3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

OK! What is the actual weight for the 93 touring model

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 14, 2001 | 12:13 PM
  #1  
AARotary's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia
OK! What is the actual weight for the 93 touring model

I have heard that it is 2750 to 2850 and that the base model is the lightest then came the touring and the R-1 is the heaviest. I notice that at the driver side I saw a plate that said that my car is weight at 3200 lbs. Is this the actual weight of my car and is it accurate.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2001 | 01:25 PM
  #2  
Ryan95's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
From: CO
Re: OK! What is the actual weight for the 93 touring model

Originally posted by AARotary
I have heard that it is 2750 to 2850 and that the base model is the lightest then came the touring and the R-1 is the heaviest. I notice that at the driver side I saw a plate that said that my car is weight at 3200 lbs. Is this the actual weight of my car and is it accurate.
My PEP weighted 2841 with 1/4 tank and nobody in it.
A touring should weigh a couple pounds more but not much.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2001 | 02:09 PM
  #3  
JConn2299's Avatar
reliable performance
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 383
Likes: 1
From: MA, USA
What you're reading on the door sticker is the gross vehicle weight. That's the weight of the car loaded with passengers, etc.

Most sources put the weight of the touring model at 2,862 lbs.
It's the heaviest.

Mazda lists the weight of the '93 base model at 2,789 lbs.
It's the lightest.

The PEP and PEG packages are somewhere between the two
extremes.

The R-1 / R-2 models are usually listed as weighing 2,800 lbs.
although you would think the later models with two air bags might weigh a tiny bit more.

The gap between the weights is so small that what you weigh in comparison to other drivers is probably more important. I have
heard of people getting so weight conscious, that they suck all the windshield washer fluid out of their car. Actually, it makes some sense when you think about where the weight of that fluid is located.

P.S. all these weights are for manual transmission cars. Add another 68 lbs for auto trans.

Last edited by JConn2299; Aug 14, 2001 at 02:13 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2001 | 08:02 PM
  #4  
bajaman's Avatar
Constant threat
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,968
Likes: 39
From: near Wichita, Kansas
weight

I weighed my car recently, it is a 1993 base model with an automatic tranny, and it weighed 2890 lbs.

Reply
Old Aug 14, 2001 | 09:24 PM
  #5  
GaryK's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: Verona, VA
I weighed my 93 Touring and it was a hefty 2940 lbs. with somewhere around 1/3 tank of fuel. My car has a few items that add weight such as a roll bar and 18 inch wheels and tires. But it also has lost some weight due to aftermarket exhaust, etc.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2001 | 10:19 PM
  #6  
Scorpio's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: Issaquah, WA, USA
I had my '94 R2 weighed and it was 2730 with 1/2 tank gas (the stock precat and cat weigh at least 700 pounds (ok, maybe not that much, but they are heavy!)). I had just gone non-seq so lots of stuff had been removed (airpump is also heavy).

I also had each corner weighed while I was there...check it out at:

http://www.micromanx.com/goble/rx7/p...ht/weight.html

Since then, I've lost another 10 pounds when I went to a lightweight flywheel! :)

Reply
Old Aug 14, 2001 | 10:36 PM
  #7  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,807
Likes: 648
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Exclamation

I weighed my R1 recently and was pleasantly surprised to find out it weighed 2720 lbs (with an almost-empty gas tank). The weight-saving measures that I have done are swapping out the precat w/a downpipe and the stock catback w/a PFS. I'm getting rid of the cat in favor of a midpipe soon; hopefully that'll push me below 2700.

Reply
Old Jan 7, 2014 | 02:54 PM
  #8  
Tem120's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 6
From: Miami
Bringing this back from the dead I'm a little curious as to what cause the huge weight difference between the R1 , and the Touring .

sun/moon roof is like is one of the major issues . I think its about 80 lbs ?

but i'm curious if anyone has weighed the extra parts like the bose system , and the rear windshield washer , the cruise control . does all of this add up to about 250 lbs ?
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2014 | 03:59 PM
  #9  
Montego's Avatar
Don't worry be happy...
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 6,901
Likes: 842
From: San Diego, CA
ah good old AARotary. A.K.A Head of Neck! A.K.A.Credit Card Thief... lol
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2014 | 07:10 PM
  #10  
SA3R's Avatar
10-8-10-8
Tenured Member: 10 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 848
Likes: 12
From: Australia
I weighed my 1992 JDM for comparison for you US guys. I get 2711 pounds (1230kg right on) without me in it.

