BNR stage 3's???
#26
Urban Combat Vet
iTrader: (16)
Originally Posted by GoodfellaFD3S
The entire assy is longer from front to back, necessitating a modded y pipe and w/g actuator arm.
#27
Original Gangster/Rotary!
iTrader: (213)
Originally Posted by matty
did u ask brian about what kind of rwhp can be expected? did he test these at all? and why onyl go for 15psi...do u have fuel mods? these turbos are designed for more boost!!!
also goodfellas...why did u only run low boost for dyno...i am curious.
also goodfellas...why did u only run low boost for dyno...i am curious.
Low boost.....I was making a crosscountry trip from TX to NJ the next day, and didnt feel like pushing the envelope. Plus, it was a 100 degree day, and the car had been on the dyno for base tuning for like 3 hours---heatsoaked like a **** and high boost don't mix.
Rich
#28
Original Gangster/Rotary!
iTrader: (213)
Originally Posted by matty
also goodfellas...why did u only run low boost for dyno...i am curious.
#29
Original Gangster/Rotary!
iTrader: (213)
Originally Posted by Sgtblue
I'm probably looking at replacing my stock twins within the next year or two. Would you elaborate a little on this? How extensive are the modifications?
Rich
#30
Hey, where did my $$$ go?
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bimingham, AL
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by matty
good points....i still would like to see some hard data first my man. I need more power then the 340 rwhp @ 14psi that i am currently making on the stockers. When are you going to post up some 17-18psi dyno plots?
Also dont you think that Bnr should have done some dyno testing as part of their R and D, not to mention as a part of their marketing for these. I just dont get how you can develop a new product thats costs 2300 and not have any hard data to support it. Its not like BnR is new to this game either....i didnt see any data from the first sets either. I guess its simply cavet emptor and that in my mind sucks. I want to buy these but I wont lay done the cash until i see dyno sheets and i would guess many other share a similar view. I would be happy with close to 400rwhp @ 17-18 psi on stock ports. That in my mind would jusitfy the 2300 cost.
Also dont you think that Bnr should have done some dyno testing as part of their R and D, not to mention as a part of their marketing for these. I just dont get how you can develop a new product thats costs 2300 and not have any hard data to support it. Its not like BnR is new to this game either....i didnt see any data from the first sets either. I guess its simply cavet emptor and that in my mind sucks. I want to buy these but I wont lay done the cash until i see dyno sheets and i would guess many other share a similar view. I would be happy with close to 400rwhp @ 17-18 psi on stock ports. That in my mind would jusitfy the 2300 cost.
Who does??? You cant get dyno sheets from Greddy or Garret, ect on thier turbo kits. They might give you some off the wall max based on compressor map flow sheets, ect. they are arent rotary spacific and they dont tell you anything about powerband, ect. The only reason we know what other turbos make is because of customers that have purchased them and dynoed them. The same will happen with these BNR's, he's been selling tons of them its just that no one really has thier car finished and bug free. Well a few people do but they are waiting on tuning.
Bryan knows what these turbos and compressor wheels are capable of because he has built this similar turbo setup for other cars. The restriction will be the exhaust manifold not the turbos, they will definatly max the exhaust manifold out. Also....stay tuned sometime around mid year of '05 because there MIGHT be some upgraded goodies that can be purchased for the stage 3's to really get them making power (cough exh manifold caugh caugh). But you didnt hear that from me (hear what? I didnt say anything). Yes, I've been begging and pleading for about a year for this and I think its fixing to happen pretty soon.
Huh? what might happen, I have no idea what your talking about. lol
Stephen
#31
Stephen, IT'S ABOUT TIME lol. I remember I talked to you about this like 8 months ago, and I talked to Rich about it a few months back, too. You're *def* gonna run into restriction from the exhaust manifold well before you max out the flow of the stock twins. The stock twins can flow a lot, as evidenced by the similarly sized Supra twins, yet their manifold and runners are designed so much better, that they have less turbulence and restriction, and thus are capable of producing so much more power.
I'm pretty confident you can make 450 to the wheels w/ an upgraded/hi-flow exhaust manifold on the BNRs. I really think it's doable. I just think it's a shame that it's taken practically 11 years for someone to make a hi-flow exhaust manifold...
