3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

BNR stage 3's???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-10-04, 01:56 AM
  #51  
Lives on the Forum

 
rynberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
There are also problems with going to 1600s -- which require a fuel pressure regulator and a new fuel rail. You will have to eliminate the ACV, which means no more passing emissions.

Yes, some people have had 1300 injectors fail, but I haven't heard any issues with stepping down to 1200cc injectors. You should still easily have enough fuel for up to 380 rwhp and still be below 90% duty cycles.
Old 12-10-04, 02:17 AM
  #52  
Sponsor
RX7Club Vendor
iTrader: (10)
 
FDNewbie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 13,216
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by rynberg
There are also problems with going to 1600s -- which require a fuel pressure regulator and a new fuel rail. You will have to eliminate the ACV, which means no more passing emissions.

Yes, some people have had 1300 injectors fail, but I haven't heard any issues with stepping down to 1200cc injectors. You should still easily have enough fuel for up to 380 rwhp and still be below 90% duty cycles.
Rynberg...haven't seen your posts in a while

Yea I know about the new rail & FPR. Good point about the ACV tho...slipped my mind. And I forgot about the 1200s, too. I think you or someone else mentioned that as an option a while back when I last posted about 1300s. I'll keep that in mind. I take it the 1200s sit on the stock rail just fine?

Neal, I dunno what your current status is...you have to pass emissions, or have you found a way around it? As for power, on a stock engine, you should be right around 360 - 380rwhp tops w/ the new BNRs. In parallel, w/ a matching engine port, they'll top out at about 420rwhp (I don't think they'll pass emissions in parallel), and in sequential, at about 400rwhp. So depends on what you want I guess.
Old 12-10-04, 05:15 AM
  #53  
WTB** Very Low Miles 94-95

 
artguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Tejas
Posts: 3,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AgentSpeed
I've got 'em too! They're great. I'm expecting just shy of 400hp at 15psi. I've just started running a little boost now and my car is very responsive. I'm running then non-seq.
hmmm....well you sure are hopeful arent u.

Ill give ya 350-350 at the wheels running that boost. Post yer sheets when you dyno it. Would love to see.


mucho luck


j
Old 12-10-04, 05:18 AM
  #54  
WTB** Very Low Miles 94-95

 
artguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Tejas
Posts: 3,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by matty
these NEW bnrs are still pretty much unchartered territory. There isnt any data out at all on these. How can the manufacturer expect a person to make a purchase without thist have an data out at all. One thing that I always questioned was does the cost / value work when compared to a single. In all honsty i dont think so. Here is why : Stock twins can get you 350-365 pretty easily on a ported motor. The old bnrs got you 375-385 with one guy making 400rwhp. So thats a gain of ~ 20 rwhp with a cost of $2300. Now compare to a single...$3500 cost with power potential of 500 rwhp but most guys making in the 400s. I am a missign soemthing here? Why are u guys going upgraded twins? Enlighten me.
because it will cost a person a whole lot more than 3500 to go single if they are doing it right.
Old 12-10-04, 07:19 AM
  #55  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (12)
 
moehler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 2,319
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
Originally Posted by FDNewbie
Ditch the 1300s. While it may not be 100% established, people have reported 1300cc injectors sticking, and someone not too long ago posted how he lost his engine due to the 1300cc injector sticking, AND he had the KDR anti-det mod at the time. That's a risk I just wouldn't wanna sit w/. Besides, you'll leave yourself more flexibility for whatever future plans may arise w/ 1600s. That's my opinion.
1300's are fine for MANY people. A few people had problems and now everyone shy's away from them. I got them - daily driven at 14 psi and 300 rwhp. No problems in two years.

