3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Good buy or not?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-22-10, 04:56 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
viegasgixxer1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good buy or not?

http://www.autotrader.com/fyc/vdp.js...standard=false

Whats your opinion on this car and the price?
Old 06-22-10, 05:05 PM
  #2  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (126)
 
allrotor93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 6,703
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
too much when i am selling a 93 r1 with 38000 miles and a new motor for $17k
Old 06-22-10, 05:13 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
viegasgixxer1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well i called the dealership and theyre letting it go for 17,9000. My next bet at buying a 7 would be 250 mile out in NY where i can find them for like 14. is it worth it? and yes theyre in really good condition with low miles.
Old 06-22-10, 06:14 PM
  #4  
Grabbin My Wankel

iTrader: (2)
 
RXILVER7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Yonkers N.Y.
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seems expensive. I got my SSM touring for less with the same miles years ago when the economy was good. In this economy you should be able to get a car much cheaper.
Old 06-22-10, 07:12 PM
  #5  
Don't worry be happy...

iTrader: (1)
 
Montego's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 6,846
Received 787 Likes on 463 Posts
Originally Posted by viegasgixxer1000
well i called the dealership and theyre letting it go for 17,9000. My next bet at buying a 7 would be 250 mile out in NY where i can find them for like 14. is it worth it? and yes theyre in really good condition with low miles.
I take it you haven't done the math heh...

250 miles each way is not much to drive in order to save $4K. **** I'll drive 500 miles if someone pays me $4,000 to do it, that's comes out to $8 per mile!
Old 06-22-10, 09:27 PM
  #6  
Searching for 10th's

iTrader: (11)
 
jkstill's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 2,247
Received 29 Likes on 18 Posts
Originally Posted by viegasgixxer1000
http://www.autotrader.com/fyc/vdp.js...standard=false

Whats your opinion on this car and the price?
If the compression checks out and it passes a leak down test, I would say it a good buy. A totally stock FD in excellent condition is a rather rare car.

Better than spending 15k on one and discovering a month later it needs 5k of work.
Old 06-23-10, 09:20 AM
  #7  
Form > Function

iTrader: (108)
 
MattGold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 1,653
Received 198 Likes on 100 Posts
I bought my 93 SSM in 2000 with 33K for $13,500. I would argue that FD prices have definitely NOT bottomed out now-a-days. We are well into the upswing, currently just in a minor dip
Old 06-23-10, 10:23 AM
  #8  
Don't worry be happy...

iTrader: (1)
 
Montego's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 6,846
Received 787 Likes on 463 Posts
^^ people always seem to make their exception the rule. So how many other 33K fd's did you find in 2000 for 13,500?
Old 06-23-10, 11:49 AM
  #9  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
viegasgixxer1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The dealers gonna let it go for 17 and its only 8 miles away from home. I think its a solid deal, the car is impecable. I want a stock 7 not one that's modified so this fits my need perfect. Considering I'm new to rotarys I'm going to keep this car stock and learn as much as possible about it. Good thing my cousin is a highly licensed mechanic.
Old 06-23-10, 11:53 AM
  #10  
Who say's i need a Van

iTrader: (18)
 
Hotwheelz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Whatsittoya
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by allrotor93
too much when i am selling a 93 r1 with 38000 miles and a new motor for $17k
A new motor at 38,000mi?
Old 06-23-10, 02:02 PM
  #11  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
viegasgixxer1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gmonsen
viegasgixxer1000... I think you are making a sound decision. The best FD's out there to buy are bone stock, low mileage cars where you can tell the owner cared for the car. Check the engine bay. If someone really takes care of their car, the engine bay is usually very clean.

Gordon
Thats exactly what i wanted when i decided i wanted a 7. The FD is a beautiful car in stock form and thats what i want. this car is bone stock and i couldnt be happier. Its very low miles and everything is in best of condition. The price seems ok for a car like this. I have to admit, and i might get flamed for this, but im a rook when it comes to rotarys, all i know is what ive been reading on this site and on my own time. but i feel like with buying this car i will keep learning and learning. I have no plans to mod this car.
Old 06-23-10, 02:55 PM
  #12  
dorito powered

iTrader: (5)
 
KKMpunkrock2011's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gmonsen
Personally, if that car holds up under scrutiny, its not really a bad price for a 36,000 mile car. There is an interesting piece in the current Motor Trend Classics saying that the FD is a future collectible. It searched ads and found an average price of $17-and-change and average of 72,000 miles on the chassis of the cars surveyed. They noted that there were very few made and that most of them are trashed. I am fairly certain that the FD prices have hit bottom and will only go up from here. If you can take advantage of owners here on the forum who may believe pricing is softer than the market may actually be, you may be able to save a thousand or two. But be sure the cars you are comparing are really comparable.

