3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

not enough fuel (dynos inside)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 23, 2004 | 01:26 PM
  #26  
cavellm's Avatar
Thread Starter
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,118
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
There was a leak a while ago. A line coming from the back of the car was split. I replaced that with a new one.

The other thing I did is remove the relay from the pump that was installed last time the motor popped. I could hear it clicking on and off. Didn't think that was very safe. So the pump is wired back to how it was stock.

Pump is appx 10k miles old.

Would the best way to get accurate fuel pressure be to get a fitting on the sx regulator, and use regular fuel line to run from the engine bay to the cabin and place the gauge at the end of that hose?
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2004 | 01:42 PM
  #27  
Umrswimr's Avatar
DFW Drunk by Proxy
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,291
Likes: 0
From: Valley Ranch, Tx
Interesting. What does the fuel relay do, exactly? Is there a "high" and "low" fuel pump voltage? Even so, I think I just proved that we're not fuel CAPACITY limited.
However, Steve's tune might have expected a higher fuel rail pressure which WOULD affect the fuel delivery.
We might be on to something here....

FYI: relays are supposed to "click" when they turn on or off. That's why your turn signals emit that "click-click-click-click" under the dash every time they turn on and off..
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2004 | 01:48 PM
  #28  
cavellm's Avatar
Thread Starter
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,118
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
The relay was pretty much put in to make the fuel pump run on high voltage all the time. Normally, (someone correct me if I'm wrong) under cruising it'll run on 6v or 7v, but then under hard acceleration (boost) it'll turn up to 12v.

We put the relay to keep it at 12v all the time. But I'd notice just while driving I'd hear it come on and off. I should only hear it switch on and off when the ignition gets turned on or shut off. I'd hear the "click" 3 or 4 times while just sitting at a stoplight. That's why I removed it, because I wasn't sure if it'd be on under boost or if it'd turn off.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2004 | 02:14 PM
  #29  
pluto's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
From: fort worth, tx, usa
Nah, because the injectors open up more at higher boost level, the a/f ratio may or may not change as much. If the injectors have the same duty cycle for both high and low boost, you'll see leaner a/f ratio at higher boost. Basically, higher duty cycle on the injectors offset it in a certain way, it seems to me that the fuel pressure drop was consistent enough where the a/f ratio was affected in the same way on both low and high boost.





Originally posted by Umrswimr
Steve-

Not trying to start a flame war- I honestly just don't understand...
If the fuel pressure were the limiting factor, then the AFR's should not be the same for both low and high boost, correct?
For example, look at the graph below. Supposing it requires X lbs fuel/min per RPM to maintain a certain AFR. Higher boost would require more fuel because there's more air. The graph below would show the Fuel required per RPM for the two settings, we'll call them "low" and "high".
Now, if fuel pressure (or injector duty cycle) were the limiting factor, you would only be able to deliver a finite amount of fuel at RPM- let's say that maximum amount 2500X lbs/min. So for the low boost setting, you would have plenty of fuel because you notice the blue line never exceeds the maximum rated fuel delivery of 2500. For the high boost setting, though, the maximum fuel delivery rate is exceeded above 7000 RPM. At this point, the fuel system would be unable to add more fuel and the AFR would QUICKLY go lean. The fuel system is clipping.
My point: the only way for the AFR's to be IDENTICAL would be if neither system were exceeding the maximum fuel rate. If they BOTH exceeded the maximum rate, the "high" boost setting would have an increased AFR occuring at a lower RPM than the low setting. (for example- if the maximum fuel delivery was 2000X lbs/min. The "high" boost setting would spike at 5500 RPM's while the "low" setting would be fine until 8K RPM)

Does this make sense? Again- not trying to start a flame war here... Just a discussion for my own clarification.

Reply
Old Mar 23, 2004 | 02:20 PM
  #30  
pluto's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
From: fort worth, tx, usa
The relay was there to ensure that the fuel pressure stays the same through out the rpm, alot of times, the ECU driver couldn't deliver enough current to drive the fuel pump hard enough at higher rpm to maintain the fuel pressure and will see a slight drop. The fuel pump can draw up to 20amps at WOT and isn't sufficient enough for the factory 16awg wire (17ft long) to maintain the needed current/voltage to keep up the needed fuel pressure at higher boost level. By hard wiring the fuel pump straight to the battery in-line with the relay, it helps maintaining the fuel pressure. I normally see half a point lower in a/f ratio by doing this.


