Rear spoiler question?
Last week I had my RX up to 177 mph (on my Blitz Power Meter) and it was amazingly steady to drive at that speed. I would have thought that the car would be more difficult to drive at such speeds.
I have the stock R1 rear wing and I believe that it dosen't hurt to have one at those speeds.
I have the stock R1 rear wing and I believe that it dosen't hurt to have one at those speeds.
Back in the day, Car and Driver did some tests on front and rear spoilers and radiator ducting on a 240z and a Pinto. All are effective at highway speeds. Double blind studies are great, but asking a driver what he feels is ridiculous. To test drag, just roll your car down a hill and see how far it goes with and without the spoiler.
Originally posted by Fred Sickert
Back in the day, Car and Driver did some tests on front and rear spoilers and radiator ducting on a 240z and a Pinto. All are effective at highway speeds. Double blind studies are great, but asking a driver what he feels is ridiculous. To test drag, just roll your car down a hill and see how far it goes with and without the spoiler.
Back in the day, Car and Driver did some tests on front and rear spoilers and radiator ducting on a 240z and a Pinto. All are effective at highway speeds. Double blind studies are great, but asking a driver what he feels is ridiculous. To test drag, just roll your car down a hill and see how far it goes with and without the spoiler.
It is universally agreed that wings, appendages and other debris put on a car for street driving is just for decoration. Sure, manufacturers will state an incremental difference in coefficient of drag but it is minute and not something that any driver is going to notice.
Sure, proper ducting at the front of the car, or a front splitter designed to direct air into the radiator is "effective" but that is just proper car design.
Everyone that has fanciful notions that wings, dive planes, spoilers or whatever else you want to call them make any differernce on the street are simply attempting to sound cool to others or they are trying to justify their purchases.
With that said, in parking lots across the nation there are thousands of "wings west" and "erbruni" customers that may as well have their PhD in Aerodynamics and fluid computational theroy. You will hear amazing tales of how their wing makes the exit ramps much easier to take. You have to take it with a grain of salt.
Personally I'd get a '99 spec wing, just to make the car look more like a '99 Jspec model... the fact that you can adjust stuff is nice between sessions at the track, so you can play with your "Toy" while it's standing still. But it's the same reason Coilovers are really superfluous, since ride height and all those fancy adjustments don't mean a whole lot when the Nut Behind the Wheel is loose !
Originally posted by Brede
Last week I had my RX up to 177 mph (on my Blitz Power Meter) and it was amazingly steady to drive at that speed. I would have thought that the car would be more difficult to drive at such speeds.
I have the stock R1 rear wing and I believe that it dosen't hurt to have one at those speeds.
Last week I had my RX up to 177 mph (on my Blitz Power Meter) and it was amazingly steady to drive at that speed. I would have thought that the car would be more difficult to drive at such speeds.
I have the stock R1 rear wing and I believe that it dosen't hurt to have one at those speeds.
Originally posted by GsrSol
I bought my 99 front lip for looks but after I installed it I could tell a big difference on the highway.
If you do a full bodykit and no wing, it should look fine. Several people have done it and their cars look good.
I bought my 99 front lip for looks but after I installed it I could tell a big difference on the highway.
If you do a full bodykit and no wing, it should look fine. Several people have done it and their cars look good.
- curious - I have the r1 lip and 99 and was thinking of going for the 99 lip to get more downforce.
The 99 spoiler makes a solid planted feeling on the tailend at 100+ no drift, nothing.
Originally posted by WVRx7
I would be curious to see that statement in any book.
The terms are interchangable in the realm of automobile aerodynamics. Sure, a "wing" is a device designed to produce lift (or downforce if installed upsidedown), but a "spoiler" does the same thing on a car.
The term "spoiler" originated when designers added a lip to the rear of racecars to "spoil" the flow of air off the rear of the automobile. The act of spoiling the airflow in and of itself will create some downforce.
A "wing" is a further evolution of the theme wherein the engineers sought to harness and/or redirect calculated amounts of the airflow.
Many of you feel that you can discern a difference on the street with your aerodynamic devices. In actuality you are actually feeling yourself attempting to justify the cost of the part. Several University Engineering programs have performed double blind tests where people are put in cars with and without huge wings, splitters and even parachutes hanging off the back of the cars. It was pretty much proven that at highway speeds all these items are decoration. No more, no less.
