I highly recommend Steve Kan Tuning. ***READ***
Originally Posted by airborne
I don't remember who posted up Kan's site but thanks. Its awesome he is now taking care of payment and all that. Does he still rely on the people where he's tuning to transport/house him?
Originally Posted by LUPE
It was 69 degrees. That number was SAE. People say that Dynapack dynos read 5-10% lower than dynojet. I said not corrected because I didn't add any percentage or alter it in anyway.
i got ya, im all too famaliar with dynapack. My 356@11psi was on the dynapack that i operated for about 3 years. They are very cool dynos when you really get into the features, that and because its hubless you can actually listen to the engine rather than try to pick out the engine from the spinning rollers.
Originally Posted by SurgeMonster
Your HP numbers seem fishy to me. I ran nearly the same time and trap with 390rwhp. Are you suggesting that raising the boost 5psi and going to racegas yielded 172rwhp for you?
Here's the VID for u.
http://www.spacerat.net/Dori/Mattsdynopulls.wmv
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,807
Likes: 648
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Originally Posted by SurgeMonster
Your HP numbers seem fishy to me. I ran nearly the same time and trap with 390rwhp. Are you suggesting that raising the boost 5psi and going to racegas yielded 172rwhp for you?
I know Matt and he is a standup guy. His FD was built at Gotham and is legit. It seems like the only time you post anymore is to **** in people's cheerios......how are you enjoying that C5
?
Matt,
The porting on your engine is the same as what I used (SP) for drag racing, I build it the same as what I would do on my drag car so I know it is good for 700rwhp. I wouldn't worry about it too much.
Steve
The porting on your engine is the same as what I used (SP) for drag racing, I build it the same as what I would do on my drag car so I know it is good for 700rwhp. I wouldn't worry about it too much.
Steve
Originally Posted by AZ'sFastFD3S
Good numbers! I know I could have hit that HP # if I tried. I thought I had to "pin" the motor before I tried. Now I know I dont, here I come.
Originally Posted by GoodfellaFD3S
Hi Yanni,
I know Matt and he is a standup guy. His FD was built at Gotham and is legit. It seems like the only time you post anymore is to **** in people's cheerios......how are you enjoying that C5
?
I know Matt and he is a standup guy. His FD was built at Gotham and is legit. It seems like the only time you post anymore is to **** in people's cheerios......how are you enjoying that C5
?Thanks Rich. It seemed he was a little butt hurt about something. Maybe its because he owns a shitty C5 now.
Originally Posted by pluto
Matt,
The porting on your engine is the same as what I used (SP) for drag racing, I build it the same as what I would do on my drag car so I know it is good for 700rwhp. I wouldn't worry about it too much.
Steve
The porting on your engine is the same as what I used (SP) for drag racing, I build it the same as what I would do on my drag car so I know it is good for 700rwhp. I wouldn't worry about it too much.
Steve
I remember when you did the porting. You were scared about the primary ports being too big. Looks like your porting did the job.
Thanks,
Matt
Ya....I didn't know how the driveability will hold with such a big port so I was on the cautious side for letting you know up front. 
You were definately the first race port I did on a street car.

You were definately the first race port I did on a street car.

Originally Posted by AZ'sFastFD3S
I remember when you did the porting. You were scared about the primary ports being too big. Looks like your porting did the job.
Thanks,
Matt
Thanks,
Matt
Steve Kan..
since your in this thread.. I just want to bounce a question off of you.
Whats the most HP have you gotten out of a T78 Single turbo? @ what PSI?
And the most HP you have squeezed out of a 13B on PUMP(93octane)gas @ what PSI?
LUPE.
what kind of drive train are you using?? ie: clutch/flywheel? Drive shaft? rear end?
thanks..
since your in this thread.. I just want to bounce a question off of you.
Whats the most HP have you gotten out of a T78 Single turbo? @ what PSI?
And the most HP you have squeezed out of a 13B on PUMP(93octane)gas @ what PSI?
LUPE.
what kind of drive train are you using?? ie: clutch/flywheel? Drive shaft? rear end?
thanks..
Originally Posted by SlingShotRX7
Steve Kan..
since your in this thread.. I just want to bounce a question off of you.
Whats the most HP have you gotten out of a T78 Single turbo? @ what PSI?
And the most HP you have squeezed out of a 13B on PUMP(93octane)gas @ what PSI?
LUPE.
what kind of drive train are you using?? ie: clutch/flywheel? Drive shaft? rear end?
thanks..
since your in this thread.. I just want to bounce a question off of you.
Whats the most HP have you gotten out of a T78 Single turbo? @ what PSI?
And the most HP you have squeezed out of a 13B on PUMP(93octane)gas @ what PSI?
LUPE.
what kind of drive train are you using?? ie: clutch/flywheel? Drive shaft? rear end?
thanks..
Act 6puck clutch/flywheel?/driveshaft?/Ford 8.8 rear end off a 4 link with no panhard (am i right)
Originally Posted by SlingShotRX7
LUPE.
what kind of drive train are you using?? ie: clutch/flywheel? Drive shaft? rear end?
thanks..
You guys need to let me know when you want Steve Kan back to St.Louis. I was thinking around June. Since the number of cars keeps growing, I need to start planning ahead.
Originally Posted by LUPE
You guys need to let me know when you want Steve Kan back to St.Louis. I was thinking around June. Since the number of cars keeps growing, I need to start planning ahead.
Originally Posted by PDViper77
Eric, I wll definiately be ready by June! That would be great timing.
https://www.rx7club.com/midwest-rx-7-forum-32/steve-kan-back-st-louis-3rd-time-spring-summer-06-a-507837/
Originally Posted by LUPE
It's safely tuned, I expect it to last longer than all of my previous 11 motors.
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,807
Likes: 648
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Originally Posted by shawnk
If that is a true number that might be one of the funniest quotes I have ever heard on this forum....