Originally posted by cavellm
There was a leak a while ago. A line coming from the back of the car was split. I replaced that with a new one.

The other thing I did is remove the relay from the pump that was installed last time the motor popped. I could hear it clicking on and off. Didn't think that was very safe. So the pump is wired back to how it was stock.

Pump is appx 10k miles old.

Would the best way to get accurate fuel pressure be to get a fitting on the sx regulator, and use regular fuel line to run from the engine bay to the cabin and place the gauge at the end of that hose?
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2004 | 02:25 PM
  #31  
cavellm's Avatar
Thread Starter
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,118
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
So it may be safer to put the relay back on... Just the constant noise of hearing it turning on and off scared me away from keeping it installed on the car.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2004 | 02:30 PM
  #32  
pluto's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
From: fort worth, tx, usa
maybe the clicking noise was caused by low voltage trying to activate the relay at idle (8V) vs. (12V). You shouldn't hear it clicking at WOT if the voltage is consistent



Originally posted by cavellm
So it may be safer to put the relay back on... Just the constant noise of hearing it turning on and off scared me away from keeping it installed on the car.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2004 | 03:38 PM
  #33  
Umrswimr's Avatar
DFW Drunk by Proxy
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,291
Likes: 0
From: Valley Ranch, Tx
Originally posted by pluto
Nah, because the injectors open up more at higher boost level, the a/f ratio may or may not change as much. If the injectors have the same duty cycle for both high and low boost, you'll see leaner a/f ratio at higher boost. Basically, higher duty cycle on the injectors offset it in a certain way, it seems to me that the fuel pressure drop was consistent enough where the a/f ratio was affected in the same way on both low and high boost.
I understand what you're saying, but for the graphs to be identical, the Injector DC never hit 100%. If it had hit 100%, then the AFR would have quicky gone lean, especially on the high boost setting. If the DC never hit 100%, then you cannot be fuel flow limited. Make sense?
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2004 | 03:42 PM
  #34  
rex u.k's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
From: England,u.k
If your resistor was left in place then the relay would click on/off as you change from low/high load conditions.
If you left the relay out of play then you should only here the relay click once when you acctivate the circuit.

How did you run the car without the relay?
Did you still have the factory fuel circuit running?
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2004 | 03:53 PM
  #35  
pluto's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
From: fort worth, tx, usa
I guess it depends on how you interpret fuel flow and fuel capacity. Fuel flow can be interpreted by the size of the injectors going into the engine or at the rate of fuel flowing to the fuel injectors (i.e. fuel line/fuel pump/fuel filter/FPR)

for example, lets say 4000cc/min worth of fuel injectors are good for 600rwhp at 40psi static pressure, if you raise the fuel pressure to say 50psi, it can support 750rwhp. I think cavell's problem is not on the injectors, but rather on the fuel pressure not maintaining its static pressure.




Originally posted by Umrswimr
I understand what you're saying, but for the graphs to be identical, the Injector DC never hit 100%. If it had hit 100%, then the AFR would have quicky gone lean, especially on the high boost setting. If the DC never hit 100%, then you cannot be fuel flow limited. Make sense?
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2004 | 04:14 PM
  #36  
Umrswimr's Avatar
DFW Drunk by Proxy
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,291
Likes: 0
From: Valley Ranch, Tx
Originally posted by pluto
I guess it depends on how you interpret fuel flow and fuel capacity. Fuel flow can be interpreted by the size of the injectors going into the engine or at the rate of fuel flowing to the fuel injectors (i.e. fuel line/fuel pump/fuel filter/FPR)

for example, lets say 4000cc/min worth of fuel injectors are good for 600rwhp at 40psi static pressure, if you raise the fuel pressure to say 50psi, it can support 750rwhp. I think cavell's problem is not on the injectors, but rather on the fuel pressure not maintaining its static pressure.
Ok, that makes sense... I don't know that the AFR's would still overlap so perfectly, but it sounds like a plausable solution.
Get that fuel pressure guage installed, Cavelle! People are waiting!
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2004 | 04:30 PM
  #37  
cavellm's Avatar
Thread Starter
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,118
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
To reiterate my previous question...

