3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Percent of Engine Swap FDs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-02-15, 10:12 PM
  #76  
Tony Stewart Killer.

Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
Snook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: London
Posts: 5,156
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
ZDan sounds like your coming out of the closet and proud of it.
Old 09-02-15, 10:23 PM
  #77  
Spanking Pcars

iTrader: (4)
 
RedBaronII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: DFW area
Posts: 1,084
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Originally Posted by gmonsen
I have never heard of an NA 3 rotor failing. Period. Mine hasn't and I don't think Trey's has or Chris' or Logan's, which was a pure race motor making 476 whp. An NA 3 rotor is very hard to break. I have several thousand miles on my motor and I don't see it ever going. I think you got bad information...
G
Maybe you drive it like a Granny, instead of like you stole it.
That is a sure way to never brake it.
Old 09-03-15, 06:38 AM
  #78  
Senior Member

 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Pawtucket, RI
Posts: 682
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by gmonsen
the notion of taking an already swapped v8 out and putting a bigger or stronger v8 and tranny and rear in puzzles me me a bit. Was 450 ft lbs of torque -- or whatever -- just too little?
See my previous posts in this thread...

You say you don't see any "inconsistencies" between the AC Ace and Cobra and the Rx7 and the swapped v8 in an FD body. Not quite sure how to unravel that.
You implied that if you like V8 RX-7s, you must not like rotary RX-7s. I'm saying that it's not inconsistent to like both.

The point was that a swapped AC Ace with a v8 in it is no longer an Ace, is a Cobra. A swapped FD is no longer an Rx7, its a "you-fill-in-the-blank".
So it's no longer an RX7 if you put a 3-rotor in it either... I was never one to get hung up on names anyway. Call them what you will, but everybody knows what you're talking about when say it's an RX-7 with a V8. Saying it used to be an RX-7 but now it is not an RX-7 any more because it has a different engine, so I call it [insert name here] seems a bit silly...

The Cobra was built and sold in some numbers by Shelby American with that name, so it's not exactly the same situation as individuals swapping V8s into RX-7s.
Old 09-03-15, 08:15 AM
  #79  
SEMI-PRO

iTrader: (2)
 
ZoomZoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,865
Received 36 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by gmonsen
I hear you, Fritz. It costs about $35,000 for a 3 rotor NA. So, its expensive, but less so than the most expensive single turbo builds and way less than 3 rotor turbos. I paid for 2 motors, sort of, since the first guys that built it.... Anyway, I'm just yakking. Its the best motor for the FD, but it is about $35,000 to build and install, so its expensive, I guess. Its for the more sophisticated driver who values total performance rather than just power or largely power.

G
So you proved my point. An experienced Rotary shop couldn't even build it right. And $35k for a motor in an RX-7 that still under performs?
Why? How does that make it "best" by any conceivable metric one would measure a car by?

That build is proof enough we landed on the moon because...
<a href="http://s1063.photobucket.com/user/Mik3ymomo/media/83746B35-73EE-492D-AD44-3CE35F00FA78.gif.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://i1063.photobucket.com/albums/t516/Mik3ymomo/83746B35-73EE-492D-AD44-3CE35F00FA78.gif" border="0" alt=" photo 83746B35-73EE-492D-AD44-3CE35F00FA78.gif"/></a>
Old 09-03-15, 08:16 AM
  #80  
PURIST

iTrader: (43)
 
turbodrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Bel Air, MD
Posts: 3,167
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by gmonsen
I have never heard of an NA 3 rotor failing. Period. Mine hasn't and I don't think Trey's has or Chris' or Logan's, which was a pure race motor making 476 whp. An NA 3 rotor is very hard to break. I have several thousand miles on my motor and I don't see it ever going. I think you got bad information...

G
Originally Posted by gmonsen
I don't know that you have ever driven an NA 3 rotor FD and think you are just speculating that they may not be reliable. If that's right, its just plain wrong.

G
Didn't your car blow up at Deals Gap a few years back? Im sure you will deny it because I don't think you made it public knowledge. But I remember the story going that you drove it down and it came back on a flat bed.

Maybe u should stop lying? Or maybe u believe your own lies?

-Austin

Last edited by turbodrx7; 09-03-15 at 08:38 AM.
Old 09-03-15, 09:13 AM
  #81  
Junior Member
 
fjwheeler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: TN
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If I dropped 35,000 to have ~400 hp I wouldn't tell anyone. Jeeze that's a lot of coin. Head and Cam LS1 would do 425whp for $3500 and be dead nuts reliable. My mind is blowing right now.
Old 09-03-15, 09:43 AM
  #82  
Mazzei Formula

iTrader: (6)
 
Monsterbox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Birmingham, Al
Posts: 3,020
Received 143 Likes on 69 Posts
This is hilarious.