Originally Posted by GoodfellaFD3S
Running shitbox hurley apex seals (made out of plywood and playdoh) will aid in ripping through the motors in a hurry. I think I popped like 5 or 6 motors with those pieces of garbage installed.....
Originally Posted by GoodfellaFD3S
Hi Yanni,
I know Matt and he is a standup guy. His FD was built at Gotham and is legit. It seems like the only time you post anymore is to **** in people's cheerios......how are you enjoying that C5
?
I know Matt and he is a standup guy. His FD was built at Gotham and is legit. It seems like the only time you post anymore is to **** in people's cheerios......how are you enjoying that C5
?Hey Rich,
My intentions were absolutely NOT to hurt his feelings or make him seem silly. I know certain trap speeds in a FD and the rwhp they yield. I trapped 122 making 379rwhp. Now how did he trap 123 @ 17psi meaning he is making about 390rwhp and then say he made 562rwhp @ 22 psi? That means the difference of 5 psi between 22psi and 17psi is 172 rwhp. The hp numbers are wrong or he is a terrible terrible driver to get that low of a trap speed with 17psi where he should be making ~475rwhp to be in line with the 562@ 22psi. Get my drift? You can't trap 123 with 475rwhp and you can't gain 172rwhp with an increase of 5psi. That is nearly 35rwhp for each psi raised.
The C5 well, I'm surprised at how much enjoyment I've had out of it already. RX-7s are very different. I miss the boost of the RX-7 and especially shifting at high rpms that's what I miss most. The vette has a larger comfortable interior, a lot more features inside/digital gauges anything you want to know about the car, lots of trunk space, its very sexy and people respect it everywhere you go. You do see a lot of them on the road, but I get a lot more stares and people interested in it than with the RX-7 (I'm not sure anyone knew what the RX-7 was)
Hey Yanni,
the 122mph trap speed was done with his old setup (T62-1) and dynoed around 390rwhp at 12psi. He has since upgraded to a GT42 turbo and made 562rwhp@22psi. If I remembered correctly, he also made 499rwhp@17psi on the new setup.
Steve
the 122mph trap speed was done with his old setup (T62-1) and dynoed around 390rwhp at 12psi. He has since upgraded to a GT42 turbo and made 562rwhp@22psi. If I remembered correctly, he also made 499rwhp@17psi on the new setup.
Steve
Originally Posted by SurgeMonster
Hey Rich,
My intentions were absolutely NOT to hurt his feelings or make him seem silly. I know certain trap speeds in a FD and the rwhp they yield. I trapped 122 making 379rwhp. Now how did he trap 123 @ 17psi meaning he is making about 390rwhp and then say he made 562rwhp @ 22 psi? That means the difference of 5 psi between 22psi and 17psi is 172 rwhp. The hp numbers are wrong or he is a terrible terrible driver to get that low of a trap speed with 17psi where he should be making ~475rwhp to be in line with the 562@ 22psi. Get my drift? You can't trap 123 with 475rwhp and you can't gain 172rwhp with an increase of 5psi. That is nearly 35rwhp for each psi raised.
The C5 well, I'm surprised at how much enjoyment I've had out of it already. RX-7s are very different. I miss the boost of the RX-7 and especially shifting at high rpms that's what I miss most. The vette has a larger comfortable interior, a lot more features inside/digital gauges anything you want to know about the car, lots of trunk space, its very sexy and people respect it everywhere you go. You do see a lot of them on the road, but I get a lot more stares and people interested in it than with the RX-7 (I'm not sure anyone knew what the RX-7 was)
My intentions were absolutely NOT to hurt his feelings or make him seem silly. I know certain trap speeds in a FD and the rwhp they yield. I trapped 122 making 379rwhp. Now how did he trap 123 @ 17psi meaning he is making about 390rwhp and then say he made 562rwhp @ 22 psi? That means the difference of 5 psi between 22psi and 17psi is 172 rwhp. The hp numbers are wrong or he is a terrible terrible driver to get that low of a trap speed with 17psi where he should be making ~475rwhp to be in line with the 562@ 22psi. Get my drift? You can't trap 123 with 475rwhp and you can't gain 172rwhp with an increase of 5psi. That is nearly 35rwhp for each psi raised.
The C5 well, I'm surprised at how much enjoyment I've had out of it already. RX-7s are very different. I miss the boost of the RX-7 and especially shifting at high rpms that's what I miss most. The vette has a larger comfortable interior, a lot more features inside/digital gauges anything you want to know about the car, lots of trunk space, its very sexy and people respect it everywhere you go. You do see a lot of them on the road, but I get a lot more stares and people interested in it than with the RX-7 (I'm not sure anyone knew what the RX-7 was)
Originally Posted by pluto
Hey Yanni,
the 122mph trap speed was done with his old setup (T62-1) and dynoed around 390rwhp at 12psi. He has since upgraded to a GT42 turbo and made 562rwhp@22psi. If I remembered correctly, he also made 499rwhp@17psi on the new setup.
Steve
the 122mph trap speed was done with his old setup (T62-1) and dynoed around 390rwhp at 12psi. He has since upgraded to a GT42 turbo and made 562rwhp@22psi. If I remembered correctly, he also made 499rwhp@17psi on the new setup.
Steve
Thanks for clearing it up steve.





