3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

how do fd match up to 300zx tt?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-08-02, 12:22 AM
  #1  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Rx-7Action's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: NOR CAL(modesto)
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
how do fd match up to 300zx tt?

im getting a 7 this week and my friend is getting a 90-96 TT 300zx...whats the better SPORTS CAR, what has more potential? thanks alot
Old 09-08-02, 12:31 AM
  #2  
WWFSMD

 
maxcooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 5,035
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
You know what you'll get if you ask the RX-7 Forum, but the honest truth is that they are even enough in stock form that it will come down to the driver. The RX-7 handles better and has better brakes, but the Z has more torque and is a more comfortable cruiser.

You can make more power with the Z, but it is a lot heavier so it needs more power. You see more RX-7s at drag strips and road racing tracks, if that tells you anything.

-Max
Old 09-08-02, 12:49 AM
  #3  
Senior Member

 
Crazy_Jake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Clovis, NM
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've been told a stock RX can run 13.8's stock. I saw a stock tt Z run a 14.7. But like Max said alot depends on the driver.
Old 09-08-02, 03:29 AM
  #4  
Part out my Car

 
mmonaco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 1,762
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
cat and driver rated them dead even, so i also agree. if you loose go find a riced out honda
Old 09-08-02, 03:31 AM
  #5  
Senior Member

 
Silex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hell yeah and not to mention I'm sure I saw the exact same thread last week so I hope that tells you something .
Old 09-08-02, 03:33 AM
  #6  
Senior Member

 
93TTRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Southern California-Glendale
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
no contest....7 wins
Old 09-08-02, 03:53 AM
  #7  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
cmartinp28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: union, nj
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
as stock...... i would say that the rx7 has the edge by a little...... as for potential rx7 by far. the 400+lbs difference come into play bigtime....... which means, it can be made to corner better, accelerate better, and stop better
Old 09-08-02, 02:29 PM
  #8  
5yr member, joined 2001

 
JONSKI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Marco Island, FL
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Test drive them both. I can't imagine a car like the 300zx TT having the feel of a 3rd gen rex, which is practically orgasmic.
Old 09-08-02, 03:12 PM
  #9  
Full Member

 
R1Outcast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Stock for stock, there's no way a 300ZX TT could beat an FD (straight line or curves). That is, unless the FD driver is a 6 year old. The Z is a luxury-sports car...big, bulky, a bunch of feel good goodies inside, etc. While the FD (especially R1s or R2s) is a pure sports cars...light weight, compact size, and for R models...dual oil coolers, no sunroof, no rear window wipers, sportier suspension, no cruise control, etc.
Old 09-08-02, 06:51 PM
  #10  
Living life 9 seconds at a time

iTrader: (2)
 
ErnieT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Abingdon, Md
Posts: 6,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have a couple friends w/ 300zx turbo's w/ your basic bolt-on's. Few things I've come to realize about them in general.
A. They're pig heavy
B. They're very expensive to mod
C. They're slow as **** even when modded (fastest I've seen w/ bolt on's was a high 12)
D. They're tranny sucks. I've seen two break in a matter of 5k.

You'll smoke any Z with just a couple bolt on's.
Old 09-08-02, 06:59 PM
  #11  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Rx-7Action's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: NOR CAL(modesto)
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
JUST what i wanted to hear...lol
Old 09-08-02, 09:25 PM
  #12  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
fd3virgin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: abingdon, maryland
Posts: 1,447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
test drove a late model 300z tt before i bought the fd....nothing brings a smile too my face then when i punch the fd...... 93 black touring.
Old 09-08-02, 09:33 PM
  #13  
Your Opinion is Wrong

 
Dyre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Peoples Republic of California
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They also have horriable axel hop in drag race type luanches... They tend to brake alot of axel.
Old 09-08-02, 09:47 PM
  #14  
Senior Member

 
Dragonz818's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The stock 300 zx has the fastest 1/4 times out of Rx7 and supra. Its not by much so depends on the driver.
Old 09-08-02, 09:49 PM
  #15  
Junior Member

 
fast mayte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Houston, tx
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i like the rx7 cuz it's more suped' down and looks more of a meaner sports car than a z. but then again, they r both rated at the same, but as for reliabilty, i don't trust nissan as much as some mazda's(miata,rx's,protoge's)

it's up to u for what looks better to u, ofcource nissan's got teh t-tops. thats bad ***, but rx is a rx. can't beat it
Old 09-08-02, 09:50 PM
  #16  
Bacon

iTrader: (1)
 
Van Sema's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: PNW
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Haha ... use the search button. You'll find another thread exactly the same as this one.

