3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Rx7 handling @ 120+mph

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-02-05, 01:33 PM
  #26  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (8)
 
M104-AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 2,857
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
I have a '93 Touring with Koni shocks. Compared to '93 Mercedes 500E, the FD will get to 120-140 faster, but compared to my 500E, it is a little "jittery" on the road, even with with R-compound tires. It handles well enough, but without a rear-wing, too floaty in the rear for me.

And yes, the brakes , IMHO, are too equally biased, which can lead to the rear getting lighter FASTER than the fronts, which can cause a rear spin. Rain makes it downright scary.

The 500E, I can cruise at 150 MPH all day (it tops out at 165 MPH), and it is very stable, especially when you're in a panic stop. It also weights about 3,900-lbs !
M104-AMG is offline  
Old 08-02-05, 01:56 PM
  #27  
silver ghost

iTrader: (11)
 
G's 3rd Gen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Home of the Rolex 24
Posts: 3,061
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by M104-AMG
I have a '93 Touring with Koni shocks. Compared to '93 Mercedes 500E, the FD will get to 120-140 faster, but compared to my 500E, it is a little "jittery" on the road, even with with R-compound tires. It handles well enough, but without a rear-wing, too floaty in the rear for me.

And yes, the brakes , IMHO, are too equally biased, which can lead to the rear getting lighter FASTER than the fronts, which can cause a rear spin. Rain makes it downright scary.

The 500E, I can cruise at 150 MPH all day (it tops out at 165 MPH), and it is very stable, especially when you're in a panic stop. It also weights about 3,900-lbs !

I have owned FD's w/ and w/ out wings.. I didnt notice much of a difference at 120 to 165 in handling. I would not go over 130 w/ stock rim/tire set-up. Unless you have very good tires. My current FD has no wing. Has eibach springs. Rims are 17x8 in front and 17x 9 1/2 in back. I am running 235/45 in front and 265/ 40 in back. Bridgestone so3 pole positions. It was said before that good tires make a big diffference. Very true.. I had her to 165 a twice and felt solid as a rock. I did run her up there and it only felt "floaty" w/out the front undertray on...

Last edited by G's 3rd Gen; 08-02-05 at 02:04 PM.
G's 3rd Gen is offline  
Old 08-02-05, 02:17 PM
  #28  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
PhoenixDownVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mibad
Ricer or Racer?
All I know is, there is one big problem with the FD. Everyone else on the road is always in your way.
Ricer. This is hardly a serious topic discussing the FD's handling capabilities during any realistic situation on a track, rather a silly, dangerous high speed that should be visited sparingly (if at all) on the streets and rarely much even on the track.

Again. Ricer.
PhoenixDownVII is offline  
Old 08-02-05, 03:32 PM
  #29  
Full Member

 
joeyz87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Castro Valley
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ya i got a ticket doing 110 last year driving fc. Then I total it into back
of truck, wasn't my fault. He saw me get behind him and down shifted so I would crash into him. I went from 90mph to 65mph problem was he went from 65mph to 45mph. Impact was like hitting a wall at 15-20 mph. Fc was stuck to truck as he pull off to side. I was ok fc was suffered severe injuries and died shortly after. Now I have fd and drvie much faster.
joeyz87 is offline  
Old 08-02-05, 05:30 PM
  #30  
\m/

 
Rhode_Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Asheville NC
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by M104-AMG
I have a '93 Touring with Koni shocks. Compared to '93 Mercedes 500E, the FD will get to 120-140 faster, but compared to my 500E, it is a little "jittery" on the road, even with with R-compound tires. It handles well enough, but without a rear-wing, too floaty in the rear for me.

And yes, the brakes , IMHO, are too equally biased, which can lead to the rear getting lighter FASTER than the fronts, which can cause a rear spin. Rain makes it downright scary.

