3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

To DP or not to DP, that is the question!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 26, 2002 | 12:30 PM
  #1  
bluesman!'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Question To DP or not to DP, that is the question!

I've read everything I can on and off the forum re DP's. So I understand basically how they work and the benefits of less restricion, less heat, etc. Some retailers/mfgr's claim as much as a 25-35 hp gain. I know how those claims go but I'd be happy with half that. However, my car is used for street use only and I live in an urban area where I rarely get to rev it real high. What I don't know is whether the hp gains will be accross the power band, or mainly at higher rpms? If it will have a dramatic effect on 0-30, or even 0-60 times I'm game, but if it will only benefit me in a quarter mile, I'll pass. Any advice will be appreciated.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2002 | 12:36 PM
  #2  
mjw's Avatar
mjw
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 1
From: LostAngeles
You will definitely notice a difference, my primary turbo spooled a bit earlier after I installed the downpipe. But the foremost reason to get a DP is the heat reduction under the hood, you prolong the life of everything under there by reducing the heat it receives.

Matt
93 SSM
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2002 | 12:40 PM
  #3  
GsrSol's Avatar
Z06 powered FD
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,883
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Texas
Originally posted by mjw
You will definitely notice a difference, my primary turbo spooled a bit earlier after I installed the downpipe. But the foremost reason to get a DP is the heat reduction under the hood, you prolong the life of everything under there by reducing the heat it receives.

Matt
93 SSM
Exactly, I was more worried about the heat rather then hp gains.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2002 | 12:44 PM
  #4  
lane_change's Avatar
It has begun
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,393
Likes: 17
From: Houston, TX
Another vote for a DP as a reliability mod rather than just performance. But the performance will also be helped dramatically.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2002 | 12:50 PM
  #6  
lawn boy's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: washington (pittsburgh), pa
only problem with a downpipe is the potential for boost spikes
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2002 | 12:50 PM
  #7  
bluesman!'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: Florida
O.K. I won't argue the benefits of reducing all that heat. That seems to be a foregone conclusion and reason enough to add a DP. But I'd still like to know what to expect in performance gains.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2002 | 01:17 PM
  #8  
BrianK's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 625
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
Originally posted by bluesman!
O.K. I won't argue the benefits of reducing all that heat. That seems to be a foregone conclusion and reason enough to add a DP. But I'd still like to know what to expect in performance gains.
you'll start engaging the clutch at a little higher rpm to get the same feel as before. You'll notice a slight drop in response at the low rpm range when you hit the gas while underway. The difference, however, is very small, and hardly noticeable.

I too drive my car conservatively and was a bit bummed when I first drove the car until I felt the passenger's side fender after a long drive and was actually able to hold my hand on it. not to mention that there's a much more noticeable power change in the upper rpm range that's fun to venture into every now and then.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2002 | 01:31 PM
  #9  
Rated R1's Avatar
Oji San
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
From: Lexington, SC
According to your mod list you already have a catback and intake. Before you do another exhaust mod you really should upgrade the ECU, get a standalone unit, or control your boost somehow. With a DP, CB, and intake you are definitely going to see some elevated boost.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2002 | 01:52 PM
  #10  
bluesman!'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Thanks. You anticipated my next question!
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2002 | 02:23 PM
  #11  
skunks's Avatar
I'm a CF and poop smith
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 1
From: Hawaii
you don't need a dp, just punch out your precat
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2002 | 02:43 PM
  #12  
maxpesce's Avatar
Ex fd *****
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 1
From: Ventura CA USA
DP, CB and Intake will be ok on the stock ecu - as long as you are running the STOCK cat you should not get any boost creep or spikes.

Check my sig I run all my mods on the stock ecu and have no boost spiking or creep issues - and the black soot in my tail pipes confirms what my A/F meter is telling me - I am still running rich enough.

a DP will drasticaly reduce underhood temps even more so if you wrap it with ThermoTec as I have.