Would the easiest, and safest way be to get a fitting on the regulator, and run regular fuel line from the engine bay under the hood or thru the firewall and put the gauge on the other end? Would a length of line 3 or 4 ft like will be needed affect the pressure reading?

C'mon Dave, you've known me how long and you can't spell my name right? sheesh!

Cavell
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2004 | 04:38 PM
  #38  
Umrswimr's Avatar
DFW Drunk by Proxy
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,291
Likes: 0
From: Valley Ranch, Tx
Actually, the more I think about it, the less I'm convinced... Man, this is getting complicated! (Thanks for the discussion, BTW)

What you're saying is that the fuel pump/FPR/filter cannot supply the required volume fuel at the required pressure, correct? I can believe that- there's only a finite amount of fuel it can pump. No arguement there...

However, that flow limit would be reached SOONER on the high boost situation (because more fuel is required) and the AFR should reflect that. Even if the injector DC% increased as a result of the lower fuel pressure (does the ECU factor that in?), this "enrichment" mode would happen at different RPM's, right? (basically, back to my previous fuel flow graph). Now, if it DID happen at different RPMs, I would think it would appear in the AFR...



Man, I need a beer....
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2004 | 04:40 PM
  #39  
Umrswimr's Avatar
DFW Drunk by Proxy
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,291
Likes: 0
From: Valley Ranch, Tx
Originally posted by cavellm
To reiterate my previous question...

C'mon Dave, you've known me how long and you can't spell my name right? sheesh!

Cavell
Dammit... I always screw that up....

<alt><e>
Find
Edit
Replace all
"Cavelle"
"Cavell"



And to answer your other question- I think an electric guage would be better. Put the sensor on the fuel rail and run the wires to the interior. The idea of running gasoline through the firewall scares me.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2004 | 06:41 PM
  #40  
cavellm's Avatar
Thread Starter
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,118
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Yeah, I guess 40+psi of fuel spraying into the cabin would be kinda bad.

Even if its just a temporary thing, maybe run it to outside the windshield.

Cause I already have a little mechanical fuel pressure gauge. Might be worth just to test it out before I spend $100+ for an electronic one. Even if later on I decide to get one.

I understand what you guys are saying. I'll try the gauge first, then put the relay back on to see if that makes a difference.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2004 | 10:35 PM
  #41  
clayne's Avatar
PV = nRT
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,250
Likes: 0
From: New Zealand (was California)
Sounds like the pump is having trouble sustaining flow to me, too.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2004 | 10:55 PM
  #42  
cavellm's Avatar
Thread Starter
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,118
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
What is the point where 2 pumps would be necessary and/or beneficial? Certainly not at least until 500+ rwhp, right?
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2004 | 12:32 PM
  #43  
cewrx7r1's Avatar
Eye In The Sky
Tenured Member: 25 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,941
Likes: 133
From: In A Disfunctional World
Their dyno is hosed and your HP/Torques readings are crap. WHY, torque and HP will cross at 5200 rpm not 6500rpm.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2004 | 12:46 PM
  #44  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
Originally posted by cewrx7r1
Their dyno is hosed and your HP/Torques readings are crap. WHY, torque and HP will cross at 5200 rpm not 6500rpm.
Chuck, if you look carefully at the scales for torque and HP, you will see they are different. If you look at the torque and hp values at 5250 rpm, they are the same.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2004 | 02:46 PM
  #45  
Umrswimr's Avatar
DFW Drunk by Proxy
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,291
Likes: 0
From: Valley Ranch, Tx
Originally posted by rynberg
Chuck, if you look carefully at the scales for torque and HP, you will see they are different. If you look at the torque and hp values at 5250 rpm, they are the same.
Or if he had taken the time to read the rest of the thread where that's been pointed out twice already.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2004 | 02:49 PM
  #46  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
Originally posted by Umrswimr
Or if he had taken the time to read the rest of the thread where that's been pointed out twice already.
Haha, well I didn't bitch at any of the guys that were still arguing about the crossover point after I already pointed that out, so why would I yell at Chuck...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Queppa
New Member RX-7 Technical
11
Nov 18, 2024 03:47 AM
dkwasherexd
Single Turbo RX-7's
21
May 27, 2017 04:51 AM
Snoopy FD
Build Threads
25
Dec 8, 2015 01:45 PM
alphawolff
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
17
Nov 17, 2015 05:57 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:24 PM.