Why don't Ferrari owners just rip out the stupid overpriced motors and swap in LS platforms, so much cheaper, easier to maintain, and can make just as much power. Not to mention, you can just go down the street and change your plugs/wires/alternator for cheap.

^This is the same kinda way (sarcasm above) that I see the LS swap on the RX-7. If you want to ***** out your car so that you can have "reliability" go for it. I totally understand the desire. To each their own.



But to those that haven't made a decision which way to go, or are on the fence being persuaded by all the V8 stuff getting swapped into every car everywhere, its not unique in any way. Ride in a 3 Rotor or a 600rwhp 13b and tell me you wish you had an N/A V8 Hell the sound alone is worth the risk!
Old 09-03-15, 09:47 AM
  #83  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (83)
 
Supernaut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles CA
Posts: 5,859
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by turbodrx7
Maybe u should stop lying? Or maybe u believe your own lies?
I can't comment on 3 rotors from speed1 but I believe it's explained here.

Originally Posted by gmonsen
I paid for 2 motors, sort of, since the first guys that built it, Speed1, really didn't know what they were doing (although they are great with stock rotaries of all sorts and single turbos, etc) and I had Logan rebuild it from scratch
Old 09-03-15, 09:51 AM
  #84  
Mazzei Formula

iTrader: (6)
 
Monsterbox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Birmingham, Al
Posts: 3,020
Received 143 Likes on 69 Posts
Originally Posted by ZoomZoom
So you proved my point. An experienced Rotary shop couldn't even build it right. And $35k for a motor in an RX-7 that still under performs?
Why? How does that make it "best" by any conceivable metric one would measure a car by?

That build is proof enough we landed on the moon because...
<a href="http://s1063.photobucket.com/user/Mik3ymomo/media/83746B35-73EE-492D-AD44-3CE35F00FA78.gif.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://i1063.photobucket.com/albums/t516/Mik3ymomo/83746B35-73EE-492D-AD44-3CE35F00FA78.gif" border="0" alt=" photo 83746B35-73EE-492D-AD44-3CE35F00FA78.gif"/></a>

The engine is expensive because of its rarity. Just like a Ferrari Enzo motor is $150,000. Just like a Veyron motor has 4 turbo's just to make 1,000hp. Its not about being the most efficient / best cost in the world. Its about the uniqueness, the sound, the feel, the rarity, and the overall experience. Why even buy an FD to begin with if the goal is the "best" performing / cheapest car?

And to comment on Gmonsen's post,

It doesn't necessarily cost 35k. Alot of the cost is in fabrication work. I spent WAY less than that and performed the swap in under 6 months. The car performs flawlessly and makes over 700rwhp before 20psi on pump gasoline. I'd estimate costs at around 20-22K doing the work on your own.

If you want a V8 to make that power, costs aren't going to be so much less
Old 09-03-15, 09:52 AM
  #85  
JZW
Full Member
iTrader: (5)
 
JZW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: MD
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by fjwheeler
If I dropped 35,000 to have ~400 hp I wouldn't tell anyone. Jeeze that's a lot of coin. Head and Cam LS1 would do 425whp for $3500 and be dead nuts reliable. My mind is blowing right now.
He could've easily have spent that money on making hp alone. Not everyone wants a full blown out 500hp FD. To him, that build was exactly what he was looking for if you read his posts. Something that is practically like a stock FD but improved. He believes that the 3 rotor should have been put into the factory FD. So no, in my opinion, everyone has their own goals in mind and he achieved it. He wasn't aiming for power... so I don't see your point.
Old 09-03-15, 09:53 AM
  #86  
Mazzei Formula

iTrader: (6)
 
Monsterbox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Birmingham, Al
Posts: 3,020
Received 143 Likes on 69 Posts
Originally Posted by fjwheeler
If I dropped 35,000 to have ~400 hp I wouldn't tell anyone. Jeeze that's a lot of coin. Head and Cam LS1 would do 425whp for $3500 and be dead nuts reliable. My mind is blowing right now.
My mind is blown, everyone in this thread could have spend $12,000 on a Mustang GT and make 400rwhp.
Old 09-03-15, 09:55 AM
  #87  
JZW
Full Member
iTrader: (5)
 
JZW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: MD
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Monsterbox
The engine is expensive because of its rarity. Just like a Ferrari Enzo motor is $150,000. Just like a Veyron motor has 4 turbo's just to make 1,000hp. Its not about being the most efficient / best cost in the world. Its about the uniqueness, the sound, the feel, the rarity, and the overall experience. Why even buy an FD to begin with if the goal is the "best" performing / cheapest car?

