3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

ECU, my stocker safe with a super loaded one?

Old Jan 5, 2004 | 01:38 AM
  #1  
Recipe7's Avatar
Thread Starter
With Life.
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,387
Likes: 0
From: Dodgers
ECU, my stocker safe with a super loaded one?

im wondering if its safe to drive my relatively stock 93 automatic (look at sig) with an ecu that is meant for a DP, MP, intake, etc.

can a 93 use an ecu from a 94 or a 95?

also, whats the exact difference from the cali and the non cali. is it a "non-cali" basically just cause its made for a DP and MP and such?

so im looking for a stock automatic ECU. maybe one reprogramed for intake and catback. PM me if you can hook me up

Last edited by Recipe7; Jan 5, 2004 at 01:42 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2004 | 02:01 AM
  #2  
Heath's Avatar
MAGNUM SE7EN
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,427
Likes: 0
From: Asheville, NC USA
It should be safe to use but you will most likely run rich.

A 93 shouldn't have a problem using an ecu from a 94 or 95 although 95's don't have egr's.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2004 | 02:23 AM
  #3  
artguy's Avatar
WTB** Very Low Miles 94-95
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,298
Likes: 0
From: Tejas
you can blow it running rich....i would not drive it hard or under boost until you get it tuned properly. I honestly wouldnt even drive it like that at all.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2004 | 03:32 AM
  #4  
poss's Avatar
Slower Traffic Keep Right
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,194
Likes: 2
From: Dayton, OH
Originally posted by artguy
you can blow it running rich....
I've never heard of anyone actually blowing their motor by running rich. Do you have any info on this? I assume you are talking about the carbon hot spot theory. IMO, possible, but very unlikely.

I can say this though, if it runs rich, you will have MASSIVE carbon build up on your rotors, not so much the combustion surfaces, but the sides....unfortunately, i have seen this. It does wonders for compression numbers.

Anyway, other than running rich, you shouldn't have any problemswith that ECU. The egr issue with the 95's is the only problem I could see with using a different ECU.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2004 | 05:19 PM
  #5  
Recipe7's Avatar
Thread Starter
With Life.
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,387
Likes: 0
From: Dodgers
what is this EGR?

and can someone explain to me the difference from cali and non cali ecu's?

thanks
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2004 | 07:18 PM
  #6  
fdeeznutz's Avatar
White is tight
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ
Originally posted by Heath
It should be safe to use but you will most likely run rich.

A 93 shouldn't have a problem using an ecu from a 94 or 95 although 95's don't have egr's.
I tried using a 93 ECU in my car and all of the check lights came on and the car ran like ****. It might have been the diff in east coast west coast
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2004 | 08:28 PM
  #7  
93BlackFD's Avatar
built my own engine
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,470
Likes: 2
From: Buckhead, Atlanta
carbon buildup can cause sticky seals too
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SCinfidel
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
4
Sep 8, 2015 05:36 PM
Steven_McKinley
General Rotary Tech Support
12
Sep 5, 2015 10:48 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:53 AM.