Fastest e.t. with non-sequential set-up
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Clovis, NM
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fastest e.t. with non-sequential set-up
Does anyone know some really low quarter mile e.t.'s with non-sequential set-up? I'm talking like 11's? I've heard of 11.70's but I wanted to see if anyone else had heard of times this low. And I mean stock turbos, not different compressor wheels or opened up for better flow.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Clovis, NM
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by JoeD
fastest i have heard on stock twins was 11.1.
fastest i have heard on stock twins was 11.1.
Do you know how much boost the stock turbos can generate?
#5
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Originally posted by Crazy_Jake
Damn! It was a non-sequential conversion I assume?
Do you know how much boost the stock turbos can generate?
Damn! It was a non-sequential conversion I assume?
Do you know how much boost the stock turbos can generate?
the stock turbos could spin to 17/18 pounds of boost. but would you want to run the turbos at that much boost without race fuel, and for long periods of time?? no.
#7
Lurking..................
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: PA
Posts: 2,220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah non-sequential doesn't actually make the car faster than say a sequential car. And that 11.1 JoeD is talking about I believe has a ton of mods, And I believe Kevin Wyum(sp??) went 10's on twins back in the day but I am not sure if they were stock or not.
Trending Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Snook
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
17
02-27-21 02:54 PM