3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

SAFC best choice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 27, 2004 | 12:16 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: Conway Arkansas
SAFC best choice

Is using an SAFC one of the better choices for fuel control, i dont have stacks of cash and already spent what i have on intakes, gauges boost AF and water temp, as well as greddy FMIC and AST. I am now broke but need a fuel computer and can dishout a couple hundred for it. Is SAFC the best choice because after these mods the motor will run lean.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2004 | 12:26 PM
  #2  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
I believe the SAFC will allow you to adjust your fuel mapping without a problem, however, it will not allow you to adjust timing or remove fuel cut from the stock ECU.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2004 | 12:31 PM
  #3  
moehler's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,319
Likes: 32
From: South Jersey
I have no experiance with the SAFC, but you could find a used pettit or m2 ecu for a few hundered bucks.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2004 | 01:02 PM
  #4  
POM HB's Avatar
Lookie Only
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,073
Likes: 1
From: King, WA
Remember that SAFC only add or reduce fuel that stock ecu decides the amount. So, you have to be sure about your boost level that it won't creep.

I was gonna do that years ago, but couldn't decide.

POM HB
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2004 | 02:01 PM
  #5  
MazdaRx7Racer4Life's Avatar
I AM A THIEF!! READ THE FEEDBACK SECTION!
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
You'll end up spending more money ( think) trying to get rid of fuel cut and boost creep afterwrds, save up a little more and get either a powerfc, or like POM Hb said, an M2 or petit ecu seems more than enough for your application.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2004 | 02:16 PM
  #6  
kyle@insight's Avatar
Dont like it? I dont care
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 931
Likes: 0
From: Gold's Gym
This is all hear-say for me so feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but this is what I was told as to why you shouldn't use an SAFC on an FD.

Many people use them on TIIs and such to control fuel because the TII's secondary injectors come on at a predetermined RPM. It doesn't work that way on an FD, an FD is not RPM dependant, I believe it's load or boost dependant.... or possibly maybe even throttle dependant, my mind is a little fuzzy on this. Anyway, it's due to that reason that an SAFC is a bad idea on an FD, because there's no specific time that the secondary injectors come on, which can result in a very lean condition at lower RPMs.

Again, this is something i was told a while back, feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

Either way, I say do it once and do it right. PFC or some other full ECU, not a cheap piggy-back.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2004 | 02:33 PM
  #7  
MazdaRx7Racer4Life's Avatar
I AM A THIEF!! READ THE FEEDBACK SECTION!
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
Originally posted by kyle@insight
This is all hear-say for me so feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but this is what I was told as to why you shouldn't use an SAFC on an FD.

Many people use them on TIIs and such to control fuel because the TII's secondary injectors come on at a predetermined RPM. It doesn't work that way on an FD, an FD is not RPM dependant, I believe it's load or boost dependant.... or possibly maybe even throttle dependant, my mind is a little fuzzy on this. Anyway, it's due to that reason that an SAFC is a bad idea on an FD, because there's no specific time that the secondary injectors come on, which can result in a very lean condition at lower RPMs.

Again, this is something i was told a while back, feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

Either way, I say do it once and do it right. PFC or some other full ECU, not a cheap piggy-back.
I agree with you on that, theres a reason the fd community doesn't use the safc, which is relatively cheap compared to other fuel controllers. The PFC was made for the fd, as were the m2 and petit ecu, do it right the first time, that way you do't have to do it over, sometimes the cheap remedy to a problem turns out to be a problem itself, spend wisely.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2004 | 03:46 PM
  #8  
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: Conway Arkansas
Where the hell am i to find a used ECU for less than my first born?
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2004 | 03:58 PM
  #9  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Arrow

CRX7,

Apparently, the SAFC does adjust timing, but indirectly. You should spend some time in the Super AFC forum as you will find answers to your questions there:

https://www.rx7club.com/super-afc-123/
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2004 | 04:31 PM
  #10  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
Originally posted by CRX7
Where the hell am i to find a used ECU for less than my first born?
I've said it before, and I'll say it again. If you can't afford to mod the car, then DON'T DO IT! What is so HARD to understand about that?

The S-AFC is completely worthless on an FD. You still can't run higher than stock boost (10 psi) with it and the stock ecu runs rich enough at 10 psi for all of the bolt-ons.

If you are broke, install a manual boost controller, keep boost at 10 psi, and be done with it. If you wouldn't have spent money on worthless mods like an A/F gauge and FMIC, you could afford an ecu.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2004 | 04:39 PM
  #11  
rajeevx7's Avatar
2 FD's since '98
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 7
From: West Palm Beach
I love my PFS computer! Plug and play with maps already set for 10,12 & 15 psi. No tuning required, but probably helpfull. Bam...300+HP out the box.

Some cars do have a problem with fuel cut not getting canceled in 3rd gear but mine didn't.

Raj
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2004 | 04:41 PM
  #12  
rajeevx7's Avatar
2 FD's since '98
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 7
From: West Palm Beach
Oh, and the commander has full logistic read outs and can adjust timing and fuel making it a dynamic computer to change with each new mod. Got mine for $250 out of the FS Section.

