3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

high flow cat vs resonator & manual boost controller vs electronic...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 3, 2011 | 06:40 PM
  #1  
EfiniBoy01's Avatar
Thread Starter
Patience=POWER
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: inland empire, CA
high flow cat vs resonator & manual boost controller vs electronic...

I have an sr motorsports dp-bonez midpipe-greddy evo cat back...my set up is listed power fc, pettit cool charge iii stock location intercooler, hks intake, hks twin power, pettit motor with streetport...3mm apex seals...upgraded rotor housings, new stock twin turbos with wastegate ported...My question is I heard that even with the stock turbos wastegate being ported the chances of boost creep are still apparent so what would you guys recomend a highflow cat to add to the midpipe or just a resonator to add back pressure? Also do you think a manual boost controller would help to keep boost at a safe psi or do you recomend an electronic one? Ideas and input please thanks!!!
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2011 | 06:45 PM
  #2  
DaleClark's Avatar
RX-7 Bad Ass
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,622
Likes: 2,724
From: Pensacola, FL
A lot of this has been covered, some searching is your friend.

All cars seem to be a little different when it comes to boost creep. Biggest thing a highflow cat does is get rid of exhaust stink. A resonated midpipe won't help much with creep, but will cut some of the noise down.

IMHO, manual boost controllers are ghetto on an FD. Get a good used electronic boost controller or get a better boost solenoid to use with the PFC.

Dale
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2011 | 07:47 PM
  #3  
moconnor's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,678
Likes: 96
From: Bay Area, CA
High quality ball and spring MBCs (the bleed type ones are too variable) are perfectly appropriate for an FD. I have been using dual Hallmans with cabin controller (one for precontrol and one for wastegate) for years and I am not sure I could have debugged my boost problem without them. Not only do they allow rapid spool but they are perfectly predictable.

The problem with electronic boost controllers is that they tend to have a mind of their own (particularly the high end ones) and you are never quite sure what they are up to. (Witness countless discussions of tuning, say, the Blitz SBC-ID on many boards.) A single EBC is also going to effectively bypass the transition control system on a sequential FD.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2011 | 08:18 PM
  #4  
EfiniBoy01's Avatar
Thread Starter
Patience=POWER
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: inland empire, CA
Sorry but I forgot to mention Im non sequential too...
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2011 | 12:45 PM
  #5  
FX3S's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: LA/NYC
+1 2xMBC. simple and works.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2011 | 08:47 PM
  #6  
Montego's Avatar
Don't worry be happy...
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 6,901
Likes: 842
From: San Diego, CA
screw mbc lol... seriously Im with Dale.

I have a profec spec II which is on the low side of ebc's and I just love it. Simple to adjust, use, and given that it displays boost in real time I completely did away with my boost gauge.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2011 | 09:45 PM
  #7  
Double_J's Avatar
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,089
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
I used to have high flow cats on 2 of my fd's. Reluctantly I tried just a resonated midpipe and it made very little difference for stink or sound. I wish I would have switched to the midpipe a long time ago!
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2011 | 10:30 AM
  #8  
arghx's Avatar
rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 461
From: cold
manual vs electronic boost controller debate has been done to death. Manual valves are like lawn mower carbs; they're simple but they're dumb. Electronic controllers can be pretty simple ranging all the way up to being very complicated. If you want something that is electronic but very simple to control (like a manual boost controller), look at the Greddy Profec S.

Here is a thread comparing all the major external electronic boost controllers: https://www.rx7club.com/3rd-generation-specific-1993-2002-16/electronic-boost-controller-comparison-chart-952767/
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2011 | 10:51 AM
  #9  
mrb63083's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,748
Likes: 1
From: Dallas
From what I understand, a high flow cat adds backpressure while still allowing a free(er) flowing path for performance, and it's legal . A resonator helps baffle sound, only. However, I could be wrong.

