3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

How Low Is Your Fd?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 2, 2003 | 10:40 PM
  #51  
faster's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Chesnee SC
I just bought my car (93 touring) and no mention was ever made about it being lowered but I assume it is because it rubs like hell with the stock sized tires and rims. Does this mean its lowered or is it the aftermarket rims (different backspacing is all I can figure) the rims are 16" tsw's and the tires are dunlop sp 900's or something like that in the stock size.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2003 | 12:33 AM
  #52  
GsrSol's Avatar
Z06 powered FD
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,883
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Texas
Originally posted by Ghostrider7
my car is tucking but I don't scrap anywhere because my suspension is great and good driving skills
Right! I know I had mad driving skills right after I turned 16.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2003 | 06:52 AM
  #53  
WaLieN's Avatar
Call me gramps!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,334
Likes: 0
From: Detroit, MI
Stock height for me -- I kinda like the stock height of the FD. Though, I wouldn't mind slightly higher rate springs.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2003 | 07:00 AM
  #54  
the_glass_man's Avatar
Will u do me a kindness?
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 5,030
Likes: 4
From: Parlor City, NY
Originally posted by WaLieN
Stock height for me -- I kinda like the stock height of the FD. Though, I wouldn't mind slightly higher rate springs.
The front is fine, but the rear looks like it has been jacked up. The look is more obvious with the addition of upgraded plus sized low profile tires.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2003 | 09:29 AM
  #55  
FD3RotorTurbo's Avatar
FD3Rotor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 418
Likes: 1
From: Utah
I loward mine a 1.25" in the front and 1.5" in the back
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2003 | 10:10 AM
  #56  
ptrhahn's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,282
Likes: 703
From: Arlington, VA
I'm at about 25" fender height front, 25.25" rear w/ GC coilovers. I run 275/40, 235/45 17" tires that account for the slight difference.

it looks just about perfect, with nearly zero gap, but not such that it looks like a show car either. No rubbing w/ 500/400 spring rates.

My standard Sears floor jack BARELY clears the pinch weld along the side.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2003 | 10:15 AM
  #57  
Montego's Avatar
Don't worry be happy...
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 6,901
Likes: 842
From: San Diego, CA
Mine is stock height, but my car is begging to be lowered. I have 17's on there and that creates the fender gap from hell.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2003 | 11:00 AM
  #58  
rotary-tt's Avatar
2 babies - no back seats
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 981
Likes: 0
From: N. Wilm., Delaware?
Originally posted by the_glass_man
The front is fine, but the rear looks like it has been jacked up. The look is more obvious with the addition of upgraded plus sized low profile tires.
Funny how times have changed. When I was young, jacked up was 'cool'. It gave you the drag car look and was necessary for '60 series' tires. You put 'ladder bars' on the back leaf sprints and cranked up the torsion bars in the front

I'm keeping my FD 'jacked up' stock look. It will come back in style one day. Maybe I'll put in some spacers and raise it some more I've kept my old Yamaha receiver (silver) from the early 80's when for 20 yrs receivers went all black. Now silver is back in style
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2003 | 11:44 AM
  #59  
GsrSol's Avatar
Z06 powered FD
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,883
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Texas
Well I was going to lower mine a tad more but I just measured it and the front is just a hair under 24" and the rear is 24 1/4". It's probably around 25" in my sig.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2003 | 12:07 PM
  #60  
Wargasm's Avatar
Weird Cat Man
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,868
Likes: 3
From: A pale blue dot
My car rides on stock rims/tires and it is about 25 1/4 inches front and rear to the fender lip. No rubbing or hitting on things, but I am careful.

Brian
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2003 | 02:12 PM
  #61  
crazyrx7's Avatar
Big Daddy!!!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Here is a couple of pics of my car.

R.K.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2003 | 02:14 PM
  #62  
crazyrx7's Avatar
Big Daddy!!!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Another.