18 inch wheels, stock car with one main cat converter still in it. Auto trans.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2014 | 08:29 PM
  #11  
bajaman's Avatar
Constant threat
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,968
Likes: 39
From: near Wichita, Kansas
Originally Posted by SA3R
I weighed my 1992 JDM for comparison for you US guys. I get 2711 pounds (1230kg right on) without me in it.

18 inch wheels, stock car with one main cat converter still in it. Auto trans.
Interesting that your car and my car are very similar and yet mine weighs about 180 lbs more. I wonder where that weight comes from?
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2014 | 08:56 PM
  #12  
TonySeagle's Avatar
You got beef?
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 282
Likes: 2
From: Georgia
Originally Posted by bajaman
Interesting that your car and my car are very similar and yet mine weighs about 180 lbs more. I wonder where that weight comes from?
Are the emissions the same?
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2014 | 10:16 PM
  #13  
freaknbigpanda's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
JDM cars don't have the precat so that probably accounts for some (all?) of it
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2014 | 10:46 PM
  #14  
Fritz Flynn's Avatar
All out Track Freak!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (263)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 10,672
Likes: 413
From: Charlottesville VA 22901
Lightest is the 93 base and the heaviest is the 94 touring. Bone stock the cars weigh approx 2750 to 2870 with out fuel. I'd est there's no more than 120lbs difference between the lightest and heaviest.

Lots of cool info out there about the weights of the exhaust parts, spare etc..... it's not completely accurate but fairly close.

Mazda was really careful with the weight so it's super hard to loose any but you can get 100lbs out or drop a base model down to 2650 which is fairly light weight car w/o much fuss.

exhaust 35 or more
turbo jeff battery 15
strip the rear hatch area 50 (exhaust and road noise will increase quite a bit)

Drop another 100 plus with some sacrifce

race seats on custom non sliding rails
AC
PS
Radio
Air bag or bags
airpump
other emissions pipes solenoids etc....
radio antenna
front tow hooks (i don't think I've ever used them for anything)

etc....

Now you have a 2500 pound FD that will kick some serious ***
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2014 | 08:40 AM
  #15  
SA3R's Avatar
10-8-10-8
Tenured Member: 10 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 848
Likes: 12
From: Australia
Good question. I think because the JDM does not have things including:

No Precat
No AWS system
No Emissions system
No airbags

And mine being a base base model also has

No sunroof
No Bose
No cruise control

And I removed

All air con including radiator, pump, lines and core inside the heater box

Some other stuff that was not needed

All the unused bracketry that is factory installed for cruise control retrofit.

Spare wheel.

So mine is 2711 with quarter tank of gas, auto trans, 18 inch wheels, four seats and full tool set and jack. I think if I were to ditch the jack and tools, I could break into the 2600s... :p
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2014 | 06:09 PM
  #16  
bajaman's Avatar
Constant threat
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,968
Likes: 39
From: near Wichita, Kansas
Originally Posted by SA3R
Good question. I think because the JDM does not have things including:

No Precat
No AWS system
No Emissions system
No airbags

And mine being a base base model also has

No sunroof
No Bose
No cruise control

And I removed

All air con including radiator, pump, lines and core inside the heater box

Some other stuff that was not needed

All the unused bracketry that is factory installed for cruise control retrofit.

Spare wheel.

