Difference between rebuilt and replaced engine?
#2
In both cases, both are more then likely rebuilds (or remans as we call them) anyways - unless you order brand new rotor housings, rotors, etc, and build a 'new' one from scratch. As of this time, Mazda does not have 'crate' rotary engines.
The general consensus is that a reman from KD Rotary is a good choice (as they supposedly take it apart to inspect it), though sourcing one thru another means can certainly be fine.
Hope that helps!
The general consensus is that a reman from KD Rotary is a good choice (as they supposedly take it apart to inspect it), though sourcing one thru another means can certainly be fine.
Hope that helps!
#5
Originally posted by mightyslash
I'm sorry but I'm still confused. My question is, is a brand new engine always better than a rebulit one?
I'm sorry but I'm still confused. My question is, is a brand new engine always better than a rebulit one?
Then again, if you had a carefully rebuilt rebuild (hehe) with close eye towards tolerances (or even blue printing) - it would be better then a sloppy job comprising of all new components.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
07-01-23 04:40 PM
ncds_fc
New Member RX-7 Technical
1
08-15-15 10:06 AM