Converting to Parallel, boost creep Q's...
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Northern California
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Converting to Parallel, boost creep Q's...
Im considering doing a full sequential on friends FD. It has a really nice street ported motor, upgraded fuel pump, injectors, IC, dowpipe, exhaust etc.....
After many hours of fighting with the sequential system, parrallel would be much easier. I already ported the new '99 turbos on the car, but i wonder if this will be sufficient to control boost creep at 14psi (the max we want to run) on the car. I remmeber some people saying that they went parallel, but could never control the creep issue. Should the porting be ok? Or do i need to port really big and change the flapper (i dont really want to, but whatever is necessary).
We plan on using the APEX PFC for boost control...
Any suggestions?
After many hours of fighting with the sequential system, parrallel would be much easier. I already ported the new '99 turbos on the car, but i wonder if this will be sufficient to control boost creep at 14psi (the max we want to run) on the car. I remmeber some people saying that they went parallel, but could never control the creep issue. Should the porting be ok? Or do i need to port really big and change the flapper (i dont really want to, but whatever is necessary).
We plan on using the APEX PFC for boost control...
Any suggestions?
#3
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (8)
Originally Posted by Fatty_FC3S
Im considering doing a full sequential on friends FD. It has a really nice street ported motor, upgraded fuel pump, injectors, IC, dowpipe, exhaust etc.....
After many hours of fighting with the sequential system, parrallel would be much easier. I already ported the new '99 turbos on the car, but i wonder if this will be sufficient to control boost creep at 14psi (the max we want to run) on the car. I remmeber some people saying that they went parallel, but could never control the creep issue. Should the porting be ok? Or do i need to port really big and change the flapper (i dont really want to, but whatever is necessary).
We plan on using the APEX PFC for boost control...
Any suggestions?
After many hours of fighting with the sequential system, parrallel would be much easier. I already ported the new '99 turbos on the car, but i wonder if this will be sufficient to control boost creep at 14psi (the max we want to run) on the car. I remmeber some people saying that they went parallel, but could never control the creep issue. Should the porting be ok? Or do i need to port really big and change the flapper (i dont really want to, but whatever is necessary).
We plan on using the APEX PFC for boost control...
Any suggestions?
#4
Lives on the Forum
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally Posted by Cgotto6
If im not mistaken...I dont think the PFC controls boost....
Most likely, there won't be a creep problem, but some cars just seem to do it when others don't. If you have ported the wastegate as far as you can, that's all you can do. If the car still experiences creep, then a restrictor will have to be added to the exhaust.
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Northern California
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was thinking of leaving the turbo control door in (not removing), but it says NOT to weld this or leave it in on the "http://www.scuderiaciriani.com/rx7/" site. Why would they say that ? heat issue maybe? Heres what i was thinking, id like some input:
Remove Actuator
Build "solid" rod that holds door open (one end on arm, one end bolted where acutator previously was)
I know some people have boost creep issues at 14psi when they remove the door assembly entirely. My thought was to use a mechanical means to keep the door open, yet still have some restriction so as not to get boost creep. The door opens and stays like that above 4500rpm stock anyways, i dont see why holding it open all the time would be any different.....
Remove Actuator
Build "solid" rod that holds door open (one end on arm, one end bolted where acutator previously was)
I know some people have boost creep issues at 14psi when they remove the door assembly entirely. My thought was to use a mechanical means to keep the door open, yet still have some restriction so as not to get boost creep. The door opens and stays like that above 4500rpm stock anyways, i dont see why holding it open all the time would be any different.....
#6
The Dirty Mexican
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Californian refugee taking shelter in Texas
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Cgotto6
If im not mistaken...I dont think the PFC controls boost....
http://www.apexi-usa.com/electronics_boost.asp
Last edited by cesarx7; 04-22-05 at 01:18 AM.
Trending Topics
#8
Senior Member
You especially do not want to add to restriction before the turbos. I have BNR stage 3's with the ported waste gate and have never had a problem with boost creep. Greanted I am still running a cat(high flow) everything seems to work out ok
#11
There and back again
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Camarillo, Ca
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Fatty_FC3S
I was thinking of leaving the turbo control door in (not removing), but it says NOT to weld this or leave it in on the "http://www.scuderiaciriani.com/rx7/" site. Why would they say that ? heat issue maybe? Heres what i was thinking, id like some input:
Remove Actuator
Build "solid" rod that holds door open (one end on arm, one end bolted where acutator previously was)
I know some people have boost creep issues at 14psi when they remove the door assembly entirely. My thought was to use a mechanical means to keep the door open, yet still have some restriction so as not to get boost creep. The door opens and stays like that above 4500rpm stock anyways, i dont see why holding it open all the time would be any different.....
Remove Actuator
Build "solid" rod that holds door open (one end on arm, one end bolted where acutator previously was)
I know some people have boost creep issues at 14psi when they remove the door assembly entirely. My thought was to use a mechanical means to keep the door open, yet still have some restriction so as not to get boost creep. The door opens and stays like that above 4500rpm stock anyways, i dont see why holding it open all the time would be any different.....
I ported my waste gate and have not had any issues of controlling boost, but I also have the stock cat.
#12
The Man
with a 3" exhaust and a ported motor(no restriction) has caused significant boost creep for me, however, I had removed the 2ndary butterflies and gasket matched every manifold from the TB down. My creep was almost 7psi by 6500rpm. I would set my boost controller to Off in order to keep boost from creeping beyond 14psi on pump gas. I also had ported my wastegate to within .0025 of the steel flapper door but still had huge issues. I had to install a 2.5" restrictor gasket into my exhaust between the midpipe and catback for restriction to keep the boost rock steady. BTW, I had boost creep issues with sequential operation also.
Art
Art
#13
Lives on the Forum
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally Posted by cesarx7
There is a kit you have to buy...
http://www.apexi-usa.com/electronics_boost.asp
http://www.apexi-usa.com/electronics_boost.asp
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Northern California
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So basically i would be OK as long as still have Cat in place, but without it, boost creep would be a pretty "for sure" thing.....
Maybe a Pop off vavle would be good insurance in this situation....
Maybe a Pop off vavle would be good insurance in this situation....
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
09-16-18 07:16 PM