I know RE just came up w/ a design a few months ago, but they haven't released it yet, since they kept on having problems w/ it cracking I believe.
I'm pretty confident you can make 450 to the wheels w/ an upgraded/hi-flow exhaust manifold on the BNRs. I really think it's doable. I just think it's a shame that it's taken practically 11 years for someone to make a hi-flow exhaust manifold...
I know RE just came up w/ a design a few months ago, but they haven't released it yet, since they kept on having problems w/ it cracking I believe.
#32
Lives on the Forum
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
More than just the power, I would like to see the reliability issues solved with these turbos.
Stephen and Rich, I know that Bryan has treated you guys right and you have loved your modded turbos, but EVERY single BNR set I've seen in person (five, I think) has either had horrible oil leaks (not restrictor pill related) or other problems.
And I KNOW other forum members have had issues with the BNRs as well. The reliability is the important factor to me, not whether the new ones can make 15 more rwhp.....
Stephen and Rich, I know that Bryan has treated you guys right and you have loved your modded turbos, but EVERY single BNR set I've seen in person (five, I think) has either had horrible oil leaks (not restrictor pill related) or other problems.
And I KNOW other forum members have had issues with the BNRs as well. The reliability is the important factor to me, not whether the new ones can make 15 more rwhp.....
#33
Original Gangster/Rotary!
iTrader: (213)
Originally Posted by rynberg
More than just the power, I would like to see the reliability issues solved with these turbos.
Stephen and Rich, I know that Bryan has treated you guys right and you have loved your modded turbos, but EVERY single BNR set I've seen in person (five, I think) has either had horrible oil leaks (not restrictor pill related) or other problems.
And I KNOW other forum members have had issues with the BNRs as well. The reliability is the important factor to me, not whether the new ones can make 15 more rwhp.....
Stephen and Rich, I know that Bryan has treated you guys right and you have loved your modded turbos, but EVERY single BNR set I've seen in person (five, I think) has either had horrible oil leaks (not restrictor pill related) or other problems.
And I KNOW other forum members have had issues with the BNRs as well. The reliability is the important factor to me, not whether the new ones can make 15 more rwhp.....
No smoke, no drips. You are thinking of the old style BNRs, which were rebuilds and upgrades. These are brand new turbos upgrades and no rebuilding at all, thus no more problems.
And 15 rwhp is a bunch of poop......these new ones are torquier and have the potential to trap 125 mph on pump gas, while my stockers topped out around 112 mph. 13 mph increase is a hell of of a lot more than 15 at the wheels
Rich
#35
BNR built motor and twins
Join Date: May 2003
Location: 2 hours drive from sanity
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
No leaks, drips, or otherwise for me either. All I'm waiting on is tuning, my breakin is all but finished.
To answer the question on page 2, I'm only shooting for 15psi because that was my goal for this set up. I wanted a real nice streetable car that I could enjoy without pushing too much boost. I asked Bryan for a good reliable engine and turbo set up that would produce at least 350hp @ 15psi with all my other mods. After talking, we decided on the stage 3's. Now that my car is built, Bryan and I both are sure we passed my goal! I don't think anyone would be disappointed with these turbos.
To answer the question on page 2, I'm only shooting for 15psi because that was my goal for this set up. I wanted a real nice streetable car that I could enjoy without pushing too much boost. I asked Bryan for a good reliable engine and turbo set up that would produce at least 350hp @ 15psi with all my other mods. After talking, we decided on the stage 3's. Now that my car is built, Bryan and I both are sure we passed my goal! I don't think anyone would be disappointed with these turbos.
#36
Original Gangster/Rotary!
iTrader: (213)
Originally Posted by AgentSpeed
No leaks, drips, or otherwise for me either. All I'm waiting on is tuning, my breakin is all but finished.
To answer the question on page 2, I'm only shooting for 15psi because that was my goal for this set up. I wanted a real nice streetable car that I could enjoy without pushing too much boost. I asked Bryan for a good reliable engine and turbo set up that would produce at least 350hp @ 15psi with all my other mods. After talking, we decided on the stage 3's. Now that my car is built, Bryan and I both are sure we passed my goal! I don't think anyone would be disappointed with these turbos.