I'm not trying to turn this thread into a debate or anything, I just think that the 1300's are plenty for the BNR's and if "su_maverick" is not going to go single any time soon (as I would hope not after just spending all that $$ on these turbos ), they are the best investment for these upgraded turbos.
Old 12-10-04, 07:35 AM
  #56  
Senior Member

 
Exidous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
I just got my new BNR 3's in... HEHE All I have to say is wow. The machine work is top notch and nothing was missed. I sent in the manifold and he coated and removed the wastegate for me. The turnaroudn was only about 2 1/2 weeks and he kept me updated constantly. I didn't have to call him. I'll let you all know how the install and performance goes. Hey good fellas we should get together sometime next spring.
Old 12-10-04, 08:37 AM
  #57  
BNR built motor and twins

 
AgentSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: 2 hours drive from sanity
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yeah I've got 1300's and 550's with my BNR's. (Walbro pump) I've never had an issue with my 1300's but I spent the extra to get brand new 850's bored to 1300's. I felt a little safer that way. The less I have to mess with the fuel system the better!
Old 12-10-04, 09:01 AM
  #58  
Original Gangster/Rotary!


iTrader: (213)
 
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Posts: 30,529
Received 539 Likes on 326 Posts
Lightbulb

Originally Posted by artguy
hmmm....well you sure are hopeful arent u.

Ill give ya 350-350 at the wheels running that boost. Post yer sheets when you dyno it. Would love to see.


mucho luck


j
Hey Big J,

if you poke over at the dyno sheet area, you'll see that I made ~342 at 12 psi right before I bugged outta Texas. Ol' Chris Ott at RP (who has made like 70,000 pulls on that dyno) told me he was confident I would have made ~355 at 12 psi if we would have let the car cool down and waited until nighttime to dyno (august texass heat). So, while I agree that 400 at 15 psi is optimistic, it is not as far-fetched as may first appear. Of course, I also have some serious portwork done.....close to 30 hours spent latenight at the shop inhaling clouds of alum/iron dust
Old 12-10-04, 09:04 AM
  #59  
Original Gangster/Rotary!


iTrader: (213)
 
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Posts: 30,529
Received 539 Likes on 326 Posts
Originally Posted by su_maverick
leave the primaries alone?
Negative. Best to get new primaries.....your original ones have seen a lot of use over the years. Might as well get new 850s and the milled rail rather than new 550s. As far as the 1300s, I have had no problems. Acc. to the homies over at RC eng, you need to install tham asap once they have been bored out. They use a varnish solution to clean them, and if you let the inj's sit for more than a coupla days or so they can gum up.

Btw, during a tuning session about 1.5 yrs ago w/the old BNR 3s, I was actually running out of pump and the tuner used the injs to compensate by raising the duty cycle at high rpm. This was at like 18 psi, and prolly making well over 400 based on my buttocks dyno.

Rich
Old 12-10-04, 10:01 AM
  #60  
SINFUL7

iTrader: (37)
 
KaiFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alaska
Posts: 6,574
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I will also be running 1300cc inj's, my friends have it on their FD's and so far no problems at all with sticking...
Old 12-10-04, 10:16 AM
  #61  
Hey, where did my $$$ go?

 
SPOautos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bimingham, AL
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by HDP
Um, Stephen, the crank case is vented to the intake before the turbos. One of the nipples on the plastic primary inlet elbow should go to the filler neck unless it has been modified.

Yea, I should have clarified.....I'd run another one in addition to that one. Take the one that goes to the uim off and run it to the intake as well.
Old 12-10-04, 11:04 AM
  #62  
Sponsor
RX7Club Vendor
iTrader: (10)
 
FDNewbie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 13,216
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by moehler
1300's are fine for MANY people. A few people had problems and now everyone shy's away from them. I got them - daily driven at 14 psi and 300 rwhp. No problems in two years.

I'm not trying to turn this thread into a debate or anything, I just think that the 1300's are plenty for the BNR's and if "su_maverick" is not going to go single any time soon (as I would hope not after just spending all that $$ on these turbos ), they are the best investment for these upgraded turbos.
Yea I wasn't saying they're definitely bad, you'll regret it etc. Just sayin that the few reports of them sticking made me cautious, and so I personally would just steer away from 1300s. No reason taking any MORE risks w/ the rotary IMO. And Rynberg made an excellent point...1200s are available as an alternative too.