So mine is 2711 with quarter tank of gas, auto trans, 18 inch wheels, four seats and full tool set and jack. I think if I were to ditch the jack and tools, I could break into the 2600s... :p
Ah! I have cruise control and the car is basically stock, with the exception of the Pettit downpipe and Racing Beat exhaust.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2014 | 06:35 PM
  #17  
SA3R's Avatar
10-8-10-8
Tenured Member: 10 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 848
Likes: 12
From: Australia
Originally Posted by bajaman
Ah! I have cruise control and the car is basically stock, with the exception of the Pettit downpipe and Racing Beat exhaust.
That would likely explain the difference then, yes. My car is still liveable in day-to-day driving despite what it sounds like. Myself and my passengers never notice most of the missing items and the car still appears factory stock inside and out. So it is possible to do
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2014 | 09:53 PM
  #18  
jkstill's Avatar
Searching for 10th's
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,279
Likes: 42
From: Portland OR
Originally Posted by Tem120
sun/moon roof is like is one of the major issues . I think its about 80 lbs ?
All of the bits of the sunroof that can be safely removed total about 23.5 lbs.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2014 | 11:32 PM
  #19  
djseven's Avatar
Eh
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,553
Likes: 344
From: Nashville, TN
I've been weighing some parts in the last few weeks from my personal while making some changes.
Factory Pre-Cat/down pipe was 22lbs
Pettit 3" down pipe was right at 7lbs equalling a 15lbs saving

I saved a whopping 3lbs with my Aluminum driveshaft.
Lightweight flywheel and counterweight saved me a little shy of 7lbs

I forgot to weigh the Bonez Hi-Flow cat before boxing it to ship. I'm going back to the stock cat but I imagine a 15-20lb difference there.

I'm hoping with stock cat, full sequential/emmissuons, water/meth, fire extinguisher and mount along with heavier aftermarket wheels my R2 will stay under 2800lbs. Should know with in a month.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2014 | 05:16 AM
  #20  
muibubbles's Avatar
Bubblicious DEF.
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 4,273
Likes: 10
From: 732
Originally Posted by SA3R
So mine is 2711 with quarter tank of gas, auto trans, 18 inch wheels, four seats and full tool set and jack. I think if I were to ditch the jack and tools, I could break into the 2600s... :p
you carry 111lbs of tools in your car regularly??? are you carrying around a full size jack? a craftman 540pc tool set weighs less than 100lbs so im just curious what you are carrying around
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2014 | 09:04 AM
  #21  
Tem120's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 6
From: Miami
Originally Posted by jkstill
All of the bits of the sunroof that can be safely removed total about 23.5 lbs.
What do you mean by that ?

parts from the sunroof which can be removed ? while still maintaining USE ?

or do you mean removing the whole thing and weighed it ? I think im gonna strip my sunroof this weekend if its the first option haha .
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2014 | 03:14 PM
  #22  
blacksi's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
I weighed my touring with no weight reduction, spare tire, 18" wheels, 1/2 a tank ,pwr steering, A/C, 6 speed and one of those AL v8 thingy's and it was 2835.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2014 | 04:51 PM
  #23  
Fritz Flynn's Avatar
All out Track Freak!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (263)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 10,672
Likes: 413
From: Charlottesville VA 22901
Originally Posted by blacksi
I weighed my touring with no weight reduction, spare tire, 18" wheels, 1/2 a tank ,pwr steering, A/C, 6 speed and one of those AL v8 thingy's and it was 2835.
The 6 speed thingy weighs more than the 5 speed thingy. I'm guessing the clutch and fly wheel also weigh more.

The V8 aluminum long block thingy weighs more than the 13b long block thingy.

Either your scale is broken or you have some weight reduction.

Don't believe me look up those two things.

Trust me the intercooler doesn't weigh 100lbs.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2014 | 03:17 PM
  #24  
t-von's Avatar
Rotor Head Extreme
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 26
From: Midland Texas
This makes me wish I had weighed my 94 touring before the NA 20b swap. My hope is that the weight evens out.

Edit: Keep in mind that the auto 94 tourings are the heaviest.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1987 T2
Build Threads
11
Apr 1, 2017 11:59 PM
FD3S_wanted
Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes
4
Sep 22, 2015 06:18 PM
kkev.7788
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
7
Sep 2, 2015 01:32 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:00 PM.