3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

BNR stage 3's???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-24-04, 12:09 PM
  #26  
Urban Combat Vet

iTrader: (16)
 
Sgtblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Mid-west
Posts: 12,028
Received 877 Likes on 617 Posts
Originally Posted by GoodfellaFD3S
The entire assy is longer from front to back, necessitating a modded y pipe and w/g actuator arm.
I'm probably looking at replacing my stock twins within the next year or two. Would you elaborate a little on this? How extensive are the modifications?
Old 11-24-04, 07:01 PM
  #27  
Original Gangster/Rotary!


iTrader: (213)
 
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Posts: 30,529
Received 539 Likes on 326 Posts
Lightbulb

Originally Posted by matty
did u ask brian about what kind of rwhp can be expected? did he test these at all? and why onyl go for 15psi...do u have fuel mods? these turbos are designed for more boost!!!

also goodfellas...why did u only run low boost for dyno...i am curious.
With all of my engine and manifold porting, Bryan expects me to max out at about 420 rwhp at 20 psi, roughly. He tells me that the turbine manifold will end up being the restriction. You are correct, these turbos are designed for 17 to 19 psi all day.

Low boost.....I was making a crosscountry trip from TX to NJ the next day, and didnt feel like pushing the envelope. Plus, it was a 100 degree day, and the car had been on the dyno for base tuning for like 3 hours---heatsoaked like a **** and high boost don't mix.

Rich
Old 11-24-04, 07:02 PM
  #28  
Original Gangster/Rotary!


iTrader: (213)
 
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Posts: 30,529
Received 539 Likes on 326 Posts
Originally Posted by matty
also goodfellas...why did u only run low boost for dyno...i am curious.
Oh, also......you are only in CT, once there is clear weather we should meet up halfway and you can see these bad boys up close and personal .
Old 11-24-04, 07:03 PM
  #29  
Original Gangster/Rotary!


iTrader: (213)
 
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Posts: 30,529
Received 539 Likes on 326 Posts
Originally Posted by Sgtblue
I'm probably looking at replacing my stock twins within the next year or two. Would you elaborate a little on this? How extensive are the modifications?
Bryan takes care of it all for you, you just have to send him your y pipe in addition to the twin turbo assy. No problem at all. You get them back and they bolt right up.

Rich
Old 11-24-04, 10:16 PM
  #30  
Hey, where did my $$$ go?

 
SPOautos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bimingham, AL
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by matty
good points....i still would like to see some hard data first my man. I need more power then the 340 rwhp @ 14psi that i am currently making on the stockers. When are you going to post up some 17-18psi dyno plots?
Also dont you think that Bnr should have done some dyno testing as part of their R and D, not to mention as a part of their marketing for these. I just dont get how you can develop a new product thats costs 2300 and not have any hard data to support it. Its not like BnR is new to this game either....i didnt see any data from the first sets either. I guess its simply cavet emptor and that in my mind sucks. I want to buy these but I wont lay done the cash until i see dyno sheets and i would guess many other share a similar view. I would be happy with close to 400rwhp @ 17-18 psi on stock ports. That in my mind would jusitfy the 2300 cost.

Who does??? You cant get dyno sheets from Greddy or Garret, ect on thier turbo kits. They might give you some off the wall max based on compressor map flow sheets, ect. they are arent rotary spacific and they dont tell you anything about powerband, ect. The only reason we know what other turbos make is because of customers that have purchased them and dynoed them. The same will happen with these BNR's, he's been selling tons of them its just that no one really has thier car finished and bug free. Well a few people do but they are waiting on tuning.

Bryan knows what these turbos and compressor wheels are capable of because he has built this similar turbo setup for other cars. The restriction will be the exhaust manifold not the turbos, they will definatly max the exhaust manifold out. Also....stay tuned sometime around mid year of '05 because there MIGHT be some upgraded goodies that can be purchased for the stage 3's to really get them making power (cough exh manifold caugh caugh). But you didnt hear that from me (hear what? I didnt say anything). Yes, I've been begging and pleading for about a year for this and I think its fixing to happen pretty soon.