And to comment on Gmonsen's post,

It doesn't necessarily cost 35k. Alot of the cost is in fabrication work. I spent WAY less than that and performed the swap in under 6 months. The car performs flawlessly and makes over 700rwhp before 20psi on pump gasoline. I'd estimate costs at around 20-22K doing the work on your own.

If you want a V8 to make that power, costs aren't going to be so much less
You can't explain that to certain people, they just will not understand. Most of the people on here that are back lashing his swap don't even understand why Gmonsen did it in the first place. Again, its differences of opinions.. they believe in reliability (which isn't wrong btw).
Old 09-03-15, 10:01 AM
  #88  
Mazzei Formula

iTrader: (6)
 
Monsterbox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Birmingham, Al
Posts: 3,020
Received 143 Likes on 69 Posts
Originally Posted by JZW
You can't explain that to certain people, they just will not understand. Most of the people on here that are back lashing his swap don't even understand why Gmonsen did it in the first place. Again, its differences of opinions.. they believe in reliability (which isn't wrong btw).
Most people with attacks more than likely haven't performed a swap in their life
Old 09-03-15, 10:03 AM
  #89  
Junior Member
 
fjwheeler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: TN
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Monsterbox
This is hilarious.





But to those that haven't made a decision which way to go, or are on the fence being persuaded by all the V8 stuff getting swapped into every car everywhere, its not unique in any way. Ride in a 3 Rotor or a 600rwhp 13b and tell me you wish you had an N/A V8 Hell the sound alone is worth the risk!

My experiences in rotary cars have been 400+ hp and they are crazy, lots of noise and junk. HOWEVER, bang for the buck a LS car will win every single time. See, I have also ridden in boosted LS cars, there is nothing like it, where the 7 is "refined" the LS just wants more, constantly. It feels like it never stops pulling and that no matter what it will give you more.




plus my least favorite part of the rotary is the exhaust.
Old 09-03-15, 10:09 AM
  #90  
Mazzei Formula

iTrader: (6)
 
Monsterbox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Birmingham, Al
Posts: 3,020
Received 143 Likes on 69 Posts
Originally Posted by fjwheeler
My experiences in rotary cars have been 400+ hp and they are crazy, lots of noise and junk. HOWEVER, bang for the buck a LS car will win every single time. See, I have also ridden in boosted LS cars, there is nothing like it, where the 7 is "refined" the LS just wants more, constantly. It feels like it never stops pulling and that no matter what it will give you more.




plus my least favorite part of the rotary is the exhaust.

You're right, the CBR brothers should just remove this shitty 1600rwhp 4-Rotor 110mm 205mph 6 second motor and replace with a cheaper more realiable V8 that wins every time because the exhaust sounds like ****.
Old 09-03-15, 10:12 AM
  #91  
SEMI-PRO

iTrader: (2)
 
ZoomZoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,865
Received 36 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by Monsterbox
This is hilarious.

Why don't Ferrari owners just rip out the stupid overpriced motors and swap in LS platforms, so much cheaper, easier to maintain, and can make just as much power. Not to mention, you can just go down the street and change your plugs/wires/alternator for cheap.

^This is the same kinda way (sarcasm above)
The Hilarity began at your comparison with Ferrari.
Unless you meant to show the stark differences. As one is regarded and hailed by millions as the greatest manufacturer of high performance racing and fine automobiles; while the other sits on a trash heap of despair.

Yes, different.

I wonder if people held onto the steam engine with such a death grip...
Old 09-03-15, 10:15 AM
  #92  
Mazzei Formula

iTrader: (6)
 
Monsterbox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Birmingham, Al
Posts: 3,020
Received 143 Likes on 69 Posts
Originally Posted by ZoomZoom
The Hilarity began at your comparison with Ferrari.
Unless you meant to show the stark differences. As one is regarded and hailed by millions as the greatest manufacturer of high performance racing and fine automobiles; while the other sits on a trash heap of despair.

Yes, different.