Opinions do vary but most experts believe that one must reach between 85 and 110mph before the airflow loading is sufficient to make detectable differences in handling of a car. AND, this relies on the assumption that the aerodynamic devices were correctly designed.
I would be curious to see that statement in any book.
The terms are interchangable in the realm of automobile aerodynamics. Sure, a "wing" is a device designed to produce lift (or downforce if installed upsidedown), but a "spoiler" does the same thing on a car.
The term "spoiler" originated when designers added a lip to the rear of racecars to "spoil" the flow of air off the rear of the automobile. The act of spoiling the airflow in and of itself will create some downforce.
A "wing" is a further evolution of the theme wherein the engineers sought to harness and/or redirect calculated amounts of the airflow.
Many of you feel that you can discern a difference on the street with your aerodynamic devices. In actuality you are actually feeling yourself attempting to justify the cost of the part. Several University Engineering programs have performed double blind tests where people are put in cars with and without huge wings, splitters and even parachutes hanging off the back of the cars. It was pretty much proven that at highway speeds all these items are decoration. No more, no less.
Opinions do vary but most experts believe that one must reach between 85 and 110mph before the airflow loading is sufficient to make detectable differences in handling of a car. AND, this relies on the assumption that the aerodynamic devices were correctly designed.
Originally posted by Brentis
when I drive on the tollway my car regularly sees 100+ mph...
when I drive on the tollway my car regularly sees 100+ mph...
You and the other fruit loops in this thread bragging about 100-170mph on public highways, in the rain even, are pure and prime examples of idiocy in the first degree.
I don't know the last time I strictly abided by a speed limit, but I surely don't endanger everyone within the anticipated debris field when I am in my Rx7.
I do that type of driving on a track and tend to have respect for the other users of the public highways.
Oh and before you brag about your "skills", keep in mind that people with any formal training or experience behind the wheel tend to keep things on a track where risks are managable.
Originally posted by WVRx7
Well, that makes you a bigger man now doesn't it.
You and the other fruit loops in this thread bragging about 100-170mph on public highways, in the rain even, are pure and prime examples of idiocy in the first degree.
I don't know the last time I strictly abided by a speed limit, but I surely don't endanger everyone within the anticipated debris field when I am in my Rx7.
I do that type of driving on a track and tend to have respect for the other users of the public highways.
Oh and before you brag about your "skills", keep in mind that people with any formal training or experience behind the wheel tend to keep things on a track where risks are managable.
Well, that makes you a bigger man now doesn't it.
You and the other fruit loops in this thread bragging about 100-170mph on public highways, in the rain even, are pure and prime examples of idiocy in the first degree.
I don't know the last time I strictly abided by a speed limit, but I surely don't endanger everyone within the anticipated debris field when I am in my Rx7.
I do that type of driving on a track and tend to have respect for the other users of the public highways.
Oh and before you brag about your "skills", keep in mind that people with any formal training or experience behind the wheel tend to keep things on a track where risks are managable.
Originally posted by Brentis
Oh please - go to hell. the soccer mom's drive 80 on this road with minivans and cell phones. It is much different than the hillbilly's like your righteous self see in backwoods west virginia.
Oh please - go to hell. the soccer mom's drive 80 on this road with minivans and cell phones. It is much different than the hillbilly's like your righteous self see in backwoods west virginia.
You are the man.
yep. you're obviously sipping the moonshine tonight. you think that a mom on the cell phone driving 80 with a car load of kids is safer than a vehicle designed for performance is at 100?
one poorly constructed sentence = a west virginia school teacher??
one poorly constructed sentence = a west virginia school teacher??
Originally posted by Brentis
yep. you're obviously sipping the moonshine tonight. you think that a mom on the cell phone driving 80 with a car load of kids is safer than a vehicle designed for performance is at 100?
one poorly constructed sentence = a west virginia school teacher??
yep. you're obviously sipping the moonshine tonight. you think that a mom on the cell phone driving 80 with a car load of kids is safer than a vehicle designed for performance is at 100?
one poorly constructed sentence = a west virginia school teacher??
As for your comments about WV. Are you in 3rd grade or are you so intellectually bankrupt that all you can come up with are geography put downs.
How about you PM me an address and I'll send you a plane ticket to WV and you insult my home state to my face.
I think the topic was spoilers. PM's are better for your private matters.
The R1 lip spoiler seems to fit a little better than the 99 spec. Different bumper I guess. The spec spoiler stick into the fender well about 1/2 inch, and doesnt line up perfectly in the front. It still looks nice, just not perfect.
