3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Charge relief valve vs. air pump

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 09:31 AM
  #1  
quarnstrom's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Grosse pointe, MI
Charge relief valve vs. air pump

I thought the relief valve made a "pssft" sound (which it does) when letting up on accelerator. This is an (new)additional low groaning (or, "moo") sound btn. 2,000 and 4,000 RPM whether accelerating, decceleration, or steady. Other members have posted communications that seem to say it's the air pump. I don't need to pass any environmental tests. So, can it be removed? What's involved?
Thanks
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 12:11 PM
  #2  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
The charge relief valve (CRV) is venting until around 4000 rpms. It vents off the access from pre-spooling the secondary turbo (so it doesn't over work itself).

The airpump has a relief as well (which is not the CRV or related to it) and that is what makes the "MOO" sound.

The charge relief valve is needed for sequential turbo operation. The airpump is only required for emissions.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 12:25 PM
  #3  
quarnstrom's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Grosse pointe, MI
Thank you. So, can the airpump be disconnected or removed without causing performance problems? I mean, do any adjustments have to be done to the engine afterwords, or will it start, idle, acelerate, etc. just as it did before?
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 12:35 PM
  #4  
RE Suzuki's Avatar
I speak Japanglish
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 1
From: bayarea, ca
If you are trying to get rid of that "moo" sound try this.

http://www.clubrx.org/default.asp?id...ntent=62&mnu=5

If you remove the airpump, you might experience minor idle issues. Someone correct me if im wrong.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 12:48 PM
  #5  
CantGoStraight's Avatar
What's your point ?
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,573
Likes: 0
From: Gainesville, Fla.
Originally Posted by RE Suzuki
If you are trying to get rid of that "moo" sound try this.

http://www.clubrx.org/default.asp?id...ntent=62&mnu=5

If you remove the airpump, you might experience minor idle issues. Someone correct me if im wrong.


It's hit and miss with some engines. I disconnected mine with no ill effects to the idle. It's just a matter of unplugging it to see. The air pump cuts out over 3k rpm any way so preformance wise I doubt you'll see and gain.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 03:15 PM
  #6  
Monkman33's Avatar
Goodfalla Engine Complete
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,243
Likes: 42
From: Kennewick, Washington
Originally Posted by CantGoStraight
It's hit and miss with some engines. I disconnected mine with no ill effects to the idle. It's just a matter of unplugging it to see. The air pump cuts out over 3k rpm any way so preformance wise I doubt you'll see and gain.
what about the weight savings..... yes weight... must go ultra-diet mode.....
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 05:17 PM
  #7  
CantGoStraight's Avatar
What's your point ?
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,573
Likes: 0
From: Gainesville, Fla.
if it allows you to get rid of the cat and pump there would be a pretty good bit of weight eliminated with those two items.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Skeese
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
65
Mar 28, 2017 03:30 PM
c0rpse
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
1
Aug 25, 2015 11:50 PM
86glxNA
New Member RX-7 Technical
7
Aug 22, 2015 08:54 PM
12abridgeport
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
2
Aug 17, 2015 06:28 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:48 PM.