3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Go for single or twin?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 30, 2008 | 12:49 PM
  #26  
metalCORE's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
From: Germany
I haven't said you can't use it, but it works best at high boost. Sorry for my stupid post, i got the info from a garrett mechanic, but you sure know it better.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2008 | 12:58 PM
  #27  
thewird's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,603
Likes: 15
From: Toronto, Canada
And he still is going on about it as if it has to be right because he heard it from garrett mechanic...

I think you should only post like this when you know for a fact yourself what your posting instead of listening to other people.

thewird
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2008 | 01:15 PM
  #28  
metalCORE's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
From: Germany
...look at the compressor map, as example for the GT3582R, and look at the pressure difference. You will see what i mean, hopefully...

Believe what you want, but the picture tells the story...
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2008 | 01:43 PM
  #29  
thewird's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,603
Likes: 15
From: Toronto, Canada
Maybe your the one who should have a good solid look at those compressor maps. Efficiency start dropping off after 20psi on a 35R...

thewird
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2008 | 03:06 PM
  #30  
metalCORE's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
From: Germany
???

...it tells me that the pressure ratio is Pi = 2 (don't know the correct english spelling for Pi, but for 2 its around 1 bar or 14.5 psi) and thats the lowest acceptable pressure.

Perhaps we look a bit different on these compression diagrams...
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2008 | 03:24 PM
  #31  
thewird's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,603
Likes: 15
From: Toronto, Canada
Taken from http://fc3spro.com/TECH/TURBO/compmap.html . Stop posting if you don't know what your talking about and pretending its 100% fact even after people tell you your wrong.



thewird
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2008 | 04:43 PM
  #32  
oo7arkman's Avatar
In the Garage
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 1
From: Central FL
^^Thank you!!!! Geez... MetalCORE, I am not really sure what so-called garrett mechanic you spoke with but even then if you look at the correct maps you will see that the GT35r really begins to run out of breathe after 21-22psi... Efficiency drops at that boost to below70% which at the point you want to stop turning up the boost.... This is what spurned A-Spec into creating the 500r with does much better at higher boost. If you don't believe us here is a quote from the turbo gooroo Sean from a-spec himself that can be found in the a-spec vendor forum under 500r. "A-spec 500R
Originally Posted by Zero R
If your looking for something that has more topend than a 35R but quicker response than the larger turbo's this will do it. It is more efficient across the board and especially at higher pressure ratios. Example 15lbs on a 35R 74% eff. 500R 77%.. @18lbs 35R 72% 500R 75%.. @20lbs 35R 67% 500R 75%.. @25lbs 35R is out of breath, 500R is 73%.. It will support up to 75lbs/min. at a pressure ratio of 2.75 I can even broaden this for you further if you opt for the anti surge compressor. The best part is you wont have to sacrifice response for this setup. It will be very similar to the standard 35R in response. I spent a while finding this combination and I think it will be the absolute best offering out there for those who want response and power.
To the OP, I really think that it is in your best interest to stay with a TT setup. The BNR's are really pretty killer from everything that I have heard. From cost of going single to the simple fact that you live in CA... Despite what was said earlier about it not really being so expensive if you already have a lot of the suppourting mods... Well they are only about half correct. It is sure cheaper than starting from scratch,but there are numerous misc. expences that end up making the process cost more than even a good planner can anticipate from hoses, to fittings, heat wraps and other little things that you find when you get into it. Just look around in the single turbo forum and search for how much it costs to go single, even for those that already have most of the suppourting mods. Unfortuneately it is not that cheap. Easily over $5k and that is doing all the work except the tuning yourself. No, I don't mean you have to have the most expensive available option to put it all together, but really to do it right the first time and for it to be reliable it does cost a good chunk of change.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2008 | 03:44 AM
  #33  
metalCORE's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
From: Germany
@oo7arkman: Thanks for this information, but i even can't believe he told me ****, 'cause he's also working on race cars... Besides, i haven't informed that much, i'm going single next year but i think i have understand to read a compressor map. So little mistakes are possible - this is human, i think. ;-)

@thewird: Thanks for the link, nice to know. But as there is said the box describes the center of efficiency plateau. Perhaps that was the difference, i was looking to another map where the pressiure ratio was really the limit with 2. :-)
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2008 | 04:39 PM
  #34  
axnjaksn's Avatar
the one and only
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: socal
Single All The Way!!!!!!
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2008 | 05:49 PM
  #35  
oo7arkman's Avatar
In the Garage
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 1
From: Central FL
Originally Posted by metalCORE
@oo7arkman: Thanks for this information, but i even can't believe he told me ****, 'cause he's also working on race cars... Besides, i haven't informed that much, i'm going single next year but i think i have understand to read a compressor map. So little mistakes are possible - this is human, i think. ;-)
Sure, little mistakes are possible. But 10psi is not really what I would call a "little" mistake. No telling what mistake he made, but if he is working on race cars I hope this mistake was a rare one. Possibly he did not calculate correctly for the rotary. Does he normally work on piston engines? The single turbo is a fun setup IMO. 400-450rwhp is really more than enough in the FD, and it just makes it a blast to drive. Good luck with your future single conversion, but you may want to speak with a few other tuners before you commit to the conversion just to gain more knowledge.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2008 | 12:49 PM
  #36  
RXKarma's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: Oahu, HI
if you want an idea of what the BNR TT systems are capable of check out goodfellafd3s's car and dyno video
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2008 | 01:42 PM
  #37  
heidihi's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
From: ames, iowa
agreed but remember he was non seq.. but there are reports of people breaking 400whp using the BNR's sequential still.. i think that be a dream machine if it were easy to do!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HalifaxFD
Canadian Forum
126
May 9, 2016 07:06 PM
sinistersam
New Member RX-7 Technical
5
Sep 13, 2015 07:17 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:19 PM.