dynoed my 7 last night
#1
Rotary Freak
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Salem, IN
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
dynoed my 7 last night
just thought everyone might like to see the results. i have the sheets, but can't get them posted for a while. I made 303.2 hp and 283.3 tq SAE. My mods are dp/mp, Apex'i catback, Don't be a Rikki non-seq conversion, power fc, and a k&n in the stock airbox. I was running 1.02 bar or 15lbs for those of you who hate the metric system. It had absolutely no knock and running 12.5 air fuel all across the board. I didn't think it was too shabby at all. What do you all think??
#2
Rotary Enthusiast
The airbox inlet is more of a restriction than stock filter, based on my pressure drop measurements. With RB duct, or better yet ... other mods to box (search), you will get same power at 13-14 psi, with less turbo stress.
#3
what was the ambient temp? I would think those numbers should be higher considering the amount of boost you were running. Also, the a/f is a bit on the risky side for my taste.
#5
Rotary Freak
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Salem, IN
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the ambient air was 49.2 degrees, we had it pretty chilly in there, but my motor was averaging about 88 degrees celcius water temp during 4th gear pulls. the air fuel is about as harsh as i wanna get, i'm gettin a front mount, intake, and fuel pump soon, so i will dial it down to like 12:1. the rpm lead was attached to the front trailing spark plug wire, he had to squeeze to get it in there, but he managed
#6
Yeah I always figured the o2 should stay between 11.2 and 11.7 I always kept it near their.
Good numbers. I dont have a mp but almost the same mods and I made just ab out 280hp when I went on the dyno. I had about 250 tq I also still have sequential setup.
I have a question for ya. Did you ever have the mp on when running seq. If you did was their noticeable boost spiking?
Good numbers. I dont have a mp but almost the same mods and I made just ab out 280hp when I went on the dyno. I had about 250 tq I also still have sequential setup.
I have a question for ya. Did you ever have the mp on when running seq. If you did was their noticeable boost spiking?
#7
Rotary Freak
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Salem, IN
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i never had it running right with the sequential setup so i converted it. i never had the mp on there with the sequential. although on the dyno the boost was dropping off to like 12 lbs on the big end in 4th, so i figured with the power curve i have it's not bad at all
Trending Topics
#8
Original Gangster/Rotary!
iTrader: (213)
That's an interesting split between hp and torque. When I put down 337 awhile back w/my ported motor, I had less torque than you. Can't quite remember the value, but I know it was less than yours.
#9
The Dude Abides
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: san jose, ca
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You should be a little higher then that at 15psi. What type of dyno was this, a Dynojet? I'd expect at least 320RWHP with a midpipe. Get a bigger IC. The turbos aren't efficient at those boost levels and generate a lot of heat. And I would add some fuel. 12.5:1 is too lean to be running around at all the time. Keep in mind, the dyno doesn't put as much load on the engine as the street does. You'll be even leaner on the street.
#10
Lives on the Forum
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Your engine and turbos are hand grenades waiting to go off. You should never run an A/F ratio under full boost of higher than 11.5 on pump gas. Running the stockers at 15 psi is harsh enough but it's suicide with the stock IC. Also, you really don't have enough fuel delivery with the stock pump and injectors to run 15 psi. I hope this is not your daily driver setting.
You are running on the ragged edge and are asking for a rebuild (and new turbos).
You are running on the ragged edge and are asking for a rebuild (and new turbos).
#12
development
I think 15psi is a little high for the stockers and the stock IC...probably the turbos heating up to much at 15psi, you might be able to make more power at a lower psi...little cooler air and the stock IC can't help too much, I'm an idiot though
I was making 301 at 13psi seq-setup.
I was making 301 at 13psi seq-setup.
Last edited by dubulup; 12-11-02 at 06:47 AM.
#15
Rotary Freak
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Salem, IN
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i brought the a/f back down, just wanted to see what it would do at an even 12.5. the turbos are brand new with less than 2,000 miles on them. i know i'm running them at their edge, but that'll just give me reason to go to a single. as for the intercooler, i've got an apex front mount and intakes on the way as well as a radiator and fuel pump. it was only running 92% injector duty with the fuel cranked up and running 10:1 a/f. but at any rate, i know the damage that can be done, i never asked for comments about my mods, i just wanted to know what everyone thought of my numbers. but i do appreciate all the concern and help you all provide
#17
Full Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: sunnyvale, Ca
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wow
Nice numbers. Fresh motor too? Thanks for the post. Everyone knows not to run the stock turbos up that high but it's great to know what you get on a single run. I have about the same setup but with a mp and i got 275 rwhp and 234 lb-ft at 12 psi @ about 80F ambient.