Last edited by maxpesce; Jun 26, 2002 at 02:45 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2002 | 02:52 PM
  #13  
Quickfini's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 0
From: british columbia
Yeah, do you feel that your footwell is really warm now? The stock precat tends to clog up a lot too causing extreme heat conditions. Once i got rid of my precat, that extra heat in the footwell was gone. I felt a little bit of extra power, but my main concern was just heat reduction. It'll increase the life of your engine, your turbos, and everything else. Might as well get it and be on the safe side
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2002 | 06:30 PM
  #14  
redrotaryrock8's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
From: boston
its not even about the power gain only. its about less heat. your underhood temperatures go down significantly. and thats good for the operation of the car. heat is rx7s biggest enemy. if you can get something for 300-350 bucks that can reduce this problem, then why not?????

To DP is the answer. all the way!!!!
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2002 | 06:38 PM
  #15  
gotorx7's Avatar
The 7 can't lose!
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 487
Likes: 1
From: Adelaide, South Australia
Originally posted by bluesman!
O.K. I won't argue the benefits of reducing all that heat. That seems to be a foregone conclusion and reason enough to add a DP. But I'd still like to know what to expect in performance gains.
This is my "Before" Dyno chart :


And here is the "After".

(which actually shows before and after anyway.

Everything else is stock. (note KW, not HP)
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2002 | 07:45 PM
  #16  
Quickfini's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 0
From: british columbia
Whats the conversion from kw to hp again?

thanks..
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2002 | 07:10 AM
  #17  
bluesman!'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Originally posted by Quickfini
Whats the conversion from kw to hp again?
thanks..
You took the words right out of my mouth! Thanks gotorrx7, a pic is worth a thousand words. Now if I only new the conversion for kph!
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2002 | 10:08 AM
  #18  
maxpesce's Avatar
Ex fd *****
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 1
From: Ventura CA USA
100 Kw = 98.63 Hp
100 km/hr = 62.14 mi/hr
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2002 | 10:12 AM
  #19  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
Originally posted by maxpesce
100 Kw = 98.63 Hp
100 km/hr = 62.14 mi/hr
nope

100 kW = 134 HP

140 kW = 188 HP - very low for stock FD

152 kW = 203 HP - represents gain of 15 RWHP
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2002 | 10:13 AM
  #20  
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Saint Louis, Mo
what does kw stand for?
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2002 | 10:15 AM
  #21  
prew's Avatar
*******
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 1
From: NJ
my pre cat got clogged and i started to notice a loss in power, so dave at kdr put a downpipe on for me. If your pre-cat was clogged you will notice a big difference in the power. As far as heat goes, I could always hear my cars exhuast system make noises after i shut the car off while it was cooling down. After the downpipe i dont hear these sounds anymore.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2002 | 09:56 PM
  #22  
djantlive's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 0
My precat was in great condition and when I put in a DP, I noticed big difference throughout the powerband, especially in low RPM. I was really pleasantly surprised that I would gain performance in low rev. I thought it was just for high RPM.

It's gotta be one of the best things you can do to get better performance and not sacrifice reliability.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2002 | 10:16 PM
  #23  
lawn boy's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: washington (pittsburgh), pa
Originally posted by prew
my pre cat got clogged and i started to notice a loss in power, so dave at kdr put a downpipe on for me. If your pre-cat was clogged you will notice a big difference in the power. As far as heat goes, I could always hear my cars exhuast system make noises after i shut the car off while it was cooling down. After the downpipe i dont hear these sounds anymore.
was it the dinging noise?
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2002 | 10:29 PM
  #24  
Boner's Avatar
Ancient Lurking Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15
Likes: 1
From: Planet Zylon



Must be your tractor leaning out in third.....
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2002 | 11:14 PM
  #25  
Quickfini's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 0
From: british columbia
Originally posted by rynberg


nope

100 kW = 134 HP

140 kW = 188 HP - very low for stock FD

152 kW = 203 HP - represents gain of 15 RWHP
Yeah, thats what i thought the conversion was, but i thought something was wrong with my calculation when i found 188hp at the wheels on a stock fd.. that IS pretty low for a stock fd..
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:37 PM.