3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

BNR turbos?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 23, 2008 | 07:13 PM
  #101  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by rollingsband1
as i love the quick spooling of the sequential setup! if there was a single that would deliver full boost by 2500rpm and be able to hold to redline, and still produce 400rwhp numbers and be reliable then id def be intrested as im not wanting much more than that amount of power, but spool up is a problem for me and i want my car to build power very quickly.. not as you said a rubber band effect!! that annoy me to death!
If a setup like that existed, we'd all have it.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2008 | 07:29 PM
  #102  
FD3S2005's Avatar
SideWayZ The Only Way
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,945
Likes: 32
From: Davie, Florida
Originally Posted by rollingsband1
any thoughts of a group buy bryan??
a gb would be awsome but it would take alot of time like all the other gb's
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2008 | 07:32 PM
  #103  
rollingsband1's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
From: warfield
Originally Posted by Mahjik
If a setup like that existed, we'd all have it.
I know thats why the BNR non sequential would be a good choice for that wouldnt you think?? full boost by 2500-3000 rpm max?
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2008 | 08:30 PM
  #104  
Flybye's Avatar
It's never fast enough...
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,760
Likes: 3
From: Miami - Given 1st place as the POOREST city in the US as per the federal government
Originally Posted by Mahjik
......Unless you live in a place where modifications can/will get you in trouble with the law and registration people, BNR's are basically a waste of time.....
How a bout...BNRs are a waste of time UNLESS you enjoy the power of the sequential system?

I've SCCAs a many times, and I GREATLY enjoy the sequential setup having a nice power band that won't send me flying across the track. I'm also lazy and it's nice not having to down shift sometimes.

I've been in a T78, and the lag was....errr. It's like "Ok...here comes the power..............................*BAM* NOW!!!"

Running high HP with sequential just takes a lot of time and dedication to dial the entire system up right.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2008 | 08:37 PM
  #105  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by Flybye
I've been in a T78, and the lag was....errr. It's like "Ok...here comes the power..............................*BAM* NOW!!!"
There are more singles out there beside a T78.

Originally Posted by Flybye
Running high HP with sequential just takes a lot of time and dedication to dial the entire system up right.
What's your definition of "high HP"?
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2008 | 08:42 PM
  #106  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by rollingsband1
I know thats why the BNR non sequential would be a good choice for that wouldnt you think?? full boost by 2500-3000 rpm max?
You need to read Gordon's post about. He goes into a little more detail about what I was referring to. You need to quit thinking about "full boost", and think about "power". There are many single turbos out there which can have more "power" at 3000 rpms than upgraded twins even if they aren't at "full boost". Once again, you need to look at the dynos to really understand and then make sure you are getting the performance you want.

As Bryan mentioned, not everyone who owns an RX7 is on this forum. However, on "this forum", no one has gotten much past 380rwhp in sequential setup. IIRC, PFS had a race car which was close many years ago. Even then 380rwhp in sequential is rare, however around 360'ish is common. So if 360 sounds good, then that's the route you should go. IMO, an FD around 340-360whp sequentially is ideal.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2008 | 08:45 PM
  #107  
Flybye's Avatar
It's never fast enough...
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,760
Likes: 3
From: Miami - Given 1st place as the POOREST city in the US as per the federal government
True. I haven't been around for a while. Perhaps there are "nicer" singles out now.

My definition of high horsepower when it comes to the sequential system is basically anything beyond 50+hp and/or with no cats installed. You know everything that needs to be considered. Boost creep, prespool, prespool vent (**** I've forgotten some of the names of these things) and WG management.

Took me the entire weekend just to tweak my system up when I good rid of all the cats (and no mid muffler). I probably did like 30+ runs adjusting the WG, and the rest of the flaps. Don't even feel a surge of any type at 4500.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2008 | 08:55 PM
  #108  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Flybye,

You kinda took my quote out of context. My point was that since anything over 380whp is more of an anomaly with the sequential setup. So if someone "needs' more power, it's more sensible just to go to a decent single than run upgraded twins in non-seq. Basically the end difference is going to be about $1200 from using BNR's verses a nice single. That's not a huge difference when you consider it. BNR's are a great upgrade for people who live in places which strict rules like California.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2008 | 09:14 PM
  #109  
Flybye's Avatar
It's never fast enough...
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,760
Likes: 3
From: Miami - Given 1st place as the POOREST city in the US as per the federal government
Ohh. Yeah, if you absolutely "need" 400+ rwhp, a single would differently make things a hella lot easier. LOL. In setup, management, time & money.

