How much HP to run with a C6?
#76
You guys are funny. Debating performance of a $14k 14 year old car with some mods and a brand new factory moded car selling for almost $90,000. Do you think the Corvette guys go on about how they compare to an Enzo, F1 or Ultima? Well I guess in this case the Rx7's with mods are actually pretty close, never mind.
#77
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (8)
Originally Posted by Kevin T. Wyum
You guys are funny. Debating performance of a $14k 14 year old car with some mods and a brand new factory moded car selling for almost $90,000. Do you think the Corvette guys go on about how they compare to an Enzo, F1 or Ultima? Well I guess in this case the Rx7's with mods are actually pretty close, never mind.
But then again, you throw a few grand at a C5 zo6, and your nearing true supercar performance status.
#81
Originally Posted by Cgotto6
...But then again, you throw a few grand at a C5 zo6, and your nearing true supercar performance status.
#82
rotary sensei
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Cgotto6
The new Z06's have about the same power band, except more useable...Pretty much 2000-7000rpms...
#85
Lives on the Forum
iTrader: (9)
Like I say, I know exactly how much power my car makes, and exactly how much it weighs with me in it, and can run some back to back runs with a car that is exactly as fast as a C6 Z06 only has an automatic trans so it's perfectly repeatable.
I'll let you know how it goes, but i'm honestly expecting to loose with 365 rwhp in a 2750 lb. RX7. I think it'll take another 30 hp to be in the ballpark.
I'll let you know how it goes, but i'm honestly expecting to loose with 365 rwhp in a 2750 lb. RX7. I think it'll take another 30 hp to be in the ballpark.
#86
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Originally Posted by montego
#87
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (8)
Originally Posted by Kevin T. Wyum
I think you meant throw tens of thousands because for a few grand you usually get some nice tuner emblems, racing hat and a few gauges on any car over 70k.
#89
Will work for horsepower
The Fd Was The First Corvette Anyway, At Least The Body. Park Next To One And From The Nose To Just Before The Rear Bumper They Are Very Close. Then When They Got To The Bumper They Didnt Know What The Hell To Do So They Punted. I Would Rather Own The Original Even If They Did Forget The Pistons!
#90
I am glad to see that alot of people on this website are unbiased enough to give the Corvettes props. I LOVE FD's, and have wanted one since late 1992. I have also owned 3 first generations, and a first generation rx-7 was my first ever car. I was about to purchase an FD recently, but the C5 Z06 is simply far more reliable and faster, so I purchased one.
I am sorry to say, but it will take at least 350 to the wheels for an FD to even touch a C5Z. Most stock C5Z's put down about 350-360 at the wheels, with over 300 lb. ft. of torque from idle. Stock quarter mile times for a C5Z are around 12.4 @ 116mph, with stock drag radial cars going 11.8@120+. In addition, a stock C5Z is capable of a conservative .98G on the skidpad, and 70+mph through the slalomn. They weigh about 3100lbs. They are built for the roadcourse, and can run times much quicker than the Z51 C6 Corvettes. With a brake upgrade (stock can crack after heavy usage), they rock!
C6 coupes are not as fast as the C5Z. The Z51 is a 400hp C6 with a stiffer suspension and bigger brakes, but those cars can not even touch a stock C5Z. They are typically mid to high 12 second cars.
Obviously the C6 Z06 is the craziest Corvette now. If I have to even fill people in on these cars they are already past hope. Easy high 11's, 1+G, and huge slalomn speeds make a really capable track car. There is a reason they are selling for $70,000 msrp+ $15,000.
Obviously driver is the most important factor in any car, and a shitty driver in a C6Z will lose to a good driver in a C5Z.
