3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Post your 40-70 times

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 26, 2002 | 09:43 PM
  #26  
QuIcKSiLvEr's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: VanCity
Dammit, i'll try it again soon.. my average was 5.74 along time ago when my car was stock.. i weigh about 130lbs (lightweight) and my friend was timing at about 150lbs.. on a full tank of gas, and road slightly wet.. i'm not sure if that time is good, but it seems somewhat slower.. i think the slower time was due to a slipping clutch.. so yeah.. i'll try it again with my catback when the weather gets better.. it's snowing a lot nowadays.. sigh..
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2002 | 07:33 PM
  #27  
Sank's Avatar
Grad Student
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Boulder County
Thumbs up 4.13 w/ DP

I finally got around to doing mine. Bone stock 93 touring, but with a downpipe. That's it. Ambient temperature was about 35F.
Code:
Start Speed  40.0mph
 mph       s   g   ft      hp 
 50.0    1.47 0.30    97  136
 60.0    2.92 0.30   214  163
 70.0    4.37 0.28   353  188

Pk Power:  68.1mph   4.08s   323ft   201hp
  Peak G:  65.8mph   3.74s   290ft  0.33g

----------------------------------------

Start Speed  40.0mph
 mph       s   g   ft      hp 
 50.0    1.39 0.32    91  144
 60.0    2.79 0.31   205  168
 70.0    4.13 0.31   333  200

Pk Power:  67.9mph   3.84s   303ft   215hp
  Peak G:  65.5mph   3.51s   271ft  0.36g

----------------------------------------

Start Speed  40.0mph
 mph       s   g   ft      hp 
 50.0    1.42 0.30    93  136
 60.0    2.85 0.32   209  172
 70.0    4.23 0.32   341  209

Pk Power:  68.4mph   4.01s   318ft   212hp
  Peak G:  68.6mph   4.03s   320ft  0.34g

----------------------------------------

Start Speed  40.0mph
 mph       s   g   ft      hp 
 50.0    1.40 0.33    92  145
 60.0    2.80 0.30   205  163
 70.0    4.16 0.33   335  212

Pk Power:  66.9mph   3.73s   292ft   214hp
  Peak G:  67.1mph   3.76s   295ft  0.35g
This was back and forth, back and forth on the same stretch of road. The average time comes to be: 4.23 seconds. The interesting thing is I also tried the same speed test, but using second gear as well as third, and the time for that was 3.98 and 3.77 seconds.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2002 | 07:40 PM
  #28  
evot23's Avatar
Classy
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,900
Likes: 2
From: Gainesville, FL
pretty quick for bone stock!! EXCELLENT
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2002 | 07:43 PM
  #29  
Sank's Avatar
Grad Student
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Boulder County
Lightbulb

Note that the temperature was nice and chilly. I'll try again on a nice warm day and there will probably be a noticable difference.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2002 | 10:42 PM
  #30  
technonovice's Avatar
Thread Starter
Jinx
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 1
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally posted by Sank
Note that the temperature was nice and chilly. I'll try again on a nice warm day and there will probably be a noticable difference.
Now that would be interesting too.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2002 | 12:33 AM
  #31  
capt. bill1's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
From: Sarasota FL/Ft Lauderdale
Got my car back from the shop the other day. It had a primary boost problem and we found that the J&S box was causing the 6000 rpm cut out. So I will do some more 40-70 runs this week and post the times.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2002 | 12:41 AM
  #32  
FD Seeker's Avatar
Rotary Optimist
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
From: San Clemente, CA
Wink Re: 4.13 w/ DP

Originally posted by Sank
Bone stock 93 touring, but with a downpipe.
Hmmm... 'bone stock' and 'downpipe' in the same sentence
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2002 | 12:48 AM
  #33  
kwikrx7's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 0
From: Mechanicsburg, PA USA
Very impressive times Sank for a FD with only dp. Must have a strong running car. I won't be able to do the test until after Feb. 5th but look foward to doing it. I'll make sure I post my numbers
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2002 | 12:34 AM
  #34  
FD Seeker's Avatar
Rotary Optimist
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
From: San Clemente, CA
I'm having my friend do this test with his SS Camaro.
Definitely not apples to apples, but I'm very curious.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2002 | 12:44 AM
  #35  
Sank's Avatar
Grad Student
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Boulder County
Definately not apples to apples. He's got a 6-speed, and massive torque. Keep him in one gear, but allow him to shift to his optimum as well. Then get both times and compare to mine, both times. I would be curious to see both numbers from the SS. And they do have a quicker stock 1/4 mile time as well...
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2002 | 10:56 AM
  #36  
technonovice's Avatar
Thread Starter
Jinx
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 1
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally posted by FD Seeker
I'm having my friend do this test with his SS Camaro.
Definitely not apples to apples, but I'm very curious.
I'd think the Camaro's 3rd gear is somewhat still comparable to the FD....we'll see.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2002 | 12:20 PM
  #37  
billvp's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Chattanooga, TN
hmmm, I can hit 80 in 2nd gear in my '91 Stealth tt ... should I try it using 2nd or 3rd? :p