I think that a high flow cat is ideal if you're concerned with boost creep/spike.

I have a ported wastegate and a high flow cat; I never experience any boost issues.
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2011 | 09:04 PM
  #10  
FX3S's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: LA/NYC
I've had 3 fd's all w/ the same mbc setup and straight piping all the way through to an apexi GTspec. Never worried about or had boost creep ever since. There are probably many other places you can put that money to use.
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2011 | 09:20 PM
  #11  
Narfle's Avatar
Rx7 Wagon
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,978
Likes: 888
From: California
Originally Posted by moconnor
High quality ball and spring MBCs (the bleed type ones are too variable) are perfectly appropriate for an FD. I have been using dual Hallmans with cabin controller (one for precontrol and one for wastegate) for years and I am not sure I could have debugged my boost problem without them. Not only do they allow rapid spool but they are perfectly predictable.

The problem with electronic boost controllers is that they tend to have a mind of their own (particularly the high end ones) and you are never quite sure what they are up to. (Witness countless discussions of tuning, say, the Blitz SBC-ID on many boards.) A single EBC is also going to effectively bypass the transition control system on a sequential FD.
I sold my Hallmans to moconnor and bought a profec type-s. I liked the mbc's more with sequential. The dual mbc's gave me more prespool adjustablity than my profec Type-S.

For a non-sequential setup, you might as well go with an electric controller. It will probably hold boost better and help spool.

Your cat-back will have more to do with noise than your mid-pipe. If you get a hi flo cat, get one with an air-pump fitting.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2011 | 01:28 PM
  #12  
Montego's Avatar
Don't worry be happy...
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 6,901
Likes: 842
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by mrb63083
From what I understand, a high flow cat adds backpressure while still allowing a free(er) flowing path for performance, and it's legal . A resonator helps baffle sound, only. However, I could be wrong.
Nope you are correct. If you ever pickup a resonated midpipe you will see that its just a straight through pipe and there is nothing in the way to impede the flow of the exhaust.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2011 | 06:26 PM
  #13  
FD3S2005's Avatar
SideWayZ The Only Way
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,945
Likes: 32
From: Davie, Florida
greddy type S boost controller.. easiest i bc i ever used.

as for the creep.. yes even if the wg is ported u still can get it.. i have the bnr stage 3 in seq with ported wg and still get creep some creep. but it doesnt go past 18psi for me which is what im tuned for
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2011 | 07:25 PM
  #14  
Captain_Panic's Avatar
Back in the BOOST Game
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 698
Likes: 1
From: Chicago IL
I am non sequential tuned to 15 psi with a resonated mp and rb catback. Ported wastegate, no creep. I think the racing beat dual being a bit more restrictive than some exhausts helps this.

I use the pfc to control boost. It works ok, but I think I can get better perf with an ebc.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2011 | 01:55 AM
  #15  
FD3S2005's Avatar
SideWayZ The Only Way
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,945
Likes: 32
From: Davie, Florida
got a resonator and rb catback, it does restrict but im not sure by how much.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2011 | 07:14 AM
  #16  
IRPerformance's Avatar
Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 11,347
Likes: 321
From: NJ
A manual boost controler is asking for problems. All it takes is one overbooost or good spike and you will be paying for a rebuild. I have seen it happen too many times. Get a proper electronic boost controler. The power fc integrated control works decent with the twins. If you are getting spiking the apexi boost kit has a faster responding solenoid which helps. A simple electronic controler like the greddy profec spec s is acceptable as well. However, with full exhaust and twins you may not be able to keep the boost reasonable in cold climates. I'd stick with a cat.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2011 | 09:18 AM
  #17  
Sgtblue's Avatar
Urban Combat Vet
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 12,160
Likes: 983
From: Mid-west
The OP may already be aware, but since the discussion overlaps both topics.....a Boost Controller (Manual or Electric) will not control boost creep. It's only effective for spike.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:27 PM.