I still want an FD with a LS1 in it though
I am sorry to say, but it will take at least 350 to the wheels for an FD to even touch a C5Z. Most stock C5Z's put down about 350-360 at the wheels, with over 300 lb. ft. of torque from idle. Stock quarter mile times for a C5Z are around 12.4 @ 116mph, with stock drag radial cars going 11.8@120+. In addition, a stock C5Z is capable of a conservative .98G on the skidpad, and 70+mph through the slalomn. They weigh about 3100lbs. They are built for the roadcourse, and can run times much quicker than the Z51 C6 Corvettes. With a brake upgrade (stock can crack after heavy usage), they rock!
C6 coupes are not as fast as the C5Z. The Z51 is a 400hp C6 with a stiffer suspension and bigger brakes, but those cars can not even touch a stock C5Z. They are typically mid to high 12 second cars.
Obviously the C6 Z06 is the craziest Corvette now. If I have to even fill people in on these cars they are already past hope. Easy high 11's, 1+G, and huge slalomn speeds make a really capable track car. There is a reason they are selling for $70,000 msrp+ $15,000.
Obviously driver is the most important factor in any car, and a shitty driver in a C6Z will lose to a good driver in a C5Z.
I still want an FD with a LS1 in it though
#91
Originally Posted by rx7f4n4tic
hardly... I beat a c5 z06 by a bumper with dp/cb/intake/basemap PFC and nitto drag radials and who knows what he had. we need LESS hp than they do to be equal... not by alot but we dont need anywhere as much Stock c5 zo6's run mid 12s with pro drivers, so the other 80% of the world is gonna run high 12's low 13s.
And with those mods I had around 300whp if that, probably a little less.
And with those mods I had around 300whp if that, probably a little less.
#92
rotary sensei
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by speedy41
I am sorry to say, but it will take at least 350 to the wheels for an FD to even touch a C5Z. Most stock C5Z's put down about 350-360 at the wheels, with over 300 lb. ft. of torque from idle.
It takes 340 rwhp RX-7 to run with a 390 rwhp modded & lightened C5 Z06.
https://www.rx7club.com/forum/showth...&highlight=z06
Torque doesn't win races hp does.
Originally Posted by speedy41
Stock quarter mile times for a C5Z are around 12.4 @ 116mph, with stock drag radial cars going 11.8@120+.
Originally Posted by speedy41
In addition, a stock C5Z is capable of a conservative .98G on the skidpad.
Originally Posted by speedy41
They weigh about 3100lbs.
Originally Posted by speedy41
They are built for the roadcourse, and can run times much quicker than the Z51 C6 Corvettes.
The editors at Automobile Magazine were so impressed with the all-new 1993 RX-7 at the recent long-lead press preview that they asked Mazda if they could race one at the $100,000 Consulier Challange last month. When the dust cleared, the new RX-7's launch got a boost as the potent sports car showed its heels to some of the world's most exotic-and expensive-street machinery.
Consulier, a small south Florida car builder of race cars modified for street use, invited auto enthusiast publications to bring any stock production car of their choice to the historic Sebring (Florida) race track. The challenge: match or beat the lap time of the Consulier's prototype fiberglass race. Automibile editor David E. Davis, Jr. called MMA public relations, who arranged the loan of a pre-production RX-7 model for the event. Along with it came the services of Peter Farrell, the current international Motor Sports Association Firehawk Series driving champion, who had helped MMA organize the RX-7 long-lead press preview.
"At the long-lead I'd had a lot of chances to drive the RX-7, both on the road and the race track," said Farrell, a former rally racing champion his native New Zealand. "It was an impressive performer, and probably the best-handling car I've ever driven on the street."
"The new RX-7 is lighter, stronger and more powerful than the old one, which was no slouch around the track. It achieves true supercar performance. While I didn't think we could match the speed of a disguised racecar like the Consulier, I was confident that we'd do well in any match-up with a bonafide street car."
That they did. With Automobile technical editor Barry Winfield supervising and writers from Car and Driver, Motor Trend and AutoWeek looking on during the two-day event, the RX-7 with Farrell behind the wheel bettered the times of a Porsche 911 Turbo, a new Lamborghini Diablo, an Acura NSX, and a host of "unofficial" entries, including a race-modified Corvette and a Ferrari F-40 - - cars that cost two to 10 times as much as the RX-7.
