3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

non sequential conversion...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 5, 2001 | 03:38 AM
  #1  
skunks's Avatar
Thread Starter
I'm a CF and poop smith
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,958
Likes: 1
From: Hawaii
non sequential conversion...

hi, does anyone have a non sequential conversion here? also how does the boost come on and does anyone have a non sequential conversion with a straight pipe? is there any turbo lag? how much boost do you guys get with your setup?

thanks for the info
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2001 | 11:44 AM
  #2  
FD Racer's Avatar
sold the FD...kept the FB
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 1
From: Torrance, CA
Re: non sequential conversion...

Originally posted by skunks
hi, does anyone have a non sequential conversion here? also how does the boost come on and does anyone have a non sequential conversion with a straight pipe? is there any turbo lag? how much boost do you guys get with your setup?

thanks for the info
Yeah I'm running my turbos non-sequential with a DP, MP, and CB. The boost will come on slower, no more nailing the throttle at 3000rpm at seeing full boost. There is more turbo lag, especially below 4000rpm. By 4000 i can usually get to at least 10-12psi, but it depends what gear your in. Since the boost builds slower, you dont see much boost at low rpm partly because your rpms climb much faster than your boost does. If you're in fifth gear you can get 10 psi at 3000 becouse your rpms dont climb as fast in fifth, but you still have to wait for it. I'm running about 12.5 psi.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2001 | 11:47 AM
  #3  
rxrotary2_7's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 5,097
Likes: 1
From: southern NJ
Re: non sequential conversion...

Originally posted by skunks
hi, does anyone have a non sequential conversion here? also how does the boost come on and does anyone have a non sequential conversion with a straight pipe? is there any turbo lag? how much boost do you guys get with your setup?

thanks for the info

there is a search function at the top of the page. this question has been asked and answered numerous times. you may get a lot of info from other threads.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2001 | 12:30 PM
  #4  
Mach2's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: Inwood, Long Island
I have one question regarding the non-sequential setup that I think might be helpful for others. I've noticed that with a highflow cat on my car(sequential) my boost would rise much faster at lower rpms when compared to the mp I have now. Knowing that in parallel the stock turbos have noticeably more lag at lower rpms, why does everyone recommend the mp over a highflow cat? From my personal experience I think that adding a little backpressure to the exhaust when running the stock turbos in parallel might be a good idea. It might lower the max hp a bit, but it should have noticeable benefits for every day driveability. Anyone ever try installing the two with parallel twins? Were there any benefits/disadvantages between the two??
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ls1swap
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
17
Jun 3, 2024 03:25 PM
Snook
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
17
Feb 27, 2021 02:54 PM
HalifaxFD
Canadian Forum
126
May 9, 2016 07:06 PM
Snook
Single Turbo RX-7's
39
Oct 4, 2015 08:47 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:37 AM.