroke engine, that is a ton of extra oil, and it's just not necessary to lube these tiny seals. Again, Idemitsu reports racers running 400:1, and yes that's on a roadcourse, full throttle.
How would a flame front in a combustion chamber know it was in a Rotary Engine?

If it burns well in a motorcycle 2 stroke engine it will do the same in a rotary.


"This isn't a two stroke engine, that is a ton of extra oil, and it's just not necessary to lube these tiny seals. Again, Idemitsu reports racers running 400:1, and yes that's on a roadcourse, full throttle."

Howard's straight will be a little longer than a road course, maybe 10x. Recheck Mazda's tests on the preceding page for amounts of oil.

Barry
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 04:06 PM
  #282  
no_more_rice's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by Barry Bordes
How would a flame front in a combustion chamber know it was in a Rotary Engine? If it burns well in a motorcycle 2 stroke engine it will do the same in a rotary.
Actually, both Rich and I have experienced high rpm break-up at rich mix ratios, but that wasn't my primary point. My point was that the rotary four stroke engine has wet sump lubrication - unlike a two stroke, which relies on a 50:1 (or richer) pre-mix to lubricate ALL internals, including the crankshaft. All the oil needs to do in a rotary is lubricate a few tiny seals, with very small surface areas. It's apples and oranges. You don't need much oil to do the job, especially a good synthetic, and that comes straight from Idemitsu, who has raced these cars for many years. 200:1 is PLENTY, and, in my opinion 400:1 is adequate for the street. RX-7 World runs that ratio in all their cars, and his motors look great at tear down. We need more science here, and less random speculation. The fact is running super-rich pre-mix ratios robs power, and there is abundant evidence 1/2 oz per gallon works perfectly well. I've been running that ratio for five years and I drive the car hard.

Howard's straight will be a little longer than a road course, maybe 10x.
That is up to Howard, but the Texas Mile is an extreme case which has little to do with the overall purpose of this thread.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 04:36 PM
  #283  
Narfle's Avatar
Rx7 Wagon
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,009
Likes: 888
From: California
Originally Posted by rdahm
There was a good question asked in single turbo that was regarding fuel cut and premixing tuning with the PFC. No answers :-(

That's my concern re: premix. Someone brought it up and it nags on me.
Not nearly as big a concern as the fact that when you're in gear and off the gas you will not be injecting premix into the CC.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 04:44 PM
  #284  
Narfle's Avatar
Rx7 Wagon
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,009
Likes: 888
From: California
Originally Posted by no_more_rice
My point was that the rotary four stroke engine
It's not a 4-stroke. Nor is it a 2-stroke. It would be a 1-stroke if stroke we're even relevant.

All the oil needs to do in a rotary is lubricate a few tiny seals, with very small surface areas.
the problem is that the lubicative effect of premix is dependant upon how much 2 -cycle is in it and how much of it makes it to the friction surface. Not the number and/or size of the friction surfaces.

It's apples and oranges.
It's really not.
You don't need much oil to do the job
50:1 isnt much oil.

200:1 is PLENTY, and, in my opinion 400:1 is adequate for the street.
We need more science here, and less random speculation.
The fact is running super-rich pre-mix ratios robs power
super rich meaning what? sounds like random speculation to me.

and there is abundant evidence 1/2 oz per gallon works perfectly well. I've been running that ratio for five years and I drive the car hard.
you have yet to display any of this abundant evidence and have still yet to state how many miles you've put on your "case study" in those five years...which is 1000x more relevant than the period of time youve owned it.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 05:39 PM
  #285  
DDagman's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
From: Foster city Ca
Would an HKS F-con throw out an error code? Or can I just block off the OMP
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 05:45 PM
  #286  
DDagman's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
From: Foster city Ca
Would an HKS F-con throw out an error code? Or can I just block off the OMP
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 08:36 PM
  #287  
zammm's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 174
Likes: 1
From: St. Petersburg, FL
I just installed the OMP block off plate. Jesus Christ....Way harder than I thought it was going to be.. The plugs are so hard to get to..you have to take off the UIM,and Primary fuel injectors, and its still hard as hell to get to them... Oil is leaking out of where my OMP used to be after installing the block off plate...I guess its just the remaining oil that was left in there, most of it was black....I'm glad I did it, BUT GEEZ WHAT A PITA...