Jeez...LOL...we can do 180ish with 350ish RWHP. I guess it's all the drag junkies who want 400+ Well...you know how it is. The more passing power we have, the better.

I know I'll end up with the BNRs someday, though. 350-400rwhp is plenty to keep up with most things in the showrooms today. Plus I don't see my self with a single in a tiny track.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2008 | 09:26 PM
  #110  
rollingsband1's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
From: warfield
Originally Posted by Mahjik
You need to read Gordon's post about. He goes into a little more detail about what I was referring to. You need to quit thinking about "full boost", and think about "power". There are many single turbos out there which can have more "power" at 3000 rpms than upgraded twins even if they aren't at "full boost". Once again, you need to look at the dynos to really understand and then make sure you are getting the performance you want.

As Bryan mentioned, not everyone who owns an RX7 is on this forum. However, on "this forum", no one has gotten much past 380rwhp in sequential setup. IIRC, PFS had a race car which was close many years ago. Even then 380rwhp in sequential is rare, however around 360'ish is common. So if 360 sounds good, then that's the route you should go. IMO, an FD around 340-360whp sequentially is ideal.
i cannot argue with you one bit with what you said.. if its still sequential 350hp is a butt load..
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2008 | 10:47 PM
  #111  
jmadams74's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 526
Likes: 5
From: Atlanta
This is a little off topic, but I'm going to post it up here because this is becoming a very informative thread. This really only applies to BNR stage 3 sequential with Apexi PFC (and datalogit). My setup is as above with profec b, type s EBC (type 2 hookup for those familiar with this contoller) and all the supporting mods. Bottom line, I was having a heck of a time getting the boost and transition tuned in with the new BNR's. . .it was good, just not right! Then I read a couple of posts on setting turbo transition by Nashman69g in the thread
https://www.rx7club.com/power-fc-forum-47/pfc-boost-control-722648/
I have fiddled with transition settings a lot but what he said about setting up the transition made a lot of sense to me so I tried it today. It's like driving a different car! I think it's fair to say that those who have struggled with transition know that as long as you are full on throttle, it's not too difficult to get it pretty good (assuming all sequential support systems are functioning properly). But once you get into transition and your not on full throttle, all sorts of weird s--t starts happening. I'm not sure what the technical explanation is for the success of this setup, maybe the BNS's can carry the boost load to a higher rpm under less than full throttle relative to the stock turbos, but the car is just screaming better than ever with virtually no lag or hesitation anywhere! transition seems to be crisper as well but maybe my imagination. I'm maxing at about 14 psi now as I was having some problems last time Steve Kan worked with it and couldn't go higher at that time and I don't want to turn it up higher now without being very careful! This simple adjustment to the transition has done more for performance and response than anything else I think I have ever done to the car! Obviously, test at your own risk. . .hope this is helpful to those working with BNR stage 3 sequential setup.
--Jeff
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2008 | 06:53 PM
  #112  
FD3S2005's Avatar
SideWayZ The Only Way
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,945
Likes: 32
From: Davie, Florida
how many ppl had this prob ^ with the seq?
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2008 | 07:04 PM
  #113  
matty's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,014
Likes: 40
From: CT
Originally Posted by Mahjik
You need to read Gordon's post about. He goes into a little more detail about what I was referring to. You need to quit thinking about "full boost", and think about "power". There are many single turbos out there which can have more "power" at 3000 rpms than upgraded twins even if they aren't at "full boost". Once again, you need to look at the dynos to really understand and then make sure you are getting the performance you want.

As Bryan mentioned, not everyone who owns an RX7 is on this forum. However, on "this forum", no one has gotten much past 380rwhp in sequential setup. IIRC, PFS had a race car which was close many years ago. Even then 380rwhp in sequential is rare, however around 360'ish is common. So if 360 sounds good, then that's the route you should go. IMO, an FD around 340-360whp sequentially is ideal.
i say in the end whats the difference between 360 and 380? why would someone bust their ***** for the 20rwhp?
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2008 | 07:13 PM
  #114  
rollingsband1's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
From: warfield
cause thats 20rwhp they didnt have before :-P
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2008 | 07:17 PM
  #115  
matty's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,014
Likes: 40
From: CT
Originally Posted by rollingsband1
cause thats 20rwhp they didnt have before :-P
yeah but going from 360 to 380 means alot in terms of money mods reliability. the cost to the value is extremely high. if u want more then 350 go to 450 it will cost u basically the same thing.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2008 | 07:26 PM
  #116  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,804
Likes: 646
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Originally Posted by matty
i say in the end whats the difference between 360 and 380? why would someone bust their ***** for the 20rwhp?
There's more to it than just peak rwhp, you should know that
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2008 | 07:27 PM
  #117  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,804
Likes: 646
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Originally Posted by matty
yeah but going from 360 to 380 means alot in terms of money mods reliability. the cost to the value is extremely high. if u want more then 350 go to 450 it will cost u basically the same thing.
Matty, are you on crack?