The 500E, I can cruise at 150 MPH all day (it tops out at 165 MPH), and it is very stable, especially when you're in a panic stop. It also weights about 3,900-lbs !
(Off topic response)

You have a 500E? Lucky bastard
Rhode_Dog is offline  
Old 08-02-05, 05:35 PM
  #31  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (14)
 
Julian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Longview, Texas
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by BobfisH
How on earth can you compare **** to the handling of an RX7?!?!!! lol you madman
I think the firm **** was a good analogy!
Julian is offline  
Old 08-02-05, 05:48 PM
  #32  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (14)
 
Julian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Longview, Texas
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Guys, if you want to race on public highways enter an Open Road Race where they close down the highway. It is embarrassing that out of 139 cars entered this spring in Big Bend Texas that only 2 were RX-7's. An ORRexample is this link http://www.bborr.com/home.html. also some events in Nevada et.al.

With regard the subject matter, the car needs to be aligned for high speed events; do no use autocross settings. For high speed you want stability, for autocross you want instability to speed up turn-in, hence toe out in front.... The car can be Very stable at over 150 speeds, on straights, turns and under braking; if it is not fix it. Yes aero is very important, the front end must have all the stock pieces on or equivalent, leakage in the undertray can make it hell at high speeds.

Last edited by Julian; 08-02-05 at 05:50 PM.
Julian is offline  
Old 08-02-05, 07:12 PM
  #33  
It Just Feels Right

 
mibad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Southern Maryland
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by PhoenixDownVII
Ricer. This is hardly a serious topic discussing the FD's handling capabilities during any realistic situation on a track, rather a silly, dangerous high speed that should be visited sparingly (if at all) on the streets and rarely much even on the track.

Again. Ricer.
I obviously don't even know what a Ricer is. I just ***-u-me-d it was people obsessed with making their cars Japanese spec. I never thought it was a derogatory term, but I'm old and don't know these things.. I agree that 120+ belongs on the race track.
mibad is offline  
Old 08-02-05, 08:56 PM
  #34  
The Anti-Prius

iTrader: (9)
 
Sled Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Federal Way, WA
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Meyers2211
My question is how does the 7 handle at 100+mph stock and then with aftermarket suspension? Is it a smooth ride at this speed?

be easy on a newbie, and yes i did search.

thanks
mark
2nd part of your question 1st.

Did you try to do a search under STUPID QUESTIONS?
IM sure it's there somewhere

Now the answer to the 1st part.

WTF do you think??? Mazda produces a car that can exceed 150mph stock & they didn't test & refine it???

As far as aftermarket suspension.............

Like what? Airbags & 13" whitewalls? Seams there's a HUGE difference on what's available & how it affects the stability at speed.
Sled Driver is offline  
Old 08-02-05, 09:14 PM
  #35  
Rotary Freak

 
2FAST7S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Carmel, NY
Posts: 1,886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Julian
Guys, if you want to race on public highways enter an Open Road Race where they close down the highway. It is embarrassing that out of 139 cars entered this spring in Big Bend Texas that only 2 were RX-7's. An ORRexample is this link http://www.bborr.com/home.html. also some events in Nevada et.al.

With regard the subject matter, the car needs to be aligned for high speed events; do no use autocross settings. For high speed you want stability, for autocross you want instability to speed up turn-in, hence toe out in front.... The car can be Very stable at over 150 speeds, on straights, turns and under braking; if it is not fix it. Yes aero is very important, the front end must have all the stock pieces on or equivalent, leakage in the undertray can make it hell at high speeds.
I know theres something like that out in Montana...btw, is it still ok to speed up there???? The so called American autobahn(sp).
If there was something similar close to our side of the country you can bet i'd be there trying to travel back in time in my FD. lol
2FAST7S is offline  
Old 08-02-05, 09:53 PM
  #36  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
PhoenixDownVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mibad
I obviously don't even know what a Ricer is. I just ***-u-me-d it was people obsessed with making their cars Japanese spec. I never thought it was a derogatory term, but I'm old and don't know these things.. I agree that 120+ belongs on the race track.
Yea, it can sometimes be associated with just a liking to Japanese bike's/Car's but it's usually an immature mentality and lack of taste thereof with cars and modifications.
PhoenixDownVII is offline  
Old 08-02-05, 10:03 PM
  #37  
The shy megalomaniac

iTrader: (2)
 
