3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Intake Manifold Comparison?

Old Aug 10, 2008 | 11:49 PM
  #1  
Rotaryfreak702's Avatar
Thread Starter
RUN DAMN YOU!!!!!!
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, NV
Intake Manifold Comparison?

Is the Intake Manifold from the cosmo engine better than the standard manifold on the 13B-REW? Would it be worth replacing?
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2008 | 11:53 PM
  #2  
heidihi's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
From: ames, iowa
from my understanding is the cosmo intake is better but the FD throttle body is better..
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2008 | 02:38 AM
  #3  
NE_rotary's Avatar
Rotary Freak
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
can u bolt the fd throttle body to the cosmo intake manifold?

imo the cosmo intake looks a lot better than the fd.
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2008 | 05:51 AM
  #4  
proz07's Avatar
looking for 82-83 corolla
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
From: ar
the cosmo UIM will require major port work to work with the FD LIM or some type of adapter plate. the runners are bigger but they are also offset from the FD people claim gains but persnally i think thats from having a plenum it would probably be cheaper putting a plenum on your stock UIM than making the cosmo work correctly.
my 2c
z
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2008 | 09:11 AM
  #5  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by Rotaryfreak702
Is the Intake Manifold from the cosmo engine better than the standard manifold on the 13B-REW? Would it be worth replacing?
It's not a simple swap:

Originally Posted by jspecracer7
I'm assembling parts right now to put a 13B cosmo onto my FD. For optimum performance you'll need:

1) the 13B cosmo lower intake manifold gasket(so if you port your motor, port match it to the gasket)

2) 13B Cosmo lower intake manifold

3) 13B cosmo upper to lower intake manifold gasket

4) 13B cosmo upper intake manifold

5) 20B cosmo throttle body

6) throttle body elbow of your choice

7) 13B Cosmo fuel rail(or fabricate your own)

8) block off the ACV on the outside of the 13B cosmo lower intake manifold

You can use the FD throttle body, HOWEVER if you go this route, you will need to get rid of your idle control valve. The reason you want the 20B throttle body is 1) It's bigger. 2) It already has an idle control valve on it.

You will need to relocate your air temp sensor to the throttle body elbow(or you could tap the cosmo intake manifold) and you will need to take off your FD TPS and bolt it up to the 20B cosmo throttle body.

Not the hardest project in the world. I think the hardest thing will be to get the throttle cable to work.
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2008 | 12:43 PM
  #6  
Monkman33's Avatar
Goodfalla Engine Complete
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,243
Likes: 42
From: Kennewick, Washington
Now what upper would you recommend for use with my xcessive LIM? and what throttle body?
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2008 | 01:05 PM
  #7  
NE_rotary's Avatar
Rotary Freak
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
damn i think ill stick with my fd intake manifold...
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2008 | 03:16 PM
  #8  
Gorilla RE's Avatar
GorillaRaceEngineering.co
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,048
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans
RE. The runners are all the same ID as the Xcessive. See pics http://www.rotarycarclub.com/showthread.php?t=14


-J
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2008 | 07:35 PM
  #9  
Monkman33's Avatar
Goodfalla Engine Complete
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,243
Likes: 42
From: Kennewick, Washington
i dont see the xcessive lim in that comparison
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2008 | 07:44 PM
  #10  
Rotaryfreak702's Avatar
Thread Starter
RUN DAMN YOU!!!!!!
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, NV
Originally Posted by internal comsucktion engi
RE. The runners are all the same ID as the Xcessive. See pics http://www.rotarycarclub.com/showthread.php?t=14


-J
Thats some good stufff...looks a bit complicated i'd really want to see a full dyno run showing some numbers on the difference throughout the whole rpm band.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2008 | 05:47 PM
  #11  
Gorilla RE's Avatar
GorillaRaceEngineering.co
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,048
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans
Originally Posted by Monkman33
i dont see the xcessive lim in that comparison
Probably because it's not in those pictures.... My point was that the Xcessive manifold has equal sized runners much like that of the RE manifold (I believe they are the same ID as well).

-J
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2008 | 06:03 PM
  #12  
Gorilla RE's Avatar
GorillaRaceEngineering.co
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,048
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans
Originally Posted by Rotaryfreak702
Thats some good stufff...looks a bit complicated i'd really want to see a full dyno run showing some numbers on the difference throughout the whole rpm band.
Well I can tell you, with the RE manifold you will see gains in the mid to high end of the rpm range. This is do to the fact the RE has larger diameter, shorter runners with a large plenum area.

The REW manifold is more designed for all around low/mid rpm driveability (due to small long ID primary runners) but makes also makes good power through the mid to high rpms as well. But the REW is just not as efficient in the higher rpms due to the fact that it only has two large diameter runners with no plenum area/volume to draw from.

-J
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2008 | 10:21 PM
  #13  
Monkman33's Avatar
Goodfalla Engine Complete
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,243
Likes: 42
From: Kennewick, Washington
So my question still stands: what would be a good manifold combination to go with the Xcessive LIM?

edit - and Throttle Body...
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2008 | 10:25 PM
  #14  
Gorilla RE's Avatar
GorillaRaceEngineering.co
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,048
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans
Originally Posted by Monkman33
So my question still stands: what would be a good manifold combination to go with the Xcessive LIM?

edit - and Throttle Body...
Do you read nothing????
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2008 | 08:25 PM
  #15  
Monkman33's Avatar
Goodfalla Engine Complete
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,243
Likes: 42
From: Kennewick, Washington
So it would require port matching and a bunch of work to get the re uim to mate with the xcessive lim... and then the fd tb would be the better option in that regard?

