3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

New Rotary Engine Technology

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-14-01, 09:51 PM
  #1  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
93 RX-7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Shawnee, KS, USA
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
New Rotary Engine Technology

Hey guys, ran across a great article on an 85 year old man who's working on a revolutionary new rotary design. While the article does briefly mention our beloved car, its focuses mainly on one man's dream to make the ultimate engine. Take a look:


Rotary Development
Old 11-15-01, 01:33 AM
  #2  
Does not drive a WRX!!!

iTrader: (6)
 
wReX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,253
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Very cool article.

"...the engine in the McMaster prototype, they won't find it under the hood or in the trunk. It will be tucked into the rear axle, where the differential typically sits. So placed, the MRE would eliminate the transmission and the drivetrain and reduce the car's weight by a third...
...McMaster claims that it could theoretically generate more than 1,000 horsepower."


Better have lots of new tires sitting around
Old 11-15-01, 05:25 AM
  #3  
Full Member

 
Jsquared's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Raleigh, NC (NC State)/Charlotte, NC
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
that sounds incredible if he can get it to work
Old 11-15-01, 06:05 AM
  #4  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
iTrader: (1)
 
Node's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Stinson Beach, Ca
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I want a engine for each wheel, **** differentials.
All Wheel Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Independent Suspension
All Wheel Independent Engines ;-)
Old 11-15-01, 06:09 AM
  #5  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
iTrader: (1)
 
Node's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Stinson Beach, Ca
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
"Called the McMaster Rotary Engine (MRE), it has no oil, no seals, no rings, and no coolant; it is designed to run completely dry. The burnished-steel apparatus weighs just 220 pounds -- about a third lighter than a typical six-cylinder car engine -- yet McMaster claims that it could theoretically generate more than 1,000 horsepower, enough to drive an M-1 tank. In a car it would eliminate the need for the transmission, the drivetrain, and the exhaust system. "
Uhm, itd have about 1000hp and about 100lbs/torque
Sorry but tanks are staying diesel ;-)

"As radical as the engine's design may be, even more so is the fuel with which McMaster intends to run it. "We begin with sunshine and water," he says"
Sunshine, lollipops and raiiiiiiiiiiiinbows :-D
Old 11-15-01, 06:22 AM
  #6  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
iTrader: (1)
 
Node's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Stinson Beach, Ca
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
this guy sounds pretty amazing
but no transmission? They expect to run that ****** at 1:1???
They definately need a transmission.
I mean, there idea of none makes for a smooth ride and constant acceleration through the powerband.
But still, with a tranny they would stress the engine less, and have more power in some areas, and less RPMs would mean less vibration (little but there will be some), and less noise.
I say go for a 3 speed or so centrifugal tranny.
But that wouldnt fit in the axle. Oh well, fault of design ;-)
Old 11-15-01, 06:27 AM
  #7  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
iTrader: (1)
 
Node's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Stinson Beach, Ca
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
"As for rotary car engines, only one company has really championed them in a meaningful way. That was Japan's Mazda, which in the late 1960s developed its own rotary engines and in 1978 introduced the RX-7, the sporty coupe that finally validated the design. With Detroit mired in a slump, Mazda sold more than 1 million RX-7s between 1978 and 1985. But as conventional engines caught up in fuel efficiency, Mazda all but gave up on the rotary by the early 1990s. The company last year introduced two new rotary designs -- the new RX-7 and the RX-8 -- but even its chief executive has admitted that Mazda's rotary cars are merely "icon products.""
THOSE BITCH *** MOTHER *******!
Old 11-16-01, 02:20 AM
  #8  
Hi sir

 
Donovan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Modesto/Rancho Cordova CA
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
why Oh WHY couldn't Mercedes have gotten the Rotary cars they where working on off the ground. Some times I really hate Mazda
Think of where the rotary could be if a GOOD ( Toyota BMW etc.) car company had made them.
Old 11-16-01, 08:55 AM
  #9  
Junior Member