Huh? what might happen, I have no idea what your talking about. lol


Stephen
Old 11-25-04, 12:19 AM
  #31  
Sponsor
RX7Club Vendor
iTrader: (10)
 
FDNewbie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 13,216
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Stephen, IT'S ABOUT TIME lol. I remember I talked to you about this like 8 months ago, and I talked to Rich about it a few months back, too. You're *def* gonna run into restriction from the exhaust manifold well before you max out the flow of the stock twins. The stock twins can flow a lot, as evidenced by the similarly sized Supra twins, yet their manifold and runners are designed so much better, that they have less turbulence and restriction, and thus are capable of producing so much more power.

I'm pretty confident you can make 450 to the wheels w/ an upgraded/hi-flow exhaust manifold on the BNRs. I really think it's doable. I just think it's a shame that it's taken practically 11 years for someone to make a hi-flow exhaust manifold...

I know RE just came up w/ a design a few months ago, but they haven't released it yet, since they kept on having problems w/ it cracking I believe.
Old 11-25-04, 01:55 AM
  #32  
Lives on the Forum

 
rynberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
More than just the power, I would like to see the reliability issues solved with these turbos.

Stephen and Rich, I know that Bryan has treated you guys right and you have loved your modded turbos, but EVERY single BNR set I've seen in person (five, I think) has either had horrible oil leaks (not restrictor pill related) or other problems.

And I KNOW other forum members have had issues with the BNRs as well. The reliability is the important factor to me, not whether the new ones can make 15 more rwhp.....
Old 11-25-04, 08:24 AM
  #33  
Original Gangster/Rotary!


iTrader: (213)
 
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Posts: 30,529
Received 539 Likes on 326 Posts
Lightbulb

Originally Posted by rynberg
More than just the power, I would like to see the reliability issues solved with these turbos.

Stephen and Rich, I know that Bryan has treated you guys right and you have loved your modded turbos, but EVERY single BNR set I've seen in person (five, I think) has either had horrible oil leaks (not restrictor pill related) or other problems.

And I KNOW other forum members have had issues with the BNRs as well. The reliability is the important factor to me, not whether the new ones can make 15 more rwhp.....
Hellooooo Tyler

No smoke, no drips. You are thinking of the old style BNRs, which were rebuilds and upgrades. These are brand new turbos upgrades and no rebuilding at all, thus no more problems.

And 15 rwhp is a bunch of poop......these new ones are torquier and have the potential to trap 125 mph on pump gas, while my stockers topped out around 112 mph. 13 mph increase is a hell of of a lot more than 15 at the wheels

Rich
Old 11-25-04, 10:34 AM
  #34  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
FD3SR1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: springfield MO
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what other mods are needed to run the bnr stage 3 twins? fuel ecu ect?
Old 11-25-04, 12:04 PM
  #35  
BNR built motor and twins

 
AgentSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: 2 hours drive from sanity
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
No leaks, drips, or otherwise for me either. All I'm waiting on is tuning, my breakin is all but finished.
To answer the question on page 2, I'm only shooting for 15psi because that was my goal for this set up. I wanted a real nice streetable car that I could enjoy without pushing too much boost. I asked Bryan for a good reliable engine and turbo set up that would produce at least 350hp @ 15psi with all my other mods. After talking, we decided on the stage 3's. Now that my car is built, Bryan and I both are sure we passed my goal! I don't think anyone would be disappointed with these turbos.
Old 11-25-04, 12:16 PM
  #36  
Original Gangster/Rotary!


iTrader: (213)
 
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Posts: 30,529
Received 539 Likes on 326 Posts
Originally Posted by AgentSpeed
No leaks, drips, or otherwise for me either. All I'm waiting on is tuning, my breakin is all but finished.
To answer the question on page 2, I'm only shooting for 15psi because that was my goal for this set up. I wanted a real nice streetable car that I could enjoy without pushing too much boost. I asked Bryan for a good reliable engine and turbo set up that would produce at least 350hp @ 15psi with all my other mods. After talking, we decided on the stage 3's. Now that my car is built, Bryan and I both are sure we passed my goal! I don't think anyone would be disappointed with these turbos.
I think that's a very wise decision on your part. 350 and 15 psi are #s that should keep the car running well with no problems for a long time.
Old 11-25-04, 12:17 PM
  #37  
Original Gangster/Rotary!


iTrader: (213)
 