Winfield says he was impressed with the demonstration drive that Farrell gave him around the racetrack, and took a few laps himself to get the feeling of the RX-7's track performance. Farrell also gave demonstration rides to the other writers who attended. speed of a disguised racecar like the Consulier, I was confident that we'd do well in any match-up with a bonafide street car."
"Now they really have a sense of just how good this car really is," Farrell said. "It's so easy and undemanding a car to drive on the street that it may be hard at first to grasp just how incredible the car performs. But these writers are fully aware now." AutoWeek's coverage of the event ran in January on ESPN, while Winfield's story in Automobile and John Phillips' in Car and Driver are expected in March issues, just in time for the 1993 RX-7's appearance in Mazda dealer showrooms across the U.S.
#93
Traction is the most important thing in a high HP drag race, and it is much easier to modulate the throttle with a NA car. Spin the tires with a large turbo, let off, and where are you? At 3000rpm with no boost.
I am sure there have been plenty of FD's run mid 11's with 360 RWHP, with drag radials. The day a 2700lb car with 360rwhp runs a mid 11 with stock tires is the day I shove a stick of dynamite up my *** and ask for a cigarette.
Obviously we are talking purley about speed, not reliability or price. To get 360 to the wheels of an FD takes a single with a PFC, injectors, a radiator, DP, MP, catback, and good gas. If you have a bad tune, you go bye bye.
For a stock C5 Z06 to get 360 to the wheels you need the car, and 91 octane from your closest gas station. Tuning? The Z06 will rip, snort, rattle, fart, and puke with a retardedly rich A/F ratio and make 360 to the wheels.
I guess I am just an FD lover, who woke up and smelled the roses. Reality is reality.
Oh, and whats with that article from 1992? C5 Z06's didn't even exist then.
Also, who cares what some guy posted on here about racing a "2002 Z06 with 390 to the wheels". It says he has aftermarket wheels, and aftermarket wheels are way heavier than stock.
I am sure there have been plenty of FD's run mid 11's with 360 RWHP, with drag radials. The day a 2700lb car with 360rwhp runs a mid 11 with stock tires is the day I shove a stick of dynamite up my *** and ask for a cigarette.
Obviously we are talking purley about speed, not reliability or price. To get 360 to the wheels of an FD takes a single with a PFC, injectors, a radiator, DP, MP, catback, and good gas. If you have a bad tune, you go bye bye.
For a stock C5 Z06 to get 360 to the wheels you need the car, and 91 octane from your closest gas station. Tuning? The Z06 will rip, snort, rattle, fart, and puke with a retardedly rich A/F ratio and make 360 to the wheels.
I guess I am just an FD lover, who woke up and smelled the roses. Reality is reality.
Oh, and whats with that article from 1992? C5 Z06's didn't even exist then.
Also, who cares what some guy posted on here about racing a "2002 Z06 with 390 to the wheels". It says he has aftermarket wheels, and aftermarket wheels are way heavier than stock.
Last edited by speedy41; 04-12-06 at 12:21 AM.
#94
Originally Posted by speedy41
To get 360 to the wheels of an FD takes a single (No it doesn't) with a PFC (No it doesn't) , injectors, a radiator (No it doesn't), DP, MP, catback, and good gas. If you have a bad tune, you go bye bye.
#95
moon ******
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Anyone figured out how to run a two-step rev limiter on an ignition setup for a rotary? Id imagine youd have to only run leading, or have no timing split, unless you're just that smart, but with the right drag tires and new bushings in your suspension (and no dubz or overly stiff coil overs) you could snap off a good drag time.
And, well, the reason I bring up a two step is it lets you build boost, WOT, but set your redline wherever you want to, at the cost of some pretty serious backfiring.
And, well, the reason I bring up a two step is it lets you build boost, WOT, but set your redline wherever you want to, at the cost of some pretty serious backfiring.