 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: A Place Where KIWI Birds Build Their Nest
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OMG......He'll be punished by GOD by making a car such that fast. :p :p :p

OMG....1000hp, man!!!
Old 11-16-01, 01:20 PM
  #10  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
93 RX-7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Shawnee, KS, USA
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Am I off on this? I think Ford, who owns Mazda, won't let them import the RX-7 because of the competition it would give to their Rustang.
Old 11-16-01, 05:55 PM
  #11  
Senior Member

 
Mykl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Montgomery, Al.
Posts: 724
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Node

Uhm, itd have about 1000hp and about 100lbs/torque
Sorry but tanks are staying diesel ;-)


Sunshine, lollipops and raiiiiiiiiiiiinbows :-D
Modern tanks are not diesel powered.

M1 tanks run on a gas turbine engine that makes 1500 horsepower, they don't run on an ICE. I'm not sure how much torque it makes at low revolution, but since it's a turbine probably not very much. Turbines are actually most efficient when running at peak power.

So, if that rotary concept could produce and sustain 1500 horsepower then it could very easily move a tank.

Remember, that horsepower is merely a multiplication of torque at a certain RPM.

torque X RPM / 5252 = horsepower

So, theoretcially, if you can spin a Honda engine to 100000 RPM's, and it made ~100 lbft of torque there, it could easily move a 63 ton tank. Fuel efficiency would suck though, and you'd be better off with a turbine in the end.
Old 11-16-01, 05:56 PM
  #12  
Senior Member

 
Mykl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Montgomery, Al.
Posts: 724
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by 93 RX-7
Am I off on this? I think Ford, who owns Mazda, won't let them import the RX-7 because of the competition it would give to their Rustang.
I think you're a bit off there.

I think it has more to do with that the car just isn't profitable over here. Not enough of a demand for it.
Old 11-16-01, 06:15 PM
  #13  
Full Member

 
Swamp RX-7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Washington D.C.
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have a hard time thinking of my RX-7 as an "icon product". WTF is that all about? If Honda or maybe mercedes had gotten hold of the rotary first, the RX-7 and other rotary powered cars would be the norm. Also, a company like honda or toyota would have made the car almost bullet-proof, by using state-of-the-art parts under the hood and around the car. They wouldn't cheap out like Mazda and use cheap plastic. Cheap plastic on a $33000 car!!!I doubt the S2K(although slow) has cheap shitty parts on it. It is the #2 sport car behind the NSX. Oh well, I bought my RX-7 for it's innovative looks, beautiful lines, wonderful handling, and telling people that they just got beat by a 1.3L engine. I didn't buy it cuz it's a Mazda.
Old 11-24-01, 12:13 PM
  #14  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
93 RX-7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Shawnee, KS, USA
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have to agree that it wasn't profitable for them. Especially with so many car companies going after the limited high dollar market (Nissan, Toyota, not to mention Chevy with King Vette).

Having owned an 85 GS new from the showroom, I'd like to see Mazda drop back on the RX- 7. Make it a little smaller again, keep the handling but less muscle. We'd have a quick agile car again at more of a $25K price tag. And all you guys that are into opening up the engines could still have a blast adding all the horsepower you want.

And I can't agree more. Spend a couple bucks more on the interior and get rid of some plastic.
Old 11-24-01, 01:00 PM
  #15  
Rattle can retard

 
Flobb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: St. Peters, MO
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
old news, and I already argued this thing being crap in the old thread so I won't bother doing it again.
Old 11-24-01, 10:28 PM
  #16  
Junior Member

 
poony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The following link is their McMaster Motor's website. Just went to check that! Very simple, but explain you what the engine looks like.

That's quite a neat idea. I guess I'll want to try a car with this type of rotary engine when the day comes!



http://www.mcmastermotor.com/concept.htm
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
elfking
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
3
08-19-15 09:48 PM
Seaweed
Introduce yourself
0
08-16-15 11:46 AM



Quick Reply: New Rotary Engine Technology



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:18 PM.