3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

carbon fiber drive shat

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 10, 2003 | 12:32 AM
  #2  
fcfdfan's Avatar
Reverse Engineer
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
From: Middle of Nowhere, Center of Everywhere
ACT in Huntington Beach, CA, can help you out. But are you sure that's the mod you need if your sig says "not enough power"?
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2003 | 12:33 AM
  #3  
93blackrx's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
From: in the garage
I believe it is similar to a light weight flywheel, I'm not sure how much of a difference it makes though. I thought I saw then at www.rx7.com and they seemed outragously expensive to me. Not too high on my priorites right now.

Matt
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2003 | 01:10 AM
  #5  
HedgeHog's Avatar
Rotary Poseur
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 718
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, BC, Canada
It's actually ACPT not ACT. www.acpt.com

Our d/s is quite short so the weight savings isnt that huge. I never weighed mine but just holding it felt only a small weight savings. However, power tranmission seems to be smoother...or mebbe i'm just imagining it.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2003 | 01:13 AM
  #6  
GoRacer's Avatar
Speed Mach Go Go Go
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,772
Likes: 2
From: My 350Z Roadster kicks my RX7's butt
I thought MazdaSpeed offered one? Doesn't the RX-8 come with one?
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2003 | 01:14 AM
  #7  
DaiOni's Avatar
Wankler
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,565
Likes: 2
From: Kobe, Japan
there are a handful of japanese manufacturers who make them. Need a healthy wallet though.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2003 | 02:20 AM
  #8  
maxcooper's Avatar
WWFSMD
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,035
Likes: 4
From: SoCal
It would probably be better for you to get a "normal" replacement. Mazdatrix sells ones with replaceable u-joints for less than the factory part.

-Max
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2003 | 02:59 AM
  #9  
r0gu3's Avatar
Boostless FD
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
A lot less drivetrain loss, gain some HP at the wheels there.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2003 | 03:24 AM
  #10  
maxcooper's Avatar
WWFSMD
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,035
Likes: 4
From: SoCal
I don't think it significantly reduces the inertial losses. The stock part is not much heavier and the diameter is pretty small when compared to a flywheel for instance. It also spins slower than the flywheel since it is after the transmission, so that further reduces its inertial contribution relative to a flywheel. I am sure it makes some difference (it has to -- it is lighter), but it is unlikely to be a very significant difference. It should reduce drivetrain shock, but the CF driveshaft is not a big bang-for-the-buck mod, so it makes sense to put it off until you have most of the other mods that give a bigger boost for the money.

-Max
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2003 | 03:52 AM
  #11  
r0gu3's Avatar
Boostless FD
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
I was kidding, hence the smiley.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2003 | 08:12 AM
  #12  
DamonB's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 8
From: Dallas
Originally posted by maxcooper
It also spins slower than the flywheel
Forgot about that one. The stock driveshaft is so danged light I don't see spending all that dough. Unless you've got a tube frame carbon bodied endurance racer I see no need to spend that far for so little gain.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Snoopy FD
Build Threads
25
Dec 8, 2015 01:45 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:09 PM.