3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

I want to build a a quick and fast FD , I have a few questions

Old Jun 6, 2008 | 08:38 PM
  #26  
hatemy7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 724
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
one thing that ive noticed, I am not bashing on BNR's but they have a lot of turbo LAG, that is something that I do not want to deal with all that crap u know, Looks like Im going with the GT3r garret turbo
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2008 | 08:39 PM
  #27  
hatemy7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 724
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by overehttop
+1 to this thread, right on hatemy7 looking to do the same thing myself. Got a dead FD needing a rebuild do to a cracked jacket.
LOl hell yeah, I am always willing to learn from the great ones. Plus asking is not a crime, KNOWLEDGE is power.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2008 | 08:48 PM
  #28  
RLaoFD's Avatar
Brappable not Unflappable
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 8
From: Bay Area
Originally Posted by hatemy7
one thing that ive noticed, I am not bashing on BNR's but they have a lot of turbo LAG, that is something that I do not want to deal with all that crap u know, Looks like Im going with the GT3r garret turbo
Can you support this statement? Since you have the option of running sequential I thought that they still spool moderately fast compared to the stock sequential setup.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2008 | 08:55 PM
  #29  
zheka's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: North Port, Florida
I enjoy reading this thread!


I have never realized in what it would $cost$ to give another 100 whp to my stock FD I mean from 200 to 300 whp. And to do it right.

Is there a cheap way to get it to 300 whp?
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2008 | 09:01 PM
  #30  
fendamonky's Avatar
F'n Newbie...
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,942
Likes: 323
From: Nokesville, Va
I haven't driven my 7 in about three weeks, due to being back in the states on vacation, though I don't remember any great increase in lag...

I'm running my BNRs in sequential and I still see max primary boost at about 2k-2.5k.. on my lower boost setting I'm running 12 psi on primary/secondary turbo's, on my higher setting I'm running 12/16psi on primary/secondary turbo's..

I'm not suggesting you run BNR's hatemy7. It would cost MUCH more for you to hit the levels you want on twins (if it's even possible, I believe it is.. it's just not really been done yet) than it would on a quality single. I'm just a massive fan of the sequential system and have (a little) experience with the BNR's, so I'll add my two cents on what I've got experience with. I'm only adding my imput in this thread because the support systems to run the BNR's at high power are very similar (if not identical) to what you will need on a high power single setup.

Being thorough in your supporting mods will make or break your reliability at high horsepower, this stays true whether you've got one snail under the hood or two.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2008 | 09:15 PM
  #31  
fendamonky's Avatar
F'n Newbie...
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,942
Likes: 323
From: Nokesville, Va
Originally Posted by zheka
Is there a cheap way to get it to 300 whp?
Do all the reliability mods, than add in your standard bolt-ons (DP/hi-flow cat/CB, Intake, IC, ECU, Ignition Amp) and a good tune and you should be able to push right around 300whp. You might want to also go ahead and get a better/rewired fuel pump and a FPR so you don't need to worry about overdoing your fuel system though..

Boost + Fuel + Cooling = power.

Before I got my PFC tuned the first time I made 247whp @ .8 bar (on a Dyno Dynamics dyno, it reads 15%-18% lower than American dyno's, so it was comparable to 284whp - 291whp) after my first tune to .85bar (12psi) I made 280whp (322whp - 330whp) at the top end of what my (stock) fuel system could handle..

At that point I had spent (off the top of my head) about 5 grand on the mods, most all of the reliability mods had already been performed when I purchased my FD.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2008 | 09:22 PM
  #32  
zheka's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: North Port, Florida
Well actually I don't have i stock FD since I Install DP And HKS Hi-Power Exhaust Also K&N Filters with HKS Pipes. Everything else is stock.
Any idea what i gained in power?
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2008 | 09:53 PM
  #33  
fendamonky's Avatar
F'n Newbie...
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,942
Likes: 323
From: Nokesville, Va
Unfortunately I don't know...