On the flipside...are there any negatives to just going all out and getting 1600s? Do ppl have probs w/ FPRs? (This is a serious question, not rhetorical )

Last edited by FDNewbie; 12-10-04 at 11:07 AM.
Old 12-10-04, 11:38 AM
  #63  
Back in the 7 life again

 
su_maverick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: NoVA
Posts: 2,389
Received 19 Likes on 11 Posts
well, as of right now I cant go any deeper into debt with the new fuel system and ecu and its almost pointless to do it on a fresh engine that needs 1-2k of break in anyway. The only X-factor to this are if my injectors needs to be replaced now anyway. If that happens I will just go ahead and go deeper into debt and spring for the new fuel system and ecu.
Ok, so this is what I will need for the new fuel system: (please add anything Im missing)
1.) Moddified primary ruel rail
2.) Walboro or Denso fuel pump
3.) 2x 850cc primary fuel injectors
4.) 2x 1300cc secondary injectors
OR
4.) Replace secondary fuel rail
5.) 2x Bosch 1600cc injectors

The reason I am interested on the negatives of the 1600s as well is the fact that the Bosch ones retail for $80 a piece and the 1300cc Denso ones retail for about $320 a piece. I could pretty much upgrade my entire fuel system for the price of two of the 1300cc injectors.
Old 12-10-04, 11:44 AM
  #64  
Back in the 7 life again

 
su_maverick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: NoVA
Posts: 2,389
Received 19 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by SPOautos
Yea, I should have clarified.....I'd run another one in addition to that one. Take the one that goes to the uim off and run it to the intake as well.
so you would have two going from the neck to the intake?





BTW- just found out from Bryan that he will not get my turbos done today and he is leaving for vacation tommorow. So it now looks like it will be January before my car is back on the road. Im not too pleased with this as he guaranteed that they would be shipped back today.

Last edited by su_maverick; 12-10-04 at 11:53 AM.
Old 12-10-04, 11:45 AM
  #65  
Will u do me a kindness?

iTrader: (2)
 
the_glass_man's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Parlor City, NY
Posts: 5,031
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Go with the 1600's and new rail. It will leave you room to grow. If you ever need more you can keep the stock secondaries and put them in the primary rail.
Old 12-10-04, 01:35 PM
  #66  
Sponsor
RX7Club Vendor
iTrader: (10)
 
FDNewbie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 13,216
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by the_glass_man
Go with the 1600's and new rail. It will leave you room to grow. If you ever need more you can keep the stock secondaries and put them in the primary rail.
That was my point...

Oh and Neal, speaking of "rumors" of problems, if you wanna stay away from all possible negatives, skip the Walboro, and stick w/ Denso. I might know someone who can hook you up w/ a good price on them (specifically the stock Supra Turbo fuel pump, which IS the denso pump).
Old 12-10-04, 01:42 PM
  #67  
Back in the 7 life again

 
su_maverick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: NoVA
Posts: 2,389
Received 19 Likes on 11 Posts
that would be good. Since my turbos have been delayed I am going to have PBC check out my injectors to see what their condition is. Any help on the fuel pump would be appreciated. I am just hessitant because Im a little nervous of having this 7k project turn into a 10k project....15k is alot to swallow in 6 months.
Old 12-10-04, 02:38 PM
  #68  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (9)
 
ptrhahn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 9,033
Received 506 Likes on 279 Posts
I don't think you're going to need all that fuel. I'm running just 1300 secondaries and a Supra fuel pump, and that's PLENTY with my mods up to 15 psi
Old 12-10-04, 02:44 PM
  #69  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

 
matty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: CT
Posts: 4,923
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
enough talk...lets see some dyno sheets.
Old 12-10-04, 02:57 PM
  #70  
Back in the 7 life again

 
su_maverick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: NoVA
Posts: 2,389
Received 19 Likes on 11 Posts
pete- what are you seeing for injector duty? I am going to be running 15psi as standard but possibly 16-17 on a max run.

matty- as far as I know, there are only two active people on this thread that have the turbos up and running on their cars. I would be happy to show my dyno sheets when the car is ready for it but that will be around march-april before that can happen.
Old 12-10-04, 03:07 PM
  #71  
Sponsor
RX7Club Vendor
iTrader: (10)
 
FDNewbie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 13,216
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Neal, I'm not trying to say what you should and shouldn't do, but don't waste all that money running 15 - 17 psi on the BNRs. Brian says they're MADE to run 20 - 22 psi, meaning if I were to do it, I'd have my PFC tuned for something like 13 and 21 psi, w/ it normally @ 13, just for every day driving, and 21 when I'm on the prowl. Ie, if you're gonna pay, you might as well play Use the twins for what they're capable of doing.
Old 12-10-04, 03:16 PM
  #72  
Back in the 7 life again

 
su_maverick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: NoVA
Posts: 2,389
Received 19 Likes on 11 Posts
well, for now they are going to be at 15 when everything is up and running right and I will slowly up the boost and do readouts on it just to make sure I dont get boost happy and blow all the work I just did with it. I have alot of time to play with these suckers and there is no fun in having a dead car for another couple months. Its cheaper to pay for extra tuning rather than a new engine.