#96
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 822
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ehos
And a $5000 litre bike will crush them both. Doesn't matter in drag racing, someone out there is always going to be going faster, for cheaper.
amen
'06 ZX-10 is good for high 9s straight out of the box, baby
#97
Originally Posted by Kevin T. Wyum
Sheesh wrong on almost every count. I ran a corrected 10.98 on stock modified twins with a stock radiator, piggy back computer, stock unported motor that had never been out of the car and street legal M&H drag tires. Couldn't tell you what my HP was but whatever it takes for 125mph on 2750 lbs w/ driver.
10.98 is a phenominal time. How long did your stock twins last? Everybody knows they wont last over 14psi.
I can't even stand arguing about this though, because I love both cars. Third Gen rx-7's have been my dream cars for 13+ years. The Z06 is reliable, fast as hell out of the box, looks awesome, and handles excellently.
#98
Originally Posted by Improved FD
amen
'06 ZX-10 is good for high 9s straight out of the box, baby
'06 ZX-10 is good for high 9s straight out of the box, baby
Obviously any sportbike will eat the cars we are discussing. From a standing start they will kill them, but from a roll against high HP cars it becomes a bit different.
Any decent sportbike will run a low 10 @ 140+ mph. All sportbikes do 0-60 in about 2.7 seconds (even 600s because bikes eaither wheelie or spin). After the 0-60, they are not THAT much quicker than really fast cars.
The problem sportbikes have is that they are as aerodynamic as a brick wall. They have a huge radiator gobbling up air, and virtually no aero aids. The rider is also very unaerodynamic usually. That is why most sportbikes, that do high 9 second 1/4s, only do about 170mph top speed.
Cars and bikes are a whole different discussion. Even roadcourse times are surprising. Bikes can transition extremely quickly, but will only hold about .8g maximum, so any good sportscar will out corner a sportbike.
#99
rotary sensei
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by speedy41
Traction is the most important thing in a high HP drag race, and it is much easier to modulate the throttle with a NA car. Spin the tires with a large turbo, let off, and where are you? At 3000rpm with no boost.
I am sure there have been plenty of FD's run mid 11's with 360 RWHP, with drag radials. The day a 2700lb car with 360rwhp runs a mid 11 with stock tires is the day I shove a stick of dynamite up my *** and ask for a cigarette.
I am sure there have been plenty of FD's run mid 11's with 360 RWHP, with drag radials. The day a 2700lb car with 360rwhp runs a mid 11 with stock tires is the day I shove a stick of dynamite up my *** and ask for a cigarette.
Originally Posted by speedy41
Obviously we are talking purley about speed, not reliability or price. To get 360 to the wheels of an FD takes a single with a PFC, injectors, a radiator, DP, MP, catback, and good gas. If you have a bad tune, you go bye bye.
Twins have put out 400 plus rwhp and BNR twins 420 plus rwhp at conservative boost levels. Plenty of 360 rwhp cars have run 7 years plus and still going strong.
Originally Posted by speedy41
For a stock C5 Z06 to get 360 to the wheels you need the car, and 91 octane from your closest gas station. Tuning? The Z06 will rip, snort, rattle, fart, and puke with a retardedly rich A/F ratio and make 360 to the wheels.
Originally Posted by speedy41
I guess I am just an FD lover, who woke up and smelled the roses. Reality is reality.
Originally Posted by speedy41
Oh, and whats with that article from 1992? C5 Z06's didn't even exist then.
Originally Posted by speedy41
Also, who cares what some guy posted on here about racing a "2002 Z06 with 390 to the wheels". It says he has aftermarket wheels, and aftermarket wheels are way heavier than stock.
Facts are facts...
Last edited by Mr rx-7 tt; 04-12-06 at 12:56 AM.
#100
rotary sensei
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by speedy41
Well my friend, you are one of a very few.
10.98 is a phenominal time. How long did your stock twins last? Everybody knows they wont last over 14psi.
10.98 is a phenominal time. How long did your stock twins last? Everybody knows they wont last over 14psi.