Raj
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2004 | 01:04 AM
  #13  
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: Conway Arkansas
hey rnberg, it will be ok, i have money, thats why i posted, trying to find the best choice here, but thanks for such a graceful reply.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2004 | 05:55 AM
  #14  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
Originally posted by CRX7
hey rnberg, it will be ok, i have money, thats why i posted, trying to find the best choice here, but thanks for such a graceful reply.
If you are being sarcastic, I did answer your question. As far as you having cash:

Originally posted by CRX7
...i dont have stacks of cash and already spent what i have on.....I am now broke but need a fuel computer and can dishout a couple hundred for it.....
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2004 | 07:48 AM
  #15  
moehler's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,319
Likes: 32
From: South Jersey
Originally posted by CRX7
Where the hell am i to find a used ECU for less than my first born?
go to the for sale forum... if you wait for a few weeks you'll get one. many people start with these ecu's and then switch to a pfc when they upgrade their car further. so you do see them for sale. you should be able to find one close to the price of a new SAFC. modding these cars is EXPENSIVE... keep that in mind. you change one little thing, and you have to change five other things to compensate for it.
as rynberg said, if you can't afford it, just get a boost controller and keep it at 10 psi.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2004 | 11:47 AM
  #16  
rx7raca's Avatar
wHiTe kNiGhT
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,393
Likes: 0
From: ct
safc is for NA cars, and older turbo model cars. its not made for the kind of power the fd can put out. bottom line, dont ever consider it.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2004 | 12:43 PM
  #17  
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: Conway Arkansas
sounds goods, upgraded ecu it is then, thanks for the help
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2004 | 12:45 PM
  #18  
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: Conway Arkansas
but i do wonder this, with the mods i have i have been told the motor will run lean, which was my reasoning for the safc in the first place.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2004 | 12:52 PM
  #19  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
Originally posted by CRX7
but i do wonder this, with the mods i have i have been told the motor will run lean, which was my reasoning for the safc in the first place.
Not true at 10 psi. Wade has done extensive a/f ratio testing and my own testing supports it.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2004 | 12:52 PM
  #20  
rajeevx7's Avatar
2 FD's since '98
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 7
From: West Palm Beach
Bunk that uprgraded computer crap. You want to have a stand alone or piggy back to have many different maps available.
You have to understand that an upgraded stock ecu to support 15 lbs will have you running rich untill you get all the mods that the computer was built for. Probably IC,Intake,Exhaust. Too rich = power loss+fouled plugs.
Any other comp. has the ability to change as you change your car.
Raj
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2004 | 01:16 PM
  #21  
maxcooper's Avatar
WWFSMD
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,035
Likes: 4
From: SoCal
Originally posted by kyle@insight
This is all hear-say for me so feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but this is what I was told as to why you shouldn't use an SAFC on an FD.

Many people use them on TIIs and such to control fuel because the TII's secondary injectors come on at a predetermined RPM. It doesn't work that way on an FD, an FD is not RPM dependant, I believe it's load or boost dependant.... or possibly maybe even throttle dependant, my mind is a little fuzzy on this. Anyway, it's due to that reason that an SAFC is a bad idea on an FD, because there's no specific time that the secondary injectors come on, which can result in a very lean condition at lower RPMs.

Again, this is something i was told a while back, feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

Either way, I say do it once and do it right. PFC or some other full ECU, not a cheap piggy-back.
The injector timing thing is an issue if you want to change the injector sizes. It is the reason why you can't change the ratio of primary:secondary injector sizes on the FD and expect to avoid going rich when your bigger secondaries kick in using an RPM-based adjustment. For instance, you couldn't install large secondaries and then just scale down the fuel map at some fixed RPM to compensate. There is no way to get the transition right since the secondaries come on at different RPMs based on the various conditions you listed.

The S-AFC adjusts fuel delivery by fiddling with the boost sensor signal to the stock ECU. Want more fuel? Tell the ECU that we are running higher boost than we really are. Want less fuel? Tell the ECU we are running less boost than we really are. The problem with this approach on the FD is that you will quickly run into the boost-related fuel cut (built in to the stock ECU) if you want to richen the mixture or run run a little higher boost than stock. You can't fix this with an FCD, because then the S-AFC wouldn't be able to tell the stock ECU to deliver more fuel.

The S-AFC seems to have a loyal following for some other cars or models, but it just doesn't work well on the FD.

If you want to run more boost but don't have a lot of money to spend, get a re-chipped ECU or a PFS PMC (AKA EFI PMS) used. I think there are many of them available in the used market. However, if you plan to mod the car out a lot, it may be worth saving up and getting a PowerFC (or another stand-alone) from the start. You'll spend less in the long run.

Also, my car was much smoother the moment I installed the PowerFC (no more 3K RPM hesitation!) and I think others have had similar experiences. If you have the 3K hesitation, get a PowerFC and it will be gone.

-Max
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
renjiv2
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
57
Jan 25, 2024 03:34 AM
He's On Toroids
NE RX-7 Forum
48
Oct 19, 2015 08:58 PM
Ian_D
Single Turbo RX-7's
25
Oct 14, 2015 12:31 PM
Feffman
SE RX-7 Forum
1
Oct 7, 2015 06:57 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:49 AM.