BTW- Ramy, I know its just an opinion and that is what we are all looking for (well, with a little fact behind it). I know that I am going to have to upgrade my fuel system and am just looking for other peoples opinions and experiences on doing this. I dont mind going on the safe side and getting the larger injectors but I just dont want to hurt the car/performance by having them OR getting too small injectors and having to upgrade again in the future. I plan on sticking with these things so this is going to be the base of my mods for the years to come.

Also, should I look into getting HKS's fuel cut defender if I am going to be running higher boost? and how about a hew FPR?
So far I have just looked at the new injectors, pump, and rail...what else should I be adding to my cart?

Last edited by su_maverick; 12-10-04 at 03:19 PM.
Old 12-10-04, 05:39 PM
  #73  
Sponsor
RX7Club Vendor
iTrader: (10)
 
FDNewbie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 13,216
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by su_maverick
well, for now they are going to be at 15 when everything is up and running right and I will slowly up the boost and do readouts on it just to make sure I dont get boost happy and blow all the work I just did with it. I have alot of time to play with these suckers and there is no fun in having a dead car for another couple months. Its cheaper to pay for extra tuning rather than a new engine.
Understandable. I don't think you should slap 'em on and kick out 20psi off the bat, either. Just wanna make sure you're not considering a fuel setup for your current situation ONLY. I say do it once, and do it right. That way, you give yourself more room to play in the future, even in things you never currently considered. Plus, you save labor costs too. Eg, I couldn't afford my lightened flywheel, but I bit the bullet and did it anyways, simply cuz the tranny was out at the time, and it was a fresh clutch. Why pay for all that labor again?

Well, as of right now I cant go any deeper into debt with the new fuel system and ecu
Neal, really, an ECU is the ONLY way to go. You're kidding yourself if you don't think so. I personally would go w/ a PFC, due to it's ease of use, large knowledge base available, and the amount of tuners who are very familiar w/ it (including Ray @ PFS and Demetrious).

Also, should I look into getting HKS's fuel cut defender if I am going to be running higher boost?
If I'm not mistaken, the PFC has a built-in knock-sensor that'll engage fuel cutoff at a given level (that you set). The PFC can do pretty much anything and everything you need from an ECU, minus hold boost well. But you have that angle covered w/ your Profec B. So ECU, ECU, ECU. That, and you'll HAVE to get one to control the 1600s.

BTW- Ramy, I know its just an opinion and that is what we are all looking for (well, with a little fact behind it). I know that I am going to have to upgrade my fuel system and am just looking for other peoples opinions and experiences on doing this. I dont mind going on the safe side and getting the larger injectors but I just dont want to hurt the car/performance by having them OR getting too small injectors and having to upgrade again in the future. I plan on sticking with these things so this is going to be the base of my mods for the years to come.
Hey Neal, I'm glad you understand. I'm not trying to force you to do this or that...just wanted to chime in w/ my $0.02, cuz I know back in the day when I didn't know much, I woulda LOVED for someone to give me their $0.02, not just for short-term plans, but for long term as well. The good news is, it took me so long to afford the mods I planned, that I never got around to doing one that I'd regret lol
Old 12-10-04, 06:35 PM
  #74  
Lives on the Forum

 
rynberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by FDNewbie
If I'm not mistaken, the PFC has a built-in knock-sensor that'll engage fuel cutoff at a given level (that you set).
We WISH!

The PFC does not retard timing at high knock levels, it just provides a number on the display! Helpful, isn't it?
Old 12-10-04, 07:02 PM
  #75  
Sponsor
RX7Club Vendor
iTrader: (10)
 
FDNewbie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 13,216
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by rynberg
We WISH!

The PFC does not retard timing at high knock levels, it just provides a number on the display! Helpful, isn't it?
LOL...Mine has that horizontal graph, where it gets full/darker the closer to knock you get... I personally thought it was functional tho. Makes sense that it's not given ppl have blown their engines w/ PFCs


Quick Reply: BNR stage 3's???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:08 AM.