#20
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Re: Wow
Originally posted by WhtRocket
Nice numbers. Fresh motor too? Thanks for the post. Everyone knows not to run the stock turbos up that high but it's great to know what you get on a single run. I have about the same setup but with a mp and i got 275 rwhp and 234 lb-ft at 12 psi @ about 80F ambient.
Nice numbers. Fresh motor too? Thanks for the post. Everyone knows not to run the stock turbos up that high but it's great to know what you get on a single run. I have about the same setup but with a mp and i got 275 rwhp and 234 lb-ft at 12 psi @ about 80F ambient.
#22
Full Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: San Leandro, CA
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Strange how our cars are different w/ similar setups(which has been said all along). My latest dyno with above mods, plus Bigger secondaries, IC, fuelpump, and pettit intake(but w/ seq turbos) was 317 rwhp and 254 tq. This was in the 14 psi range and my a/f above 5k rpm was off the chart in richness, less than 10:1. So, I could take out fuel and hopefully still gain hp. This was in 65-70 degree weather. This was also in 3rd gear.
My boost is set to 12 but will spike to 15. Which is fine for me. Also, one does not usually run at 15 psi for extended periods, well at least on the street. But I had my boost set in the 14s since I have had PFC(w/ HF cat). These are 80k stock turbos running like this for 1.5 years. Approx 8k miles of agressive street driving.
Steve
My boost is set to 12 but will spike to 15. Which is fine for me. Also, one does not usually run at 15 psi for extended periods, well at least on the street. But I had my boost set in the 14s since I have had PFC(w/ HF cat). These are 80k stock turbos running like this for 1.5 years. Approx 8k miles of agressive street driving.
Steve
#23
HARRRRRRRRR
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Marietta GA
Posts: 1,858
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by rynberg
Your engine and turbos are hand grenades waiting to go off. You should never run an A/F ratio under full boost of higher than 11.5 on pump gas. Running the stockers at 15 psi is harsh enough but it's suicide with the stock IC. Also, you really don't have enough fuel delivery with the stock pump and injectors to run 15 psi. I hope this is not your daily driver setting.
You are running on the ragged edge and are asking for a rebuild (and new turbos).
Your engine and turbos are hand grenades waiting to go off. You should never run an A/F ratio under full boost of higher than 11.5 on pump gas. Running the stockers at 15 psi is harsh enough but it's suicide with the stock IC. Also, you really don't have enough fuel delivery with the stock pump and injectors to run 15 psi. I hope this is not your daily driver setting.
You are running on the ragged edge and are asking for a rebuild (and new turbos).
#24
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Mechanicsburg, PA USA
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Re: Wow
Originally posted by matty
really...that is news to me...tons of people run 15psi..My understanding is that you need to upgrade the IC before you can run that much psi.I am getting my car tuned for 15psi in the spring...alot of people do it and I am almost 100% sure that KD wouldnt tune my car to 15 psi if it wasnt fruitful or if it was dangerous.
really...that is news to me...tons of people run 15psi..My understanding is that you need to upgrade the IC before you can run that much psi.I am getting my car tuned for 15psi in the spring...alot of people do it and I am almost 100% sure that KD wouldnt tune my car to 15 psi if it wasnt fruitful or if it was dangerous.
#25
Full Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: sunnyvale, Ca
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Re: Wow
[QUOTE]Originally posted by matty
[B]
Yeah it will work for a while but generally not for long. If you look at the rest of this thread, you'll see I'm not the only one who thinks this is a bad idea. I was wrong to say everyone knows this. After all, you take exception so there's at least one believer.
[B]
Yeah it will work for a while but generally not for long. If you look at the rest of this thread, you'll see I'm not the only one who thinks this is a bad idea. I was wrong to say everyone knows this. After all, you take exception so there's at least one believer.
Last edited by WhtRocket; 12-12-02 at 06:35 PM.