3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

idling at 45 cmhg? is this bad?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-31-08, 07:52 AM
  #1  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
finneymc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Iwakuni-Shi Shimo Japan
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
idling at 45 cmhg? is this bad?

I read on http://www.fd3s.net/boost_test.html on the first line it says at idol you should be at 16-18hg

At idol my boost gauge says 45(ish) cmHG

I am not sure if b/c of the cmHG there is some type of conversion that needs to be done to get to HG, so that is why i am coming to the experts.

My turbos had a compression test done about 6000km ago and were both around 8-2-8.4ish (may be off by .1 or .2 i don't have the paper in front of me) so they are good.

SSSOOOooooo what do you guys think? is there a conversion that needs to be done to get from cmHG to HG or is that the same thing, if there is no conversion is it bad that i am at about 45 at idol?

thanks,
Craig
Old 03-31-08, 08:27 AM
  #2  
Racecar - Formula 2000

 
DaveW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Bath, OH
Posts: 3,850
Received 277 Likes on 198 Posts
Originally Posted by finneymc
I read on http://www.fd3s.net/boost_test.html on the first line it says at idol you should be at 16-18hg

At idol my boost gauge says 45(ish) cmHG

I am not sure if b/c of the cmHG there is some type of conversion that needs to be done to get to HG, so that is why i am coming to the experts.

My turbos had a compression test done about 6000km ago and were both around 8-2-8.4ish (may be off by .1 or .2 i don't have the paper in front of me) so they are good.

SSSOOOooooo what do you guys think? is there a conversion that needs to be done to get from cmHG to HG or is that the same thing, if there is no conversion is it bad that i am at about 45 at idol?

thanks,
Craig
Divide the 45 by 2.54 to get inHg = ~17.7 inHg, which is very good.
Old 03-31-08, 08:30 AM
  #3  
Original Gangster/Rotary!


iTrader: (213)
 
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Posts: 30,525
Received 538 Likes on 325 Posts
2.54cm equals 1 inch, so 45 cm is 17.7 inches, your numbers are fine . What idle rpm was this at?

Also, do you mean that you had the compression tested on your engine? Again, those are very good numbers if they're in bar.
Old 03-31-08, 09:39 AM
  #4  
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
zenofspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 762
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by finneymc
My turbos had a compression test done about 6000km ago and were both around 8-2-8.4ish (may be off by .1 or .2 i don't have the paper in front of me) so they are good.


What does that mean?
Old 03-31-08, 09:42 AM
  #5  
Racecar - Formula 2000

 
DaveW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Bath, OH
Posts: 3,850
Received 277 Likes on 198 Posts
Originally Posted by zenofspeed


What does that mean?
Multiply bar x 14.5 to get psi. So 8.2 bar = 120 psi, which is very good.
Old 03-31-08, 09:48 AM
  #6  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (2)
 
Rx72Heaven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
if you have a port isnt the idle lower?
Old 03-31-08, 10:04 AM
  #7  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by Rx72Heaven
if you have a port isnt the idle lower?
Not necessarily the idle, but the vacuum may be lower at idle depending on the size of the port, relation to sea level, etc..
Old 03-31-08, 05:52 PM
  #8  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
finneymc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Iwakuni-Shi Shimo Japan
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GoodfellaFD3S
2.54cm equals 1 inch, so 45 cm is 17.7 inches, your numbers are fine . What idle rpm was this at?

Also, do you mean that you had the compression tested on your engine? Again, those are very good numbers if they're in bar.
My idol is at about 750.

Thanks so much for this info guys i knew that I would get an educated answer here. I try to research this **** as much as i can before i post but sometimes with being out here in Japan i just can't find the answers to some of this stuff. And yes they were in bar (don't know what that means but i was told that )

thanks again guys, i am looking to get an american gauge very soon along with the 52mm steering colomn mount. I found that gauge mount here for like 50 bucks!

One more thing, i am about to get an aftermarket BOV, will that change my cmHG?
Old 03-31-08, 07:57 PM
  #9  
rotorhead

iTrader: (3)
 
arghx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: cold
Posts: 16,182
Received 429 Likes on 263 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveW
Multiply bar x 14.5 to get psi. So 8.2 bar = 120 psi, which is very good.
I thought those compression tests are in K/cm^2 ? In that case, conversion is X 14.2

So 8.2 X 14.2 = 116 . Not a big difference, but bar is not exactly the same as K/cm^2 .
Old 03-31-08, 08:04 PM
  #10  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
finneymc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Iwakuni-Shi Shimo Japan
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
cool thanks for the knowledge!!
Old 03-31-08, 10:23 PM
  #11  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (2)
 
Rx72Heaven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Right thats what i mean, thanks.


Originally Posted by Mahjik
Not necessarily the idle, but the vacuum may be lower at idle depending on the size of the port, relation to sea level, etc..
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
barkz
Power FC Forum
37
11-21-20 09:34 AM
24seven_dada
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
20
11-10-18 12:03 PM
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
09-16-18 07:16 PM
firzen
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
9
09-15-15 12:04 PM
Frisky Arab
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
5
09-04-15 06:17 PM



Quick Reply: idling at 45 cmhg? is this bad?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:24 AM.