Max
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 09:22 PM
  #288  
Herblenny's Avatar
DGRR 2017 4/26-4/30, 2017
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 13,597
Likes: 6
From: Alabama
Originally Posted by no_more_rice
We need more science here, and less random speculation.
Wait a minute! Isn't this what I been saying??

To be honest, all this pre-mix ratio is speculation as no one know what you really need for various street driving conditions.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 09:58 PM
  #289  
MOBEONER's Avatar
It's finally reliable
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,513
Likes: 10
From: NEW YORK CITY
From all i have read in this thread is occurs to me that the best mix for me personally is 1/2 oz to 1 gallon with active stock OMP pump using Idemitsu 20W50 and Idemitsu Premix.

the only bad thing about Idemitsu is is not sold locally.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 10:47 PM
  #290  
no_more_rice's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by Barban
It's not a 4-stroke.
Four cycle.

Last edited by no_more_rice; Mar 4, 2010 at 10:50 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 10:49 PM
  #291  
no_more_rice's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by Herblenny
To be honest, all this pre-mix ratio is speculation as no one know what you really need for various street driving conditions.
It's not speculation when you have case study after case study (after case study) that clearly demonstrates 1/2 oz per gallon is more than adequate.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 11:34 PM
  #292  
Narfle's Avatar
Rx7 Wagon
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,009
Likes: 888
From: California
Originally Posted by no_more_rice
It's not speculation when you have case study after case study (after case study) that clearly demonstrates 1/2 oz per gallon is more than adequate.
Where are these case studies? They don't exist.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 11:43 PM
  #293  
no_more_rice's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by MOBEONER
From all i have read in this thread is occurs to me that the best mix for me personally is 1/2 oz to 1 gallon with active stock OMP pump using Idemitsu 20W50 and Idemitsu Premix.
Why on earth you would anyone use pre-mix AND four cycle dino juice is truly beyond comprehension. Defeats the entire purpose, you may as well not even bother with pre-mix at all.

Last edited by no_more_rice; Mar 4, 2010 at 11:47 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 11:45 PM
  #294  
no_more_rice's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by Barban
Where are these case studies? They don't exist.
Post 1 mr. deaf and blind. They exist in the form of many engine tear downs I've seen first hand and documented in this thread.

You can't reason with fools....
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 11:51 PM
  #295  
no_more_rice's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by Howard Coleman CPR
Mazda decided that the pumped up twin turbo FD motor needed a bit more lube. i guarantee you every Mazda engineer wanted to put a tank in the engine compartment that would be filled with 2 cycle ashless oil. it was no doubt decided that this would not be a highly popular task for buyers... and many would just not fill the tank. the answer was to draw crankcase oil. four cycle oil is not suited for combustion chambers as it leave significant residue, carbon, that when combined w the overly rich fuel mixture just gums up the motor.

you have two options:

rework the pump so it draws 2 cycle oil from a custom tank (Rotary Aviation sells such a mod).

or remove the EOP and mix 1/2 oz per gallon w your gasoline... 1 oz when you are tracking or are on the dyno.

presto... your rotor will look like this

/thread
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2010 | 12:42 AM
  #296  
Narfle's Avatar
Rx7 Wagon
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,009
Likes: 888
From: California
Originally Posted by no_more_rice
Post 1 mr. deaf and blind. They exist in the form of many engine tear downs I've seen first hand and documented in this thread.

You can't reason with fools....
1) not a case study
2) not many many many case studies
3) you have posted nothing relevant to back up your claims
4) you have provided no information refuting any of my assertions
5) yes, it is very hard to reason with people like you

There have so far been zero (count 'em!) ZERO long term, high mileage case studies. You just keep spouting off at the mouth about how hard you drive your car and how you've been pre-mixing for 5 years(Still without a mileage count because it's low, too low to matter). It's also up for debate how much of howard's experience is due to water injection.