How much port matching and weld-fill, and drilling, and tapping, and such are we really talking about here?

Would I see benefits with a BNR sequential twins running 17psi setup?

Last edited by Monkman33; Aug 13, 2008 at 08:53 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2008 | 05:25 PM
  #16  
PandazRx-7's Avatar
Fast + Reliable = $$$$$
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,223
Likes: 4
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by internal comsucktion engi
Probably because it's not in those pictures.... My point was that the Xcessive manifold has equal sized runners much like that of the RE manifold (I believe they are the same ID as well).

-J
The Xcessive LIM will NOT work with the Cosmo 13b RE- UIM. The Xcessive LIM flange has the same pattern as the stock FD UIM. Although you have some room to port out the center runners on the Xcessive LIM, there is no way it will work with the Cosmo13b RE-UIM. It's completely off.

To answer Monkman33's question...Yes, you will need to heavily modify an Xcessive LIM to work with a Cosmo 13b UIM.

Ps: Anyone want a Cosmo RE 13b UIM, let me know.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2008 | 07:22 PM
  #17  
Prometheus's Avatar
Still got it.
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,687
Likes: 3
From: Seattle, Washington
Question:

Can you port match the 99' Spec REW LIM to accept the RE UIM

The reason I ask is that the LIM design from the 99'Spec REW LIM has a much improved flow from earlier the REW LIM design.

How does the 99' Spec REW LIM compair to the RE LIM?
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2008 | 01:48 AM
  #18  
PandazRx-7's Avatar
Fast + Reliable = $$$$$
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,223
Likes: 4
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by sk8erpunk1983
Question:

Can you port match the 99' Spec REW LIM to accept the RE UIM

The reason I ask is that the LIM design from the 99'Spec REW LIM has a much improved flow from earlier the REW LIM design.

How does the 99' Spec REW LIM compair to the RE LIM?
Don't know anything about the 99 spec LIM except that they didn't have EGR...but what I can tell you is that if the UIM is the same as our US models, than it still won't work.

The bolt patterns and runner alignments are way off between the Cosmo 13b UIM and the REW LIM wheather it be an OEM LIM or an Xcessive LIM (which is based on REW mounting point and runner alignment)...
Reply
Old May 31, 2012 | 06:57 AM
  #19  
indio84's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 651
Likes: 2
From: aruba
any one has a thread where they have detail how to use the 13b re intake on the 13brew engine. or fitting only the upper?
Reply
Old May 31, 2012 | 02:11 PM
  #20  
Amberbeer's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 86
Likes: 1
From: Tampa
The hypothetical reason you don't see this is gains vs. cost ratio is high. For most of us there are easier ways to make the car faster.

The funny thing is every other make out there has someone who has done this and posted before and after results. Even the exotics have loads of these before and after results. Why doesn't the rotary community do the same thing? Sure there have been articles that have done just that, it's not common place like with other engines.
Reply
Old May 31, 2012 | 02:35 PM
  #21  
Davin's Avatar
Back door, no babies...
Veteran: Navy
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 4
From: LA, DC & Philly
The JDM UIM is different than the USDM one. It flows better too since it does not have all the emissions stuff underneath.
Reply
Old May 31, 2012 | 02:38 PM
  #22  
neit_jnf's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,057
Likes: 261
From: Around
I'll just comment on what I have:

Xcessive LIM, ported and gasket matched
Stock FD UIM (mine's a series 8 JDM version), secondary throttle removed, ported and gasket matched
Stock FD Throttle

there are places that port the throttle but I'm not sure about it yet.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2012 | 11:56 PM
  #23  
Julian's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 5
From: Longview, Texas
Having owned the USD market LIM/UIM; Series 6 and Series 8 JDM LIM/UIM; externally they are different but internal runners are the same. Later JDM's has less emissions stuff hung on outsides and Series 8 eliminates vacuum pass-through ports.

I personally am using:
Series 8 LIM/UIM with Kennametal Extrude Honing and gasket matching, ceramic coated black by SportTuner.com (Anthony Bulger). Secondary throttle removed. I sold my Xcessive LIM
FD Throttle Body ported by BDC Motorsports (Brian Cain).
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2012 | 05:59 AM
  #24  
Sgtblue's Avatar
Urban Combat Vet
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 12,159
Likes: 983
From: Mid-west
Originally Posted by Julian
.......I personally am using:
Series 8 LIM/UIM with Kennametal Extrude Honing and gasket matching, ceramic coated black by SportTuner.com (Anthony Bulger). Secondary throttle removed.... Throttle Body ported by BDC Motorsports (Brian Cain).
I've thought about Extrude Honing. I'd consider doing this (and port matching) next time I have a reason to remove the LIM. Any before/after pictures and/or recall costs?
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2012 | 12:08 AM
  #25  
Julian's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 5
From: Longview, Texas
No photos of internals.
Costs as of January this year: Ceramic coating $200, extrude hone $690, TB port $150
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:13 AM.