To answer the question on page 2, I'm only shooting for 15psi because that was my goal for this set up. I wanted a real nice streetable car that I could enjoy without pushing too much boost. I asked Bryan for a good reliable engine and turbo set up that would produce at least 350hp @ 15psi with all my other mods. After talking, we decided on the stage 3's. Now that my car is built, Bryan and I both are sure we passed my goal! I don't think anyone would be disappointed with these turbos.
#37
Original Gangster/Rotary!
iTrader: (213)
Originally Posted by FD3SR1
what other mods are needed to run the bnr stage 3 twins? fuel ecu ect?
#38
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: springfield MO
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
whats the most rwhp anyone has pulled out of them? at what psi?
they are cheaper then 99 spec twins and from what little i have read i think they are alot better and more reliable im just not sure if i want to spend the kind of money to go single or stay twin
they are cheaper then 99 spec twins and from what little i have read i think they are alot better and more reliable im just not sure if i want to spend the kind of money to go single or stay twin
#39
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Originally Posted by GoodfellaFD3S
Oh, also......you are only in CT, once there is clear weather we should meet up halfway and you can see these bad boys up close and personal .
#41
Lives on the Forum
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally Posted by GoodfellaFD3S
Hellooooo Tyler
No smoke, no drips. You are thinking of the old style BNRs, which were rebuilds and upgrades. These are brand new turbos upgrades and no rebuilding at all, thus no more problems.
And 15 rwhp is a bunch of poop......these new ones are torquier and have the potential to trap 125 mph on pump gas, while my stockers topped out around 112 mph. 13 mph increase is a hell of of a lot more than 15 at the wheels
Rich
No smoke, no drips. You are thinking of the old style BNRs, which were rebuilds and upgrades. These are brand new turbos upgrades and no rebuilding at all, thus no more problems.
And 15 rwhp is a bunch of poop......these new ones are torquier and have the potential to trap 125 mph on pump gas, while my stockers topped out around 112 mph. 13 mph increase is a hell of of a lot more than 15 at the wheels
Rich
Oh, and my 15 rwhp comment was addressing the differences between the "old" BNR Stage 3 and the "new" Stage 3s. I know the Stage 3s are a significant upgrade over the stockers. Since my turbos are getting close to being tossed in the scrap pile, I need to start looking for options -- preferably smog-stealthy options like the BNRs....
What mods are required to the y-pipe? Compatible with the Efini?
#42
BNR built motor and twins
Join Date: May 2003
Location: 2 hours drive from sanity
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
He takes the y-pipe and extends it to make it fit with the longer set-up. Where the two pieces are put together, he cuts and welds in a spacer. I think you just send him yours when you order a set.
#43
Rotary Freak
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Okinawa, Japan
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sorry to crash the party but in my last 7, an '89, I had a BNR Stage 2 with all the bells and whistles. After driving with a BNR built turbo, I have nothing but praise for his turbos. It was built for a nice mid-range for autocross and daily driving duties and never gave me any issues. Leaking? Not a drop. He does good work no matter the turbo.
#44
Hey, where did my $$$ go?
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bimingham, AL
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rynberg
More than just the power, I would like to see the reliability issues solved with these turbos.
Stephen and Rich, I know that Bryan has treated you guys right and you have loved your modded turbos, but EVERY single BNR set I've seen in person (five, I think) has either had horrible oil leaks (not restrictor pill related) or other problems.
And I KNOW other forum members have had issues with the BNRs as well. The reliability is the important factor to me, not whether the new ones can make 15 more rwhp.....
Stephen and Rich, I know that Bryan has treated you guys right and you have loved your modded turbos, but EVERY single BNR set I've seen in person (five, I think) has either had horrible oil leaks (not restrictor pill related) or other problems.
And I KNOW other forum members have had issues with the BNRs as well. The reliability is the important factor to me, not whether the new ones can make 15 more rwhp.....
