3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Lite flywheel and bigger turbo...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-12-04, 08:46 PM
  #1  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
 
cover8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: SC
Posts: 917
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Lite flywheel and bigger turbo...

i have a lightweight flywheel..8.5 lb and with a heavy duty pressure plate and ceramic 6puc sprung hub clutch...

really have to rev to engage clutch....but am going to a t66 and was wondering since bigger turbos have a higher rpm range(lag) before they "engage", should I go back to the oem flywheel.

The ad of a lw flywheel is the spool up at the cost on momentum during a gear transition...


would seem like with bigger turbo you would want a heavier flywheel...
Old 10-12-04, 08:57 PM
  #2  
Rebreaking things

 
CCarlisi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: 1 foot in Boston 1 in NJ
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Even with the stock twins the turbo is not generating boost when you let out the clutch so changing to a large single shouldn't have an impact.
Old 10-12-04, 09:35 PM
  #3  
Senior Member

 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Minden, NV
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sounds like something is wrong with your clutch. Heavy duty pressure plate and a 6puck ceramic clutch? That thing should grab hard with stock turbos.
Old 10-12-04, 09:39 PM
  #4  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
 
cover8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: SC
Posts: 917
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It does grab just have to make sure you have enough RPMs...

It would seem that if you are tracking the car a lite flywheel is better but not at the strip?
Old 10-12-04, 09:45 PM
  #5  
Senior Member

 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Minden, NV
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You have to make sure you have enough rpm's?? I don't understand. Do you give it rpm's because it grabs so hard?

And I don't take my car to the strip, but i've heard that lw flywheels aren't good for drag racing.
Old 10-12-04, 09:56 PM
  #6  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by cover8
It would seem that if you are tracking the car a lite flywheel is better but not at the strip?
Yes, that is correct. I'll repost something a wise man sent me (this starts out talking in reference to lighweight flywheels):

Yes, less load on the engine therefore less drag during the rev. Disadvantage is poor acceleration out of the hole for a launch, ie Drag racing. You need the inertia of the heavy flywheel because we lack torque, and since you don't produce much boost from a standing start, maybe 4 or 5 psi, the inertia from the flywheel spinning at high rpm helps to keep the engine from bogging out of the hole. The benefit on a road course is the flywheel is light and since you are slowing and accelerating rapidly the engine can recover the power faster if it doesn't have to work as hard to spin the flywheel to get the power to the ground!
Old 10-12-04, 10:03 PM
  #7  
RX-7 Bad Ass

iTrader: (55)
 
DaleClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 15,399
Received 2,438 Likes on 1,509 Posts
I've heard of serious drag racers that were VERY happy with a light flywheel on their car, and others that preferred a stock heavy flywheel. I think a lot of it is in launch technique.

Might also want to look at a multi-plate clutch - they're easier to drive, but have a lot of clamping power. I'm not a fan of puck clutches, since the engagement is just so harsh and binary and you look like you're still learning to drive a stick when you leave a light . But, I do recognize that there is situations where you just flat need one to hold the power.

Dale
Old 10-12-04, 11:50 PM
  #8  
addicted to lounge

 
widebody2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: ny,LI
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I have a light one...possibly he is talking about the fact that you have to give it a bit more gas to not stall...it stalls very easily with the light flywheel
Old 10-13-04, 07:06 AM
  #9  
Rotary Freak
 
spoolin93r1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Salem, IN
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i have the act pro-lite in mine with a t78. i drag race every now and then and to be quite honest with you, i don't feel much difference at all on launch. the only place i really feel it is between shifts, because it revs down so much quicker.
Old 10-13-04, 10:53 AM
  #10  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
 
cover8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: SC
Posts: 917
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thanks for the feedback.....I thought pineapple guru mentioned the FD rotary lack of torque favored the use of stock flywheel over the lightweight variety.
Old 10-13-04, 12:37 PM
  #11  
development

 
dubulup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 5,714
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
I just changed to a lighter fly and heavier clutch too with a single...just took 500 miles to break in clutch along with getting use to it.
Old 10-13-04, 02:18 PM
  #12  
Hey, where did my $$$ go?

 
SPOautos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bimingham, AL
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The light flywheels dont have as much stored inertia in them. There are some draw backs to this. The car is much more prone to bogging off the line, your rpms fall faster during a shift making it harder to stay in the powerband, with a large single your boost builds slower (ie, more laggy).

Most of these problems dont seem very apparent with seq twins but once you go non seq or especially large single its much easier to notice.

Stephen
Old 10-13-04, 05:42 PM
  #13  
addicted to lounge

 
widebody2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: ny,LI
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
this thread is kind of making me wish I didn't switch mine. could have saved a few bucks too
Old 10-13-04, 11:41 PM
  #14  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
 
cover8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: SC
Posts: 917
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
So Stephen, you recommend going back to stockflywheel with larger singles?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rotate86
Single Turbo RX-7's
5
05-18-18 02:44 PM
LongDuck
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
12
10-07-15 08:12 PM



Quick Reply: Lite flywheel and bigger turbo...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:34 AM.