I wonder if people held onto the steam engine with such a death grip...
Damn, you've got me convinced. Ill guess I'll consider the 550 Maranello V8 engine for the next swap.
Old 09-03-15, 10:16 AM
  #93  
Senior Member

 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Pawtucket, RI
Posts: 682
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Monsterbox
Why don't Ferrari owners just rip out the stupid overpriced motors and swap in LS platforms,
Awesome 1000 horsepower Chevy powered Ferrari 360 is awesome
Old 09-03-15, 10:19 AM
  #94  
Mazzei Formula

iTrader: (6)
 
Monsterbox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Birmingham, Al
Posts: 3,020
Received 143 Likes on 69 Posts
Ebola is more appealing
Old 09-03-15, 10:22 AM
  #95  
SEMI-PRO

iTrader: (2)
 
ZoomZoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,865
Received 36 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by Monsterbox
Damn, you've got me convinced. Ill guess I'll consider the 550 Maranello V8 engine for the next swap.
You do realize that's a V-12?
Let's make this easier... What exactly do you know about cars?
Old 09-03-15, 10:26 AM
  #96  
Mazzei Formula

iTrader: (6)
 
Monsterbox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Birmingham, Al
Posts: 3,020
Received 143 Likes on 69 Posts
Not much at all actually. Thanks for teaching me about the v12

I've only swapped:

13brew - FB
13brew - RX8
Rb25 - S14
SC400 V8 - S13
20b - FD

So essentially I'm a newbie, please fill me in on what I'm missing out on. Its seems I've missed the point 5 times now, because I should have done an LSX each time right?
Old 09-03-15, 10:28 AM
  #97  
SEMI-PRO

iTrader: (2)
 
ZoomZoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,865
Received 36 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by Monsterbox
Not much at all actually. Thanks for teaching me about the v12

I've only swapped:

13brew - FB
13brew - RX8
Rb25 - S14
SC400 V8 - S13
20b - FD

So essentially I'm a newbie, please fill me in on what I'm missing out on. Its seems I've missed the point 5 times now, because I should have done an LSX each time right?
Ok so seeing you have no knowledge of the subject maybe quit posting?
Old 09-03-15, 10:30 AM
  #98  
Mazzei Formula

iTrader: (6)
 
Monsterbox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Birmingham, Al
Posts: 3,020
Received 143 Likes on 69 Posts
Originally Posted by ZoomZoom
Ok so seeing you have no knowledge of the subject maybe quit posting?
Will do thanks for the guidance
Old 09-03-15, 10:42 AM
  #99  
I can't see my car **(

iTrader: (16)
 
Ruler_Mark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Central FL
Posts: 1,600
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
My current rx7 weighs 2760 with driver and full tank of e85. V8, 4speed auto, Turbo, 8.8 IRS swap, caged. If I swapped to a stick(t56) it would be ~150#s less. It has full stereo, sub in box with amp( another 40-50pounds). Would be in the 25XX range or lower EZ as a road race car although I wouldn't stay turbo a procharger would be a better fit.

I've had:
93, 13b Streetport stock twins -> started a 20b swap then parted it out
93, 13b Streetport 99 twins -> Larger port and 40r -> NA LS3 -> Turbo LS3
93, 13b stockport 99s, blew a whole rotor, sold it
84, 13b GSLE, gave to a friend
94, came ls6 swapped, parted
93, 13b large port 70trim, sold

I don't drive my cars lightly, they constantly are used at their fullest. The current LS3 has lasted the longest(4 years of abuse), we are even running it over 1000 at the crank 2.5x the factory rating.
Old 09-03-15, 11:08 AM
  #100  
Senior Member

iTrader: (2)
 
arutha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am about 80% done with my v8 conversion. I've had my FD for 15 or 16 years at this point, normal upgrades and it was great, little issues here and there but nothing too bad. But then I started tracking it... Sure a 3 rotor NA, or if I am really dreaming a 4 rotor, would be great for my power needs and would do away with all the turbo related issues but I couldn't afford it. And I've had the car with me for so long I can't imagine selling it just to buy a BMW or something else. I know what's been done to my car and it's already paid for...

So by selling all my "parts" from the rotary setup I will only be spending a couple grand more to have a pretty nice setup. That being said I might hate it, I will absolutely miss the sound, the smoothness of the tranny and the non-linear acceleration, but I will not miss the constant tinkering and worrying about something going wrong at the track. Hopefully I can go through a few seasons without any major issues and that will make me happy. If I just don't like the car afterwards then I'll sell it and find something else, which at this point is a very small list.

For a street car I say rotary all day, but for a track car with someone working two jobs and a family, I just can't spend the extra time messing with it, plus I don't really enjoy working on my car, I want to drive it. Hopefully the whole experience isn't lost but I guess I'll find out.

And I know people will say the LS's have their issues, and anything will, but from everyone I've talked to there will be a lot less in the long run and that's what I am after.


Quick Reply: Percent of Engine Swap FDs



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:19 AM.