Find out how those people had thier crank case vent set up. I've talked to a few people that had smoking issues with the old ones and they all ended up being fixed by seting up the crank case differently. Basically, instead of running it to the uim with a one way valve just run a hose (or two) from those oil filler neck nipples down to the intake (before the turbo). That way the intake is constantly sucking on the crank case and it stays in vacume so that the oil can drain out of the turbos. Actually any dynamic seal turbo could run into this problem of needing better crank case vent. I've seen some brand spanking new dynamic seal Garrett single turbos that smoked like crazy and I fixed it in 5 minutes by redoing the crank case vent. I didnt have this problem with my old stage 3's and the people I know that had thier crank case like mine didnt either.
If you know anyone with smoking issues (no matter what turbo's) tell them to try rerouting thier crank case before doing anything drastic. It only takes about 5 minutes to do.
Also, if rerouting solves the problem you might want to add a catch can so that any junk that might come from the oil filler neck gets caught in the can and not into the intake.
I've heard of some 13B race cars that acutally had to run two -8 lines from the oil neck to the intake to vent the crank case enough. I think the larger the ports the harder it becomes to vent the crank case.
Anyway, just thought I'd throw that out there since it might help your friends.
Stephen
Last edited by SPOautos; 11-29-04 at 02:44 PM.
#45
A Fistfull of Dollars!
iTrader: (2)
Originally Posted by SPOautos
Find out how those people had thier crank case vent set up. I've talked to a few people that had smoking issues with the old ones and they all ended up being fixed by seting up the crank case differently. Basically, instead of running it to the uim with a one way valve just run a hose (or two) from those oil filler neck nipples down to the intake (before the turbo). That way the intake is constantly sucking on the crank case and it stays in vacume so that the oil can drain out of the turbos. Actually any dynamic seal turbo could run into this problem of needing better crank case vent. I've seen some brand spanking new dynamic seal Garrett single turbos that smoked like crazy and I fixed it in 5 minutes by redoing the crank case vent. I didnt have this problem with my old stage 3's and the people I know that had thier crank case like mine didnt either.
If you know anyone with smoking issues (no matter what turbo's) tell them to try rerouting thier crank case before doing anything drastic. It only takes about 5 minutes to do.
Also, if rerouting solves the problem you might want to add a catch can so that any junk that might come from the oil filler neck gets caught in the can and not into the intake.
I've heard of some 13B race cars that acutally had to run two -8 lines from the oil neck to the intake to vent the crank case enough. I think the larger the ports the harder it becomes to vent the crank case.
Anyway, just thought I'd throw that out there since it might help your friends.
Stephen
If you know anyone with smoking issues (no matter what turbo's) tell them to try rerouting thier crank case before doing anything drastic. It only takes about 5 minutes to do.
Also, if rerouting solves the problem you might want to add a catch can so that any junk that might come from the oil filler neck gets caught in the can and not into the intake.
I've heard of some 13B race cars that acutally had to run two -8 lines from the oil neck to the intake to vent the crank case enough. I think the larger the ports the harder it becomes to vent the crank case.
Anyway, just thought I'd throw that out there since it might help your friends.
Stephen
#46
Original Gangster/Rotary!
iTrader: (213)
Originally Posted by HDP
Um, Stephen, the crank case is vented to the intake before the turbos. One of the nipples on the plastic primary inlet elbow should go to the filler neck unless it has been modified.
Rich
#47
Back in the 7 life again
unless its a 95 where the pcv valve has been eliminated.
I just ordered my Stage IIIs and bryan should be shipping them back tommorow. I was going to go with an upgraded fuel pump and upgrade the secondarys to 1300cc. Am I going to need more or is this fine?
I have not ported anything yet.
I just ordered my Stage IIIs and bryan should be shipping them back tommorow. I was going to go with an upgraded fuel pump and upgrade the secondarys to 1300cc. Am I going to need more or is this fine?
I have not ported anything yet.
#48
Ditch the 1300s. While it may not be 100% established, people have reported 1300cc injectors sticking, and someone not too long ago posted how he lost his engine due to the 1300cc injector sticking, AND he had the KDR anti-det mod at the time. That's a risk I just wouldn't wanna sit w/. Besides, you'll leave yourself more flexibility for whatever future plans may arise w/ 1600s. That's my opinion.
Last edited by FDNewbie; 12-10-04 at 01:00 AM.
#50
Originally Posted by su_maverick
leave the primaries alone?