3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

how much $$ do i have to spend to keep up with V8s?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 8, 2001 | 04:10 PM
  #1  
zooq's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
From: Qatar
how much $$ do i have to spend to keep up with V8s?

how much should i spend on an FD to have it keep up with SS's TAs and C5 vetts?
and still have it reliable.
thanks
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2001 | 04:18 PM
  #2  
lone wolf's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, WA
I don't spend any money.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2001 | 04:22 PM
  #3  
zooq's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
From: Qatar
would you care to explaine that to me?
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2001 | 04:22 PM
  #4  
mmaragos's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 597
Likes: 1
From: Windsor, CA
Look back at the previous posts on how to upgrade.

This one is pretty good...

https://www.rx7club.com/vforums/show...threadid=28606
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2001 | 04:29 PM
  #5  
JoeD's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,158
Likes: 2
From: Bay Area, CA
get a clue. a stock FD will beat stock SS's and TA's. all you need to beat a C5 is a downpipe and cat-back.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2001 | 05:13 PM
  #6  
Toadman's Avatar
Nomad Mod
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 359
Likes: 6
From: The O.C.
yep... and some driving skills. Great to leave them with mouths agape being beaten by a 1.3L... Rotary knowledge is getting scarce. Good for us.. *evil grin*
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2001 | 05:14 PM
  #7  
GsrSol's Avatar
Z06 powered FD
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,883
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Texas
If you know how to drive and have a good motor then you only have to worry about C5's.

When I was completly stock I raced 2 WS6's and 1 C5, I beat all of them. Never raced an SS when I was stock.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2001 | 06:22 PM
  #8  
TuRbOfAsT87II's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: New York
If im not mistaken if you know how to drive then you should already be taking v8's stock. If not then do the cheap basics and you will beat them...im sure of it.
Jeff
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2001 | 06:34 PM
  #9  
Dr Wankel's Avatar
Altitude SUCKS!!!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
From: Fort Collins, Colorado
I didn't need a Cat-back to beat a C5
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2001 | 06:35 PM
  #10  
DK's Avatar
DK
40k worth of fail
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 0
From: Hermosa Beach, CA
When I say "beat them" I mean on a real track or real twisties ... not some drag race or street race. You should be able to handle them on those pointless straight exhibitions of ***** power, too, but the RX-7 is a track car and will easily beat any of those aforementioned V8s ... probably even in reverse.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2001 | 05:18 AM
  #11  
TuRbOfAsT87II's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: New York
If im not mistaken the drag or street races test the car and drivers ability. As for being on a track, honestly not that many people know what an 'apex' or 'rumble strips' or 'apron' is, so their ability to race on a track is limited. If they have the car most of them do/should know how to drive it.
Jeff
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2001 | 07:33 AM
  #12  
mmaragos's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 597
Likes: 1
From: Windsor, CA
I thought stock SS's ran 13.6 in the 1/4, and stock C5s ran 13.3.

These are likely best case scenarios with good drivers.

The stock SS should be a really close race with matched drivers.

A stock vs. stock race and I would want a base or an R (lighter than the touring) to shave a couple tenths.

The C5s are going to be tough, but many of the vette drivers probably will not be able to run the car to its best possible quarter.

Stock vs. stock, give me a base or R model and a very experienced driver...that would win most of the time.

For people like me that don't practice the quarter too often and have a couple hundred extra pounds (touring model - and, yeah, I need to lose a few too), having a few more mods to get more HP is a good idea for dragging.

On top of that, there are plenty of modded Camaros and Vettes out there...
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2001 | 12:44 PM
  #13  
MattZeeTerror's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: florida
The only f-body that has ever gave me a run for my money in the rx is a z06 405, he handed me my *** on a paper plate. Of course that car runs a 12.2 out of the box
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2001 | 01:09 PM
  #14  
dclin's Avatar
Perpetual Project
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,667
Likes: 2
From: Texas
Originally posted by mmaragos
....a couple hundred extra pounds (touring model - and, yeah, I need to lose a few too), having a few more mods to get more HP is a good idea for dragging.

The weight difference between a 93 Touring and a 93 R1 is 62lbs - 'The RX7: Mazda's Legendary Sports Car, Jack Yamaguchi, page 112.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2001 | 01:49 PM
  #15  
peck1270's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
Smile

Just buy a couple gallons of gas and that should do the trick!!
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2001 | 02:25 PM
  #16  
mmaragos's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 597
Likes: 1
From: Windsor, CA
The vehicle weight on my '94 Touring is 3210 lbs (as stamped in the door frame). I thought that base and R models were in the 2900 range???
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2001 | 02:44 PM
  #17  
Pressurized's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, Ohio
No, no, no....that stamp on the inside of the door is not the same as the curb weight. That's the vehicle's GNRW or something like that, not sure what it means exactly, maybe it's the weight of the car at maximum capacity(full tank and 2 adults)? But yeah, that weight on the stamp is always considerably more than the actual curb weight.

Haha, I had a friend that read his stamp and was trying to tell me his Civic weighed 3200 lbs! It's kinda funny, but I can see where it would be confusing.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2001 | 03:01 PM
  #18  
Pressurized's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, Ohio
No, no, no....that stamp on the inside of the door is not the same as the curb weight. That's the vehicle's GNRW or something like that, not sure what it means exactly, maybe it's the weight of the car at maximum capacity(full tank and 2 adults)? But yeah, that weight on the stamp is always considerably more than the actual curb weight.

Haha, I had a friend that read his stamp and was trying to tell me his Civic weighed 3200 lbs! It's kinda funny, but I can see where it would be confusing.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2001 | 06:30 PM
  #19  
Tad's Avatar
Tad
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
From: bay area CA USA
yep, I believe it's ALL about the drivin
skill, the LS1's auto is pretty good,
it shifts a hellof alot better than I do thats for sure!

I raced a few, and we were dead even, except during my shift,
i'd lose ground everytime I shifted.

If I was a REALLY good driver, would be a different story
(too bad i'm not, hehe)
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sethix
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
6
Nov 3, 2017 11:48 PM
sccarally
South RX-7 Forum
3
Oct 8, 2015 05:27 PM
Hank
Introduce yourself
2
Oct 1, 2015 07:34 AM
maikelc
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
8
Sep 24, 2015 01:01 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:48 PM.