OK I gotta brag a little, Non-Sequential
#76
0 lbs of boost
iTrader: (1)
Non sequential worked great for me. I had full boost at ~3700 rpm and the car seemed to pull over 8k rpm where sequential and poor man's non sequential setup seemed to run out of steam at around 7500 rpm. It also cured the slight boost creep I was having. Did I mention the mess under the uim! My setup was pettit streetport, pfc, full exhaust, 1300 secondaries, m2 large smic, msd 6a on the leading, full non sequential with ported manifold and turbo hotsides, low mileage twins.
For me the benefits greatly outweighed the slight increase in lag. Never dyno'd it with that setup, but the car trapped 110 mph @ 10lbs and 115 mph @ 13lbs, 94 touring with ps and ac. If you NEED better response, swap in some 4.33 gears or another engine As always, to each their own and your mileage may vary!
For me the benefits greatly outweighed the slight increase in lag. Never dyno'd it with that setup, but the car trapped 110 mph @ 10lbs and 115 mph @ 13lbs, 94 touring with ps and ac. If you NEED better response, swap in some 4.33 gears or another engine As always, to each their own and your mileage may vary!
#77
White chicks > *
iTrader: (33)
^^LOL yeah
i would go back to seq but i just love the single turbo pull with non seq..only thing that sucks is i do more of city driving than highway so it sucks when people ride your *** off the lights cause you start off so slow..and i dont get to experience boost much cause my job is only 2 miles away with a stop light at each block!! LOL
o well, ill deal with it
i would go back to seq but i just love the single turbo pull with non seq..only thing that sucks is i do more of city driving than highway so it sucks when people ride your *** off the lights cause you start off so slow..and i dont get to experience boost much cause my job is only 2 miles away with a stop light at each block!! LOL
o well, ill deal with it
#78
blackhole on wheels
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Chapin,SC
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Montego, about a 20B my best friend is 10AE20B and his 20B has a little lag but the extra torque makes up for it. Mean while Im going to have to get a PFC my fuel cut is starting to get annoying. I can't get to the upper rpms without hitting fuel cut. Yes my uim butterflies are still in.
#79
The Man
Wow, I'm a day late and 2.50 short. I have one of the setup's kyle was referring to, and since I road race the car more than anything, the nonseq. is not a good option. Over 3550rpm it's fast, but when you don't start out in 1st gear from a stop and do a lot of shifting, you eventually get below 3300rpm on a few turns on the track I run, so it's just too laggy. BTW, my sequential setup worked flawlessly for 7plus years Jim, no worries about a poorly working set of turbos. I also installed a 15K mile set of turbo's when I did the nonseq. I prefer the sequential setup for normal and track use.
Art
Art
#80
blackhole on wheels
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Chapin,SC
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RTS3GEN What mods do you have or did you have when you pulled that 357.
I am just curious. Since last week I have found a few problems I caused by doing the swap. I fixed them and now I am only seeing the 10 psi im supposed to. So now Im missing all that power the thing had back when I was boosting to 15 psi.
I am just curious. Since last week I have found a few problems I caused by doing the swap. I fixed them and now I am only seeing the 10 psi im supposed to. So now Im missing all that power the thing had back when I was boosting to 15 psi.
#82
The Man
Originally Posted by Mahjik
Bolt-ons, Supra Fuel pump, Pettit Raceported motor and Pettit ECU.
what he said! I made the 357 on sequential not that it matters.
Art
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Snook
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
17
02-27-21 02:54 PM
HalifaxFD
Canadian Forum
126
05-09-16 07:06 PM