Gordon
scan the whole article? I find it interesting that they stated that most FDs are trashed, if this forum is any indication, more and more are reaching good hands and will be well kept for years to come.
Old 06-23-10, 03:12 PM
  #13  
Form > Function

iTrader: (108)
 
MattGold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 1,653
Received 198 Likes on 100 Posts
Originally Posted by montego
^^ people always seem to make their exception the rule. So how many other 33K fd's did you find in 2000 for 13,500?

Not too take this too far off topic - but quite a few in the ballpark.

Remember, this is before "the industry" really took off. Before Fast & Furious, before DSport & Modified Magazine, before Formula D & Time Attack, before RX-7 Store had their own store front.

My only point being, after 2001 the market on RX-7s, took off and continues to stay high. Current trends represent only a dip it an otherwise abnormally high market.

I suppose the crossroads is now between the FD being a 'used car' and 'collectors item' as gmonsen eluded to. That's all from me. Back to the dungeon.
Old 06-23-10, 03:16 PM
  #14  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
viegasgixxer1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MattGold
Not too take this too far off topic - but quite a few in the ballpark.

Remember, this is before "the industry" really took off. Before Fast & Furious, before DSport & Modified Magazine, before Formula D & Time Attack, before RX-7 Store had their own store front.

My only point being, after 2001 the market on RX-7s, took off and continues to stay high. Current trends represent only a dip it an otherwise abnormally high market.

I suppose the crossroads is now between the FD being a 'used car' and 'collectors item' as gmonsen eluded to. That's all from me. Back to the dungeon.
You cant really say the FD is at an abnormally high price. if any car REALLY suffered from the F&F movies its the supra. I love supras, one of my fav cars of all time. id love to own one but they are WAY out of my price range. your talking MID 20's for a automatic N/A. 30+ for a twin turbo supra. its ridiculous. and VERY hard to find one in stock condition.
Old 06-23-10, 03:40 PM
  #15  
Put it in the microwave!

iTrader: (22)
 
kensin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 1,556
Received 35 Likes on 29 Posts
Buy nsx.
Old 06-23-10, 03:46 PM
  #16  
Form > Function

iTrader: (108)
 
MattGold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 1,653
Received 198 Likes on 100 Posts
Originally Posted by viegasgixxer1000
You cant really say the FD is at an abnormally high price. if any car REALLY suffered from the F&F movies its the supra. I love supras, one of my fav cars of all time. id love to own one but they are WAY out of my price range. your talking MID 20's for a automatic N/A. 30+ for a twin turbo supra. its ridiculous. and VERY hard to find one in stock condition.
I think if you follow any 'normal' price patterns of used vehicles that were mass produced... the FD is abnormally high. Evolutions, STIs, 911s, S4s, etc, etc all have fallen over the years - the RX-7 straight-lined (the Supra had a rising curve).

Now, I'm not saying I wouldn't pay it - or it's not worth it. But the facts stand. $19,000 for a 17 year old car that MSRPd for ~$35,000. You're talking LESS than 4% depreciation per year, not including the initial 'first year' depreciation.

But again... worth every penny.
Old 06-23-10, 04:03 PM
  #17  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
viegasgixxer1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MattGold
I think if you follow any 'normal' price patterns of used vehicles that were mass produced... the FD is abnormally high. Evolutions, STIs, 911s, S4s, etc, etc all have fallen over the years - the RX-7 straight-lined (the Supra had a rising curve).

Now, I'm not saying I wouldn't pay it - or it's not worth it. But the facts stand. $19,000 for a 17 year old car that MSRPd for ~$35,000. You're talking LESS than 4% depreciation per year, not including the initial 'first year' depreciation.