Premixing is probably great for race cars that aren't expected to last, or dyno queens that see 15,000 miles between tear downs. You want to keep your housings? You should probably run 2-cycle though the OMP.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2010 | 03:30 AM
  #297  
grimple1's Avatar
Turd Ferguson
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 2
From: Sherman Oaks, California
Originally Posted by MOBEONER
From all i have read in this thread is occurs to me that the best mix for me personally is 1/2 oz to 1 gallon with active stock OMP pump using Idemitsu 20W50 and Idemitsu Premix.

the only bad thing about Idemitsu is is not sold locally.
Any 2-stroke oil would be fine. As long as it is ashless. A lot folks run other oils than the Idemitsu. I've run the Castrol 2-Stroke oil for a 2 years. Zero problems with plugs. Was a daily driver. It's currently down for non-engine repairs.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2010 | 07:14 AM
  #298  
Banzai-Racing's Avatar
Rotary Specialists
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,867
Likes: 343
From: Indiana
Originally Posted by zammm
I just installed the OMP block off plate. Jesus Christ....Way harder than I thought it was going to be.. The plugs are so hard to get to..you have to take off the UIM,and Primary fuel injectors, and its still hard as hell to get to them... Oil is leaking out of where my OMP used to be after installing the block off plate...I guess its just the remaining oil that was left in there, most of it was black....I'm glad I did it, BUT GEEZ WHAT A PITA...

Max
Please tell us you put RTV sealant on the BOP before you installed it. You also allowed it to cure overnight before starting the car, right?

Originally Posted by no_more_rice
Actually, both Rich and I have experienced high rpm break-up at rich mix ratios, but that wasn't my primary point.
It is odd that you use Rich as an example, he is running premix in conjuction with the OMP. He is running the same mix ratio as you as supplemental lubrication. He had high rpm break up at 1.5 oz/ga with the OMP still functioning, he was dumping in tons of oil.


Originally Posted by no_more_rice
Why on earth you would anyone use pre-mix AND four cycle dino juice is truly beyond comprehension. Defeats the entire purpose, you may as well not even bother with pre-mix at all.
Yet you just used someone that is doing just that as an arguement in a previous post.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2010 | 07:51 AM
  #299  
Herblenny's Avatar
DGRR 2017 4/26-4/30, 2017
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 13,597
Likes: 6
From: Alabama
Originally Posted by barban
1) not a case study
2) not many many many case studies
3) you have posted nothing relevant to back up your claims
4) you have provided no information refuting any of my assertions
5) yes, it is very hard to reason with people like you

there have so far been zero (count 'em!) zero long term, high mileage case studies. You just keep spouting off at the mouth about how hard you drive your car and how you've been pre-mixing for 5 years(still without a mileage count because it's low, too low to matter). it's also up for debate how much of howard's experience is due to water injection.

premixing is probably great for race cars that aren't expected to last, or dyno queens that see 15,000 miles between tear downs. You want to keep your housings? You should probably run 2-cycle though the omp.
amen!!
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2010 | 08:20 AM
  #300  
Herblenny's Avatar
DGRR 2017 4/26-4/30, 2017
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 13,597
Likes: 6
From: Alabama
Originally Posted by no_more_rice
It's not speculation when you have case study after case study (after case study) that clearly demonstrates 1/2 oz per gallon is more than adequate.
So your recommendation is at 1:256 (oil to gas)

Let's see if its case study or speculation...

From Amsoil


As you could see 1:100 is max dilution with their synthetic oil.

Now lets look at how the famous Idemitsu 2 cycle oil for the rotary was tested when their patient was placed..



If I'm reading correctly, they used ratio of 1:20 (oil to gas)!

All I can say is, there is no real world testing to show just pre-mix alone will make your engine last longer.. There are way too many variables and not enough real world testing (Yes, real world as in high rpm, low rpm, low load, high load, decel, idling, cold, hot, extended driving, high mile drives, etc. etc.) of just pre-mix.
Attached Thumbnails save the whales, SAVE YOUR MOTOR-idemitsu.jpg  

Last edited by Herblenny; Mar 5, 2010 at 08:23 AM.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:59 PM.