R.K.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2003 | 02:17 PM
  #63  
crazyrx7's Avatar
Big Daddy!!!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
And another.

R.K.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2003 | 04:24 PM
  #64  
WanKeL FD RX-7's Avatar
Rotary addict since 86
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,519
Likes: 2
From: Montreal, QC, Canada
crazyrx7 : Sweet ride sweet girl too
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2003 | 10:48 PM
  #65  
Senna's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
it's been mentioned long ago BUT can't believe you drove you car on the BEACH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Sweet ride BTW!
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2003 | 03:40 AM
  #66  
MakoDHardie's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
From: DE, Taiwan
on sort of a side note here....

Does anyone know how much ride height difference there is between new and broken in upper mounts? I just installed new front upper mounts on my car tonight since the bump stops and dust boots were slaughtered on my original set. What about break-in time on the upper mounts?.....as in how long it will take for the spring to seat into the bottom of the upper mount enough so that the imprint stops.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2003 | 01:16 PM
  #67  
SVT Squasher's Avatar
Love'n my 7
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
From: YOU DONT HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW
Lowerd 2' tires aer very close to fenders, had to roll front fenders. Feels like Im getting up off the ground when I get out of my FD.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2003 | 01:24 PM
  #68  
alberto_mg's Avatar
Rotary Freak
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,690
Likes: 0
From: nyc+li, ny
Originally posted by MakoDHardie
on sort of a side note here....

Does anyone know how much ride height difference there is between new and broken in upper mounts? I just installed new front upper mounts on my car tonight since the bump stops and dust boots were slaughtered on my original set. What about break-in time on the upper mounts?.....as in how long it will take for the spring to seat into the bottom of the upper mount enough so that the imprint stops.
I replaced those also when I re-did my suspension recently. Given the depth of the indentation from holding the old spring, I'd say its worth 1/4". Mine have been on for a few months now and I don't notice any difference in height since installing. I might be taking mine apart to check something out soon and will report back if I remember.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2003 | 06:08 PM
  #69  
MakoDHardie's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
From: DE, Taiwan
I'm still trying to figure that out in my head and calculate about the same thing for amount of preload that the car will be able to sag to when under weight....

I may look at both and make measurements.... it'd be a pain, but if other people wanted to know, I'd check it out just so that someone doesn't have to later...

Are there any noticable handling characteristics that make newer upper mounts better? As far as I can tell, the rubber only gets stiffer as it gets older. And unless the upper mounts are falling apart, would there be another reason they should be changed out?
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2003 | 09:18 PM
  #70  
alberto_mg's Avatar
Rotary Freak
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,690
Likes: 0
From: nyc+li, ny
didn't notice a change in handling. but the suspension did get quieter over bumps b/c of the new rubber parts.

a rotary mechanic once said they should also be changed out b/c when they get real hard and brittle with age, you risk the strut piston thing in the middle busting through there and tapping the hood.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2003 | 09:39 PM
  #71  
MakoDHardie's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
From: DE, Taiwan
Ha ha.....that's hilarious. I just woke up from a nap and had the same thought..... Its probably better over bumps.... I'm either stupid and good at figuring things out, or else I'm smart and just really slow... Speaking of new rubber parts, I have a bag of 6 pillow ball bushings from Mazda that I have to installed..... anybody wanna let me use their hydraulic press this weekend?
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2003 | 10:57 PM
  #72  
1RedR1and1RedPEP's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
From: chicago
25.25 at fender. all four corners 18x10s with 650/ 500 lb. springs
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2003 | 03:25 PM
  #73  
spoolin1012's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
From: Miami


I'm unhappy with my drop, wish it could sit a little lower.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turblown
Vendor Classifieds
12
Oct 17, 2020 03:25 PM
Logan Reinisch
General Rotary Tech Support
44
Sep 17, 2018 12:20 PM
Jmpabon93
New Member RX-7 Technical
1
Sep 30, 2015 04:57 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:16 AM.