I'd say get on a dyno to really find out. What boost are you running? Do you still have your stock ECU? I would suggest getting a bigger/better radiator, an aftermarket ECU, a larger SMIC and a tune. Just based off what you have right now I'd guess (don't quote me on this!) somewhere in the range of 240-250 whp.

As an aside, you can always check on some of the merchant websites (rx7store.net, rx7.com, etc) which have staged power upgrades and see where you match compared to what they have, based off your current mods.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2008 | 10:51 PM
  #34  
Six Rotors's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
From: Pluto
Originally Posted by hatemy7
one thing that ive noticed, I am not bashing on BNR's but they have a lot of turbo LAG, that is something that I do not want to deal with all that crap u know, Looks like Im going with the GT3r garret turbo
Obviously spoken by somebody who has never driven them.My BNRs are set up sequentially and my experience matches fendamonkey's.A very driveable package for a road car,but of course they don't make 500rwhp.I can get into lots of trouble on the road with what I have.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2008 | 11:18 PM
  #35  
FD3Smaniac's Avatar
slurpee
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 723
Likes: 1
From: Flint, Michigan
You said you were doing this build in honor of your father? i dont want to say the wrong thing here... so enlighten me, im curious.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2008 | 11:51 AM
  #36  
hatemy7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 724
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by Six Rotors
Obviously spoken by somebody who has never driven them.My BNRs are set up sequentially and my experience matches fendamonkey's.A very driveable package for a road car,but of course they don't make 500rwhp.I can get into lots of trouble on the road with what I have.
Wow, look at what I stated , I am not bashing on BNR turbos, and I have driven them and I did not like em, I am not saying that they suck or anything like that, it is just my personal opinion. so relax.


to everyone else I appreciate everyones .02 cents, I have learned a lot and I am still researching on what should I do.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2008 | 03:26 PM
  #37  
Six Rotors's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
From: Pluto
Originally Posted by hatemy7
Wow, look at what I stated , I am not bashing on BNR turbos, and I have driven them and I did not like em, I am not saying that they suck or anything like that, it is just my personal opinion. so relax.


to everyone else I appreciate everyones .02 cents, I have learned a lot and I am still researching on what should I do.
I am very relaxed believe me.But my point is that if you have really driven BNRs properly set up in sequential mode how can you say they have too much LAG?10-12 psi of boost at 2200 rpm does not feel like LAG to me.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2008 | 08:22 AM
  #38  
hatemy7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 724
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
^ I guess, everyone has different opinions. you like the turbos and I dont, easy as that.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2008 | 10:46 AM
  #39  
Six Rotors's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
From: Pluto
It is not about liking or disliking a specific turbo.I was trying to understand your definition of LAG.But I give up.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2008 | 11:05 AM
  #40  
zinx's Avatar
_________________________
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,723
Likes: 1
From: Indianapolis
Just spray it with a 200 shot.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2008 | 01:25 PM
  #41  
hatemy7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 724
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
^ that doesnt sound like a bad Idea.

and this is what I am talking about turbo lag

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFc3TVgBmMI

TII built engine with a BNR turbo ( not sure what size but you can see what I am talking about)
it took for ever to build its power and spool. by the time it picked up the race was over.

the car is fast but spool took forever
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2008 | 02:46 PM
  #42  
zinx's Avatar
_________________________
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,723
Likes: 1
From: Indianapolis
Originally Posted by hatemy7
^ that doesnt sound like a bad Idea.

and this is what I am talking about turbo lag

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFc3TVgBmMI

TII built engine with a BNR turbo ( not sure what size but you can see what I am talking about)
it took for ever to build its power and spool. by the time it picked up the race was over.

the car is fast but spool took forever

brake boost.

