Compression test results - Rebuild opinions?
Compression test results - Rebuild opinions?
I am thinking about selling the car pretty soon, so I had the compression checked at a local Rotary specialist. Results are:
Front: 77 / 80 / 75 @ 243 rpm
Rear: 78 / 78/ 78 @ 253 rpm
From reading I know that these results are at the very low end of acceptable. The car does not smoke at all, does not use coolant, and starts without issue hot or cold.
Just wondering if I should rebuild now before risking more damage or wear. The car is barely driven, maybe twice in the last 4 months. Opinions welcome, thanks!
Front: 77 / 80 / 75 @ 243 rpm
Rear: 78 / 78/ 78 @ 253 rpm
From reading I know that these results are at the very low end of acceptable. The car does not smoke at all, does not use coolant, and starts without issue hot or cold.
Just wondering if I should rebuild now before risking more damage or wear. The car is barely driven, maybe twice in the last 4 months. Opinions welcome, thanks!
What are your vacuum readings at idle for both rotors? Anything lower than 15 inHg is a sign of a tired motor. Assuming stock ports
Last edited by Dvst8; Mar 23, 2016 at 04:11 PM.
Yes stock ports. Only mods are Power FC, Apexi intakes and catback exhaust.
Here is a video I took of the car idling about a month ago. I've been struggling with getting it to idle without hunting for 10 seconds.
The commander read -414mmhg which i guess is a little over 16 inhg
The vac source was off the upper intake that is usually capped.
Here is a video I took of the car idling about a month ago. I've been struggling with getting it to idle without hunting for 10 seconds.
The commander read -414mmhg which i guess is a little over 16 inhg
The vac source was off the upper intake that is usually capped.
Stay on top of your regular maintenance(new antifreeze every 3 years!) and it should last you a good long while. That engine seems fine, and your Power FC probably just needs to relearn its idle.
My engine has:
Front rotor: 7.7, 7.6, 7.6
Rear rotor: 8.0, 8.0, 8.0
which I consider to be a very healthy motor and I average between 50-60 kPa at idle, or about 14.5-17.7 inHg. So, sometimes I see figures below 15 inHg but I'm sure my engine is in pretty good shape.
Are you sure about that?
My engine has:
Front rotor: 7.7, 7.6, 7.6
Rear rotor: 8.0, 8.0, 8.0
which I consider to be a very healthy motor and I average between 50-60 kPa at idle, or about 14.5-17.7 inHg. So, sometimes I see figures below 15 inHg but I'm sure my engine is in pretty good shape.
My engine has:
Front rotor: 7.7, 7.6, 7.6
Rear rotor: 8.0, 8.0, 8.0
which I consider to be a very healthy motor and I average between 50-60 kPa at idle, or about 14.5-17.7 inHg. So, sometimes I see figures below 15 inHg but I'm sure my engine is in pretty good shape.
Trending Topics
I am thinking about selling the car pretty soon, so I had the compression checked at a local Rotary specialist. Results are:
Front: 77 / 80 / 75 @ 243 rpm
Rear: 78 / 78/ 78 @ 253 rpm
From reading I know that these results are at the very low end of acceptable. The car does not smoke at all, does not use coolant, and starts without issue hot or cold.
Just wondering if I should rebuild now before risking more damage or wear. The car is barely driven, maybe twice in the last 4 months. Opinions welcome, thanks!
Front: 77 / 80 / 75 @ 243 rpm
Rear: 78 / 78/ 78 @ 253 rpm
From reading I know that these results are at the very low end of acceptable. The car does not smoke at all, does not use coolant, and starts without issue hot or cold.
Just wondering if I should rebuild now before risking more damage or wear. The car is barely driven, maybe twice in the last 4 months. Opinions welcome, thanks!
that's pretty low, how many miles are on the car? with it that low your housing are probably worn beyond use, so if anything at best your saving a rotor by rebuilding it now
At 83k your housings are not worn out unless you drive the **** out of it all the time or you run around with no air filter. I would do the water steam clean method to help clean some carbon out of the engine and exhaust. These engines will maintain compression for well into the 100k range as long as the internals are clean.
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,804
Likes: 646
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
You cannot get/give an accurate idle vacuum unless your idle is stable.
'Stock' idle is very low, like 720 rpm. Most 'street' ported engines will idle at 900-1000 rpm.
Who checked the compression? Was it done with the engine completely warmed up, and did they open the throttle fully?
'Stock' idle is very low, like 720 rpm. Most 'street' ported engines will idle at 900-1000 rpm.
Who checked the compression? Was it done with the engine completely warmed up, and did they open the throttle fully?
The car only has issues idling at zero load, so I think it may be a power fc issue. If I turn on just the running lights it settles perfectly about 800 rpms if memory serves. I will try get another clip tomorrow.
The compression test was done by MER in Cresson, Tx. They are a race shop, they advertise rotary work and they had lots of cars, parts and torn down engines in their shop. I found them trustworthy and I believe they did the test correctly.
The compression test was done by MER in Cresson, Tx. They are a race shop, they advertise rotary work and they had lots of cars, parts and torn down engines in their shop. I found them trustworthy and I believe they did the test correctly.
That is how mine works with the pfc. At startup it revs up higher than idle but if I turn the lights on it will settle to the idle rpm. Throughout the driving cycle at stopping it can idle around 100-300 rpms higher then the set idle until I hit the lights and it would settle back down. The idle is set the same in the options for no load/load/ac load.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FCJayy
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
5
Mar 8, 2016 10:55 PM
12aholic
1st Gen General Discussion
1
Mar 1, 2016 03:45 PM
visatrade
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
5
Feb 29, 2016 11:01 AM







