going single (gt35r)
#51
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by desmond
another thing he could do for now is take off one of the ic couplers just after the turbo so he can't get into boost at all. it will run like crap from the giant boost leak, but he won't be able to get into boost. thats what i did on my stock twins when i was trying to pass emissions and didn't want the guy conducting the test to get into boost. is there any harm in doing this?
#52
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by seandizzie
Yes you can over spin the turbo, it will spin very fast when venting to atmosphere. if you do any rpm/throttle input that would normally spool the turbo, you are spinning the hell out of it.
#55
Please somebody help!!!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Woodridge, IL
Posts: 1,442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by crazyrx7
First of all he can't keep an eye on his injector duty because he doesn't have a power fc.
Originally Posted by nissanconvert
I also read the OP wrong- i thought he had the PFC already.
Originally Posted by crazyrx7
Secondly if he bores out his primaries to 850's; the stock ecu still sees them as 550's and dumps in fuel accordingly. But you now have a bigger injector so you will most likely flood the car on first startup because it will be dumping in so much fuel.
Originally Posted by nissanconvert
getting your primaries machined to accept 850cc injectors
Originally Posted by nissanconvert
And i said get the rail machined to accept 850cc's not get the 550cc's bored out.
Originally Posted by nissanconvert
I also read the OP wrong- i thought he had the PFC already.
Originally Posted by mahjik
The difference is CFM verses manifold pressure. CFM is basically velocity, in this case air. At the same given pressure, a larger turbo is moving more air (i.e. CFM is higher), thus the increase in power between a large single turbo and the stock twins. Even if a larger turbo could not make 450hp @13 PSI, 10 PSI on a large single turbo is still not the same as 10 PSI on the stock twins. Its extremely doubtful the stock ECU will be able to support that.
Please don't make any mistake: i don't think that he had a good idea.
#56
Mr. Links
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by NissanConvert
I understand CFM (volume/time) but i don't see how at the same manifold pressure, with the same engine, same porting, etc. how one turbo will be getting the engine (otherwise unchanged) to ingest more air.
If CFM made no difference at all, then switching turbos would have no effect at the same boost settings as the stock twins (i.e. 10 PSI would result in x HP on all turbos given the same car/engine). But we all know that's not the case.
#57
Mr. Links
iTrader: (1)
Let's put it this way:
You have a few ways to get more power, but they both require air and fuel. For air, you have basically two things:
1. Larger turbo
2. Engine porting
The larger turbo is going to send more air faster. The intake ports are only open for a limited time. The more that can get into the intake ports, the more power you can make (given the rest of the equation is complete as well).
Engine porting helps by opening the intake ports so they are basically open longer. This is why you can make more power with the stock turbos and porting as the ports are open longer to bring in more air. However, they are still limited by the CFM which a large singe will still outflow them with or without porting.
You have a few ways to get more power, but they both require air and fuel. For air, you have basically two things:
1. Larger turbo
2. Engine porting
The larger turbo is going to send more air faster. The intake ports are only open for a limited time. The more that can get into the intake ports, the more power you can make (given the rest of the equation is complete as well).
Engine porting helps by opening the intake ports so they are basically open longer. This is why you can make more power with the stock turbos and porting as the ports are open longer to bring in more air. However, they are still limited by the CFM which a large singe will still outflow them with or without porting.
#58
Please somebody help!!!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Woodridge, IL
Posts: 1,442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But with all of the other restrictions in the system how is the single going to move more air? I don't deny that a single will move more air but if the air doesn't have anywhere to go the air isn't getting moved.
This is all a moot point anyhow. If he doesn't have a boost controller or his wg spring is set too high (i doubt it's set at 14lbs but even 10lbs would likely be too high) then one stab on the throttle might be a one way trip to a rebuild.
This is all a moot point anyhow. If he doesn't have a boost controller or his wg spring is set too high (i doubt it's set at 14lbs but even 10lbs would likely be too high) then one stab on the throttle might be a one way trip to a rebuild.
#59
Lives on the Forum
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally Posted by NissanConvert
But with all of the other restrictions in the system how is the single going to move more air? I don't deny that a single will move more air but if the air doesn't have anywhere to go the air isn't getting moved.
Stock at 10 psi, I made 220 rwhp. After all bolt-ons, BNRs, streetport, I made 305-310 rwhp at 10 psi. What has changed? Volume of air is the only answer. Air is moving faster through my system than stock.
#60
Mr. Links
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by NissanConvert
But with all of the other restrictions in the system how is the single going to move more air? I don't deny that a single will move more air but if the air doesn't have anywhere to go the air isn't getting moved.
