3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

reliability build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-03-07, 11:04 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
tnutty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: rocklin ca
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
reliability build

okay guys so from my last thread to here, i have one of two cars im going to pick up a stock 93 tt with some minor mods,

1.upgraded pullies, M2 pwr radiator, and M2 upgraded ecu (stage 2, boosts at 12psi instead of factory 10), upgraded walbro fuel pump, silicone radiator hosing, M2 downpipe, k&n filter (also have a hks super mega flow intake system if you want), greddy turbo timer, autometer boost gauge, '99 spec oem front lip
engine strut bar, M2 ast box eliminator kit, hks blow off valve. now this is my first option

2.or my second option is a 93 with as i can tell only a single turbo set up with maybe fuel system upgrade.

i doubt very highly either of these have been professionally tuned, so my question is where does this board think i should go with the build of either of the two cars.

so which in your opinion would be the best to pick up, and if so what basic mods fore reliability first and performance second should be performed.


thanks guys i appreciate the non flamage (much appreciation)
Old 12-03-07, 11:08 PM
  #2  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

iTrader: (14)
 
moconnor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 4,660
Received 82 Likes on 49 Posts
Pick the cleanest car with the lowest miles. Mods are easy to remove and install.

Forget about reliability - either engine can go when you least expect it.

And if reliability is important to you, why are you buying an FD?
Old 12-03-07, 11:12 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
tnutty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: rocklin ca
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
to be honest ive really always loved their curves, its kinda been my dream car. considering ive owned an sold my other dream car (65 mustang) im ready to move on to this one. i care about reliability because i wanna have the best chance at having a performing fd with the thought that i took the extra time and money to take into account the fact that these cars themselves arent as relaible as id like.

if that helps . . .
Old 12-03-07, 11:18 PM
  #4  
Super GReddy 7

 
JayShadow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I hope you have passion, cause without it (and a daily driver)
this is'nt the car for you.

I hope you find what your looking for.
(search)
Old 12-03-07, 11:21 PM
  #5  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

iTrader: (14)
 
moconnor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 4,660
Received 82 Likes on 49 Posts
My advice is to buy the cleanest lowest miles car you can afford and put $5k in the bank for a new engine so that you can actually enjoy the car and now worry too much if it swallows a seal. Ideally, get a car with a (documented) recent engine. In either case, be prepared to spend the a few k a year on maintenance and repairs - which is not really out of the ordinary for a car of this age and performance.
Old 12-04-07, 12:06 AM
  #6  
Slow FD

iTrader: (7)
 
afawaterpolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would go with the car that looks the least abused. It's hard to go off of mile alone but you have to use something. Also if it were me I would go with the single turbo set up. I've had two FD's a 93 with twins running non-sequential and my current one running a single TO4R.

I would have to say the single, even though its running more boost and is ran harder than the one with twins ever was has been much more reliable. In my opinion the key is having a good tune done on the car after any significant mods are done, that really helps with the reliability.
Old 12-04-07, 04:26 AM
  #7  
sleeper
iTrader: (6)
 
4CN A1R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Abbottstown, PA
Posts: 1,957
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
i'd take both somewhere to get a compression test. which ever tests the best is what i'd go with. last thing you want is to have to replace the motor right after you get your hands on it...
Old 12-04-07, 04:35 AM
  #8  
Top's always down
iTrader: (5)
 
SLOASFK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Spain
Posts: 4,841
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by tnutty
2.or my second option is a 93 with as i can tell only a single turbo set up with maybe fuel system upgrade.
Just an FYI, a single turbo FD is going to need a complete fuel system upgrade and a tuned standalone ECU at the very bare minimum. The one with stock twins will probably be more reliable.
Old 12-04-07, 05:06 AM
  #9  
Moderator

iTrader: (7)
 
dgeesaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Fort Kickass
Posts: 12,302
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by 4CN A1R
i'd take both somewhere to get a compression test. which ever tests the best is what i'd go with. last thing you want is to have to replace the motor right after you get your hands on it...
Compression test and coolant hydrocarbon test, yes.

You don't want an engine with a bad coolant seal either.

Dave
Old 12-04-07, 11:52 PM
  #10  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
tnutty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: rocklin ca
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yeah true that guys thanks.

how exactly would i go about getting a coolant hydrocarbon test, and a compresion test.

also i got as much passion as anyone on here, thats why ive waited through 6 months of searching to buy one of these.
Old 12-05-07, 12:04 AM
  #11  
Turd Ferguson

iTrader: (1)
 
grimple1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sherman Oaks, California
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
My .02$ Get the one that looks like it's had the least amount of bs done to it. Don't forget your CA visual emissions!


You must get a compression test on these cars. If you're not careful you'll have your hands on the most beautiful financial nightmare that you ever seen. DO NOT IMPULSE BUY AN RX7! You will regret it.
Old 12-05-07, 10:43 AM
  #12  
In the burnout box...

iTrader: (32)
 
mono4lamar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 4,453
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I like single turbos... Never ever wanted to deal with the twins! Though there are many smart guys on here that can help you. Buying the car means you have to be ready with money on the side to fix it. If you don't plan on fixing it you shouldn't but it and if you do buy it you should plan on not driving it.

Get the hydro-carbon test and compression test as stated above... That's the main battle with these cars...
Old 12-05-07, 11:06 AM
  #13  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by tnutty
yeah true that guys thanks.

how exactly would i go about getting a coolant hydrocarbon test, and a compresion test.

also i got as much passion as anyone on here, thats why ive waited through 6 months of searching to buy one of these.
You can do a semi-compression test yourself on the car:

http://www.rotaryresurrection.com/3r...ion_check.html

Using a cheap $20 piston engine compression tester will at least give you an idea if the engine is healthy or not. As far the hydrocarbon test, you'll most likely have to take it to a shop for that. There are some home testers, but the good ones I've seen are extremely expensive. Hydrocarbon tests are pretty standard for all cars, not just rotary powered cars, so it should be very easy to find a shop to do it. Any shop that does coolant flushes/changes will have the equipment.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HalifaxFD
Canadian Forum
126
05-09-16 07:06 PM
Engine stand ready
New Member RX-7 Technical
11
09-11-15 08:12 AM



Quick Reply: reliability build



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:12 AM.