which injectors for a 380hp twinturbo setup?
#4
Mr. Links
iTrader: (1)
https://www.rx7club.com/3rd-generation-specific-1993-2002-16/what-situation-do-you-have-259912/
#6
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 762
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For some reference. I did a pull the other day on stock injectors, stock twins at 14psi. and 304WHP. The log showed 98% duty cycle. 11.5-12.0 AFRs.
The motor is ported, so I think I should have around 330whp if it weren't for the low compression (75s and 85s)
It isn't clear if you mean just crank HP or WHP. For crank HP, I think you could do 380 on stock fuel. But HP can vary car to car. You must mean crank HP since the twins are out of breath at 380whp.
What PSI are you intending to run your stock twins at?
The motor is ported, so I think I should have around 330whp if it weren't for the low compression (75s and 85s)
It isn't clear if you mean just crank HP or WHP. For crank HP, I think you could do 380 on stock fuel. But HP can vary car to car. You must mean crank HP since the twins are out of breath at 380whp.
What PSI are you intending to run your stock twins at?
Trending Topics
#8
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My plan was to get the maximum out of the twin system and i thought that would be max 380-400 HP at the crank... And i dont want to change the twins every year.
The ports are stock.
Another Problem is form which company shall i buy the injectors. Sard is nice, but very expensive 550$...
Edit: And u have to calculate, that we have 98-100 octan gas in Germany
The ports are stock.
Another Problem is form which company shall i buy the injectors. Sard is nice, but very expensive 550$...
Edit: And u have to calculate, that we have 98-100 octan gas in Germany
#9
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 762
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well, I heard the octane ratings in Europe do not equate to the same ratings in the US. Like 98 would be called 92 here or something like that.. Could be wrong though.
If you want the twins to be reliable, I personally wouldn't push them over 13 psi. But you can get 295-310 WHP at 13psi on stock injectors. So around 350+ crank.
If you want the twins to be reliable, I personally wouldn't push them over 13 psi. But you can get 295-310 WHP at 13psi on stock injectors. So around 350+ crank.
#10
The nonspatial continuum
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For some reference. I did a pull the other day on stock injectors, stock twins at 14psi. and 304WHP. The log showed 98% duty cycle. 11.5-12.0 AFRs.
The motor is ported, so I think I should have around 330whp if it weren't for the low compression (75s and 85s)
It isn't clear if you mean just crank HP or WHP. For crank HP, I think you could do 380 on stock fuel. But HP can vary car to car. You must mean crank HP since the twins are out of breath at 380whp.
What PSI are you intending to run your stock twins at?
The motor is ported, so I think I should have around 330whp if it weren't for the low compression (75s and 85s)
It isn't clear if you mean just crank HP or WHP. For crank HP, I think you could do 380 on stock fuel. But HP can vary car to car. You must mean crank HP since the twins are out of breath at 380whp.
What PSI are you intending to run your stock twins at?
I was wondering though, would 850/1600cc injectors be well suited to make the most of the BNR Stage 3 sequential set up? Im thinking so, I dont care about ideling rich, but I dont want the car to bog when the secondarys come to life either.
#11
Lives on the Forum
iTrader: (8)
I ran those #s in the calculator, and came up with 414 HP, minus 20% drivetrain loss = 331whp, as far as calculators go thats dead accurate.
I was wondering though, would 850/1600cc injectors be well suited to make the most of the BNR Stage 3 sequential set up? Im thinking so, I dont care about ideling rich, but I dont want the car to bog when the secondarys come to life either.
I was wondering though, would 850/1600cc injectors be well suited to make the most of the BNR Stage 3 sequential set up? Im thinking so, I dont care about ideling rich, but I dont want the car to bog when the secondarys come to life either.
thewird
#14
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: warfield
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I personally want to run 850/1200cc injectors for my setup and thats even when I go with BNR's sequentially at 17-18psi :-)
till then im just going to tune 850cc's all round.. and maybe just up the fuel pressure 5-10psi if all else just for safety margin.
till then im just going to tune 850cc's all round.. and maybe just up the fuel pressure 5-10psi if all else just for safety margin.
#15
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 762
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That is too much injector IMO. And as far as idle and bogging, that is all in the tune. Maybe something like 750/1200 if you want to play it safe while maxing out twins. I don't know, I'm just guessing from what I've read and talked about. I won't be pushing twins that hard, I'm just going single.
#16
The nonspatial continuum
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, nothing is perfect. For all I know I only hit 13.5psi. It is hard to diagnose little things. Also, I think my peak HP was reached at 7k rpm and then the stockers wouldn't hold full boost. The shop said I would probably pull 330whp if the compression wasn't shoddy. Me thinks my housings are worn out.
That is too much injector IMO. And as far as idle and bogging, that is all in the tune. Maybe something like 750/1200 if you want to play it safe while maxing out twins. I don't know, I'm just guessing from what I've read and talked about. I won't be pushing twins that hard, I'm just going single.
That is too much injector IMO. And as far as idle and bogging, that is all in the tune. Maybe something like 750/1200 if you want to play it safe while maxing out twins. I don't know, I'm just guessing from what I've read and talked about. I won't be pushing twins that hard, I'm just going single.
#18
F'n Newbie...
iTrader: (6)
I still have my stock injectors in. Now I don't know if it's just an incomplete tune, or what.. But I will regularly see over 90% running at .8-.9 bar (using PFC Commander to monitor) on a cold night.
My IDC seems to fluctuate fairly easily. I know that my car dyno'd 280rwhp at 86%
I'm not sure if this will help out or just confuse the issue.
I am about to completely re-vamp my fuel system when I put in my BNR's. From what I have heard an 850/850 set up is good for just about anything you will reasonably hit with a twin set up (I'm putting in an FPR and turning up the pressure just to be safe).
As far as drive train loss.. the last time my car was on a dyno my sheets pulled 338BHP and 280WHP on the peak run. I'm kinda tired right now and stupid, but I think it's right around 17% power loss.
My IDC seems to fluctuate fairly easily. I know that my car dyno'd 280rwhp at 86%
I'm not sure if this will help out or just confuse the issue.
I am about to completely re-vamp my fuel system when I put in my BNR's. From what I have heard an 850/850 set up is good for just about anything you will reasonably hit with a twin set up (I'm putting in an FPR and turning up the pressure just to be safe).
As far as drive train loss.. the last time my car was on a dyno my sheets pulled 338BHP and 280WHP on the peak run. I'm kinda tired right now and stupid, but I think it's right around 17% power loss.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
09-16-18 07:16 PM