3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Hi everyone, 93 vs 95 which is better?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 6, 2007 | 06:10 AM
  #1  
Amethyst's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: San Jose
Smile Hi everyone, 93 vs 95 which is better?

Hi everyone, I just registered today because I am serious considering buy a 3rd gen RX-7 and found lots of Rx-7 lovers here. It has always been my dream car and now I have finally decide to get it. I am wondering about getting a 93 or 95 rx-7 (If both are stock, no mods, same mileage, original engine). There is a difference of $3k in price, and I think maybe i am able to fix the stock problem with it. Maybe you guys will think I am dumb selling 06 civic si and get Rx-7, but I just love this car so much and willing to work on it with love, so plz help me out. Thank you





PS: I can't figure out where to post this thread, this place seems to be the most suitable.
Old Mar 6, 2007 | 06:38 AM
  #2  
NCMontegott's Avatar
This is your exit
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
From: north carolina
read the faq page it has everything you need to know about the fd
i would get a 95 if I were in your shoes.
Old Mar 6, 2007 | 06:43 AM
  #3  
Authentikdit's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
From: West Palm Beach,FL
Haha,nobody will ever think you are dumb for getting rid of a Honda and picking up a 7..But in response to your question,I suggest you do a lot more reading up.These cars aren't Hondas at all,and they will require much more work and maintenance.Read everything you can,especially the FAQ like suggested above me.
Old Mar 6, 2007 | 06:44 AM
  #4  
finnicky7's Avatar
26.55 psi T04Z Monster
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 832
Likes: 1
From: Denver
You are in for some flamage right away. But i will try and help you before this gets ugly.

1) The 93 FD was the first model brought to the US, thus it had a few more issues (recalls, technical services items, and just bad engineering) than the 95. So for the most part 95 are more desireable than the 93.

2) There are plenty of nice 93's I would take over a beat up 95. The year is not always the main buying factor. Research each cars history!

3) Which model is it: Touring or R2....Tell us the price and miles that will help as well.

4) Do you have an idea how much diffent and work intensive this car is from your Honda? Be aware a full stock FD will need to be upgraded with reliabity mods to ensure longevity. This cost additional money, are you prepared for this?
Old Mar 6, 2007 | 07:35 AM
  #5  
dubulup's Avatar
development
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,714
Likes: 7
From: Lafayette, LA
95's look the best
Old Mar 6, 2007 | 07:59 AM
  #6  
BillM's Avatar
RX-7's since 1980
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 801
Likes: 59
From: NYC
The 94-95 have a feature that you may consider important (or may not) - a passenger side airbag.
Old Mar 6, 2007 | 08:01 AM
  #7  
Jodeny's Avatar
Indifferent
Tenured Member: 25 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 982
Likes: 0
From: Long Island,NY
[QUOTE=Amethyst]Maybe you guys will think I am dumb selling 06 civic si and get Rx-7, but I just love this car so much and willing to work on it with love, so plz help me out. Thank you QUOTE]

Nope....nope, don't think your as dumb as the people who actually bought a civic si and then actuallly kept it! Only kidding.

Since the cars you are looking at are already 10 years old, it wouldn't make a difference which one you buy. Just get the one that is well maintained and as close to stock as possible. And whatever you paid for it....have the same amount in liquid cash in the bank in order to keep fixing it...they tend to be hifgh maintenance.
John
Old Mar 6, 2007 | 10:36 AM
  #8  
pwwatkins's Avatar
Supra Smasher
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 777
Likes: 0
From: indiana
94,95 came with a better interior, get a 95 if all else is the same
Old Mar 6, 2007 | 11:13 AM
  #9  
Frankie Hanky's Avatar
doom pigeon
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Good luck trying to find a 95.
R1,R2-stiffer suspension, suede interior,lip, z-rated tires.
Touring-sunroof, leather, bose system.

You should go with an r1 model. I personally think its the best model they have made.

If your thinking about the Touring model you don't need a sunroof because it actually takes up more head space and its heavy. On the R1 the suede interior is really nice because you dont move around at all and its great for the weather conditions. Its also a big plus on the suspension.

What rx7s have you found? And where.
Old Mar 6, 2007 | 11:25 AM
  #10  
dgeesaman's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 12,313
Likes: 27
From: Hershey PA
Check out FAQ question 10.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:25 AM.