But again... worth every penny.
Yeah seems like everyyear the supra is more and more expenssive. I will someday own one. As far as the 7 goes, i think its totally worth it for 17k. its a car that you never see, atleast round my ways. Its a timeless vehicle. hard to beat the sexy lines of an FD.
Old 06-23-10, 04:06 PM
  #18  
Form > Function

iTrader: (108)
 
MattGold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 1,653
Received 198 Likes on 100 Posts
Originally Posted by viegasgixxer1000
Yeah seems like everyyear the supra is more and more expenssive. I will someday own one. As far as the 7 goes, i think its totally worth it for 17k. its a car that you never see, atleast round my ways. Its a timeless vehicle. hard to beat the sexy lines of an FD.
Amen Brother.
Old 06-23-10, 04:35 PM
  #19  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
viegasgixxer1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
a pretty straight up question. I hear alot of people complain about 7's not being reliable but i cant help but feel that comes from people who dont own or dont know much about them. considering im keeping this car stock, atleast for a long time. With regular maintenance i should be ok?
Old 06-23-10, 04:43 PM
  #20  
Turd Ferguson

iTrader: (1)
 
grimple1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sherman Oaks, California
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
you are incorrect. they are not reliable. especially in stock trim. even the most die hard rotorhead will tell you to purchase a daily driver. I say this as someone that daily drove his FD for 2 years and dreaded almost every minute of it. You couldn't ever count on it 100%.

Now that it's a weekend car, it's much more enjoyable. And has brought me back from the brink of selling it.
Old 06-23-10, 04:59 PM
  #21  
Form > Function

iTrader: (108)
 
MattGold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 1,653
Received 198 Likes on 100 Posts
Originally Posted by grimple1
you are incorrect. they are not reliable. especially in stock trim. even the most die hard rotorhead will tell you to purchase a daily driver. I say this as someone that daily drove his FD for 2 years and dreaded almost every minute of it. You couldn't ever count on it 100%.

Now that it's a weekend car, it's much more enjoyable. And has brought me back from the brink of selling it.
Another Amen. I always equated an RX-7 to a unfaithful girlfriend. The sex is great, she's beautiful, etc, etc - but it's just a matter of time until she crosses you.

The RX-7 should not be relied on for work, school, etc - in stock form or otherwise. Sure there are exceptions to this rule, but don't expect the RX-7 to simply 'work' everyday. Be ready to administer TLC at a moments notice and/or shell out cash. ALSO, make sure you have $3-4K in reserve just in case you happen to need to replace the motor.

-M
Old 06-23-10, 05:49 PM
  #22  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
viegasgixxer1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MattGold
Another Amen. I always equated an RX-7 to a unfaithful girlfriend. The sex is great, she's beautiful, etc, etc - but it's just a matter of time until she crosses you.

The RX-7 should not be relied on for work, school, etc - in stock form or otherwise. Sure there are exceptions to this rule, but don't expect the RX-7 to simply 'work' everyday. Be ready to administer TLC at a moments notice and/or shell out cash. ALSO, make sure you have $3-4K in reserve just in case you happen to need to replace the motor.

-M
Are they really that unreliable?
Old 06-23-10, 06:31 PM
  #23  
Don't worry be happy...

iTrader: (1)
 
Montego's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 6,846
Received 787 Likes on 463 Posts
Originally Posted by viegasgixxer1000
Are they really that unreliable?

No.

Most of the reliability issues that come from these cars are the ones that the owners caused themselves. I’ve met a few owners that have had constant issues with their cars not starting or not running properly. None of them were stock.

Some of those had shitty tunes and were fouling their plugs so bad that sometimes the car wouldn’t start and they would end up flooding it. Probably the worst mod that I’ve seen is changing out the stock battery for that piece of **** oddyssey PC680. ******* thing is a motorcycle battery, so it’s just not the best choice. As it can’t hold a charge worth of ****. Better hope that your tune is 100% or that the battery is fully charged as if you have to crank your car more than 3 times you’re done as it already ran out of juice. Roll the windows down with the engine off? Bad idea, dome light? Yeah make sure it’s off. Stereo on only with the car running. The lesson is that when modding the car make sure that you put some thought into what exactly you are doing.