I can built 20 psi of boost before the race even starts and i'll jump right out in front. Sometimes, in lower gears it'll just start smoking the rear tires, but then you just have to let up on the brake and build a little less.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2008 | 03:17 PM
  #43  
Six Rotors's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
From: Pluto
Originally Posted by hatemy7
^ that doesnt sound like a bad Idea.

and this is what I am talking about turbo lag

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFc3TVgBmMI

TII built engine with a BNR turbo ( not sure what size but you can see what I am talking about)
it took for ever to build its power and spool. by the time it picked up the race was over.

the car is fast but spool took forever
So what has this to do with the TWIN BNR turbo set up on a 13B REW motor?
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2008 | 10:27 AM
  #44  
hatemy7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 724
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by Six Rotors
So what has this to do with the TWIN BNR turbo set up on a 13B REW motor?
dude, who says that I am going twin turbo? I am going single, of coarse twin turbos are going to spool up faster!!!! so it is pointless
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2008 | 10:38 AM
  #45  
Six Rotors's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
From: Pluto
Originally Posted by hatemy7
Well I am going to start building my motor and I am going to be doing a lot of freeway runs and some DIG runs ( I am sure) but I really want a very fast spool from my turbo or turbos, at the same time I would like to make between 450-500hp.
Wich would be best? single or twin turbos
should I go with a large street port or Full bridge
what is the best computer to use in your great opinions
what is the best spooling turbos
and size of injectors?

Once again, I dont mean to ask stupid questions what so ever, I just would like everyones opinion on what kind of set up I should go with.

Most runs that I will be doing is from 40-120mph.

thank you once again for all your opinions.
Whatever!!
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2008 | 01:36 PM
  #46  
fendamonky's Avatar
F'n Newbie...
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,942
Likes: 323
From: Nokesville, Va
Originally Posted by Six Rotors
So what has this to do with the TWIN BNR turbo set up on a 13B REW motor?
I brought up the BNR's because that is what I am running. I tried to make the parallel though, that hatemy7 should *not* be running twins with the power levels he is looking to attain. I voiced my opinion purely on behalf of the fact that the supporting mods to effectively run BNRs at high boost are very similar (if not identical) to what you will need to effectively run a single.

The focus was not meant to be on the BNR's, but rather on the support mods he'd need to consider in addition to the straight up power gainers.

So... no need to argue over a misunderstanding.


(goddamnit! you guys are making me feel like a ******* hippy here!!)
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2008 | 09:26 PM
  #47  
hatemy7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 724
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by Six Rotors
Whatever!!
I apologise I am not trying to be a smart *** what so ever, I am just new to this once again.
Originally Posted by fendamonky
I brought up the BNR's because that is what I am running. I tried to make the parallel though, that hatemy7 should *not* be running twins with the power levels he is looking to attain. I voiced my opinion purely on behalf of the fact that the supporting mods to effectively run BNRs at high boost are very similar (if not identical) to what you will need to effectively run a single.

I appreciate it Fendamonky, your comments and knowledge has led me to the direction that I am want. I am going with a Garrett GT35r Turbo.

I bought a brand new one for 750 thanx

The focus was not meant to be on the BNR's, but rather on the support mods he'd need to consider in addition to the straight up power gainers.

So... no need to argue over a misunderstanding.


(goddamnit! you guys are making me feel like a ******* hippy here!!)
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2008 | 09:51 PM
  #48  
Cgotto6's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 60
From: Maltby, Washington
Originally Posted by hatemy7
dude, who says that I am going twin turbo? I am going single, of coarse twin turbos are going to spool up faster!!!! so it is pointless
Dude, you really need to learn how to actually read and understand what people are saying before you respond. There is no way any useable sized single turbo will spool as fast as a properly working BNR set up. Its that simple. ****, even with my apex rx-6 bb single it doesnt spool as quickly.

Second, why did you bring up a video of a 2nd gen BNR set up. They are in no way compareable to the BNR's made for the FD as they are a *SINGLE* turbo...
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2008 | 10:17 AM
  #49  
hatemy7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 724
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
^wow.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Queppa
New Member RX-7 Technical
11
Nov 18, 2024 03:47 AM
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
Jul 1, 2023 04:40 PM
Skeese
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
65
Mar 28, 2017 03:30 PM
josef 91 vert
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
23
Sep 3, 2015 11:20 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:33 PM.