HKS F-Con V-PRO
They pick their ECUs depending on the purpose and budget of the car.
For as many tuners like Power FC for its price, and ease of use, there are tuners that like the HKS Units.
The HKS Unit is hands down a more powerful unit. The Power FC is not as powerful, but it works great for a single map street car.
For as many tuners like Power FC for its price, and ease of use, there are tuners that like the HKS Units.
The HKS Unit is hands down a more powerful unit. The Power FC is not as powerful, but it works great for a single map street car.
Last edited by Turbo II FC; May 10, 2008 at 03:55 AM.
Whether the F-con V-pro is good software or not, the hush hush, closed nature of japanese tuning products (V-pro but also the PFC before the Datalogit came out) is killing their market share. Cobb has already wiped them up with all the new car models. You think anyone is going to rock a V-pro on their R35 GT-R when Cobb has software in English?
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 453
Likes: 1
From: Tokyo Japan
32x32 maps and 20x20 maps doesn't make a difference in performance.
The performance depends on a tuner who sets up
Power FC
good Reasonable, easy to change data, meataring oil pump function, idling stability.
bad when injectors upgraded, fuel map compensation gets inaccurate bad dwell angle data adjustment
F-con Vpro 3.24
good all the data are accurate, especially upgraded injectors data are perfect writing software is best 4 channel coil function available
bad software isn't easy to get (I've seen an English software in Malaysia) Much harder to set up, especially idling map(F-con Vpro 3.3 gets better) No metaring oil pump function. Expensive, especially wiring harneses
Up to 400HP with stock twin turbos, Power FC is better
More than 400 HP with big turbo and big injector, F-con V pro 3.3 is good.
I'm using MoTeC M2R and F-con V-pro 3.3. the performance is all the same.
The performance depends on a tuner who sets up
Power FC
good Reasonable, easy to change data, meataring oil pump function, idling stability.
bad when injectors upgraded, fuel map compensation gets inaccurate bad dwell angle data adjustment
F-con Vpro 3.24
good all the data are accurate, especially upgraded injectors data are perfect writing software is best 4 channel coil function available
bad software isn't easy to get (I've seen an English software in Malaysia) Much harder to set up, especially idling map(F-con Vpro 3.3 gets better) No metaring oil pump function. Expensive, especially wiring harneses
Up to 400HP with stock twin turbos, Power FC is better
More than 400 HP with big turbo and big injector, F-con V pro 3.3 is good.
I'm using MoTeC M2R and F-con V-pro 3.3. the performance is all the same.
