I need opinions on my motormount setup
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Lancaster, NY
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I need opinions on my motormount setup
So here is my idea for a hybrid motormount setup, since the car is going to be a street car, i want some comfort. I was thinking about using a new OEM mount on the passenger side and on the easily rippable driver's side, an aluminum one. Any thoughts??
#4
TANSTAFL
iTrader: (13)
https://www.rx7club.com/3rd-generation-specific-1993-2002-16/motor-mounts-521858/
aluminum and comfortable street don't mix.
there is also a link in that thread:
https://www.rx7club.com/3rd-generation-specific-1993-2002-16/motor-mount-163324/
aluminum and comfortable street don't mix.
there is also a link in that thread:
https://www.rx7club.com/3rd-generation-specific-1993-2002-16/motor-mount-163324/
#5
Full Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Detroit
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I worked as an engineer designing hydraulic engine mounts and suspension links/bushings for 5 years and did a lot of vehicle/ride testing as a result. I can tell you definitively that you do not want to unbalance the system by using a hard mount to one side a soft mount to the other---the worst part being that you will tear up your mounting joint and or cradle.
The advantage to using hard mounts: no powertrain hop over rough road or roll during engine torquing--solid feel. The disadvantage: noise and idle shake.
The FD uses hydraulic mounts allowing the use of soft rubber to control idle shake and the hydraulic portion to control engine hop----the design is not however suited to control engine torquing which explains the often ripped stock mounts.
If you want the best comfort---stick with the stock mounts. If you can handle the extra noise and vibration, go with something stiffer like the poly mounts. I went with the Mazdaspeed mounts which seemed like a good tradeoff. My friend has poly mounts for the engine and diff though and I can honestly say that they aren't that much worse, but it is noticeable....
The advantage to using hard mounts: no powertrain hop over rough road or roll during engine torquing--solid feel. The disadvantage: noise and idle shake.
The FD uses hydraulic mounts allowing the use of soft rubber to control idle shake and the hydraulic portion to control engine hop----the design is not however suited to control engine torquing which explains the often ripped stock mounts.
If you want the best comfort---stick with the stock mounts. If you can handle the extra noise and vibration, go with something stiffer like the poly mounts. I went with the Mazdaspeed mounts which seemed like a good tradeoff. My friend has poly mounts for the engine and diff though and I can honestly say that they aren't that much worse, but it is noticeable....
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Shainiac
Single Turbo RX-7's
12
07-17-19 02:20 PM
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
09-16-18 07:16 PM
killerrx710
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
5
09-28-15 09:13 AM
killerrx710
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
1
09-24-15 10:57 PM
mulcryant
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
10
09-09-15 05:24 PM