The 300z forum has this thread too, but of course over there ... the nissan will win everytime.

It depends on the driver really.
Old 09-08-02, 09:50 PM
  #17  
Junior Member

 
crazyboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have both 93 FD and 95 300zxTT. If you have a lot of money the 7 is a better choice because of the weight difference and is easier to mod. But I don't care what anyone says their engines suck fat ones. Don't get me wrong their great for about 30,000 miles but after that it's all down hill. I have had my 7 for about 3 years and I just rebuilt my third engine, with the better seals like before, oil change every 2000 miles, I mean I baby it and it still breaks down. On the other hand my Z with about 2 more grand into is as fast as the the 7 and I have put 68,000 miles on it and NOT ONE PROBLEM. I love them both but I am just sick of putting money in the 7.
Old 09-08-02, 09:54 PM
  #18  
Full Member

 
9413Btt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Calgary
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Welcome to the world of RX7, it needs cares, loves and lots of money.
Old 09-08-02, 10:05 PM
  #19  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Rx-7Action's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: NOR CAL(modesto)
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well lets just say on my honda i was dropping 4-600 a month on mods...im not too worried...
Old 09-08-02, 10:32 PM
  #20  
going ls

 
Quik 93 FD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: South Florida
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by crazyboost
I have both 93 FD and 95 300zxTT. If you have a lot of money the 7 is a better choice because of the weight difference and is easier to mod. But I don't care what anyone says their engines suck fat ones. Don't get me wrong their great for about 30,000 miles but after that it's all down hill. I have had my 7 for about 3 years and I just rebuilt my third engine, with the better seals like before, oil change every 2000 miles, I mean I baby it and it still breaks down. On the other hand my Z with about 2 more grand into is as fast as the the 7 and I have put 68,000 miles on it and NOT ONE PROBLEM. I love them both but I am just sick of putting money in the 7.
30,000 miles and then it blows. Who rebuilt your motor, Pep Boys?
Old 09-09-02, 12:25 AM
  #21  
Tony Stewart Killer.

iTrader: (12)
 
Snook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: London
Posts: 5,156
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
hahahhaha!! Yeah man you went to the wrong shop to have it rebuilt

I also see about 20 300zxs every time I drive and 0 rx7s most of the time. In the past year I have seen 7 rx7s on the road and probaly hundreds of 300zxs that I didn't even care to notice any more
Old 09-09-02, 08:02 PM
  #22  
Full Member

 
R1Outcast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by Dragonz818
The stock 300 zx has the fastest 1/4 times out of Rx7 and supra. Its not by much so depends on the driver.
Where the hell did you get that info from?
Old 09-09-02, 08:31 PM
  #23  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Rx-7Action's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: NOR CAL(modesto)
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by R1Outcast

Where the hell did you get that info from?
hes smokin sticky icky i think...
Old 09-09-02, 08:36 PM
  #24  
WWFSMD

 
maxcooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 5,035
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally posted by Dragonz818
The stock 300 zx has the fastest 1/4 times out of Rx7 and supra. Its not by much so depends on the driver.
The Supra had the fastest times from the tests I have seen, but again they are all so close it would likely come down to driver in a real race.

-Max
Old 09-09-02, 08:38 PM
  #25  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Rx-7Action's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: NOR CAL(modesto)
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i thought it was like this
supra tt -13.4
rx7 -13.8
300zxtt - 14.2


Quick Reply: how do fd match up to 300zx tt?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:52 PM.