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Posts: 30,529
Received 539 Likes on 326 Posts
Originally Posted by FD3SR1
what other mods are needed to run the bnr stage 3 twins? fuel ecu ect?
If you kept the boost down you could prolly run them on an otherwise stock car.......but what's the fun in that ? You will definitely need porting, fuel, intercooler, ecu, clutch, etc to take full advantage of their capabilities.
Old 11-25-04, 09:52 PM
  #38  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
FD3SR1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: springfield MO
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
whats the most rwhp anyone has pulled out of them? at what psi?
they are cheaper then 99 spec twins and from what little i have read i think they are alot better and more reliable im just not sure if i want to spend the kind of money to go single or stay twin
Old 11-26-04, 07:20 AM
  #39  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

 
matty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: CT
Posts: 4,923
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by GoodfellaFD3S
Oh, also......you are only in CT, once there is clear weather we should meet up halfway and you can see these bad boys up close and personal .
thansk for the invite and that sounds like a great idea. i would love to race u even. However i am putting the car away on saturday. If you can meet saturday morn that would be cool, if not spring time would be the other alternative.
Old 11-26-04, 10:16 AM
  #40  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
FD3SR1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: springfield MO
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
does BNR have a web site? if so what is it?
Old 11-26-04, 02:59 PM
  #41  
Lives on the Forum

 
rynberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by GoodfellaFD3S
Hellooooo Tyler

No smoke, no drips. You are thinking of the old style BNRs, which were rebuilds and upgrades. These are brand new turbos upgrades and no rebuilding at all, thus no more problems.

And 15 rwhp is a bunch of poop......these new ones are torquier and have the potential to trap 125 mph on pump gas, while my stockers topped out around 112 mph. 13 mph increase is a hell of of a lot more than 15 at the wheels

Rich
Hey Rich, the new turbos sound more like it...

Oh, and my 15 rwhp comment was addressing the differences between the "old" BNR Stage 3 and the "new" Stage 3s. I know the Stage 3s are a significant upgrade over the stockers. Since my turbos are getting close to being tossed in the scrap pile, I need to start looking for options -- preferably smog-stealthy options like the BNRs....

What mods are required to the y-pipe? Compatible with the Efini?
Old 11-26-04, 04:40 PM
  #42  
BNR built motor and twins

 
AgentSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: 2 hours drive from sanity
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
He takes the y-pipe and extends it to make it fit with the longer set-up. Where the two pieces are put together, he cuts and welds in a spacer. I think you just send him yours when you order a set.
Old 11-29-04, 10:55 AM
  #43  
Rotary Freak

 
Jerk_Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Okinawa, Japan
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry to crash the party but in my last 7, an '89, I had a BNR Stage 2 with all the bells and whistles. After driving with a BNR built turbo, I have nothing but praise for his turbos. It was built for a nice mid-range for autocross and daily driving duties and never gave me any issues. Leaking? Not a drop. He does good work no matter the turbo.
Old 11-29-04, 02:34 PM
  #44  
Hey, where did my $$$ go?

 
SPOautos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bimingham, AL
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rynberg
More than just the power, I would like to see the reliability issues solved with these turbos.

Stephen and Rich, I know that Bryan has treated you guys right and you have loved your modded turbos, but EVERY single BNR set I've seen in person (five, I think) has either had horrible oil leaks (not restrictor pill related) or other problems.

And I KNOW other forum members have had issues with the BNRs as well. The reliability is the important factor to me, not whether the new ones can make 15 more rwhp.....


Find out how those people had thier crank case vent set up. I've talked to a few people that had smoking issues with the old ones and they all ended up being fixed by seting up the crank case differently. Basically, instead of running it to the uim with a one way valve just run a hose (or two) from those oil filler neck nipples down to the intake (before the turbo). That way the intake is constantly sucking on the crank case and it stays in vacume so that the oil can drain out of the turbos. Actually any dynamic seal turbo could run into this problem of needing better crank case vent. I've seen some brand spanking new dynamic seal Garrett single turbos that smoked like crazy and I fixed it in 5 minutes by redoing the crank case vent. I didnt have this problem with my old stage 3's and the people I know that had thier crank case like mine didnt either.

If you know anyone with smoking issues (no matter what turbo's) tell them to try rerouting thier crank case before doing anything drastic. It only takes about 5 minutes to do.

Also, if rerouting solves the problem you might want to add a catch can so that any junk that might come from the oil filler neck gets caught in the can and not into the intake.

