3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Clipped turbos??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 9, 2001 | 08:27 PM
  #1  
Rotary93's Avatar
Thread Starter
Retired RX7 mechanic
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 999
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Clipped turbos??

Whats the advantage of having your "Turbos Clipped"?

Do you do this to stock turbos?
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2001 | 08:37 PM
  #2  
Want2race's Avatar
Bigger and better things
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 1
From: Marietta, GA
quicker boost!! Less spool time but less top end!
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2001 | 01:26 AM
  #3  
efiniracing's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
From: Norcross,Ga,USA
Can you do it youself? Pictures?
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2001 | 05:06 AM
  #4  
Want2race's Avatar
Bigger and better things
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 1
From: Marietta, GA
no.. It require superbalancing... These things spin @ 180,000rom ya know
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2001 | 06:14 AM
  #5  
sokudo's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: japan
you got it backwords

when you clip you loose response.
clipping cuts off the corners of the blades so more air can flow through them at higher rpm so you loose response because it takes more air to spin up the turbin because there it less pich on the blades.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2001 | 10:49 AM
  #6  
cewrx7r1's Avatar
Eye In The Sky
Tenured Member: 25 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,941
Likes: 133
From: In A Disfunctional World
You do not necessarily loose respone. It is more complex than that and also depends on other mods made to the engine at the same time.

They remove material from the outter edge of the turbine blades. This reduces the inertial of the total rotating mass. Thus the turbo will spool up faster due to the weight reduction. But
this also reduces the efficiency of the turbine to harness the exhaust energy and reduces back pressure. Thus do you loose more here than was made due to weight reduction? Reduced back pressure means more power at the higher revs. Is more gain by reduce back pressure than lost by efficiency?

What happens when the engine is ported and running higher boost, you might actual gain at low and high because the stock
setup is too restrictive.

The only way to be sure, is before and after dyno tests.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2001 | 11:10 AM
  #7  
aReX-7's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
From: Medford, OR
You definately loose low end response with clipped turbos!

Not sure how many of you have driven a 3rd gen with clipped turbo's, but I have. There is a big difference in the boost at low RPM's. However, the very top end of the power curve is better than stock. I guess it just takes awhile for the "less rotational resistance" to make up for the "loss of turbine efficiency."

I did not like the clipped turbo's because I am an autocrosser, and I need the low end response all the time. I would have actually been slower with this "upgrade". The car I had the clipped turbo's on was a track car, and the previous owner said that he liked the clipped turbos on the track because he always ran higher RPM's.

My opinion is that the clipped turbo mod is one of those mods that is all hype, and not much performance. I don't see many people who have had this mod done raving about how pleased they are with the results. It is pretty easy to talk-up a mod that is strictly based on theory, but little data.

Anyone?????

My experience is that you don't gain enough on the top end to pay for the loss at the low end. Just my $.02.

Jeff
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Leeroy_25
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
4
Aug 17, 2015 12:53 PM
Marty RE
New Member RX-7 Technical
0
Aug 13, 2015 11:19 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:39 AM.