#61
Please somebody help!!!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Woodridge, IL
Posts: 1,442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rynberg
Perhaps you should rethink your evaluation of the "restrictions" in the system.
Stock at 10 psi, I made 220 rwhp. After all bolt-ons, BNRs, streetport, I made 305-310 rwhp at 10 psi. What has changed? Volume of air is the only answer. Air is moving faster through my system than stock.
Stock at 10 psi, I made 220 rwhp. After all bolt-ons, BNRs, streetport, I made 305-310 rwhp at 10 psi. What has changed? Volume of air is the only answer. Air is moving faster through my system than stock.
Originally Posted by mahjik
The restriction really isn't in the exhaust. The restrictions are really in the combustion chamber and your rpms. No matter how big your exhaust porting is, you only have so much air the combustion chamber can hold. The faster your rpms, the more air can be taken and moved (i.e. why you make more power as your revs go up).
#62
Rob
iTrader: (2)
I struggled to wrap my mind around this for a while.
Here's why it's tough to come to grips with. (the following will repeat some of what has already been said)
example thought process: You have an engine which rotates at a given RPM, let's say 6000 rotations per minute for grins. now at 6000 rpm the intake port is open for the same amount of time for both a t78 and a stock twin setup. So the time intervals are fixed by the engines rotation. Assuming that both setups are creating 10 PSI of pressure measures from the intake manifold (which has a fixed internal volume) then it seems impossible for one turbo to make more power at 10 PSI than another because both the volume of the engine and the intake manifold are fixed. And since the volumes are fixed that means the same net force is exerted onto the intake charge in both scenarios.
this is the point where most people scratch their heads ^^^
Most of you know this but I'll say it anyway:
1PSI = 1LB force per square inch (not Pounds of air per square inch!) - think about it, a square inch is a unit of area, not volume. 10 PSI = ten pound of force exerted exerted on every square inch of internal surface area of the intake manifold and intake ports = says nothing about how much air is in the intake/engine ( if it did it would be per cubic inch) just how much force the air is exerting as it gets force fed from the turbo's compressor.
With that being said, one can calculate the air density based on how much pressure is exerted, but PSI is not a measure of volume in and of itself.
Now, "Cubic feet per minute (CFM) is a non-SI unit of measurement of gasflow (most often airflow) that indicates how many cubic feet of gas (most often air) pass by a stationary point in one minute. In other words, it is a unit for measuring the rate of flow of a gas or air volume into or out of a space."
-wikipedia
OK, so we accept that a large turbo expells air at a higher velocity and therefore has a higher CFM. Now lets try to understand why:
One easy way to understand how larger turbos move air at a higher velocity it is useful to think about a neck in a river and the way that water flow through it.
The wheel size and outlet volume of a T78 turbo compressor is much larger than that of the twin setup. This large volume of air leaves the turbo and enters the bottleneck which is the intake tract speeding up just as water speeds up in a river bottleneck.
The air flowing from the small twin compressors on the other hand are flowing into the same river, but this time the river is large in relation to the charge volume so the air just creeps along.
OK so we established the following:
The tricky part:
At 10PSI (assuming the same intake temps) the T78 is cramming the same amount of air into the intake manifold as the twin setup. So what gives?
Here's the key point to understand:
The boost that you are reading at the intake manifold is not telling you how much air actually makes it into the intake ports during their short open interval. It's only a measurement of force exerted on the intake plenum.
Key to understanding:
The air coming from the twins will surge forward into the intake ports with a lower velocity than that from the T78 for the reasons that we established in our "river bottlnecK" example earlier.
So while both turbos are exerting the same amount of force on the intake ports the air from the T78 is approaching the intake ports at a higher velocity and therefore more will get in before the port closes.
Lastly: The boost reading that you see on your gauge is not taken from within the engine, it is taken from your intake plenum and should not be confused with an internal measurement. Understand these points and you will have the problem cracked.
I may be wrong but that's my logic ;o) Hope that helps someone.
Here's why it's tough to come to grips with. (the following will repeat some of what has already been said)
example thought process: You have an engine which rotates at a given RPM, let's say 6000 rotations per minute for grins. now at 6000 rpm the intake port is open for the same amount of time for both a t78 and a stock twin setup. So the time intervals are fixed by the engines rotation. Assuming that both setups are creating 10 PSI of pressure measures from the intake manifold (which has a fixed internal volume) then it seems impossible for one turbo to make more power at 10 PSI than another because both the volume of the engine and the intake manifold are fixed. And since the volumes are fixed that means the same net force is exerted onto the intake charge in both scenarios.
this is the point where most people scratch their heads ^^^
Most of you know this but I'll say it anyway:
1PSI = 1LB force per square inch (not Pounds of air per square inch!) - think about it, a square inch is a unit of area, not volume. 10 PSI = ten pound of force exerted exerted on every square inch of internal surface area of the intake manifold and intake ports = says nothing about how much air is in the intake/engine ( if it did it would be per cubic inch) just how much force the air is exerting as it gets force fed from the turbo's compressor.