Given the age of the car certain things need to be checked and performed.
1) Eliminate or replace the AST because it's plastic and it cracks
2) Replace the stock radiator again because of it’s plastic endtanks
3) Replace the pulsation dampener
4) Replace the precat with a downpipe. The precat’s always go to **** because of the hot rotary exhaust temps.
5) Get AI
6) Steam clean engine internals peiodically to remove carbon buildup

For overall fun factor:
1) Get a boost gauge to make sure you are always boosting properly
2) Replace stock vacuum hoses with silicon to avoid the always having boost problem
3) STAY 10 PSI

Happy motoring and WOT at your heart’s content without having to worry about ignition, fuel, EGT’s, AFR’s, basically detonating overall, nothing. Just floor it and go… The only downside especially compared with today’s cars is that you’de be on the slow side :P:


Originally Posted by grimple1
you are incorrect. they are not reliable. especially in stock trim. even the most die hard rotorhead will tell you to purchase a daily driver. I say this as someone that daily drove his FD for 2 years and dreaded almost every minute of it. You couldn't ever count on it 100%.

Now that it's a weekend car, it's much more enjoyable. And has brought me back from the brink of selling it.
I disagree completely, sorry to say but that car is certainly a lemon. The FD is a very reliable car if kept in good condition. What do I base this opinion on? Being an owner for 12 years and putting over 110K miles on my FD. I NEVER worry if my car is going to start nor if it's going to leave me someplace. NEVER.

In those 110K miles my car has stranded me twice: Once when the engine went and seized upon start up. And two last year when a rear coolant hose broke. That's it...


Originally Posted by MattGold
Not too take this too far off topic - but quite a few in the ballpark.

Remember, this is before "the industry" really took off. Before Fast & Furious, before DSport & Modified Magazine, before Formula D & Time Attack, before RX-7 Store had their own store front.

My only point being, after 2001 the market on RX-7s, took off and continues to stay high. Current trends represent only a dip it an otherwise abnormally high market.
I don't agree . Like I said above I've been an owner for a long time and periodically check FD prices. Low milage FD prices were way above that in 2001. Think about it the 1995 FD's were still being sold in 1996 and the purchase price of a new FD was high 30's- 40K. So you are saying that in 5 short years one could get one in the low teens? not likely. Some deals yes, but the norm? don't thinks so.

Not only from memory but by analyzing who the owners are/were: If low milage FDs were had in 2001 for 13,500 that means that higher milage ones were available for less, much less. Given that we would have had an influx of teenagers/broke *** owners having them back then. And that wasn't the case and FnF came out in 2001 we would have had them by the boat loads.

A clear indication of automobile attainability and who is buying them can be had by examining the disposable income of it's current owners. From my recollection the broke *** owners didn't start coming until 2005. Prior to that you put a M2 MED IC up for sale for 1K and it would be sold within an hour... Now? good luck with that... Cheap ebay parts on an FD? riiight lol back then it was unheard of. A clear indication of who the current owners were.

In fact the prices have slowly being declining over the years. Right now it seems to be a low point and holding some what. What I attribute it to be the low prices is that most FD's are beat to **** these days and hence must be sold at low prices. Even then the prices are quite high when taken into account how old these cars are, and the condition that they are in. It’s kinda sad but a few weeks ago I stopped at local rotary shop (one I never go to) because but I needed to see if they could get some items. When the owner came out he was impressed with my car and actually said “wow! It’s been a while seen I’ve seen a car in this good of a condition. Most of the ones we see these days are pretty torn up and the owners are always trying to cut corners” And I live in Southern CA where there seems to be the most FD’s around. Nevermind that My FD has almost 165K on the clock.

I am a firm believer that these cars WILL be collectibles. Given it's unique engine, exterior styling, performance, the way EVERYONE feels like a race car driver when they sit in it, and hence the overall wow factor. I can't drive one day without someone either giving me the thumbs up, rubber necking, taking pictures and let's face it the FD is 18 years old (it really came out in 92'). So the car has all of the makings to reach the potential of being a collectible. The only thing it has against it: is that it's badged under japanese automaker.

Last edited by Montego; 06-23-10 at 06:52 PM.
Old 06-23-10, 07:00 PM
  #24  
Cheap Bastard

iTrader: (2)
 
adam c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Posts: 8,370
Received 50 Likes on 42 Posts
If you like it, and can afford it, buy it. Sounds like an exceptional car. It should be you play car, not your daily driver.
Old 06-23-10, 08:25 PM
  #25  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
viegasgixxer1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so im guessing an evo 8 would be a much more reliable buy?


Quick Reply: Good buy or not?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:26 AM.