NeoTuri's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 881
Received 79 Likes on 59 Posts
Originally Posted by 2FAST7S
I know theres something like that out in Montana...btw, is it still ok to speed up there???? The so called American autobahn(sp).
If there was something similar close to our side of the country you can bet i'd be there trying to travel back in time in my FD. lol
I had a boss at my old job who told me about this one particular road that had signs which read "Drive at safe speeds". Apparently, due to the stupidity of a number of people, there is a speed limit up there now.
NeoTuri is offline  
Old 08-03-05, 07:18 AM
  #38  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (6)
 
Section8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 1,807
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AntiVenom7
straight line you are going to be ok. i took a pretty long off ramp at about 120+ the car was fine until i started applying the brakes. i applied them pretty steadily coming off the ramp once the road was straightening out. the car got squirrely, so i had to back off them a little.

just something to think about. not everything about a cars stability has to do with the suspension and tires. the car was rock solid 'til i hit the brakes. also, keep in mind i have relatively new slotted rotors, hawk pads, s/s lines, and rebuilt calipers.

(the point of this post isn't whether i should have been going that fast or not, so please, don't start in)
That's simple weight transfer. If you're going fast in a turn and hit the brakes, the weight shifts forward to the front wheels and off the rear wheels. This will happen in any car, and why so many inexperienced drivers spin out trying to go fast on public roads.
Section8 is offline  
Old 08-03-05, 08:22 AM
  #39  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (14)
 
Julian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Longview, Texas
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by 2FAST7S
I know theres something like that out in Montana...btw, is it still ok to speed up there???? The so called American autobahn(sp).
If there was something similar close to our side of the country you can bet i'd be there trying to travel back in time in my FD. lol
Do a google search on open road racing, their may be something on the east coast .... people come to the Texas events from almost every state including hawaii, alaska, new york .. even an entry form england.
Julian is offline  
Old 08-03-05, 10:29 AM
  #40  
Junior Member

Thread Starter
 
Meyers2211's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: LOND ISLAND NY
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sled Driver
2nd part of your question 1st.

Did you try to do a search under STUPID QUESTIONS?
IM sure it's there somewhere

Now the answer to the 1st part.

WTF do you think??? Mazda produces a car that can exceed 150mph stock & they didn't test & refine it???

As far as aftermarket suspension.............

Like what? Airbags & 13" whitewalls? Seams there's a HUGE difference on what's available & how it affects the stability at speed.

listen jus because a car manufacturer builds a car to go fast doesn't mean its stable. And out of 3 pages of posts your the first one to flame my post. These 3rd gens are all over 10 years old and i'm sure they didn't handle the same way now as they did when you drove it off the lot. I've rode in a few cars 96 z28, an 89 irocz and my bros 03 mach1 stang and the only 1 i really wasn't too nervous about the cars handling at 130+ was the stang but thats brand new technology. As far as i'm concerned it was a good question and i could go all day as to why i wanted to know but to please refute your argument is a waste of my time.

oh and aftermarket suspension, i bet that after the drop the 7 wit a decent set of springs it will handle better than stock.
Meyers2211 is offline  
Old 08-03-05, 01:02 PM
  #41  
silver ghost

iTrader: (11)
 
G's 3rd Gen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Home of the Rolex 24
Posts: 3,061
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by mibad
I obviously don't even know what a Ricer is. I just ***-u-me-d it was people obsessed with making their cars Japanese spec. I never thought it was a derogatory term, but I'm old and don't know these things.. I agree that 120+ belongs on the race track.
I think your wrong in the j-spec=ricer also.. I believe the FD looks incredible in 99+ attire. I think your referring to ricer as stickers, large wing for no reason, crazy looking paint schemes, etc...
G's 3rd Gen is offline  
Old 08-03-05, 01:09 PM
  #42  
The Anti-Prius

iTrader: (9)
 
Sled Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Federal Way, WA
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Meyers2211
it was a good question and i could go all day as to why i wanted to know but to please refute your argument is a waste of my time.

oh and aftermarket suspension, i bet that after the drop the 7 wit a decent set of springs it will handle better than stock.
Still a stupid question, no mater how you try a justify it.

What level of high speed driving experience do you (or your friends) have?

You talk about your brother's Mustang scared you at speed. IM not surprised. It speaks volumes on your skill. In your hands IM sure a RX-7 would be scary too.