The R1 lip spoiler seems to fit a little better than the 99 spec. Different bumper I guess. The spec spoiler stick into the fender well about 1/2 inch, and doesnt line up perfectly in the front. It still looks nice, just not perfect.
I have a base model FD. Ever hear the phrase less is more? No need to add a rice wing to your car. There are enough ignorant honda owners that do that (i have a honda civic without a wing so I can say that). I have to share....the other day I saw the most unlikely car to have a rice wing on it.....an old Lincoln Towncar....I died laughing when i saw that! Ultimately it is up to you to decide, but I vow to never put a wing on any car that I own.......unless I'm asked to be a formula one driver some day.....that would be nice, but aint gonna happen.
Originally posted by WVRx7
Well, that makes you a bigger man now doesn't it.
You and the other fruit loops in this thread bragging about 100-170mph on public highways, in the rain even, are pure and prime examples of idiocy in the first degree.
I don't know the last time I strictly abided by a speed limit, but I surely don't endanger everyone within the anticipated debris field when I am in my Rx7.
I do that type of driving on a track and tend to have respect for the other users of the public highways.
Oh and before you brag about your "skills", keep in mind that people with any formal training or experience behind the wheel tend to keep things on a track where risks are managable.
Well, that makes you a bigger man now doesn't it.
You and the other fruit loops in this thread bragging about 100-170mph on public highways, in the rain even, are pure and prime examples of idiocy in the first degree.
I don't know the last time I strictly abided by a speed limit, but I surely don't endanger everyone within the anticipated debris field when I am in my Rx7.
I do that type of driving on a track and tend to have respect for the other users of the public highways.
Oh and before you brag about your "skills", keep in mind that people with any formal training or experience behind the wheel tend to keep things on a track where risks are managable.
This has nothing to do with West Virginia or Kalifornia.. it has to do with common sense... I must admit I was lacking in that department when I did
<---------- that on a public 2 lane highway, but I also swore to myself that that picture would never happen on pubic roads again... and I was very lucky to have walked away with not even a scratch.... (A Bruised Tailbone Given
but no scratches )
Everybody should look at the consequences of their actions and do this sort of testosterone gunplay on a drag strip or road course... (It's tough I know
)
<---------- that on a public 2 lane highway, but I also swore to myself that that picture would never happen on pubic roads again... and I was very lucky to have walked away with not even a scratch.... (A Bruised Tailbone Given
but no scratches )Everybody should look at the consequences of their actions and do this sort of testosterone gunplay on a drag strip or road course... (It's tough I know
)
Originally posted by WVRx7
holding your hand out the window creates drag. Holding your hand at the proper angle will create some downforce. So, your hand is "effective" as an aerodynamic device.
It is universally agreed that wings, appendages and other debris put on a car for street driving is just for decoration. Sure, manufacturers will state an incremental difference in coefficient of drag but it is minute and not something that any driver is going to notice.
Sure, proper ducting at the front of the car, or a front splitter designed to direct air into the radiator is "effective" but that is just proper car design.
Everyone that has fanciful notions that wings, dive planes, spoilers or whatever else you want to call them make any differernce on the street are simply attempting to sound cool to others or they are trying to justify their purchases.
With that said, in parking lots across the nation there are thousands of "wings west" and "erbruni" customers that may as well have their PhD in Aerodynamics and fluid computational theroy. You will hear amazing tales of how their wing makes the exit ramps much easier to take. You have to take it with a grain of salt.
holding your hand out the window creates drag. Holding your hand at the proper angle will create some downforce. So, your hand is "effective" as an aerodynamic device.
It is universally agreed that wings, appendages and other debris put on a car for street driving is just for decoration. Sure, manufacturers will state an incremental difference in coefficient of drag but it is minute and not something that any driver is going to notice.
Sure, proper ducting at the front of the car, or a front splitter designed to direct air into the radiator is "effective" but that is just proper car design.
Everyone that has fanciful notions that wings, dive planes, spoilers or whatever else you want to call them make any differernce on the street are simply attempting to sound cool to others or they are trying to justify their purchases.
With that said, in parking lots across the nation there are thousands of "wings west" and "erbruni" customers that may as well have their PhD in Aerodynamics and fluid computational theroy. You will hear amazing tales of how their wing makes the exit ramps much easier to take. You have to take it with a grain of salt.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