With that being said, one can calculate the air density based on how much pressure is exerted, but PSI is not a measure of volume in and of itself.
Now, "Cubic feet per minute (CFM) is a non-SI unit of measurement of gasflow (most often airflow) that indicates how many cubic feet of gas (most often air) pass by a stationary point in one minute. In other words, it is a unit for measuring the rate of flow of a gas or air volume into or out of a space."
-wikipedia
OK, so we accept that a large turbo expells air at a higher velocity and therefore has a higher CFM. Now lets try to understand why:
One easy way to understand how larger turbos move air at a higher velocity it is useful to think about a neck in a river and the way that water flow through it.
The wheel size and outlet volume of a T78 turbo compressor is much larger than that of the twin setup. This large volume of air leaves the turbo and enters the bottleneck which is the intake tract speeding up just as water speeds up in a river bottleneck.
The air flowing from the small twin compressors on the other hand are flowing into the same river, but this time the river is large in relation to the charge volume so the air just creeps along.
OK so we established the following:
- At a given RPM the intake ports are open for a defined period of time.
- A large turbo moves air more rapidly through an intake tract with a fixed volume.
The tricky part:
At 10PSI (assuming the same intake temps) the T78 is cramming the same amount of air into the intake manifold as the twin setup. So what gives?
Here's the key point to understand:
The boost that you are reading at the intake manifold is not telling you how much air actually makes it into the intake ports during their short open interval. It's only a measurement of force exerted on the intake plenum.
Key to understanding:
The air coming from the twins will surge forward into the intake ports with a lower velocity than that from the T78 for the reasons that we established in our "river bottlnecK" example earlier.
So while both turbos are exerting the same amount of force on the intake ports the air from the T78 is approaching the intake ports at a higher velocity and therefore more will get in before the port closes.
Lastly: The boost reading that you see on your gauge is not taken from within the engine, it is taken from your intake plenum and should not be confused with an internal measurement. Understand these points and you will have the problem cracked.
I may be wrong but that's my logic ;o) Hope that helps someone.
#63
Mr. Links
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by NissanConvert
Ultimately yes the restriction is the combustion chamber volume. But if that was the only restriction no power would be gained from increasing exhaust or intake diameter.
#64
Big Daddy!!!
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nissanconvert; you can get new 850 primaries with rail if you want but how are you going to tune the factory ecu and tell it that there are 850's in there instead of 550's? If you had a power fc you would understand how much setting up it takes to get the proper amount of fuel on startup. After startup the car has to stay running some how so there is a fuel map for that rpm. I can go on for hours but I already know this where as you should read up on it then you will understand that what you said will not work.
R.K.
R.K.
#65
Rob
iTrader: (2)
I started a new thread for this flow discussion since it is probably driving this thread off track, if it even has an identifiable direction.... lol
https://www.rx7club.com/3rd-gen-archives-73/why-bigger-turbos-make-more-hp-same-psi-645551/
https://www.rx7club.com/3rd-gen-archives-73/why-bigger-turbos-make-more-hp-same-psi-645551/
#66
Please somebody help!!!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Woodridge, IL
Posts: 1,442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by crazyrx7
Nissanconvert; you can get new 850 primaries with rail if you want but how are you going to tune the factory ecu and tell it that there are 850's in there instead of 550's? If you had a power fc you would understand how much setting up it takes to get the proper amount of fuel on startup. After startup the car has to stay running some how so there is a fuel map for that rpm. I can go on for hours but I already know this where as you should read up on it then you will understand that what you said will not work.
R.K.
R.K.
Originally Posted by nissanconvert
I also read the OP wrong- i thought he had the PFC already.
I will be attending the fluid dynamics of exhaust flow discussion.
#67
Big Daddy!!!
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by NissanConvert
You're killing me...
I'm really getting tired of quoting myself.
I will be attending the fluid dynamics of exhaust flow discussion.
I'm really getting tired of quoting myself.
I will be attending the fluid dynamics of exhaust flow discussion.
Maybe I should of taken your advice and read what you wrote. Sorry man. Either way maybe I educated the original poster of this thread.
R.K.
#69
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by Jason
This thread is funny. The answer to his question is yes he can run that turbo on the stock ECU, but dont get into boost.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
demetlaw
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
6
10-02-15 06:22 PM