Only a fool would drive a car over 130 mph on his/her 1st time out. You work your way up to it so you can PREDICT how it handles. The car is more than capable to sustain high speeds, but the DRIVER must be COMPETENT & CONFIDENT of his/her abilities first.

You've read the replies that talk about car prep. Alignment, tires (& balance), condition of suspension bushing (car is over 10 years old now) are all critical.

Well, I also will include road & weather conditions.......

How even is the road surface? Direction & speed of wind?

AS far as differences in stock & aftermarket "performance" suspension mods.

Stiffer shocks & springs will make steering inputs more precise. The car will still dance around a bit due to the road condition & wind, but the corrections are more direct, less numb.

I have done numerous lapping days with my stock suspension. Over the winter I replaced all the suspension bushings. Installed custom revalved Koni shocks with a coilover conversion & new Yokohama A032R tires. Had the car corner balanced & competition alignment done.

The car feels more stable, partially due to the stiffer shocks & springs, but mainly due to my CONFIDENCE to push higher speeds & predict how the car will react.

On the subject of springs. Anyone notice that when you checkout either Eibach or H & R springs they only tell you how much they will lower your car & that they are 15 to 20 % stiffer than stock?

Major benifit to the coilover conversion is I know the exact spring rate installed & can add (or subtract) in 50 lbs spring rate incriments.

Last edited by Sled Driver; 08-03-05 at 01:20 PM.
Sled Driver is offline  
Old 08-03-05, 02:31 PM
  #43  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
PhoenixDownVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LOL, Again, this is such a ricer thread.

How many times has anyone knowledgable about cars (like guys I've met at local AutoX events or Track days) ask you "Is your car stable at 120+Mph?"

OF COURSE it varies based on wheels, tires, suspension,..on ANY car. Now, knowing the FD isn't a Toyota Tercel, you can safely assume it should hold it's own at 120+mph, so long as all things involved are in check.

It's just common sense, and almost doesn't require the question to be asked at all, which is why I found it funny that the thread got as long as it did.

I mean no harm, this is just the way I see it...sorry.
PhoenixDownVII is offline  
Old 08-03-05, 02:45 PM
  #44  
Proud member of ARSA

 
rx7n3wb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PhoenixDownVII
LOL, Again, this is such a ricer thread.

How many times has anyone knowledgable about cars (like guys I've met at local AutoX events or Track days) ask you "Is your car stable at 120+Mph?"

OF COURSE it varies based on wheels, tires, suspension,..on ANY car. Now, knowing the FD isn't a Toyota Tercel, you can safely assume it should hold it's own at 120+mph, so long as all things involved are in check.

It's just common sense, and almost doesn't require the question to be asked at all, which is why I found it funny that the thread got as long as it did.

I mean no harm, this is just the way I see it...sorry.
It's because going 100+ on the street is so cool and must be bragged about.
rx7n3wb is offline  
Old 08-03-05, 02:50 PM
  #45  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
PhoenixDownVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rx7n3wb
It's because going 100+ on the street is so cool and must be bragged about.
Fo shizzle.

Oh come on, Meyers, my point-of-view was different, but that's no reason to give me negative rep points. Lame.
PhoenixDownVII is offline  
Old 08-03-05, 03:03 PM
  #46  
Urban Combat Vet

iTrader: (16)
 
Sgtblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Mid-west
Posts: 12,023
Received 866 Likes on 615 Posts
[QUOTE=Julian]Guys, if you want to race on public highways enter an Open Road Race where they close down the highway. An ORRexample is this link http://www.bborr.com/home.html. also some events in Nevada et.al.QUOTE]

Another choice for someone who wants to drive fast, at least in the upper Midwest:
http://www.sorcrace.com/
They also have the 'Mile shoot-out' and 'Half-mile shootout' as well. No RX7s this year, as my application was in about a day too late and it filled up. There will be at least one next year though.
Sgtblue is online now  
Old 08-03-05, 03:23 PM
  #47  
Senior Member

 
moktan_fdtt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
145mph bone stock Fd. felt like you were floating on air. It handles pretty well, scary though.
moktan_fdtt is offline  




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:47 PM.