3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

moroso oil pan

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 20, 2002 | 10:34 PM
  #1  
suprfast's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 909
Likes: 1
From: home
moroso oil pan

i just opened the thread, "WHO RUNS TRACK DAYS" and i saw that oil in the pan was a problem. people running low oil just to keep from the oil being sucked up in the PVC valve or something. please correct me. now what i want to know is if the moroso oil pan would make track days more fun without having to worry about splashing oil etc. if anyone runs one of these let me know and everyone else if it was worth it. also about how much do they run. moroso is a good name, so im sure its not crap.
kris
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2002 | 10:56 PM
  #2  
0piston's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 25 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 731
Likes: 4
From: Vancouver, BC
From what I've read, the design of the oil pan it doesn't let the engine fit properly in the FD engine bay.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2002 | 10:59 PM
  #3  
Viper jr's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
From: Kannappolis, NC
I believe the oil pan Moroso makes is for a 13B, not a 13B-REW. I saw it advertised in some places for an FD but I think its really meant for Rx-3's and 4's set up for drag racing and have swapped out engines.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2002 | 11:16 PM
  #4  
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: Winnipeg,Canada
I run solo's and track days and use a stock oil pan,but run a moroso baffle plate and an accumilator, they are avalible for 12-A's and 13-B's and will save your motor big time on the track! I think they are a must have if you push the car hard,street or track.The plate is easy to install,just drop the pan,clean the gasket off it and the "block" put a gasket between the plate and pan and 1 more between the plate and block.No more oil slosh!With a turbo it works even better,as it breaks up the air bubbles that get into the oil as it goes through the rotors and turbo.I can't remember if the 3rd gen's oil pan bolt patt. is the same as the early 13-B's,I know the pan is different.I would E-MAIL moroso's tech line for the proper answ.

Last edited by SOLORX7; Jan 20, 2002 at 11:29 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2002 | 01:58 AM
  #5  
maxcooper's Avatar
WWFSMD
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,035
Likes: 4
From: SoCal
I was one of the "run the oil level low at the track" posters. I firmly believe that it is important to get oil to the engine at all times and especially when racing, but I also haven't heard of any oil-related failures besides someone losing an oil line and not realizing it until they got to their destination. I lost the oil drain plug going up the hill to the corkscrew at Laguna Seca, and did not hurt anything driving the rest of the lap easily and bringing the car into the pit (as a later rebuild showed no oil problems). For whatever reason (good stock oil pan design?) the FD does not seem to have oil starvation problems, even when you run the oil level a little low. For that reason, it is my opinion that money would be better spent on other things.

-Max
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2002 | 09:33 AM
  #6  
rx7joe's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
From: Keene, NH
The FD pan has baffles built into it.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2002 | 09:33 AM
  #7  
SPOautos's Avatar
Hey, where did my $$$ go?
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 0
From: Bimingham, AL
if you lower you oil level it might be good to run a premix in you fuel to help make up. Its cheap and effective

Later,
STEPHEN
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2002 | 11:46 AM
  #8  
DamonB's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 8
From: Dallas
I have been following this oil level and pan debate. My question is about running oil levels low. Wouldn't it be best to keep the oil levels as high as possible for lower oil temps? Or does the oil get so hot it doesn't matter?

Seems like the more oil you have to circulate the lower its temp would stay.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2002 | 12:53 PM
  #9  
SanJoRX7's Avatar
uid 0
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 858
Likes: 1
From: San Francisco, CA
Running your oil level low can lead to catastrophic engine failure. Make no mistake, our engines NEED oil, and if you run too low your engine *could* fail. Consider that if you run low already, and are at the track (which increases oil consumption simply due to the hard driving *and* because the FD's are meant to consume some oil) and if you lose your drain plug or an oil line and don't know it, you're looking at a new engine (not to mention being kicked the heck off the track).

A friend of mine ran low on oil one time too many and his 93 R1 has been sitting in his garage for >2 years (no money to rebuild it...this guy has had the worst luck being laid off...3x in 2001 ).

Anyway, the moral of the story is, run ~4 quarts of oil and check your dipstick often and you'll be fine. I ran a full 4 quarts at Thunderhill and experienced no problems when doing so, and I felt a lot better knowing that I was full rather than having to worry constantly about the oil level.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2002 | 01:25 PM
  #10  
Flybye's Avatar
It's never fast enough...
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,760
Likes: 3
From: Miami - Given 1st place as the POOREST city in the US as per the federal government
The 13b-rew also have a high-pressure oiling system for the reason of going ON the track. I have to dig up my notes and figure out where I read it, but Mazda specifically designed our engines to ensure they don't fail due to oil starvation. They actually designed it, I THINK, so that even if you are pulling 1.5gs, you will still have sufficient oil distributed throughout the engine. I don't remember the exact number, but they DID build it so that it can withstand over 1g of corning without oil problems.

