3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Looking for non EGR equipped Vac Diagram

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 08:37 AM
  #1  
PaulyDee's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis
Looking for non EGR equipped Vac Diagram

To be more specific, the car I am looking at is a `94 Canadian model without EGR. The fuel pressure regulator has two vac nipples on it. The solenoid that normally is used for EGR is used for the second FPR port. The big question is on this car the double throttle is routed differently than usual. The hoses off the solenoid are swapped and there is no check valve coming from the intake manifold.

I have a diagram from a `93 and `94 but there is no mention of the EGR missing or the second FR port. It would be nice if there was a diagram dipicting the difference. I am not 100% sure that this is a canadian/US difference or a `93 to `94/5 difference.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 10:37 AM
  #2  
DaleClark's Avatar
RX-7 Bad Ass
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,622
Likes: 2,725
From: Pensacola, FL
Interesting. I'm not sure why they would run 2 nipples on the FPR - do they both plumb to the same spot on the FPR, or is one above and one below the diaphragm?

Might want to get some pics and document this. Shouldn't be that hard to find out the reasoning behind the different design.

I'm not sure, but the '95 US MAY not have EGR. I've got a '95 shop manual at home - I'll take a look at it.

On the double throttle, are you sure the car is stock or near-stock, and you're not simply looking at a mistake by a previous mechanic?

Dale
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 10:50 AM
  #3  
PaulyDee's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis
As far as the double throttle, I am not sure why it is plumbed the way it is. It is entirely possible it was mis-plumbed by someone else, but that is why I am trying to get a matching diagram.

The FPR does has a nipple on each side of the diaphram.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 11:00 AM
  #4  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by PaulyDee
I am not 100% sure that this is a canadian/US difference or a `93 to `94/5 difference.
Apparently, they are the same:

https://www.rx7club.com/3rd-generation-specific-1993-2002-16/canadian-fd-vac-diagram-404736/

Sounds like someone did some "creative" vacuum routing on your car before you. It's not unheard of... My car had the ACV and other lines mis-routed after a Mazda dealership installed my reman (back in 1999).
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 11:58 AM
  #5  
PaulyDee's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis
Well it's not my car

This is the first one I have seen sans EGR valve.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 12:14 PM
  #6  
DaleClark's Avatar
RX-7 Bad Ass
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,622
Likes: 2,725
From: Pensacola, FL
I just checked my '95 shop manual - there is no EGR in the '95s. But, the vacuum diagram is literally identical to the '93-94 diagram, save the EGR stuff being erased. You can tell they just erased the lines, too.

Unfortunately, that won't be much help to you.

Seems like some Canadians on the board might be able to help. I'd get a pic of that weird FPR posted up - I'd like to see that myself.

Dale
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turblown
Vendor Classifieds
12
Oct 17, 2020 03:25 PM
Prediict
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
32
Nov 18, 2015 08:41 AM
alexdimen
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
20
Oct 23, 2015 01:50 PM
Postman09
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
0
Sep 29, 2015 11:23 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:54 PM.