Going single the right way (without any shortcuts or bullshit ebay parts) will end up costing about double what the BNRs are when all is said and done.

Edit: speaking of busting *****, it's all in good fun man
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2008 | 07:27 PM
  #118  
matty's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,014
Likes: 40
From: CT
Originally Posted by GoodfellaFD3S
There's more to it than just peak rwhp, you should know that
i def do. but just saying...i am sure u see my point
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2008 | 07:28 PM
  #119  
matty's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,014
Likes: 40
From: CT
Originally Posted by GoodfellaFD3S
Matty, are you on crack?

Going single the right way (without any shortcuts or bullshit ebay parts) will end up costing about double what the BNRs are when all is said and done.
double? i completely disagree. i think u are looking at 1500.

rich itemize it out for us.....i think you are wrong.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2008 | 07:29 PM
  #120  
matty's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,014
Likes: 40
From: CT
Originally Posted by Mahjik
Basically the end difference is going to be about $1200 from using BNR's verses a nice single. That's not a huge difference when you consider it. BNR's are a great upgrade for people who live in places which strict rules like California.
completely agree
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2008 | 07:48 PM
  #121  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,804
Likes: 646
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Originally Posted by matty
double? i completely disagree. i think u are looking at 1500.

rich itemize it out for us.....i think you are wrong.
35R turbo kit with wg plumbed back into dp from a place like A Spec, Gotham etc runs around 3650.

All the other small parts needed.....scroll down to see the list, not everyone will need all of it, but the costs add up, trust me:

http://www.negative-camber.org/crispyrx7/gt35rpage4.htm

BNRs are 2350, you can easily spend an extra grand with all of the extras to make everything fit right. There's your 4700.

Remember, the BNRs bolt right up to the existing setup. There's something to be said for that.

BUT, for those looking for monster power of 450+......

Reply
Old Feb 28, 2008 | 07:53 PM
  #122  
matty's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,014
Likes: 40
From: CT
Originally Posted by GoodfellaFD3S
35R turbo kit with wg plumbed back into dp from a place like A Spec, Gotham etc runs around 3650.

All the other small parts needed.....scroll down to see the list, not everyone will need all of it, but the costs add up, trust me:

http://www.negative-camber.org/crispyrx7/gt35rpage4.htm

BNRs are 2350, you can easily spend an extra grand with all of the extras to make everything fit right. There's your 4700.

Remember, the BNRs bolt right up to the existing setup. There's something to be said for that.
i think the sole difference is in the price of the kit. in this case, 1300. maybe add 200 for little stuff. both need fuel upgrades, both should have an upgraded clutch, both should have upgraded ic's, both should have an upgraded intake (intake could actually be cheaper for a single), both should have hks twin power, both should have upgraded exhaust. i dont know rich.....
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2008 | 08:41 PM
  #123  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,804
Likes: 646
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Matty, i've personally been there man. Did you see the picture of my engine bay up above ? Ihor and I have also installed a variety of single kits on quite a few customer cars at this point.

I'm not making this up, I promise.

The only way to lower the differential cost is to either cut corners, or to piece together your own setup, ie manifold, dp, etc etc. Everyone has their own way of doing things, my way is certainly not the only way.

Or, I suppose if you're a fabricator extraordinaire you can freaking make your own kit
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2008 | 08:45 PM
  #124  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Rich, with all due respect, you had different goals for your single conversion verses your BNR setup. If you were after similar goals, the only difference would be the cost of the single kit verses the BNR's as you'll need pretty much the same pieces to support either setup. If you look at a T04Z Turbo kit, the price difference is much less.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2008 | 09:14 PM
  #125  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,804
Likes: 646
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Originally Posted by Mahjik
Rich, with all due respect, you had different goals for your single conversion verses your BNR setup. If you were after similar goals, the only difference would be the cost of the single kit verses the BNR's as you'll need pretty much the same pieces to support either setup. If you look at a T04Z Turbo kit, the price difference is much less.
Thanks Kyle. I appreciate your input, and like I said up above there's more than one way to skin a cat. People can make their own choices and learn from them, I'm just sharing my experience and opinion.

And you are correct, I upped the ante once I left the BNRs, otherwise I would have stuck with them. All in all, BNRs are a great setup for a reasonable price
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:30 AM.