It's good to see they didn't skimp out on our oil delivery system . Unlike other things.....
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2002 | 09:50 AM
  #11  
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: Winnipeg,Canada
Originally posted by maxcooper
I was one of the "run the oil level low at the track" posters. I firmly believe that it is important to get oil to the engine at all times and especially when racing, but I also haven't heard of any oil-related failures besides someone losing an oil line and not realizing it until they got to their destination. I lost the oil drain plug going up the hill to the corkscrew at Laguna Seca, and did not hurt anything driving the rest of the lap easily and bringing the car into the pit (as a later rebuild showed no oil problems). For whatever reason (good stock oil pan design?) the FD does not seem to have oil starvation problems, even when you run the oil level a little low. For that reason, it is my opinion that money would be better spent on other things.

-Max
In a rotary there is absoloutly no reason to run a low oil level! It is sometimes done in a piston engine so that the crank doesn't have to run through the oil in the pan costing you about 5-10 H.P.but pistion engine guys that do it run an accumilator.The rotary allready has the rotational ***. and oil seperated by the bottoms of the housing,but running a quart low of oil adds to the risk of uncovering the oil pickup in a high G-load corner.Not to forget running less oil will drive oil and rotor temps alot higher, the last thing you want on a turbo too,as it can lead to broken apex seals and chater marks on rotor housings turning them in to paper weights

Last edited by SOLORX7; Jan 22, 2002 at 09:57 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2002 | 01:51 PM
  #12  
maxcooper's Avatar
WWFSMD
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,035
Likes: 4
From: SoCal
It is a fact experienced by just about everyone that tracks an FD that you will get smoke and a mess of oil all over the engine if you run the oil level full. This is the only reason I suggest running the level low -- to avoid the confusion caused by the smoke and the mess caused by oil on the engine.

My recommendation is also that you check the oil before you go out onto the track each time to make sure it is about halfway up the dipstick hash area. Don't be an idiot and run the oil really low. If the oil level light comes on, come into the pit and fill it up. I have never experienced the low oil level light, but it is at least there as an indicator if you forget to set the level before you go out. If you over-fill it for the conditions at hand, it will find its way to the "right" level anyway -- just be prepared for some clean-up and possibly some smoke.

Does this strategy present a problem that you should spend time and money to fix? There are a few things you can do like get a catch can or fool with the PCV valve plumbing, but I don't think getting a new oil pan would be a wise allocation of one's limited resources. It would be fixing (maybe, maybe not) a problem that doesn't need to be fixed. That is all I am saying.

Why do I think it is okay to run the level a little low? Because in all my experiences of talking with people who track their FDs, no one I know has ever lost engine due to oil starvation, and most of them run the oil level a little low. It is a non-problem.

-Max
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2002 | 08:33 PM
  #13  
Ned M's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Batavia, OH
Originally posted by maxcooper
It is a fact experienced by just about everyone that tracks an FD that you will get smoke and a mess of oil all over the engine if you run the oil level full.
I always start with the R1 full (6 qts including the oil coolers) and after a couple of lapping sessions it's always lost about 1/2 quart. From that point on, almost no oil blows out except for an ounce or so per session. This is a '93, pretty much stock. One of these days I'll wise up and start out with 5 1/2 quarts. YMMV.

Ned M.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2002 | 03:02 PM
  #14  
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: Winnipeg,Canada
The reason you guys are losing oil is in a hard left hand turn the oil sloshes over to the right side of pan and climbs up the side of the housing to the pcv vent were manifold vac. pulls it in.fb's,fc's and fd's all have this problem thats why I put in an oil pan baffle plate on my race car(fb) put one on my bud's fd and it solved this prob. now we both can run full oil pan levels and saw a 30% reduction in oil temps.and no more pumping oil out the tail pipe!It's not an expensive fix. About $35 for the plate from moroso 2 oil pan gaskets and about 2 hours under a car if your taking 2 beer breaks and 1 smoke break.

Last edited by SOLORX7; Jan 24, 2002 at 03:11 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
stickmantijuana
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
13
Jan 9, 2018 11:19 AM
troym55
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
23
May 25, 2016 12:42 PM
tiger18
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
9
Sep 3, 2015 08:27 PM
rotor_veux
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
5
Sep 3, 2015 07:10 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:12 AM.