I'll post the results for some general info
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2002 | 12:33 PM
  #38  
FD Seeker's Avatar
Rotary Optimist
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
From: San Clemente, CA
Originally posted by billvp
hmmm, I can hit 80 in 2nd gear in my '91 Stealth tt ... should I try it using 2nd or 3rd? :p

I'll post the results for some general info
Impressive...

Try in 2nd only, then 3rd only.
I think 3rd will be a more realistic comparison, since it will have you running through a lower RPM range. (my FD started around 3K for this test)

This will also be interesting to see.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2002 | 05:25 PM
  #39  
technonovice's Avatar
Thread Starter
Jinx
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 1
From: Raleigh, NC
The 3rd gear test will be more relevant.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2002 | 06:29 PM
  #40  
whitekingsnake's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: woodstock,Ga
Ok tried mine last night.

94 Base with a DP. I tried it 5 times and got between 4.0-4.5

It's easy to get addicted to it. Before my new engine I was bone stock and would see numbers like 5.0- 5.5 w/compression of 6.2-6.5 still not bad.

Later...Scott
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2002 | 07:01 PM
  #41  
FD Seeker's Avatar
Rotary Optimist
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
From: San Clemente, CA
Hmmmm.... Should I conclude from all this that I can cut a clean 1/2 second off my time by simply getting a downpipe???
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2002 | 08:36 PM
  #42  
technonovice's Avatar
Thread Starter
Jinx
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 1
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally posted by FD Seeker
Hmmmm.... Should I conclude from all this that I can cut a clean 1/2 second off my time by simply getting a downpipe???
There are varibales like compression, air temperature, tune, etc...
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2002 | 09:26 PM
  #43  
FD Seeker's Avatar
Rotary Optimist
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
From: San Clemente, CA
Exclamation

Originally posted by technonovice


There are varibales like compression, air temperature, tune, etc...
Everyone posting their times should include variables like:
-Temperature
-Car mileage
-Full tank of gas? (extra weight)
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2002 | 11:31 AM
  #44  
technonovice's Avatar
Thread Starter
Jinx
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 1
From: Raleigh, NC
Well since response here has been so weak I will have to seek more data ...non FD. I have started compiling the info into a list.

Try and get us more times.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2002 | 09:11 AM
  #45  
capt. bill1's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
From: Sarasota FL/Ft Lauderdale
Ran some 40-70 times last night. Cold night, low on gas. Two way times 3.2-3.4 sec.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2002 | 09:42 AM
  #46  
FD Seeker's Avatar
Rotary Optimist
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
From: San Clemente, CA
Originally posted by capt. bill1
Ran some 40-70 times last night. Cold night, low on gas. Two way times 3.2-3.4 sec.
What are your mods?
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2002 | 09:50 AM
  #47  
technonovice's Avatar
Thread Starter
Jinx
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 1
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally posted by capt. bill1
Ran some 40-70 times last night. Cold night, low on gas. Two way times 3.2-3.4 sec.
I definitely want to see your mods. Let me know what you think of that cd.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2002 | 10:21 AM
  #48  
nrolfes1's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 156
Likes: 1
From: Metro Detroit, MI
you warm weather boys have to realize that most of us rust belt guys have put our cars up for the winter. If most others are like me, winter is a chance to tear the car apart and make some solid upgrades.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2002 | 10:42 AM
  #49  
FD Seeker's Avatar
Rotary Optimist
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
From: San Clemente, CA
Originally posted by nrolfes1
you warm weather boys have to realize that most of us rust belt guys have put our cars up for the winter. If most others are like me, winter is a chance to tear the car apart and make some solid upgrades.
That's just plain sad. I was wearing shorts yesterday in 80 degree weather.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2002 | 11:30 AM
  #50  
capt. bill1's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
From: Sarasota FL/Ft Lauderdale
My mods are listed on my first post to this thread on the first page of this thread.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:54 AM.