I've heard of some 13B race cars that acutally had to run two -8 lines from the oil neck to the intake to vent the crank case enough. I think the larger the ports the harder it becomes to vent the crank case.

Anyway, just thought I'd throw that out there since it might help your friends.

Stephen

Last edited by SPOautos; 11-29-04 at 02:44 PM.
Old 12-03-04, 05:44 AM
  #45  
HDP
A Fistfull of Dollars!

iTrader: (2)
 
HDP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: HuntsVEGAS, AL
Posts: 5,321
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by SPOautos
Find out how those people had thier crank case vent set up. I've talked to a few people that had smoking issues with the old ones and they all ended up being fixed by seting up the crank case differently. Basically, instead of running it to the uim with a one way valve just run a hose (or two) from those oil filler neck nipples down to the intake (before the turbo). That way the intake is constantly sucking on the crank case and it stays in vacume so that the oil can drain out of the turbos. Actually any dynamic seal turbo could run into this problem of needing better crank case vent. I've seen some brand spanking new dynamic seal Garrett single turbos that smoked like crazy and I fixed it in 5 minutes by redoing the crank case vent. I didnt have this problem with my old stage 3's and the people I know that had thier crank case like mine didnt either.

If you know anyone with smoking issues (no matter what turbo's) tell them to try rerouting thier crank case before doing anything drastic. It only takes about 5 minutes to do.

Also, if rerouting solves the problem you might want to add a catch can so that any junk that might come from the oil filler neck gets caught in the can and not into the intake.

I've heard of some 13B race cars that acutally had to run two -8 lines from the oil neck to the intake to vent the crank case enough. I think the larger the ports the harder it becomes to vent the crank case.

Anyway, just thought I'd throw that out there since it might help your friends.

Stephen
Um, Stephen, the crank case is vented to the intake before the turbos. One of the nipples on the plastic primary inlet elbow should go to the filler neck unless it has been modified.
Old 12-03-04, 07:25 AM
  #46  
Original Gangster/Rotary!


iTrader: (213)
 
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Posts: 30,529
Received 539 Likes on 326 Posts
Originally Posted by HDP
Um, Stephen, the crank case is vented to the intake before the turbos. One of the nipples on the plastic primary inlet elbow should go to the filler neck unless it has been modified.
There are 2 nipples on the oil filler neck. One goes to a hard line that goes to the prim turbo inlet (as you describe) and one goes to the uim with the pcv valve in-line (as spo describes).

Rich
Old 12-09-04, 11:23 PM
  #47  
Back in the 7 life again

 
su_maverick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: NoVA
Posts: 2,389
Received 19 Likes on 11 Posts
unless its a 95 where the pcv valve has been eliminated.
I just ordered my Stage IIIs and bryan should be shipping them back tommorow. I was going to go with an upgraded fuel pump and upgrade the secondarys to 1300cc. Am I going to need more or is this fine?
I have not ported anything yet.
Old 12-10-04, 12:57 AM
  #48  
Sponsor
RX7Club Vendor
iTrader: (10)
 
FDNewbie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 13,216
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Ditch the 1300s. While it may not be 100% established, people have reported 1300cc injectors sticking, and someone not too long ago posted how he lost his engine due to the 1300cc injector sticking, AND he had the KDR anti-det mod at the time. That's a risk I just wouldn't wanna sit w/. Besides, you'll leave yourself more flexibility for whatever future plans may arise w/ 1600s. That's my opinion.

Last edited by FDNewbie; 12-10-04 at 01:00 AM.
Old 12-10-04, 01:22 AM
  #49  
Back in the 7 life again

 
su_maverick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: NoVA
Posts: 2,389
Received 19 Likes on 11 Posts
leave the primaries alone?
Old 12-10-04, 01:52 AM
  #50  
Sponsor
RX7Club Vendor
iTrader: (10)
 
FDNewbie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 13,216
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by su_maverick
leave the primaries alone?
Some guys use the stock 500s, some guys run 800 primaries. I think 500 pri and 1600 sec is more than enough, unless you ever plan on running some incredibly HUGE single...BUT, I'm sure someone who's much more knowledgeable (Stephen, Rich, etc) can provide you w/ something more concrete.


Quick Reply: BNR stage 3's???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:06 AM.