3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Fastest e.t. with non-sequential set-up

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-02-02, 06:14 PM
  #1  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
Crazy_Jake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Clovis, NM
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fastest e.t. with non-sequential set-up

Does anyone know some really low quarter mile e.t.'s with non-sequential set-up? I'm talking like 11's? I've heard of 11.70's but I wanted to see if anyone else had heard of times this low. And I mean stock turbos, not different compressor wheels or opened up for better flow.
Old 03-02-02, 06:22 PM
  #2  
Will u do me a kindness?

iTrader: (2)
 
the_glass_man's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Parlor City, NY
Posts: 5,031
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
For those 10 Seconds or less, I'm free. Yeah right.
Not sure on this one though, I know people have been into the 10's on stock twins, but with the regular setup I'm not sure.
Old 03-02-02, 06:43 PM
  #3  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
JoeD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,158
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
fastest i have heard on stock twins was 11.1.
Old 03-02-02, 06:48 PM
  #4  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
Crazy_Jake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Clovis, NM
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by JoeD
fastest i have heard on stock twins was 11.1.
Damn! It was a non-sequential conversion I assume?
Do you know how much boost the stock turbos can generate?
Old 03-02-02, 06:53 PM
  #5  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
JoeD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,158
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by Crazy_Jake


Damn! It was a non-sequential conversion I assume?
Do you know how much boost the stock turbos can generate?
yes...this was in non-sequential trim.

the stock turbos could spin to 17/18 pounds of boost. but would you want to run the turbos at that much boost without race fuel, and for long periods of time?? no.
Old 03-02-02, 11:52 PM
  #6  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
kwikrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Mechanicsburg, PA USA
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
11s are very possible on stock twins whether sequential or non-seq. Most of the faster cars I've heard of have been non-sequential FDs
Old 03-02-02, 11:56 PM
  #7  
Lurking..................

 
black99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: PA
Posts: 2,220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah non-sequential doesn't actually make the car faster than say a sequential car. And that 11.1 JoeD is talking about I believe has a ton of mods, And I believe Kevin Wyum(sp??) went 10's on twins back in the day but I am not sure if they were stock or not.
Old 03-02-02, 11:57 PM
  #8  
Lurking..................

 
black99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: PA
Posts: 2,220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh and I have heard of alot of stock twins cars breaking into the 11's so it is possible.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Snook
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
17
02-27-21 02:54 PM
GKW
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
5
09-28-15 04:34 PM



Quick Reply: Fastest e.t. with non-sequential set-up



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:07 PM.